Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2014, 11:38 pm
  #8086  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by Vid
My intended tone was more sardonic than sarcastic. You can't use offline CVM to detect fraudulent use of a stolen card until the perp is long gone. No doubt this is the reason why all ATMs require online PIN CVM. And my concern is over unknown attacks rather than this specific one. The security group at Cambridge stumbled over this and used it to make an important point. But stopping a proof-of-concept exploit without fixing the underlying problem doesn't really fix anything. FWIW, there is some more general analysis of the problem here:

https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/...wedge-attacks/
The reality is that this is a CVM weakness. You still have to steal a card. As such, it's not really an issue to be honest - stolen cards aren't the big problem, counterfeit cards are. Thus why Visa is advocating chip and signature in the US. It'll eliminate almost all of the card present fraud without forcing 'muricans to remember PINs. From their perspective, they're actually right. But they're completely inconsiderate of how miserable of experience a PIN-free card is when travelling.

Also, signature seems silly. They may as well just make it no CVM for everything.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2014, 11:51 pm
  #8087  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
I wonder if any future US issuers who prefer PIN will want to take advantage of X and Y amounts for their CVM lists to reduce hassle compared to signature priority cards. They could do something like:
  1. No CVM Required, if transaction is in the application's currency and X < $50
  2. Enciphered PIN verified online, if terminal supports this CVM
  3. Signature, if terminal supports this CVM
  4. No CVM Required, if terminal supports this CVM
  5. Plaintext PIN verified by ICC, if terminal supports this CVM
They could even make a multi-currency one so it has similar behavior in Canada and Mexico (just with < CAD50 and whatever the Mexican equivalent is). Thus for most purchases in North America it would not ask for PIN at all. And for the rest of the time, it would prefer online PIN to avoid that security issue Vid mentioned. Offline PIN would only come into play for the few (and dwindling) offline PIN only kiosks and gas stations.

The downside is that in the UK at least, this hypothetical card would be chip and signature unless offline PIN was higher in the list.
tmiw is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2014, 11:58 pm
  #8088  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by tmiw
I wonder if any future US issuers who prefer PIN will want to take advantage of X and Y amounts for their CVM lists to reduce hassle compared to signature priority cards. They could do something like:
  1. No CVM Required, if transaction is in the application's currency and X < $50
  2. Enciphered PIN verified online, if terminal supports this CVM
  3. Signature, if terminal supports this CVM
  4. No CVM Required, if terminal supports this CVM
  5. Plaintext PIN verified by ICC, if terminal supports this CVM
They could even make a multi-currency one so it has similar behavior in Canada and Mexico (just with < CAD50 and whatever the Mexican equivalent is). Thus for most purchases in North America it would not ask for PIN at all. And for the rest of the time, it would prefer online PIN to avoid that security issue Vid mentioned. Offline PIN would only come into play for the few (and dwindling) offline PIN only kiosks and gas stations.

The downside is that in the UK at least, this hypothetical card would be chip and signature unless offline PIN was higher in the list.
There would be no point in putting offline PIN below signature. The attack is a CVM downgrade, so you're downgrading the CVM to signature from offline PIN. And it's just not the issue it's made to be. If authorised online, even if offline PIN is used, a tampered CVM list can be detected. And offline authorisation should go away. Offline PIN is safe with online authorisation as long as the issuer is actually checking the authorisation message is valid.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 12:00 am
  #8089  
Vid
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by alexmt
The reality is that this is a CVM weakness. You still have to steal a card. As such, it's not really an issue to be honest - stolen cards aren't the big problem, counterfeit cards are. Thus why Visa is advocating chip and signature in the US. It'll eliminate almost all of the card present fraud without forcing 'muricans to remember PINs. From their perspective, they're actually right. But they're completely inconsiderate of how miserable of experience a PIN-free card is when travelling.

Also, signature seems silly. They may as well just make it no CVM for everything.
From a pragmatic perspective, EMV is really only about raising the bar a bit to make fraud harder. But consider this pre-play attack that can be used to make limited 'clones' of an EMV card:

https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/...-chip-and-pin/

This isn't easy to accomplish, but is possible for a determined attacker. It would be much easier to attempt card-not-present fraud, so I wouldn't expect this to be used except in very special circumstances (e.g. for high value transactions against a specific person).

Also, Anderson and Murdoch recently published a review of security in EMV as well:

https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/...-systems-fail/

It is interesting reading
Vid is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 12:05 am
  #8090  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by alexmt
There would be no point in putting offline PIN below signature. The attack is a CVM downgrade, so you're downgrading the CVM to signature from offline PIN. And it's just not the issue it's made to be. If authorised online, even if offline PIN is used, a tampered CVM list can be detected. And offline authorisation should go away. Offline PIN is safe with online authorisation as long as the issuer is actually checking the authorisation message is valid.
My understanding of that webpage is that the terminal sends the VERIFY command to the stolen card with the MITM device on it and the MITM device always answers that the PIN's valid. It also changes some stuff in the CDOL sent from the terminal so that the card thinks a signature transaction is happening. But yeah, this sounds like something that could just be verified at the issuer level better.
tmiw is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 12:43 am
  #8091  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by tmiw
My understanding of that webpage is that the terminal sends the VERIFY command to the stolen card with the MITM device on it and the MITM device always answers that the PIN's valid. It also changes some stuff in the CDOL sent from the terminal so that the card thinks a signature transaction is happening. But yeah, this sounds like something that could just be verified at the issuer level better.
Correct, in that attack the card is told the terminal only supports signature and the terminal is told that the PIN was verified.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 3:22 am
  #8092  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: NEXUS/GE
Posts: 8
Just an Update:

First Tech Credit Union - CFO Hank Sigmon - has announced they are offering 100% Chip & Pin (with "Pin Preferred" as 1st priority not "fallback") in both credit & debit cards to existing customers starting in 2015. - this would be the Only credit union in the U.S. to do this (Penn State, United Nations, andrews credit union have "chip & signature as 1st priority & fallback to chip & pin)

i believe you need to open a basic savings/checking account (min $75) and for a credit card - being a credit union - they require FICO Credit report + usually proof you have a job or actual income.

first tech credit union website is below
http://www.firsttechfed.com
kevinfor is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 5:08 am
  #8093  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by alexmt
Also, signature seems silly. They may as well just make it no CVM for everything.
While true, maybe they use signature not as a verification method but as a contract of sorts. In Israel, when you dispute a charge, they check the receipt to see if you've signed. This isn't verifying cardholder identity, but it is an "important" part of "higher volume" transactions.

Originally Posted by tmiw
I wonder if any future US issuers who prefer PIN will want to take advantage of X and Y amounts for their CVM lists to reduce hassle compared to signature priority cards. They could do something like:
  1. No CVM Required, if transaction is in the application's currency and X < $50
  2. Enciphered PIN verified online, if terminal supports this CVM
  3. Signature, if terminal supports this CVM
  4. No CVM Required, if terminal supports this CVM
  5. Plaintext PIN verified by ICC, if terminal supports this CVM
They could even make a multi-currency one so it has similar behavior in Canada and Mexico (just with < CAD50 and whatever the Mexican equivalent is). Thus for most purchases in North America it would not ask for PIN at all. And for the rest of the time, it would prefer online PIN to avoid that security issue Vid mentioned. Offline PIN would only come into play for the few (and dwindling) offline PIN only kiosks and gas stations.

The downside is that in the UK at least, this hypothetical card would be chip and signature unless offline PIN was higher in the list.
(Bolding mine)

So add a CVM above signature: "Plaintext PIN verified by ICC if transaction performed in UK"
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 8:46 am
  #8094  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by tmiw
Another place that doesn't have a customer accessible PIN pad or card slot.

If merchants are going to keep doing this, then why not have the terminal not support PIN unless there's a separate PIN pad? At least visitors to the US won't get screwed by not being able to enter a PIN.
I do not know what type of terminal they have. It is a pretty small one they can turn around to the customer. Normally they take your card and swipe it, punch in the amount, and complete the transaction. When they get a chip card they either insert it themselves or they turn the terminal around and let the customer do it. The PIN pad is part of the device and they just turn it around and let you put in your PIN if necessary.

Since the card (Chase SP) is chip and signature, I don't see that it matters who inserts the card.
tschaefges is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 9:11 am
  #8095  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by tschaefges
I do not know what type of terminal they have. It is a pretty small one they can turn around to the customer. Normally they take your card and swipe it, punch in the amount, and complete the transaction. When they get a chip card they either insert it themselves or they turn the terminal around and let the customer do it. The PIN pad is part of the device and they just turn it around and let you put in your PIN if necessary.

Since the card (Chase SP) is chip and signature, I don't see that it matters who inserts the card.
It matters for people who have a PIN-primary card (for Americans, it could be Diners or UNFCU or the older USAA; otherwise, Canadians or Europeans)
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 9:17 am
  #8096  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by joshwex90
So add a CVM above signature: "Plaintext PIN verified by ICC if transaction performed in UK"
Actually it's probably okay to do offline just above signature regardless of country. Online PIN being above offline is good because it enables seamless PIN changes--change via online banking or via IVR and you can start using the new PIN right away. Well, for purchases above $50.

Originally Posted by tschaefges
I do not know what type of terminal they have. It is a pretty small one they can turn around to the customer. Normally they take your card and swipe it, punch in the amount, and complete the transaction. When they get a chip card they either insert it themselves or they turn the terminal around and let the customer do it. The PIN pad is part of the device and they just turn it around and let you put in your PIN if necessary.

Since the card (Chase SP) is chip and signature, I don't see that it matters who inserts the card.
One of these? http://www.ingenico.com/en/products/...ict200-series/

Originally Posted by joshwex90
It matters for people who have a PIN-primary card (for Americans, it could be Diners or UNFCU or the older USAA; otherwise, Canadians or Europeans)
And people who want to use Apple Pay, Google Wallet or a contactless capable credit card.
tmiw is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 9:29 am
  #8097  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: HH Diamond
Posts: 221
Originally Posted by tmiw
That may cause PIN to never be asked for depending on the terminal. A better way would be:

CVM1: No CVM Required if transaction amount is in the card's currency and < $50
CVM2: PIN

However, it looks like PIN countries just went to contactless instead.
I've used my DC card contactless at Walgreens and Home Depot so far. Honestly, far easier than using Google Wallet (which I've done before) and I assume Apple Pay.

My friend in UK says they do contactless for just about everything under £20 now.

How does this work for larger purchases though. If you do contactless for over $50 (or £20 in their case) are you prompted to insert card instead so PIN can be entered?

Guess that will be my next thing to play with. A lot easier to spend over $50 at Home Depot than Walgreens!
weave is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 10:14 am
  #8098  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: RDU
Programs: DL(PM), UA(Silver), AA(EXP) Marriott(Ti), HH(Gold), Hertz(PC)
Posts: 2,669
Originally Posted by weave
How does this work for larger purchases though. If you do contactless for over $50 (or £20 in their case) are you prompted to insert card instead so PIN can be entered?
At BJ's, I paid contactless using ApplePay the other day, for a $73 purchase, I just had to scribble my signature on the little terminal, as if I had swiped a card.
fliesdelta is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 10:16 am
  #8099  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by weave
I've used my DC card contactless at Walgreens and Home Depot so far. Honestly, far easier than using Google Wallet (which I've done before) and I assume Apple Pay.

My friend in UK says they do contactless for just about everything under £20 now.

How does this work for larger purchases though. If you do contactless for over $50 (or £20 in their case) are you prompted to insert card instead so PIN can be entered?

Guess that will be my next thing to play with. A lot easier to spend over $50 at Home Depot than Walgreens!
I've actually tried over $50 at Walgreens with the DC card before and they just make you sign for the purchase. I haven't found a place with both contactless and EMV enabled yet but according to cardpeek it won't matter; the contactless on the card isn't EMV contactless so PIN won't be asked for at all in this mode. (Still a chance that it'll make you insert overseas instead though.)
tmiw is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2014, 10:28 am
  #8100  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
Originally Posted by weave
FWIW at Wal-Mart my C+P Diners Club MC asks for my PIN on all charges so far, even under $50
Same for me - Diners Club MC consistently prompts for PIN at Broward County Sams Clubs, Wal-Marts and Wal-Mart Neighborhood Grocery stores.

In addition, I was in Germny last week, decided to test my Arrival+ (for which I had changed the PIN on the website), with the following results:

MUC S-Bahn ticket machine - successful using PIN

Hotel and two department stores - card dipped by clerk, paper receipt generated
Non-NonRev is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.