![]() |
Originally Posted by mrcardnet
(Post 31349924)
ICBC US-issued UnionPay card - more recent US testing results
|
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31350230)
Thanks for the extensive data points. I wonder if purchasing USPS money orders will still work. It sounds like they won't given that debit mode with PIN wasn't an option. I think it's like how the card will now fail at Costco.
I didn't include this data point, but I tested an Arco chip-capable card terminal inside the gas station building (note: where Arco gas is cash & PIN debit only), & it acted like Grocery Outlet where it rejected the chip, asked for swipe & then required a PIN. Now, this is still different because the Arco terminal is not setup to accept the PBOC chip on this card, whereas USPS is setup for that chip type. However, there are many possibilities of thousands of configuration combinations between the terminal, terminal software, backend hardware, processor, card behavior, & more that the only way to really know & discover loopholes & flaws in the setup is by testing a real transaction. Maybe you can buy a small money order as a test & report back. ;) |
Originally Posted by mrcardnet
(Post 31350258)
Maybe you can buy a small money order as a test & report back. ;)
Even if it still works, there's no way to scale if you're interested in accumulating cash back without a likely shut down. |
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31350433)
Such a transaction may result in an immediate call from ICBC. :o
Even if it still works, there's no way to scale if you're interested in accumulating cash back without a likely shut down. UPDATE ON MERCHANTS CVS - full PBOC chip credit card support; no PIN, no cashback Rite-Aid - chip reject, swipe fallback with choice of PIN Debit mode or Enter for Credit mode; PIN option allows cashback |
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31350433)
Such a transaction may result in an immediate call from ICBC. :o
Even if it still works, there's no way to scale if you're interested in accumulating cash back without a likely shut down. No ICBC phone call & I used the card elsewhere without issues after this. |
Originally Posted by mrcardnet
(Post 31375341)
Confirmed FAIL. Tested just for curiosity to see if I could buy a money order. Clerk said card was rejected. It didn't give me chance to enter a PIN, & since they support PBOC chip, there was also no opportunity to swipe & get the debit fallback mode.
No ICBC phone call & I used the card elsewhere without issues after this. |
Originally Posted by LASNRT
(Post 30760000)
I signed up for the card and got mine the other day.
Funds are loaded by bank transfer - linked via the Ecard website. I haven't loaded any money yet so can't confirm the transfer time. In the packet of disclosures that came with the card, there's a $4.95 monthly fee mentioned. There's ZERO mention of this on the website, so I've emailed them about it and am waiting for a reply. If that's right, it's a complete deal breaker (the 1.49% FTF is bad enough). Also, the website shows a graphic of the card with a chip, but as you mentioned there's no chip in the card, and no QuickPass as well. If there's no monthly fee, I might load it with a few hundred dollars to hand off to travel partners who get stuck just as a back up, but otherwise it probably won't be that useful for me. |
I applied for add Mrs. Majuki as an authorized user on my card for an upcoming China trip. (I had actually applied back 3 years ago, but her authorized user card never got added.) Her card appears with the standard red, blue, and green UnionPay logo, not the holographic gold style logo that's on my card. The chip design has changed slightly as well. On the back, the hologram has changed and the standard contactless logo replaced the QuickPass logo.
When activating the card, the authorized user selects a new 6-digit PIN. I've not had another real chip-and-PIN card with an authorized user before, so the only authorized user Visa/MC cards she's had have shared the cash advance PIN. The last 5 digits of the card number are different, and she doesn't have an online account. We will do a test purchase and report back. My card is on the top and Mrs. Majuki's is on the bottom: http://i.imgur.com/ve4CteCm.jpg http://i.imgur.com/xQqdYBYm.jpg |
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31425195)
I applied for add Mrs. Majuki as an authorized user on my card for an upcoming China trip. (I had actually applied back 3 years ago, but her authorized user card never got added.) Her card appears with the standard red, blue, and green UnionPay logo, not the holographic gold style logo that's on my card. The chip design has changed slightly as well. On the back, the hologram has changed and the standard contactless logo replaced the QuickPass logo.
When activating the card, the authorized user selects a new 6-digit PIN. I've not had another real chip-and-PIN card with an authorized user before, so the only authorized user Visa/MC cards she's had have shared the cash advance PIN. The last 5 digits of the card number are different, and she doesn't have an online account. We will do a test purchase and report back. |
Originally Posted by tmiw
(Post 31425223)
I thought the card was signature-preferring?
My point was that I've not had another credit card where a PIN, cash advance or otherwise, could be set independently for an authorized user. I've never set a cash advance PIN on an American Express card, which does carry a different card number for authorized users. |
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31425308)
It generally is. I was simply pointing out the process when activating the card.
My point was that I've not had another credit card where a PIN, cash advance or otherwise, could be set independently for an authorized user. I've never set a cash advance PIN on an American Express card, which does carry a different card number for authorized users. Anyway, maybe the contactless feature on the new card will work better hopefully, if nothing else. Though I'm not sure that's anywhere close to guaranteed. |
Originally Posted by tmiw
(Post 31425505)
Anyway, maybe the contactless feature on the new card will work better hopefully, if nothing else. Though I'm not sure that's anywhere close to guaranteed.
|
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31425522)
My guess is that QuickPass won't work, but I'll report back if it does.
http://i.imgur.com/6WHDvp9m.jpg |
Originally Posted by Majuki
(Post 31430909)
I was hopeful that this signage outside of a local 99 Ranch would mean that QuickPass might work. Mrs. Majuki tried her card, but she got the "chip not accepted" message similar to when contactless was broken at Safeway. Furthermore, she tried inserting the card, which also didn't work. Finally, she swiped the card, and the transaction went through in debit mode with a PIN, similar to when I have used my card at Safeway. The pending transaction is showing up on the online account.
http://i.imgur.com/6WHDvp9m.jpg Also, here are the merchants in the US with PBOC chip card support AND also accept contactless cards of other card networks: McDonalds Walgreens CVS Thus, they would be good candidates to test QuickPass contactless using the ICBC UnionPay card. Supposedly there are thousands of merchant locations in the US that support QuickPass (I read somewhere 250K claimed), but not clear who & where they are. Home Depot, USPS, and Walmart have PBOC chip card support but do NOT accept any contactless cards or phones. |
Originally Posted by mrcardnet
(Post 31438928)
Wasn't 99 Ranch reported here before as supporting the PBOC chip card?
Also, here are the merchants in the US with PBOC chip card support AND also accept contactless cards of other card networks: McDonalds Walgreens CVS Thus, they would be good candidates to test QuickPass contactless using the ICBC UnionPay card. Supposedly there are thousands of merchant locations in the US that support QuickPass (I read somewhere 250K claimed), but not clear who & where they are. Home Depot, USPS, and Walmart have PBOC chip card support but do NOT accept any contactless cards or phones. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:39 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.