Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2015, 8:46 am
  #12136  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by bullfrog
Adult-oriented businesses experience a relatively high amount of chargeback fraud. Someone makes a legitimate charge and then a spouse or significant other sees the charge on the statement and gets upset... so to cover, the person who made the charge claims it must be fraud and initiates a chargeback, even though they know they made the purchase, just to smooth things over at home. As a result, these businesses try to maintain strong evidence to fight chargebacks.
The moral of the story here is, go to the ATM first LOL!!
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 9:10 am
  #12137  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by cbn42
Do you really think that anyone other than points geeks reads the fliers banks send them? They will go straight in the trash, and then people will switch to another credit card in their wallet.

Banks are not going to switch to PINs until the card networks force their hand. It doesn't make economic sense. A couple of small banks will continue to provide them to niche markets like people who want to pump fuel into rental cars in France on Sundays.
I still maintain that mandatory PIN for debit isn't that big of a leap. For one thing, (the majority of) people are already used to entering it at the places that support the debit networks, even if there is an option to bypass it. People choose "credit" mainly because of the liability risk if the card and the PIN are skimmed, which would no longer be a problem once EMV takes hold.

The banks will benefit too. It will save them money from the fewer fraud claims they'll have to pay out since Durbin restricts interchange for debit cards regardless of how they're run. They will still be able to point to their credit card products and claim that they're much easier to use than those "difficult" debit cards, possibly gaining additional credit customers as well.

Originally Posted by cbn42
I don't think that was the reason. The reason was increasing fraud in the US (Target, Home Depot, etc.) due to other countries switching to EMV and fraudsters shifting their attention to the last remaining easy target.

If the reason was international compatibility, then banks would simply have to issue chipped cards to international travelers on request, or put chips in their travel-oriented products. That isn't much of a reason to switch over the whole country.
A P2PE mandate would have likely taken care of the malware based skimming. (Of course, it wouldn't prevent card cloning if you can read the magstripe contents some other way.) What Target, etc. did is cause all parties involved to stop bothering to try to get/hoping that the EMV shift date (which was decided back in 2011) moved back or cancelled entirely. Which is a good thing if you want EMV to actually be accepted in the US.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 9:18 am
  #12138  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
If, and it is becoming more and more evident at least to me, that the original reason for introducing emv when this thread started over 2 years ago was the increasing difficulty in using non emv compliant cards i.e. magnetic strip cards and for the most part that problem has been solved, why is it so important for some whether the card be signature priority or pin priority.
EMV is being deployed in the US to address one specific issue: The creation of mag stripe cards using stolen card details. EMV is not a complete solution by itself, but combined with hardening the terminal protocols and tighter transaction security by retailers, should address the largest source of US card detail that feeds those clone cards. (Fraud of course will move to card not present transactions, which EMV does nothing to address.)

As has been posted here previously, PIN codes address physical loss of the card, which isn't a huge problem. Offline PINs address situations were communications links don't exist. That has dramatically dropped to certain kiosks/unattended terminals today - it used to be a problem in whole countries.

As to why I want a PIN preference card, it has nothing to do with class, status or card security concerns. I travel extensively around the world. I don't wear trainers, t-shirts, shorts, talk in a loud voice or hang out at tourist traps. I may not speak the local language enough to hold a conversation, but I can say "please" and "thank you." I don't want to do anything that identifies me as a foreigner. I want my card to work exactly like the 20 people who preceded me.

Are there a lot of people like me? On this board - maybe. In the grand scheme of things, no. US deployment of EMV was a chance for me to get a card that met my travel needs. Unfortunately the US issuers have decided to mimic the mag stripe cards as much as possible. One would have thought that an issuer like USAA with their member base weighted towards global use would offer a PIN preference card, but as you noted, signature preference works most of the time.

My US issued company Citicard works exactly how I want my personal card to work. Why Citi doesn't issue personal cards with the same CVM preference is a mystery. Once I hear of a confirmed issuer of PIN preference cards, I will get it.

Last edited by glbltvlr; Jul 2, 2015 at 9:30 am
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 9:36 am
  #12139  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by glbltvlr
As has been posted here previously, PIN codes address physical loss of the card, which isn't a huge problem. Offline PINs address situations were communications links don't exist. That has dramatically dropped to certain kiosks/unattended terminals today - it used to be a problem in whole countries.
Some countries (like the UK and Canada) still use offline PIN even though transactions are authorized in real time. You wouldn't think online PIN would be that much slower there but apparently that's not the case judging by at least one recent post in this thread.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 9:42 am
  #12140  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by tmiw
Some countries (like the UK and Canada) still use offline PIN even though transactions are authorized in real time. You wouldn't think online PIN would be that much slower there but apparently that's not the case judging by at least one recent post in this thread.
I've had that happen a few times. The clerk was almost ready to abort the transaction before the approval came through. I also think the suggestion posted earlier about using no verification for transactions under a certain amount is excellent.
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 10:05 am
  #12141  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by glbltvlr
EMV is being deployed in the US to address one specific issue: The creation of mag stripe cards using stolen card details. EMV is not a complete solution by itself, but combined with hardening the terminal protocols and tighter transaction security by retailers, should address the largest source of US card detail that feeds those clone cards. (Fraud of course will move to card not present transactions, which EMV does nothing to address.)

As has been posted here previously, PIN codes address physical loss of the card, which isn't a huge problem. Offline PINs address situations were communications links don't exist. That has dramatically dropped to certain kiosks/unattended terminals today - it used to be a problem in whole countries.

As to why I want a PIN preference card, it has nothing to do with class, status or card security concerns. I travel extensively around the world. I don't wear trainers, t-shirts, shorts, talk in a loud voice or hang out at tourist traps. I may not speak the local language enough to hold a conversation, but I can say "please" and "thank you." I don't want to do anything that identifies me as a foreigner. I want my card to work exactly like the 20 people who preceded me.

Are there a lot of people like me? On this board - maybe. In the grand scheme of things, no. US deployment of EMV was a chance for me to get a card that met my travel needs. Unfortunately the US issuers have decided to mimic the mag stripe cards as much as possible. One would have thought that an issuer like USAA with their member base weighted towards global use would offer a PIN preference card, but as you noted, signature preference works most of the time.

My US issued company Citicard works exactly how I want my personal card to work. Why Citi doesn't issue personal cards with the same CVM preference is a mystery. Once I hear of a confirmed issuer of PIN preference cards, I will get it.
Not to be disagreeable or start an argument, it is highly doubtful if you hand over a credit card with Bank of America blazed or printed in bold letters on the front would immediately tag you as a non local; especially since contrary to the opinions of some here, there are still countries that issue chip and signature cards as a norm. But if that's important to you, who am I to argue?

Last edited by JEFFJAGUAR; Jul 2, 2015 at 10:11 am
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 10:12 am
  #12142  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
it is highly doubtful if you hand over a credit card with Bank of America blazed or printed in bold letters on the front would immediately tag you as a non local; especially since contrary to the opinions of some here, there are still countries that issue chip and signature cards as a norm. But if that's important to you, who am I to argue?
I'm not taking any offense - you asked and I gave my reasons for wanting PIN preference verification. To the points you raised, I would note that EMV cards are usually not handed over to a clerk, so they usually don't see the card branding. My experience in the UK, Europe, Asia, China has been that the US is the only country that routinely uses EMV signature verification. That's certainly not the definitive word on every country, but for the ones I'm in regularly that use EMV, PIN preference is the way to go.
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 10:15 am
  #12143  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by glbltvlr
EMV is being deployed in the US to address one specific issue: The creation of mag stripe cards using stolen card details. EMV is not a complete solution by itself, but combined with hardening the terminal protocols and tighter transaction security by retailers, should address the largest source of US card detail that feeds those clone cards. (Fraud of course will move to card not present transactions, which EMV does nothing to address.)

As has been posted here previously, PIN codes address physical loss of the card, which isn't a huge problem. Offline PINs address situations were communications links don't exist. That has dramatically dropped to certain kiosks/unattended terminals today - it used to be a problem in whole countries.

As to why I want a PIN preference card, it has nothing to do with class, status or card security concerns. I travel extensively around the world. I don't wear trainers, t-shirts, shorts, talk in a loud voice or hang out at tourist traps. I may not speak the local language enough to hold a conversation, but I can say "please" and "thank you." I don't want to do anything that identifies me as a foreigner. I want my card to work exactly like the 20 people who preceded me.

Are there a lot of people like me? On this board - maybe. In the grand scheme of things, no. US deployment of EMV was a chance for me to get a card that met my travel needs. Unfortunately the US issuers have decided to mimic the mag stripe cards as much as possible. One would have thought that an issuer like USAA with their member base weighted towards global use would offer a PIN preference card, but as you noted, signature preference works most of the time.

My US issued company Citicard works exactly how I want my personal card to work. Why Citi doesn't issue personal cards with the same CVM preference is a mystery. Once I hear of a confirmed issuer of PIN preference cards, I will get it.
And only we Yankees wear sneakers (trainers), t shirts, talk in a loud voice, hang out at tourist spots when we travel? Where have you been lately? (The other day, in the lobby of a theatre waiting for the auditorium to open, I saw several people wearing NY Jets sweat shirts, with Yankee caps on backwards, sneakers and talking in a loud voice. But listening to them, they were clearly localsl. (It was in the West End of London).
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 10:19 am
  #12144  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by glbltvlr
I'm not taking any offense - you asked and I gave my reasons for wanting PIN preference verification. To the points you raised, I would note that EMV cards are usually not handed over to a clerk, so they usually don't see the card branding. My experience in the UK, Europe, Asia, China has been that the US is the only country that routinely uses EMV signature verification. That's certainly not the definitive word on every country, but for the ones I'm in regularly that use EMV, PIN preference is the way to go.
So...the perfect solution is no cvm for small purchases, eh.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 10:25 am
  #12145  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
And only we Yankees wear sneakers (trainers), t shirts, talk in a loud voice, hang out at tourist spots when we travel? Where have you been lately? (The other day, in the lobby of a theatre waiting for the auditorium to open, I saw several people wearing NY Jets sweat shirts, with Yankee caps on backwards, sneakers and talking in a loud voice. But listening to them, they were clearly localsl. (It was in the West End of London).
And I was at the Old Vic a few weeks ago to see High Society and saw similar behavior. Not saying it doesn't exist - just that I don't want to exhibit those behaviors. The odds of something bad happening in London are pretty low. The odds in a ME or African country are significantly higher. Anything I can do to blend in, I want to do.
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 10:35 am
  #12146  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
So...the perfect solution is no cvm for small purchases, eh.
No CVM for small purchases is being used in the US at Walgreens and some fast food places. I'm not a card security expert, so I can't speak to what kind of exposure there is, but it certain addresses the transaction speed impact from any verification method, signature included.
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 11:01 am
  #12147  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
IHG Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: Delta - Silver; UA - Silver; HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Spire Ambassador; Marriott Bonvoy - Titanium
Posts: 14,185
My frustration with signature is that it's a frustrating joke electronically; an electronic signature usually looks little like the real thing. No one checks those, or paper ones either. In crowded environments, having to handle a pen or stylus is a pain.

The banks motivation seems to be laziness to me.
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 11:15 am
  #12148  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by glbltvlr
I'm not taking any offense - you asked and I gave my reasons for wanting PIN preference verification. To the points you raised, I would note that EMV cards are usually not handed over to a clerk, so they usually don't see the card branding. My experience in the UK, Europe, Asia, China has been that the US is the only country that routinely uses EMV signature verification. That's certainly not the definitive word on every country, but for the ones I'm in regularly that use EMV, PIN preference is the way to go.
Is HK still chip and signature for non-UnionPay cards? For some reason I'm remembering that to be the case.

Originally Posted by glbltvlr
No CVM for small purchases is being used in the US at Walgreens and some fast food places. I'm not a card security expert, so I can't speak to what kind of exposure there is, but it certain addresses the transaction speed impact from any verification method, signature included.
Unfortunately they can only waive it for signature. Other countries apparently use contactless for that instead. Ultimately PIN/signature might not matter in the long run if nearly everyone enables NFC.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 11:22 am
  #12149  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
My frustration with signature is that it's a frustrating joke electronically; an electronic signature usually looks little like the real thing. No one checks those, or paper ones either. In crowded environments, having to handle a pen or stylus is a pain.

The banks motivation seems to be laziness to me.
I agree - signature as a viable POS verification method ceased being useful about the time blacklist books and carbon paper charge slips disappeared. You might be able to make an argument that there was some utility in using the signature to show consistency with the same scrawl used on other transactions to address the "I didn't make that charge" claim.

When mag stripe terminals disappear I think signature goes away. At that point, possession of the card is sufficient for low value transactions and two factor or biometric verification for high value transactions becomes the norm.

As to laziness, I would say it's more about the money. There's a significant investment required to do credit PIN. Banks that don't do EMV PIN at all (I'm looking at you, Chase), can avoid that. Even ones that do PIN, but make it less than Signature, avoid the customer support costs and lessen the chance that the card holder will use another card.
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2015, 11:31 am
  #12150  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by tmiw
Is HK still chip and signature for non-UnionPay cards? For some reason I'm remembering that to be the case.
I haven't been in Hong Kong for a while, but I've never had my Citi PIN preference card kick out a signature slip in mainland China.
glbltvlr is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.