Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Eyes on Account ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2023 | 10:30 am
  #1  
Original Poster
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold 1.2MM (BIS), AA LT Plat (SUBs, BD/Bask), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 4,601
Eyes on Account ?

For any credit card issuer, is there any evidence that forms of communication (for unique requests) other than a telephone call (chat, secure message, Twitter, etc.) result in lower risks than the risks commonly ascribed to human eyes on account?

Some people with notional biz credentials and multiple AmEx NLL biz cards and some people with many sock drawered SUB only cards and some people with several identical accounts and some people in general are hesitant to speak with a telephone representative out of concern for possible adverse action (shutdown, claw back, application denial) due to human eyes on account.

Any evidence that Chat or Secure Message have different likelihoods of resultant adverse action than phone calls? Any evidence that Chat or Secure Message dont have the same likelihood of (supervisory or confirmatory) human eyes on account than a phone call?
DTSK likes this.
Dr Jabadski is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2023 | 6:09 pm
  #2  
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Wyndham Diamond
Posts: 1,153
I do not have any evidence, but I feel like it's safer to send a message or chat. Not all agents are "trained" to talk live to a customer. But a lot more (perhaps lower tier) customer reps can help with standard requests like changing the due date, lowering credit limit, issuing a check for credit balance refund etc. The lower tier reps may not be as interested or even empowered to look at the entire financial relationship of a customer with the institution. They may just be trying to get through xxxx number of requests before the end of their shift. Meanwhile, the phone agents may be more trained to look for red flags. Again, I have no evidence, but this is what I believe.

What are you trying to do?
happychic is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2023 | 8:46 am
  #3  
Original Poster
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold 1.2MM (BIS), AA LT Plat (SUBs, BD/Bask), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 4,601
Originally Posted by happychic
…What are you trying to do?
Nothing specific right now, just trying to understand the environment. I'm a frequent caller for any number of reasons (recon, change statement date, move credit limit from one card to another, move a statement credit from one card to another, etc.), rarely message, never chat, never Twitter. We often read here of people who are reluctant to contact a card issuer due to undesired extra perhaps unwarranted “eyes on account”, much more commonly citing reluctance to CALL compared to reluctance to chat or message or Twitter. I’m wondering if there’s any objective evidence that calling (instead of chatting or messaging) increasing the probability of more intense eyes on account.

Is it a given that telephone agents are more highly trained and/or qualified and/or empowered? Or is that a suspicion?

(Gotta be careful these days with quotes like "without any evidence" and “I do not have any evidence” and “I have no evidence” .)

Last edited by Dr Jabadski; Jul 6, 2023 at 9:23 am Reason: clarification
Dr Jabadski is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2023 | 9:07 am
  #4  
mia
Flyertalk Posting Legend Moderator: Credit Card Programs, American Express, Capital One, Chase, Citi, Diners Club, Eco Travel, Signatures
10 Countries Visited
20 Nights
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA, IHG & Marriott Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 51,883
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
....citing reluctance to CALL compared to reluctance to chat or message or Twitter.
I think this is primarily apprehension about confrontation due to a large number of card accounts or a fictional business. It may feel more comfortable to write, than to speak, because a delay in responding to a spoken question is considered evasive, but not so much when texting.
SPN Lifer likes this.
mia is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2023 | 9:21 am
  #5  
Original Poster
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold 1.2MM (BIS), AA LT Plat (SUBs, BD/Bask), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 4,601
Originally Posted by mia
I think this is primarily apprehension …
Thank you, I tend to agree as evidenced by my usual behavior, nice to read a concurring opinion from an esteemed FTer Legend. As a doctor and a (private) pilot I prefer to act based on evidence rather than based on apprehension and suspicion. During my medical career, the standard of care shifted, in some situations very significantly, from “it's what we’ve always done” to “evidence based medicine”.
SPN Lifer likes this.

Last edited by Dr Jabadski; Jul 6, 2023 at 9:42 am Reason: clarification
Dr Jabadski is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2023 | 10:53 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS Plat, AA EP, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Dia, Hyatt Glob, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 21,524
I know I am always a bit apprehensive when I have to call to move points from my Ink card to my CSR. I guess I am concerned that one day the rep is going to say something like “you sure spend a lot of money at Office Depot and Staples” (*).

Bummer that they broke the self service transfer.

For other cards I generally have no concerns about talking to a rep, but if I can do it via secure message, I choose that route for other reasons.


(*) Given the 5X cap on Ink purchases I suspect it isn’t really a valid concern; it’s not like I am running tens of thousands of dollars through that account every month. My gift card purchases are limited to what I can use for category shifting, with health insurance being the primary use.
SPN Lifer likes this.
notquiteaff is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2023 | 3:36 pm
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DCA/RIC
Programs: HH LTD, AA LTG
Posts: 1,021
Originally Posted by notquiteaff
I know I am always a bit apprehensive when I have to call to move points from my Ink card to my CSR. I guess I am concerned that one day the rep is going to say something like “you sure spend a lot of money at Office Depot and Staples” (*).

Bummer that they broke the self service transfer thousands of dollars through that account every month. .
Why do you have to call? I transfer from my Ink and other Chase cards every few months to my CSP including this week online without issue.
isle-hawg is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2023 | 3:56 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS Plat, AA EP, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Dia, Hyatt Glob, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 21,524
Originally Posted by isle-hawg
Why do you have to call? I transfer from my Ink and other Chase cards every few months to my CSP including this week online without issue.
Because my once broken functioning online link between the cards was broken when the card number changed, and it can’t be re-established. Lots of people have this problem.

Problems Combining UR points between accounts
SPN Lifer and isle-hawg like this.

Last edited by notquiteaff; Jul 27, 2023 at 4:18 pm Reason: Broken -> functioning
notquiteaff is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.