Delta buys 49% of Virgin Atlantic (official)
#76
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LAS
Programs: PA FT, TW Gold, NW/CO PE, VK Eagleflyer
Posts: 7,173
#77
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,679
DL will not control VS. Just as SQ don't control VS today. Furthermore despite SQ being *A this never lead to VS joining.
Speculation that DL and VS will become one both operationally and in terms of FFP's including ST membership are unlikely IMHO. VS and DL will have code-shares, reciprocal lounge and mileage earning/spend agreements. Most likely they will have a closer partnership due to ownership etc. I would doubt anymore than that. SRB has resisted joining alliances.
The new domestic service will help feeder traffic to VS and DL.
Speculation that DL and VS will become one both operationally and in terms of FFP's including ST membership are unlikely IMHO. VS and DL will have code-shares, reciprocal lounge and mileage earning/spend agreements. Most likely they will have a closer partnership due to ownership etc. I would doubt anymore than that. SRB has resisted joining alliances.
The new domestic service will help feeder traffic to VS and DL.
The more we dig into VS the less I think they really need to be bought per se. I think SQ wants cash right now and it's the right move for them. I don't think VS would mind DL taking SQ's shares and wouldn't mind having some code shares. However, VS has £486.7 cash in the bank and I haven't seen a compelling case for them to join ST.
The Wild Cards in all this is VS's CEO retires next year and what EU regulators would do.
#78
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: DL; AA; UA; CO; LHLX; NZ; QR; EK; BA
Posts: 7,408
DL will not control VS. Just as SQ don't control VS today. Furthermore despite SQ being *A this never lead to VS joining.
Speculation that DL and VS will become one both operationally and in terms of FFP's including ST membership are unlikely IMHO. VS and DL will have code-shares, reciprocal lounge and mileage earning/spend agreements. Most likely they will have a closer partnership due to ownership etc. I would doubt anymore than that. SRB has resisted joining alliances.
Speculation that DL and VS will become one both operationally and in terms of FFP's including ST membership are unlikely IMHO. VS and DL will have code-shares, reciprocal lounge and mileage earning/spend agreements. Most likely they will have a closer partnership due to ownership etc. I would doubt anymore than that. SRB has resisted joining alliances.
SRB's ego and resistance to partnerships/alliances is what has gotten him into trouble in the first place. In the old world, his belief of going it alone and that his sexy product would be enough to keep customers coming back may have been enough for VS to keep aloft, but in the age of consolidation and mega-networks (including JVs), a stand-alone VS is simply not going to make it in light of the BA/AA juggernaut (and BA's recent acquisition of BD).
#79
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,679
You can rest assured that Delta will not pony up all that $$$ for some codeshares and FF relationships; they will not make the same mistake that SQ made - buying up to 49% of VS, and having almost no say in VS's strategic direction. Part of any deal will have to have, first and foremost, VS join the DL/AF/KL/AZ JV. Skyteam membership could also be a requirement.
#80
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SUX
Programs: BA Silver; HHonors Gold; SPG Gold; Points but dirt with everyone else
Posts: 8,050
I also seem to recall that SQ had written down the value of their VS stock to essentially nothing, so VS would stand to gain from someone buying it and taking an interest in the airline. They'd probably be willing to do something to facilitate that.
#81
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
VS doesn't have other options. They can't grow on their own and BA/AA now dwarf them at LHR. They are constrained and this helps them grow their reach without having to do it on their own. With LHR's slot constraints, it makes a JV even more attractive. Plus, aligning with the Skyteam carriers increases potential feed. Heck, I could even imagine a scenario whereby AF/KL might see fit to utilize some capacity to serve non-hub destinations from LHR. It just makes sense.
I would also note that people are overplaying VS's resistance to an alliance. They recently went through a strategic review and they've acknowledged that they are investigating joining an alliance. Whether it is this deal or something else, I think VS joins an alliance sooner than later.
#82
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Mass
Programs: Independent
Posts: 4,829
But by joining an alliance they are severely limiting their other JVs. Delta right now does not have a JV with them, but there is no reason tehy cannot. Why be forced into an alliance when you can have JVs with both Delta and US Air.
I think the whole JV/Merger craze is going to die soon. Other than Delta I have not seen it working out strongly for many. Look at *A - for US they are now at odds with the giant US, and suffer some of the backlash against their current stress. By joining SkyTeam, VS is now going to compete int eh transatlantic market against the AF/KLM giant, at a disadvantage because they have no real european connections.
I think the whole JV/Merger craze is going to die soon. Other than Delta I have not seen it working out strongly for many. Look at *A - for US they are now at odds with the giant US, and suffer some of the backlash against their current stress. By joining SkyTeam, VS is now going to compete int eh transatlantic market against the AF/KLM giant, at a disadvantage because they have no real european connections.
#83
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
I think the whole JV/Merger craze is going to die soon. Other than Delta I have not seen it working out strongly for many. Look at *A - for US they are now at odds with the giant US, and suffer some of the backlash against their current stress. By joining SkyTeam, VS is now going to compete int eh transatlantic market against the AF/KLM giant, at a disadvantage because they have no real european connections.
#84
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 30
I would think that for this to work for Delta, Virgin would have to agree to realign their North America route map. I would think that Delta would be interested not only in JFK, but would also want VS to connect to at least ATL and perhaps a few other hubs. This not only helps DL, but also helps VS in that it allows loyal VS flyers to connect to other cities in the US.
If AF joins in the equation, then I would think that VS would have to align with the AF & KLM hubs as well.
It is true that DL is only buying the shares from SQ and thus no money goes to VS, but I would think that Branson knows that he has to join the JV and alliance world for VS to be successful. Branson may love the Virgin brand, but I don't think that he loves loosing $80 million a year.
If AF joins in the equation, then I would think that VS would have to align with the AF & KLM hubs as well.
It is true that DL is only buying the shares from SQ and thus no money goes to VS, but I would think that Branson knows that he has to join the JV and alliance world for VS to be successful. Branson may love the Virgin brand, but I don't think that he loves loosing $80 million a year.
#85
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
I would think that for this to work for Delta, Virgin would have to agree to realign their North America route map. I would think that Delta would be interested not only in JFK, but would also want VS to connect to at least ATL and perhaps a few other hubs. This not only helps DL, but also helps VS in that it allows loyal VS flyers to connect to other cities in the US.
#86
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,797
There was a change in ownership but I am not sure of the split now. After the AF447 crash, KLM management wound up taking over control of Air France.
Branson built up a large airline which gained reputation and a large consumer base for US to British travelers and the brand is well recognized and he ran the organization extremely well with the teams.
But now due to competition from BA/AA, which was already noted in the past back when there was NO BA/AA on their airplanes in the 1990's and which continue to this day, competition has taken its toll on Virgin.
So Virgin has to partner with another firm which has additional frequency for LHR.
And the Delta one seems to make the most sense.
http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Richard...ll/MHD1p8_d6HT
Delta and Virgin both have the right teams in place to make this happen.
Increased marketshare due to the alliance will be enough to bring Virgin into profitability and Delta will also reap profits.
For Virgin this reduces the fuel costs due to Trainer refinery and Delta gets access to the fuel resources of Virgin in the UK or can spur new investment in reducing costs in the UK fuel infrastructure.
Fuel savings costs, combined by additional marketshare gained by the alliance will be enough to save the company for the future.
Airlines continue to make national or multinational mergers and joint partnerships and this trend will continue.
Branson built up a large airline which gained reputation and a large consumer base for US to British travelers and the brand is well recognized and he ran the organization extremely well with the teams.
But now due to competition from BA/AA, which was already noted in the past back when there was NO BA/AA on their airplanes in the 1990's and which continue to this day, competition has taken its toll on Virgin.
So Virgin has to partner with another firm which has additional frequency for LHR.
And the Delta one seems to make the most sense.
http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Richard...ll/MHD1p8_d6HT
Delta and Virgin both have the right teams in place to make this happen.
Increased marketshare due to the alliance will be enough to bring Virgin into profitability and Delta will also reap profits.
For Virgin this reduces the fuel costs due to Trainer refinery and Delta gets access to the fuel resources of Virgin in the UK or can spur new investment in reducing costs in the UK fuel infrastructure.
Fuel savings costs, combined by additional marketshare gained by the alliance will be enough to save the company for the future.
Airlines continue to make national or multinational mergers and joint partnerships and this trend will continue.
Last edited by adamj023; Dec 4, 2012 at 10:54 am
#87
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Upper Midwest
Programs: DL, AA
Posts: 1,677
But by joining an alliance they are severely limiting their other JVs. Delta right now does not have a JV with them, but there is no reason tehy cannot. Why be forced into an alliance when you can have JVs with both Delta and US Air.
I think the whole JV/Merger craze is going to die soon. Other than Delta I have not seen it working out strongly for many. Look at *A - for US they are now at odds with the giant US, and suffer some of the backlash against their current stress. By joining SkyTeam, VS is now going to compete int eh transatlantic market against the AF/KLM giant, at a disadvantage because they have no real european connections.
I think the whole JV/Merger craze is going to die soon. Other than Delta I have not seen it working out strongly for many. Look at *A - for US they are now at odds with the giant US, and suffer some of the backlash against their current stress. By joining SkyTeam, VS is now going to compete int eh transatlantic market against the AF/KLM giant, at a disadvantage because they have no real european connections.
I've never heard of a carrier double-dipping on JVs on a single route w/ two or more groups. They petition the DOJ for admitting another airline into existing JVs, or they have separate route portfolios w/ other airlines, but they don't intermingle.
#88
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
I would think that for this to work for Delta, Virgin would have to agree to realign their North America route map. I would think that Delta would be interested not only in JFK, but would also want VS to connect to at least ATL and perhaps a few other hubs. This not only helps DL, but also helps VS in that it allows loyal VS flyers to connect to other cities in the US.
What else would they really move?
#89
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Really? You missed the hoops BA and AA went through to get it done? And VS's virtual network strategy relying on them? And QF jumping into bed with EK in response? I don't see much evidence that the JV era is coming to an end.
Considering that AF and KLM merged in 2004, I think this idea of "KLM management" is quite silly.
#90
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,797
There are plenty of people that would book Delta that would have never thought to call up Virgin Atlantic to book tickets before and Delta only had minimal 767-400ER Service.
I was surprised Delta didn't up the 767-400ER to a 777 but it seems as they one upped this with the Virgin deal and so they will get full access to much larger jets and have have access to Virgin AND Delta slots.
Delta must have been wanting more premium seats to sell on the JFK to LHR route which are very lucrative.
Deal was a no brainer, and will happen. Other potential future deals for Delta exist like Skymark Airlines in Japan in the future.
AA has a deal with JAL while Delta really needs a Japanese partner.
I was surprised Delta didn't up the 767-400ER to a 777 but it seems as they one upped this with the Virgin deal and so they will get full access to much larger jets and have have access to Virgin AND Delta slots.
Delta must have been wanting more premium seats to sell on the JFK to LHR route which are very lucrative.
Deal was a no brainer, and will happen. Other potential future deals for Delta exist like Skymark Airlines in Japan in the future.
AA has a deal with JAL while Delta really needs a Japanese partner.
Last edited by adamj023; Dec 4, 2012 at 11:06 am