Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2013, 6:37 pm
  #1846  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by nethead25
For those that upgraded an Amex card with contactless technology (SPG,Blue, etc.) to an EMV version, did you lose the contactless functionality? From the photo of the Blue card, it looks like the antenna is no longer visible in the card substrate, unless they moved it behind the chip or blue square?
Good catch. Though not many US EMV cards have contactless capability (US Bank FlexPerks, some BofA cards are the few cards out there that has both features), EMV chips can also be equipped with contactless features.

Anyone want to try out their EMV chipped AMEX, those that previously had a contactless feature, can also work in contactless terminals?
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2013, 7:32 pm
  #1847  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by kebosabi
Anyone want to try out their EMV chipped AMEX, those that previously had a contactless feature, can also work in contactless terminals?
My previous blue had contactless (RFID, I believe), it no longer functions as contactless now that I upgraded to EMV. Negative on it moving behind the blue square or the other side of the chip (that I can see anyways).
mubach is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2013, 8:29 pm
  #1848  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by kebosabi
Good catch. Though not many US EMV cards have contactless capability (US Bank FlexPerks, some BofA cards are the few cards out there that has both features), EMV chips can also be equipped with contactless features.

Anyone want to try out their EMV chipped AMEX, those that previously had a contactless feature, can also work in contactless terminals?
Amex Blue (issued in USA) does not have both contactless ExpressPay and EMV. You can choose one, both, or neither (default). You can also have multiple cards if you prefer to have both ExpressPay and EMV.
emvchip is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2013, 8:35 pm
  #1849  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 401
Transit systems in Boston (MBTA) and Washington DC areas (WMATA) already use contactless for their smart fare cards. Chicago is on the way, maybe New York in the future too. When Boston originally started planning for their "Charlie Card" system, the plan was to have distance based pricing, à la BART. The problem they ran into was the trolley lines (Green Lines B,C,D,E). There wasn't a cost effective method to have people exit the system on the trolley with a fare card, especially when it is rush hour. (At rush hour, it can be hard enough to get people to show their fare cards when entering the trolley). The Green line connects with all of the other lines in the underground portion of the system, there was an option to put a fare zone at the various transfer stations, but leaving entry only faregates (most stations) was seen as the best answer.

Chicago, Philadephia (SEPTA), and WMATA all plan to use contactless open payment cards, so these could be EMV contactless someday.

Last edited by emvchip; Sep 17, 2013 at 9:56 pm
emvchip is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 1:33 am
  #1850  
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,580
Originally Posted by kebosabi
I doubt we'll have a tap-in/tap-out system either. But the entry gates that were installed can be bidirectional if they wanted to be (like London and Tokyo).
But then a larger number of gates would be needed. I don't think either London or Tokyo has figured out how to get two people go through a gate in opposite directions simultaneously.

Originally Posted by kebosabi
Many here in LA are starting to agree that we should look into some sort of variable pricing format because as it stands now, it makes no sense that a rail trip from Little Tokyo to Union Station (less than a mile) is $1.50 while a trip from 7th/Metro to Long Beach is the same $1.50 (close to 20 miles). And furthermore, we don't even have a transfer system so someone going across two trains over a short distance has to pay $3.00 while another person who goes long distance on one train only pays $1.50.
Looking at it from another perspective, it is in the public interest to incentivize longer trips on public transit, because longer car trips create more congestion than shorter trips. The 710 freeway to Long Beach is far more congested than Alameda Street to Little Tokyo.

Also, once a rider is on the train, there is very little marginal cost to allowing them to ride longer. Unless the train is full (unlikely in LA) the energy needed due to the rider's additional weight is negligible.

Originally Posted by kebosabi
But honestly speaking, I don't quite see it happening for at least a few years for that change to happen. Politicians who are on the Board of Directors of our Metro system are elected officials; they'll do anything to help the poor to ensure that they'll be re-elected.
Right, because poor people control the PACs that fund the campaigns that get people elected.
cbn42 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 1:58 am
  #1851  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by cbn42
But then a larger number of gates would be needed. I don't think either London or Tokyo has figured out how to get two people go through a gate in opposite directions simultaneously.
Larger, as you note, but not anywhere near double since you can change gate direction with traffic flow...
AllieKat is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 2:03 am
  #1852  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by cbn42
Looking at it from another perspective, it is in the public interest to incentivize longer trips on public transit, because longer car trips create more congestion than shorter trips. The 710 freeway to Long Beach is far more congested than Alameda Street to Little Tokyo.
Mm...I have to disagree somewhat with that. Looking at how crowded the surface streets are in LA on my way to work, I think there are a lot of car drivers on surface streets seem that seem to be using it for short trips as well.

Take for example, the local surface streets on Santa Monica Blvd. and the Westside. Whole bunch of cars in small local surface streets going from apartment and condos to work within a 5-10 mi radius seems to be the norm in certain parts of LA. And traffic can be ridiculously heavy because everyone is doing that at the same time within a short distance; kinda like a open faucet running and filling up a gallon of water; that gallon of water (surface streets) is going to fill up much more quickly than a 5 gallon tank of water (freeway).

As a former westside resident, I too was part of that 5-10 mi commuter driver because there was no incentive for me to commute with public transit. It's $75 a month for a bus pass when the commute was only within 5-10 miles. Let alone taking me 30 minutes just to get to work on a car for a 5-10 mi commute, if I had to take the bus, now I had to consider waiting for the bus as well. Now I just find it easier to just commute on a 100 MPG moped instead.

Either way, it's getting a bit OT, let's get back to discussing EMV.


Originally Posted by emvchip
Have you heard complaints that anybody rational...
You'd be surprised when you google up EMV chips in the US an read comments from a large number of stereotypical unintelligent ugly-American types posting "the moment they start putting chips on them darn cards, I'm taking it off!" FACEPALM

Like this post even on FT: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/18090689-post1121.html
Or "David" on dailyfinance.com: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/08/...e-the-emv-chi/ "The EMV allows the crooks to get your information much easier. No security here what so ever!" FACEPALM

So far the EMV conversion hasn't hit mainstream public, except for few newstories here and there. It's still only part of the informed group like us who travel int'l often and the financial and merchant sectors who have to adapt to the 2015 EMV mandate. But the majority of Americans, have zero clue what EMV is, that EMV conversion is happening, and are completely clueless to differentiate "chip" between contact and contactless.

Yes, rational people don't complain. Irrational people do. The word "chip" seems to scare them off completely, part of it has to do with not being informed on the difference between contactless and contact chip, as well as the overblown media hype regarding "chip cards" relating to "hackers being able to steal info from a mile away," which somehow gets twisted in their mind that the gubbmint can track them anywhere they go. And a vast majority of Americans have yet to learn how to Google what EMV is if they don't know what EMV is. They just assume "chip" = "contactless" = "news story of hackers stealing info wirelessly from a mile away" = "gubbmint is about to get me." FACEPALM

Heck, until recently, even credit card CSRs had no clue about the EMV chip and when asked about "chip cards" they immediately assumed it was the RFID contactless "chips." FACEPALM.

Scary, but true. In this age of 21st century, instantaneous Google searches, wikipedia and even Youtube videos they still are uninformed about how the rest of the world works.

Last edited by kebosabi; Sep 18, 2013 at 2:39 am
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 7:19 am
  #1853  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
Originally Posted by zowwie
Realistically it's going to take a BIG hotel bill (lots of points) abroad to make the 3% forex fee worthwhile.
Has anyone tested the "real" cost of the Forex fee recently?

I did my last test about 8-10 years ago. I had the Schwab "no forex fee" card and the Hhonors card "3% forex fee" with me when I was in Toronto. Needed to buy two tickets for entry into a museum, bought one with the Schwab Card, and the one with the Hhonors card, within seconds of each other, just to see what the impact was.

When the bills came, the amounts were practically equal, within a couple cents of each other. The Amex exchange rate was better than the FirstUSA one, so the 3% fee actually ended up canceling that out. So, at the time my conclusion was that those banks that waived the forex fees, essentially found a way to built those into their exchange rate conversions...

Of course, things may have changed since then, I haven't tested it in a while (and of course there is no Schwab card anymore)...

So, anyone has tried something comparable lately?
tuxster is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 8:58 am
  #1854  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by tuxster
I did my last test about 8-10 years ago...So, at the time my conclusion was that those banks that waived the forex fees, essentially found a way to built those into their exchange rate conversions
VISA, MC, and AMEX lost a class action lawsuit in hiding forex fees into the exchange rate. Those who were part of the class action lawsuit were able to retrieve their forex fees from VISA and MC a few years ago and recently from AMEX in a separate lawsuit.

Last edited by kebosabi; Sep 18, 2013 at 9:04 am
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 9:11 am
  #1855  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by cbn42
But then a larger number of gates would be needed. I don't think either London or Tokyo has figured out how to get two people go through a gate in opposite directions simultaneously.
Simultaneously is not necessary. Gate directions can be (and is) changed depending on the traffic flow for a given time in the day.

Looking at it from another perspective, it is in the public interest to incentivize longer trips on public transit, because longer car trips create more congestion than shorter trips. The 710 freeway to Long Beach is far more congested than Alameda Street to Little Tokyo.

Also, once a rider is on the train, there is very little marginal cost to allowing them to ride longer. Unless the train is full (unlikely in LA) the energy needed due to the rider's additional weight is negligible.



Right, because poor people control the PACs that fund the campaigns that get people elected.
Voters get candidates elected.
emvchip is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 10:03 am
  #1856  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Checked with CapOne just right now if their stance on EMV has changed and they still come back with the usual old cut-and-paste reply "merchants are required by VISA to use the magnetic stripe blah-blah-blah."

I wonder if CapOne really believes people are going to buy that excuse anymore when their competitors are issuing EMV chipped cards left and right, not just for int'l travelers, but also as a preparation for the 2015 EMV switchover.

In the past no one issued EMV cards. Now we have BofA, Chase, Citi, a bunch of credit unions and more recently AMEX issuing EMV on a mass scale (upon request or on a as-card-expires phase in). Clearly CapOne is in the minority now. You'd think they'd realize they're in the losing game in sticking their head in the sand that EMV ain't happening.

Last edited by kebosabi; Sep 18, 2013 at 10:15 am
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 10:33 am
  #1857  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Star Alliance Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by kebosabi
Checked with CapOne just right now if their stance on EMV has changed and they still come back with the usual old cut-and-paste reply "merchants are required by VISA to use the magnetic stripe blah-blah-blah."

I wonder if CapOne really believes people are going to buy that excuse anymore when their competitors are issuing EMV chipped cards left and right, not just for int'l travelers, but also as a preparation for the 2015 EMV switchover.

In the past no one issued EMV cards. Now we have BofA, Chase, Citi, a bunch of credit unions and more recently AMEX issuing EMV on a mass scale (upon request or on a as-card-expires phase in). Clearly CapOne is in the minority now. You'd think they'd realize they're in the losing game in sticking their head in the sand that EMV ain't happening.
Its really bizarre as well, Capital One were early on the EMV bandwagon in the UK. American Express was the slow one, about two years after the liability date.
reclusive46 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 10:41 am
  #1858  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by reclusive46
Its really bizarre as well, Capital One were early on the EMV bandwagon in the UK. American Express was the slow one, about two years after the liability date.
My thoughts exactly. CapOne was the one that advertised no forex fees and became one of the most popular cards for int'l travelers. You'd think they would be one of the first ones to get on board, especially considering how they have the experience in issuing EMV cards in Canada and the UK. Turns out, they're the last major holdout in the US while their competitors zoomed past by them.

One can only imagine the huge headache CapOne will face in the next 2 years when they have to massively re-issue cards all at once when EMV switchover takes place while their competitors are already planning ahead by upgrading cards upon request for early adopters and replacing current cards with EMV version as they are set to expire. Phasing in is cheaper and far less of a hassle than flick-of-the-switch mass replacement.

Last edited by kebosabi; Sep 18, 2013 at 10:46 am
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 5:50 pm
  #1859  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,934
Originally Posted by kebosabi
CapOne was the one that advertised no forex fees and became one of the most popular cards for int'l travelers.
But that was all in the past. In recent years, I haven't seen any of their ads mention that, I've only seen it mentioned recently by FTers. And in recent years, I'd say Chase has stolen the thunder from them, because of issuing zillions of different cards that earn real hotel points or real airline miles with no forex.

I myself don't remember those CapOne ads (were they TV? radio? print? online?), and it's Chase that I most associate in my mind with no forex cards.

And I get the impression that whoever at CapOne came up with the idea of no forex fees is not there any more, and no one who's there any more rearlly understands international travel in 2013. They're more interested these days in people "who want more cash" than people who travel internationally.

Originally Posted by kebosabi
You'd think they would be one of the first ones to get on board, especially considering how they have the experience in issuing EMV cards in Canada and the UK.
As does Amex the bank, yet they seemed to have just been second-last to the party.

So I'm not sure how much experience, by a completely different division, with EMV in another country has relevance to when it gets brought out here.

Besides, is it not possible that (internal to the bank) they had a bad experience with EMV rollout in one of those countries? And that that's souring them on going earlier than necessary over here?
sdsearch is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2013, 8:56 pm
  #1860  
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,580
Originally Posted by tuxster
Has anyone tested the "real" cost of the Forex fee recently?

I did my last test about 8-10 years ago. I had the Schwab "no forex fee" card and the Hhonors card "3% forex fee" with me when I was in Toronto. Needed to buy two tickets for entry into a museum, bought one with the Schwab Card, and the one with the Hhonors card, within seconds of each other, just to see what the impact was.

When the bills came, the amounts were practically equal, within a couple cents of each other. The Amex exchange rate was better than the FirstUSA one, so the 3% fee actually ended up canceling that out. So, at the time my conclusion was that those banks that waived the forex fees, essentially found a way to built those into their exchange rate conversions...

Of course, things may have changed since then, I haven't tested it in a while (and of course there is no Schwab card anymore)...

So, anyone has tried something comparable lately?
The exchange rates are set by the network (Visa, Mastercard, Amex, or Discover), not the issuer. Visa and Mastercard post their rates online, and they are essentially the same. The others might be different. If you want more accurate results, compare a no-forex fee Visa to a forex-fee Visa.
cbn42 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.