Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Delta MD-88/90 Retirement Tracking Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Oct 22, 2017, 6:48 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: N515CR
Status as of 2 June 2020

MD-88
Retired/Inactive Aircraft: 120
Registration - Ship# - Retirement Plan (or) Ferried to *** date
N901DL 901 - scrapped (unknown date)
N902DL 902 - scrapped (unknown date)
N903DL 903 - scrapped (unknown date)
N904DL 904 - ferried to BYH 08/13/2019
N905DL 905 - ferried to BYH 04/29/2020 (COVID-19)
N906DL 906 - ferried to SBD 09/03/2019
N907DL 907 - ferried to BYH 12/03/2019
N908DL 908 - ferried to BYH 10/28/2019
N909DL 909 - written off after landing @ LGA 03/05/2015
N910DL 910 - ferried to SBD 10/10/2019
N911DL 911 - ferried to BHM 08/31/2019
N912DL 912 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N913DL 913 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N914DL 914 - ferried to SBD 08/25/2018
N915DL 915 - ferried to SBD 07/29/2019
N916DL 916 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N917DL 917- ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N918DL 918 - ferried to SBD 07/07/2018
N919DL 919 - ferried to SBD 03/25/2018
N920DL 920 - ferried to BYH 10/30/2017
N921DL 921 - ferried to SBD 08/19/2018
N922DL 922 - ferried to BHM 09/25/2019
N923DL 923 - ferried to SBD 03/22/2018
N924DL 924 - ferried to BYH 10/30/2018
N925DL 925 - ferried to BYH 09/20/2017
N926DL 931 - ferried to BYH 05/29/2018
N927DA 927 - ferried to SBD 08/10/2018
N928DL 928 - ferried to BYH 08/28/2017
N929DL 929 - ferried to BYH 01/05/2018
N930DL 930 - ferried to BYH 12/02/2017
N931DL 931 - ferried to BYH 05/11/2018
N932DL 932 - ferried to BYH 09/15/2018
N933DL 933 - ferried to BYH 09/23/2018
N934DL 931 - ferried to BYH 07/01/2018
N935DL 935 - ferried to SBD 11/21/2018
N936DL 936 - ferried to SBD 12/09/2018
N937DL 937 - ferried to BYH 12/22/2018
N938DL 938 - ferried to SBD 11/01/2018
N939DL 939 - ferried to SBD 09/23/2018
N940DL 940 - ferried to BYH 11/13/2017
N941DL 941 - ferried to SBD 09/18/2018
N942DL 942 - ferried to BYH 09/07/2018
N943DL 943 - ferried to BYH 10/31/2018
N944DL 944 - ferried to SBD 11/02/2018
N945DL 945 - ferried to SBD 11/18/2018
N946DL 946 - ferried to BYH 12/15/2018
N947DL 947 - ferried to BYH 06/11/2019
N948DL 948 - ferried to SBD 01/19/2019
N949DL 949 - ferried to SBD 08/17/2019
N950DL 950 - ferried to SBD 01/28/2019
N951DL 951 - ferried to SBD 02/18/2019
N952DL 952 - ferried to BYH 01/03/2019
N953DL 953 - ferried to SBD 08/26/2019
N954DL 954 - ferried to SBD 02/15/2019
N955DL 955 - ferried to BYH 09/09/2019
N956DL 956 - ferried to BYH 08/31/2019
N957DL 957 - ferried to SBD 10/26/2019
N958DL 958 - ferried to BYH 03/19/2020 (COVID-19)
N959DL 959 - ferried to BYH 10/16/2019
N960DL 960 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N961DL 961 - ferried to BYH 12/03/2019
N962DL 962 - ferried to BHM 12/03/2019
N963DL 963 - ferried to BYH 03/21/2020 (COVID-19)
N964DL 964 - @ATL since 02/24/2020
N965DL 965 - ferried to BYH 03/19/2020 (COVID-19)
N966DL 966 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N967DL 967 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N968DL 968 - ferried to BYH 04/13/2020 (COVID-19)
N969DL 969 - ferried to BYH 03/21/2020 (COVID-19)
N970DL 970 - ferried to BYH 05/28/2020
N971DL 971 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N972DL 972 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N973DL 973 - ferried to BYH 03/07/2020
N974DL 974 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N975DL 975 - written off due to Tug damage
N976DL 976 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N977DL 977 - written off 04/26/2019
N978DL 978 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N979DL 979 - ferried to BYH 04/29/2020 (COVID-19)
N980DL 980 - ferried to BYH 05/12/2019
N981DL 981 - ferried to BYH 08/03/2019
N982DL 982 - ferried to BYH 06/30/2019
N983DL 983 - ferried to BYH 06/03/2019
N984DL 984 - ferried to SBD 08/31/2019
N985DL 985 - ferried to BYH 07/19/2019
N986DL 986 - ferried to BYH 12/17/2019
N987DL 987 - ferried to BHM 12/14/2019
N988DL 988 - ferried to SBD 09/16/2019
N989DL 989 - ferried to BYH 10/11/2019
N990DL 990 - ferried to BYH 04/29/2020 (COVID-19)
N991DL 991 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N992DL 992 - ferried to BHM 12/03/2019
N993DL 993 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N994DL 994 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N995DL 995 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N996DL 996 - ferried to BYH 03/19/2020 (COVID-19)
N997DL 997 - ferried to BYH 04/04/2020 (COVID-19)
N998DL 998 - ferried to BYH 04/13/2020 (COVID-19)
N999DN 999 - ferried to BYH 04/04/2020 (COVID-19)
N900DE 9000 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N901DE 9001 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N902DE 9002 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N903DE 9003 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N904DE 9004 - ferried to BYH 04/04/2020 (COVID-19)
N905DE 9005 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N906DE 9006 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N907DE 9007 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N908DE 9008 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N909DE 9009 - ferried to BYH 03/23/2020 (COVID-19)
N910DE 9010 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N911DE 9011 - ferried to BYH 04/29/2020 (COVID-19)
N912DE 9012 - ferried to BYH 06/02/2020
N913DE 9013 - ferried to MZJ 07/08/2019
N914DE 9014 - ferried to BYH 09/07/2017
N915DE 9015 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N916DE 9016 - ferried to B/HM 10/27/2019
N917DE 9017 - ferried to BYH 10/20/2017
N918DE 9018 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N919DE 9019 - ferried to SBD 07/20/2018
N920DE 9020 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)



MD-90
Retired/Inactive Aircraft: 65
N901DA 9201 - ferried to SBD 10/01/2018
N902DA 9202 - awaiting engines @ BYH since 06/25/2017
N903DA 9203 - awaiting engines @ BYH since 09/02/2017
N904DA 9204 - ferried to BYH 07/15/2018
N905DA 9205 - ferried to BYH 01/05/2019
N906DA 9206 - ferried to SBD 08/20/2019
N907DA 9207 - ferried to SBD 06/24/2019
N908DA 9208 - ferried to QRO 11/01/2019 for temp storage, returned to service 03/02/2020, ferried to BYH on 03/19/2020 (COVID-19)
N909DA 9209 - ferried to QRO 12/03/2019, temp park
N910DN 9210 - ferried to MZJ 3/16/2020
N911DA 9211 - scheduled retirement 03/02/2020
N912DN 9212 - ferried to BYH 03/27/2020

N913DN 9213 - ferried to BYH 05/22/2020
N914DN 9214 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N915DN 9215 - ferried to BYH 03/21/2020 (COVID-19)

N916DN 9216 - ferried to BYH 04/30/2020 (COVID-19)
N917DN 9217 - ferried to BYH 05/29/2020
N918DH 9218
- ferried to BYH 05/29/2020
N919DN 9219 - ferried to BYH 03/22/2020 (COVID-19)
N920DN 9220 - ferried to BYH 03/19/2020 (COVID-19)
N921DN 9221 - ferried to BYH 03/20/2020 (COVID-19)
N922DX 9222 - ferried to BYH 04/30/2020
N923DN 9223 - ferried to BYH 03/22/2020 (COVID-19)
N924DN 9224 - ferried to BYH 03/22/2020 (COVID-19)
N925DN 9225 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020
N926DH 9226 - ferried to BYH 06/01/2020

N927DN 9227 - ferried to BYH 03/21/2020 (COVID-19)
N928DN 9228 - ferried to BYH 03/21/2020 (COVID-19)
N929DN 9229 - ferried to BHM 10/28/2019, temp park
N930DN 9230 - ferried to BHM 09/08/2019, temp park
N931DN 9231 - ferried to BYH 03/21/2020 (COVID-19)
N932DN 9232 - ferried to BYH 12/25/2017
N933DN 9233 - ferried to SBD 08/29/2018
N934DN 9234 - ferried to BYH 04/30/2020
N935DN 9235 - ferried to BYH 03/19/2020 (COVID-19)
N936DN 9236 - ferried to BHM 11/22/2019, temp park
N937DN 9237 - ferried to SBD 08/13/2018
N938DN 9238 - ferried to BYH 11/12/2018
N939DN 9239 - ferried to BYH 11/15/2018
N940DN 9240 - ferried to SBD 01/04/2019
N941DN 9241 - ferried to SBD 03/03/2019
N942DN 9242 - ferried to BYH 02/03/2019
N943DN 9243 - ferried to SBD 01/03/2019
N944DN 9244 - ferried to BYH 12/12/2018
N945DN 9245 - ferried to BYH 02/14/2019
N946DN 9246 - ferried to SBD 05/05/2019
N947DN 9247 - ferried to SBD 08/07/2019
N948DN 9248 - ferried to BYH 10/14/2018
N949DN 9249 - ferried to BYH 11/15/2018
N950DN 9250 - ferried to BHM 09/05/2019
N951DN 9251 - ferried to BHM 09/01/2019
N952DN 9252 - ferried to BYH 06/07/2019
N953DN 9253 - ferried to SBD 06/03/2018
N954DN 9254 - ferried to SBD 05/12/2018
N955DN 9255 - ferried to SBD 04/15/2018
N956DN 9256 - ferried to BYH 01/03/2018
N957DN 9257 - ferried to SBD 02/28/2018
N958DN 9258 - ferried to MZJ 10/01/2017
N959DN 9259 - ferried to BYH 01/15/2018
N960DN 9260 - ferried to BYH 04/30/2020
N961DN 9261 - ferried to SBD 03/23/2018
N962DN 9262 - ferried to BYH 04/30/2020
N963DN 9263 - ferried to QRO 03/06/2020
N964DN 9264 - ferried to SBD 02/28/2018
N965DN 9265 - ferried to SBD 07/11/2018

Print Wikipost

Delta MD-88/90 Retirement Tracking Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2018, 9:11 pm
  #76  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Delta still has another single-aisle order to place. I'm guessing it will be an order for the A320neo since the 321 is too much for many markets. I would look for the CS300 to replace the A319.
I'd like Bombardier to launch the CS500, which would have ~150 seats making it an ideal replacement for A320s sticking around and eventually the 737-800s, but I have strong doubts Airbus will do such a thing. I know everyone on this forum would like that but we can't always get want we want. After Delta takes delivery of the 35th CS100, sometime in late 2020, Delta can take delivery of the CS300. When the CSeries order was announced, there were comments from Delta that they would take the CS300. I'd be shocked if Delta took 75 CS100s. I fully expected Delta will start taking CS300s after the 35th CS100 is delivered. The 50 options can replace the A319 fleet in its entirely. However, the A319 fleet is young. Those aircraft won't need replacing for another ten years.

Other than the 49 used M90, two brand new 737-800s taken in 2011, and four used 737-800s taken from GOL, Delta, including NW in this discussion, has not taken a 150-160 seat aircraft since the last 737-800s and A320s taken in 2002, right when the industry was in nose dive mode. Delta had the option of taking far more used GOL 737-800s as an alternative to taking more A321ceos but Airbus offered them a great deal and it fits in with the upgauge strategy. Delta is not going to leave the 150-160 market entirely. Its significant how much money Delta is investing in their A320 aircraft, considering how old some of them are. Yes, seven were retired and these aircraft were parked because of upcoming HMVs, which shouldn't surprise anyone as they were quite old. I'd take a hard look at those 100 A320neo family options. I'd bet Delta will exercise all of those options in favour of the A320neo as a 150-160 seat aircraft replacement. We can all continue to dream of a CS500, as do the fleet planners at Delta. If a CS500 ever comes to fruition, it will be due to Delta's insistence. A fleet of 100 A320neos and 50 CS500s would have the 150-160 market covered. However, Delta probably won't need that many given the final count of 130 180 seat 737-900ERs. In past presentations, Delta did a great job of explaining how operating 180 seat 737-900ERs and 189 seat A321ceos are much more cost effective than 737-800s, despite the 737-800s being size appropriate replacements for the M88/90 fleets.
Longboater is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 9:50 pm
  #77  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Agreed. That seems like the most logical option. The 739 will probably be retired early as it will be an oddball fleet once everything else is Airbus. The 739 will probably have a good resale value and can be taken up by UA or an LCC.

Last edited by readywhenyouare; May 24, 2018 at 11:10 pm
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 10:54 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MCO
Programs: DL PM, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 4,323
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Agreed. That seems like the most logical option. The 739 will probably be retired early as it will be an oddball fleet once everything else is Airbus. The 739 will probably have a good resale value and fan be take up by UA or an LCC.
DL is not retiring any 739s within the next 15-20 years. I don’t believe that DL is in bed with Airbus like some on this site think. DL is a business and will make decisions in what is best for the company. In the case of the last couple of aircraft orders DL has made, the A350 and A330neo order, Boeing couldn’t compete with Airbus’ delivery schedule due to backlog on 787 orders and Airbus gave DL a better price. On the A321 orders, the equivalent 737 MAX-9/10 isn’t really the best suited as a 757 replacement and I would much rather fly on an A321 than 737 MAX 9s or 10s. While I believe DL will probably end up ordering A320neos to replace the A320s and 738s, I still think DL will look at the 737 MAX-8. I definitely don’t believe DL is anti-Boeing as DL has shown it is still interested in buying from Boeing. (797s)
MCO Flyer is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:04 pm
  #79  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Agreed. That seems like the most logical option. The 739 will probably be retired early as it will be an oddball fleet once everything else is Airbus. The 739 will probably have a good resale value and fan be take up by UA or an LCC.
I disagree here. Delta services the CFM engines for the 737 fleet in house. Unless Tech Ops says yeah we're done with CFM engine maintenance, which is unlikely considering the A321ceos are all CFM engines, the 737-900ERs will last 30 years, which is how long Delta plans to operate the 737-800 fleet.

Oh yeah and the CS300 should end up replacing the small 737-700 fleet. When Delta decides to retire this small, niche fleet for hot, high, and short fields, well your guess is as good as mine. Apparently Delta has said it has the highest costs of any narrowbody in the fleet so I wonder how Delta could end up offloading these, despite being relatively young.

What almost everyone glossed over in the A321neo order announcement was the GTF maintenance line Tech Ops will open up. This basically translates to all future orders being CSeries and A320neos. What this does not translate to is the shutdown of the CFM engine line. To an earlier point, Delta could have brought the IAE engine line in house, which would have kept the M90 fleet long term, possibly past 2030 for a great majority of the fleet. But they didn't and the GTF engines will have maintenance done instead.

On a somewhat related note, this GTF line could be critical in what the 797 will end up being engined. RR/PW/GE are looking to power the 797. An obvious answer is an uprated version of the GTF. The biggest challenge for the 797 is what will the engines look like since its been decades since a similar engine has been designed. Contrary to some here, Delta will not only order the 797 but order quite a few of them. Delta will surprise people by how many they'll be operating fifteen years from now. (This is my Vegas instinct kicking in here.) I'm sure Delta will be all the more enthusiastic if the GTF powers the 797. In fact, I'm sure Delta's team, whom it should be noted has confirmed that they've been in extensive discussions with Boeing regarding the 797, along with UA and others, will lobby Boeing for a flexible engine selection rather than just one engine choice for the new aircraft. Yes, there will be a need at Delta for the 797. They would have ordered more A330-900neos had they thought it would make sense to retire the 767-300ER fleet now but didn't. The A330-800neo is an orphan aircraft that no one wants, even if given a screaming deal as there is no re-sale value. Lastly, the A321neo LR could replace the 75S of Delta but it can't do it all. Ok, wow I went off topic there.

Last edited by Longboater; May 25, 2018 at 7:37 am
Longboater is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:08 pm
  #80  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by MCO Flyer


DL is not retiring any 739s within the next 15-20 years. I don’t believe that DL is in bed with Airbus like some on this site think. DL is a business and will make decisions in what is best for the company. In the case of the last couple of aircraft orders DL has made, the A350 and A330neo order, Boeing couldn’t compete with Airbus’ delivery schedule due to backlog on 787 orders and Airbus gave DL a better price. On the A321 orders, the equivalent 737 MAX-9/10 isn’t really the best suited as a 757 replacement and I would much rather fly on an A321 than 737 MAX 9s or 10s. While I believe DL will probably end up ordering A320neos to replace the A320s and 738s, I still think DL will look at the 737 MAX-8. I definitely don’t believe DL is anti-Boeing as DL has shown it is still interested in buying from Boeing. (797s)
If in the future Boeing and CFM offer Delta a good deal on the 737-8 MAX and possibly bring the LEAP engine maintenance line to Tech Ops, Delta could very well consider it sold. The A321neo order was really a combo of Airbus and PW. I don't believe Boeing and CFM offered a similar deal. Delta's talks with Boeing over the 797 have likely gone back even before the RFP for the A321neo/737-9 MAX/737-10 MAX was issued. Far more important for both Delta and Boeing that the 797 works than purchasing neos or MAXs.
MCO Flyer likes this.
Longboater is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:17 pm
  #81  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
A fleet of 300 A321's is a force to be reckoned with. I just can't see them moving away from fleet commonality.

A good parallel is Ryanair. For years they lead Airbus on only to go back to Boeing for every order. The last time it happened Airbus essentially told Ryanair to screw off. I think Boeing has reached that point. If Delta really wants a future Boeing then they will pay close to list price. No use in only being used as a bargaining chip. And from what I understand GE doesn't give out maintenance contracts like P&W. GE makes a lot of money in engine service.
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:30 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MCO
Programs: DL PM, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 4,323
Originally Posted by Longboater
If in the future Boeing and CFM offer Delta a good deal on the 737-8 MAX and possibly bring the LEAP engine maintenance line to Tech Ops, Delta could very well consider it sold. The A321neo order was really a combo of Airbus and PW. I don't believe Boeing and CFM offered a similar deal. Delta's talks with Boeing over the 797 have likely gone back even before the RFP for the A321neo/737-9 MAX/737-10 MAX was issued. Far more important for both Delta and Boeing that the 797 works than purchasing neos or MAXs.
Thank you for explaining this very well! The poster you were quoting has said many times before that anything DL orders now will be from Airbus and that’s not true. Even after the A350/A330neo order and the A321ceo order, DL originally took its options on the 739 and ordered 40 more (although this was later reduced to 20 after a dispute with the pilot contracts and was then increased to 30.) DL will almost definitely be ordering the 797 and I believe that DL will take a look at the 737 MAX-8 for the next narrowbody order. With all of the MD retirements which DL will replace with aircraft upgaguing similar to how the C-Series is helping retire more 50 seaters. I see DL retiring the A320 soon as more 321s come online and will reposition the 738s on some of the retiring MD-88s/90 routes to help keep a 140-160 seat aircraft in markets that can’t support an upgrade in capacity.
MCO Flyer is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:32 pm
  #83  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SJC/YUL
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,878
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
A fleet of 300 A321's is a force to be reckoned with. I just can't see them moving away from fleet commonality.

A good parallel is Ryanair. For years they lead Airbus on only to go back to Boeing for every order. The last time it happened Airbus essentially told Ryanair to screw off. I think Boeing has reached that point. If Delta really wants a future Boeing then they will pay close to list price. No use in only being used as a bargaining chip. And from what I understand GE doesn't give out maintenance contracts like P&W. GE makes a lot of money in engine service.
Comparing Delta to Ryanair is ridiculous.

Saying that the next time Delta puts out a request for bids that Boeing isn't going to put together the most competitive package it can, is ridiculous.

You watch too many soap operas. Delta and Boeing are businesses. They will look for the best deal, not worry about who hurt who's feelings.
Mountain Explorer is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:40 pm
  #84  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Originally Posted by kjnangre
Comparing Delta to Ryanair is ridiculous.

Saying that the next time Delta puts out a request for bids that Boeing isn't going to put together the most competitive package it can, is ridiculous.

You watch too many soap operas.
Well I've been right about the last two orders. I'm team Boeing but I know defeat when I see it. It's been game over for Boeing since the A350 and A330neo in 2014. The A330neo has been a dog in terms of sales and worse with cancelations. Delta has kept the order despite the poor future value it will have. That is a sign of a rock solid relationship. It's like a lady saying yes to a proposal made with a plastic ring from the coin-op machine.
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:48 pm
  #85  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MCO
Programs: DL PM, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 4,323
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare


Well I've been right about the last two orders. I'm team Boeing but I know defeat when I see it. It's been game over for Boeing since the A350 and A330neo in 2014. The A330neo has been a dog in terms of sales and worse with cancelations. Delta has kept the order despite the poor future value it will have. That is a sign of a rock solid relationship. It's like a lady saying yes to a proposal made with a plastic ring from the coin-op machine.
Game over for Boeing with DL since 2014? Then tell me why DL ordered 40 more 739s in 2015 over Airbus then?
MCO Flyer is offline  
Old May 24, 2018, 11:59 pm
  #86  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Originally Posted by MCO Flyer


Game over for Boeing with DL since 2014? Then tell me why DL ordered 40 more 739s in 2015 over Airbus then?
Those were just options. Delta got the 739 for a very good price in 2011. Some speculate the cheap price came from the 787 deferments. But it wasn't a new order. If there is any evidence to show that DL has any serious interest in Boeing aircraft then I would like to see it. Richard Anderson said he would love to have the 787-10. Well, it's for sale now. Where's the order?

Here's the cite with Anderson saying he wanted the 787-10.

https://apnews.com/b62a86a21db5484d8...-delays-summer

I'm not sure why my prediction is seen as a bad thing. You all constantly complain about having to fly on the Boeing planes.
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old May 25, 2018, 12:10 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MCO
Programs: DL PM, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 4,323
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare


Those were just options. Delta got the 739 for a very good price in 2011. Some speculate the cheap price came from the 787 deferments. But it wasn't a new order. If there is any evidence to show that DL has any serious interest in Boeing aircraft then I would like to see it. Richard Anderson said he would love to have the 787-10. Well, it's for sale now. Where's the order?

Here's the cite with Anderson saying he wanted the 787-10.

https://apnews.com/b62a86a21db5484d8...-delays-summer

I'm not sure why my prediction is seen as a bad thing. You all constantly complain about having to fly on the Boeing planes.
Well the article you posted is dated from 2015, after your “2014 game over for Boeing with DL” statement. DL is still interested in Boeing and will continue look at them when making orders. Here is an article from just 2 months ago stating that DL is still interested in Boeing aircraft.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...g-mode-446726/
MCO Flyer is offline  
Old May 25, 2018, 12:38 am
  #88  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LHR / BHX / MAN / ATL
Programs: DL DM 2MM - IHG Diamond
Posts: 4,053
Class, today's word is 'paragraphs'....

Originally Posted by Longboater
I disagree here. Delta services the CFM engines for the 737 fleet in house. Unless Tech Ops says yeah we're done with CFM engine maintenance, which is unlikely considering the A321ceos are all CFM engines, the 737-900ERs will last 30 years, which is how long Delta plans to operate the 737-800 fleet. Oh yeah and the CS300 should end up replacing the small 737-700 fleet. When Delta decides to retire this small, niche fleet for hot, high, and short fields, well your guess is as good as mine. Apparently Delta has said it has the highest costs of any narrowbody in the fleet so I wonder how Delta could end up offloading these, despite being relatively young. What almost everyone glossed over in the A321neo order announcement was the GTF maintenance line Tech Ops will open up. This basically translates to all future orders being CSeries and A320neos. What this does not translate to is the shutdown of the CFM engine line. To an earlier point, Delta could have brought the IAE engine line in house, which would have kept the M90 fleet long term, possibly past 2030 for a great majority of the fleet. But they didn't and the GTF engines will have maintenance done instead. On a somewhat related note, this GTF line could be critical in what the 797 will end up being engined. RR/PW/GE are looking to power the 797. An obvious answer is an uprated version of the GTF. The biggest challenge for the 797 is what will the engines look like since its been decades since a similar engine has been designed. Contrary to some here, Delta will not only order the 797 but order quite a few of them. Delta will surprise people by how many they'll be operating fifteen years from now. (This is my Vegas instinct kicking in here.) I'm sure Delta will be all the more enthusiastic if the GTF powers the 797. In fact, I'm sure Delta's team, whom it should be noted has confirmed that they've been in extensive discussions with Boeing regarding the 797, along with UA and others, will lobby Boeing for a flexible engine selection rather than just one engine choice for the new aircraft. Yes, there will be a need at Delta for the 797. They would have ordered more A330-900neos had they thought it would make sense to retire the 767-300ER fleet now but didn't. The A330-800neo is an orphan aircraft that no one wants, even if given a screaming deal as there is no re-sale value. Lastly, the A321neo LR could replace the 75S of Delta but it can't do it all. Ok, wow I went off topic there.
Even if the points are valid but are not communicated in a way that can be digested, they become invalid by default.
ecaarch is offline  
Old May 25, 2018, 7:20 am
  #89  
pvn
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEM
Programs: Starbucks Green Card
Posts: 5,431
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Sad times. The MD-88/90, 717, and 757 are the only remaining aircraft with any sort of character.
what about the 787???
pvn is offline  
Old May 25, 2018, 7:25 am
  #90  
pvn
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEM
Programs: Starbucks Green Card
Posts: 5,431
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Agreed. That seems like the most logical option. The 739 will probably be retired early as it will be an oddball fleet once everything else is Airbus. The 739 will probably have a good resale value and can be taken up by UA or an LCC.
lol wut
pvn is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.