Where Are The Worst Steakhouses In The World?
#91
In memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: IAD, BOS, PVD
Programs: UA, US, AS, Marriott, Radisson, Hilton
Posts: 7,203
#92

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,438
#93
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
Checking out the one in Crystal City next week. Given the Virginia ABC laws, maybe I'd be better off dining at the one in D.C. to make the most of my VIP membership. No free after-dinner drinks in VA.
#94
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
I'll take the sirloin tips there over anything served at Perkins.Well, except the Ponderosa on International Drive in MCO; a huge echo chamber of kids.
#95
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,323
My spouse worked at Ponderosa as a teenager. Oh, the stories about this chain.
Don't know why anyone could nominate it as a "steakhouse."
My vote is still for Outback as the WORST, and so it was surprising to read a recent article that Outbacks are one of the top ten chains in the country.
Don't know why anyone could nominate it as a "steakhouse."

My vote is still for Outback as the WORST, and so it was surprising to read a recent article that Outbacks are one of the top ten chains in the country.
#96




Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA GS 1.86MM, Hyatt Lifetime Glob, Marriott Titanium/Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 1,275
Probably not the worst in the world, but most dissapointing for me: Morton's at the Mandarin Oriental in Singapore. Not nearly up to the quality of a typical Morton's. My only expalanation is that the meat is not aged?
#97
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 170
I've gone to some excellent and some very sub par steakhouses in Argentina.
They export most of their best beef and keep the lower quality stuff for the local population. So only the high end restaurants seemed to have really good meat.
Plus sometimes I feel like we were served the "gringo" cuts since they thought we wouldn't know any better.
They export most of their best beef and keep the lower quality stuff for the local population. So only the high end restaurants seemed to have really good meat.
Plus sometimes I feel like we were served the "gringo" cuts since they thought we wouldn't know any better.
#102
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Programs: Virtuoso
Posts: 617
I agree with the chain restaurants, Outback, Applebees's, etc as being the worst. Anytime something is that mass produced, the quality goes away. I remember when those restaurants used to be really good and quiet a treat to go too...not so much now.
#103
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, Aeroplan Diamond, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 18,686
But generally at the chains.. I'm not expecting gourmet.. that's for sure..
#104


Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ORD (formerly SAN)
Programs: Hilton Diamond; IHG Platinum; Bonvoy Gold; AA Platinum Pro; United Premier Platinum
Posts: 1,933
Ooh, fun. I want to play... I don't think people can count Outback and Ponderosa in this vote... Yes, they call themselves steakhouses, but it's definitely a different league than true steakhouses. Besides, when they charge $10-$20 for a steak, they are given a little bit of leeway, especially since a plate of spaghetti at IHOP almost costs that much nowadays. When I think "steakhouses" I think of Morton's, Ruth's Chris, etc.
Consistently, I've had bad experiences at Sam and Harry's. I've tried one in CA and one in IL. Both are equally blah. Which is a complete and utter shame considering how nicely appointed the restaurants are. But it seems like they care more about decor and ambiance than the actual food.
Also, the Palm has never been a favorite, which might explain why one of the Chicago locations closed a couple years ago. Steaks were dry and ambiance was eh. Nothing to write home about, despite spending $$$.
Consistently, I've had bad experiences at Sam and Harry's. I've tried one in CA and one in IL. Both are equally blah. Which is a complete and utter shame considering how nicely appointed the restaurants are. But it seems like they care more about decor and ambiance than the actual food.
Also, the Palm has never been a favorite, which might explain why one of the Chicago locations closed a couple years ago. Steaks were dry and ambiance was eh. Nothing to write home about, despite spending $$$.
#105

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Programs: DL KM
Posts: 629
The Palm is an interesting chain. The original ones in NY are excellent, as was the one that closed in Troy, MI (due to their awful location). The one in Chicago that closed was inedible. Went there once and couldn't believe how awful it was.
Ooh, fun. I want to play... I don't think people can count Outback and Ponderosa in this vote... Yes, they call themselves steakhouses, but it's definitely a different league than true steakhouses. Besides, when they charge $10-$20 for a steak, they are given a little bit of leeway, especially since a plate of spaghetti at IHOP almost costs that much nowadays. When I think "steakhouses" I think of Morton's, Ruth's Chris, etc.
Consistently, I've had bad experiences at Sam and Harry's. I've tried one in CA and one in IL. Both are equally blah. Which is a complete and utter shame considering how nicely appointed the restaurants are. But it seems like they care more about decor and ambiance than the actual food.
Also, the Palm has never been a favorite, which might explain why one of the Chicago locations closed a couple years ago. Steaks were dry and ambiance was eh. Nothing to write home about, despite spending $$$.
Consistently, I've had bad experiences at Sam and Harry's. I've tried one in CA and one in IL. Both are equally blah. Which is a complete and utter shame considering how nicely appointed the restaurants are. But it seems like they care more about decor and ambiance than the actual food.
Also, the Palm has never been a favorite, which might explain why one of the Chicago locations closed a couple years ago. Steaks were dry and ambiance was eh. Nothing to write home about, despite spending $$$.


