ga refused to let my companions board with me
#16
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Romanian Riviera
Programs: Delta, Turkish Elite, American
Posts: 1,113
For companions of a Medallion, isn't Breezeway printed on their boarding pass? I think that has been the case for me historically, but I do remember a few occasions where it has not (inexplicably).
#17
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Exec Platinum/MM, DL Gold/MM, Hilton Diamond, Accor Platinum, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 7,013
I think the number of companions, ages, and relation to the OP are all relevant. I have never had a problem on any airline bringing family members along with me, but if I am traveling with someone on business I usually hang back and board with them.
#19
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lax
Programs: DL DM, SPG Plat
Posts: 781
i agree that most agents will let you (and i've done it several times) but that doesn't mean they're "supposed" to let them - like many agents will let people board out of zone rather than kicking them out of line and making them wait....
#20
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MSP, SFO, YHZ, JFK
Programs: DL PM, Starwood platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 48
I have always boarded with family and companions whether they were elite or not or on the same PNR or not.
It is unbelievably mean-spirited and downright nasty of any GA to break up a travelling party when one member is elite. Perhaps the GA was trying to tell you that your status meant nothing to the company, another way to reduce you to the lowest common denominator.
Unbelievable!
It is unbelievably mean-spirited and downright nasty of any GA to break up a travelling party when one member is elite. Perhaps the GA was trying to tell you that your status meant nothing to the company, another way to reduce you to the lowest common denominator.
Unbelievable!
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,431
That being said I have never seen them send my companion back before, this is rather odd, but not against the rules if on a different PNR.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,431
It is unbelievably mean-spirited and downright nasty of any GA to break up a travelling party when one member is elite. Perhaps the GA was trying to tell you that your status meant nothing to the company, another way to reduce you to the lowest common denominator.
Unbelievable!
Unbelievable!
I agree that this is very odd, but your comments are as weird as the GA behavior IMO.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SMF
Programs: Delta PM, Hyatt D
Posts: 416
#24
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NC
Programs: DL GM, DSC, IC Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 24
Haven't ever had a problem with getting companions to board with me, even in different PNRs. Even worked on the 1am redeye out of SFO on Monday morning when companion was in Y.
The SFO agents, however, seemed to have conflicting stories to begin with. Had one agent tell me companion upgs had been temporarily suspended (to be made permanently suspended in the near future) and another tell me companions had to be on the same PNR. According to the second agent, F would check in full with medallions anyways. Both of the above are obviously false and my companion ended up in Y, but a really nice NRSA sat next to me...
The SFO agents, however, seemed to have conflicting stories to begin with. Had one agent tell me companion upgs had been temporarily suspended (to be made permanently suspended in the near future) and another tell me companions had to be on the same PNR. According to the second agent, F would check in full with medallions anyways. Both of the above are obviously false and my companion ended up in Y, but a really nice NRSA sat next to me...
#25
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chamblee, GA USA
Programs: SkyMiles PM
Posts: 257
same PNR vs. different PNR and SFO agents
First of all, my experience with SFO agents is that they are AWESOME! Doesn't matter whether our flight arrives early, late, on time, late at night, first flight in in the morning, the jetway is at the door and we are deplaning immediately. They take the trouble to learn names of frequent visitors. They are friendly. They are upbeat. I just wanted to offer another point of view.
There are software limitations that prevent people who are traveling together from being in the same PNR. Partly different itineraries. Using one voucher to pay for multiple passengers. There are probably more. So being booked in different PNRs does not mean the passengers are not traveling together. And any Delta policy (I don't know if there is one) that distinguishes between passengers traveling in the same PNR vs. different PNRs is wrong. I know the companion upgrade thing works differently for the two situations but I chalk that up also to a software limitation. The situation the OP started this post with was a completely human-enforced policy, no software involved.
My experience has been that agents know this or it can be pointed out to them.
Contradancer
There are software limitations that prevent people who are traveling together from being in the same PNR. Partly different itineraries. Using one voucher to pay for multiple passengers. There are probably more. So being booked in different PNRs does not mean the passengers are not traveling together. And any Delta policy (I don't know if there is one) that distinguishes between passengers traveling in the same PNR vs. different PNRs is wrong. I know the companion upgrade thing works differently for the two situations but I chalk that up also to a software limitation. The situation the OP started this post with was a completely human-enforced policy, no software involved.
My experience has been that agents know this or it can be pointed out to them.
Contradancer
#26
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
If the elite member chooses to board before his "companions" are eligible to board, it is the elite member who is choosing to separate the party. Pick one - board as an elite, or board as a group.
Frankly, I wish the GAs would deny all non-same-PNR companions from boarding together, although I probably wouldn't mind if, as a matter of policy, immediate families (spouse/kids) of elites were allowed to board with the elite if seated in the same cabin of service.
Elite status does not grant priority boarding to everyone you know who happens to be on the same plane.
If it does, I'm going to start declaring ALL of the PAX on the plane as my companions.
#27
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: DL:Diamond, United:1P, Continental: Plat, HH:Gold, SPG:Gold
Posts: 760
so what is the consensus then
Given, the variance in the responses incl the anecdotal evidence that it has always worked for some people, or sometimes only worked for some people, does anyone have a link to the official Delta policy on treatment of companions on split pnrs?
And for the guy who said general sfo agents are fantastic, i agree. this was not a knock against Delta overall, or SFO agents overall, but just an honest question about Delta policy based on the representations given by this one agent. You can bet I'm still going to try for getting my companions to board with me every time, but I'd at least like clear direction as to whether it's technically part of the benefit or not.
And for the guy who said general sfo agents are fantastic, i agree. this was not a knock against Delta overall, or SFO agents overall, but just an honest question about Delta policy based on the representations given by this one agent. You can bet I'm still going to try for getting my companions to board with me every time, but I'd at least like clear direction as to whether it's technically part of the benefit or not.
#28
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: DL:Diamond, United:1P, Continental: Plat, HH:Gold, SPG:Gold
Posts: 760
You're right. The GA should definitely not prevent the elite member from boarding with the non-elite members ... when the non-elite members are eligible to board.
If the elite member chooses to board before his "companions" are eligible to board, it is the elite member who is choosing to separate the party. Pick one - board as an elite, or board as a group.
Frankly, I wish the GAs would deny all non-same-PNR companions from boarding together, although I probably wouldn't mind if, as a matter of policy, immediate families (spouse/kids) of elites were allowed to board with the elite if seated in the same cabin of service.
Elite status does not grant priority boarding to everyone you know who happens to be on the same plane.
If it does, I'm going to start declaring ALL of the PAX on the plane as my companions.
If the elite member chooses to board before his "companions" are eligible to board, it is the elite member who is choosing to separate the party. Pick one - board as an elite, or board as a group.
Frankly, I wish the GAs would deny all non-same-PNR companions from boarding together, although I probably wouldn't mind if, as a matter of policy, immediate families (spouse/kids) of elites were allowed to board with the elite if seated in the same cabin of service.
Elite status does not grant priority boarding to everyone you know who happens to be on the same plane.
If it does, I'm going to start declaring ALL of the PAX on the plane as my companions.
#29
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Companions are technically on the same PNR. I can see, as a matter of policy/good will, including people with the same last name as a companion.
Anybody else are just your business associates/friends and can board as their elite status (or lack thereof) allows.
#30
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EP, HH LT Diamond
Posts: 1,001
I have always boarded with family and companions whether they were elite or not or on the same PNR or not.
It is unbelievably mean-spirited and downright nasty of any GA to break up a travelling party when one member is elite. Perhaps the GA was trying to tell you that your status meant nothing to the company, another way to reduce you to the lowest common denominator.
Unbelievable!
It is unbelievably mean-spirited and downright nasty of any GA to break up a travelling party when one member is elite. Perhaps the GA was trying to tell you that your status meant nothing to the company, another way to reduce you to the lowest common denominator.
Unbelievable!