Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2020, 5:23 am
  #4516  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland
Programs: AY+ Platinum, SK Gold, BAEC Silver, airbaltic VIP, Radisson VIP
Posts: 6,531
Switzerland update:

New cases: 8616 (last 24 hoursj

Test positivity: 28%

Incidence: 762.5/100k
adrianlondon likes this.
florens is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 5:45 am
  #4517  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: M&S Elite+
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by 13901
November is almost upon us; does anyone know when Shapps' "Task Force" will release some recommendations for going beyond the current quarantine policy?
I don't think there is anything new out there. Certainly nothing in the papers. There is a BBC story today saying LHR has fallen behind CDG which is now Europes busiest. The same story mentions 1st December as the date Shapps wants to have testing in place.
DaveS is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 5:52 am
  #4518  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,237
Originally Posted by DaveS
I don't think there is anything new out there. Certainly nothing in the papers. There is a BBC story today saying LHR has fallen behind CDG which is now Europes busiest. The same story mentions 1st December as the date Shapps wants to have testing in place.
"Britain will be in the lead", ipse dixit.
LETTERBOY, ExpatExp and DaveS like this.
13901 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 6:50 am
  #4519  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC, Eurostar
Posts: 3,293
Originally Posted by 13901
November is almost upon us; does anyone know when Shapps' "Task Force" will release some recommendations for going beyond the current quarantine policy?
I don't think anything will come out of it with quick implementation. At the moment the UK government (and all the European ones) are thinking how they can lockdown without killing the economy in general (not just travel). Restricting population movements, including maybe the Christmas transhumance, is very high on the list of actions which will be taken.
alex67500 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 6:54 am
  #4520  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,237
Originally Posted by alex67500
I don't think anything will come out of it with quick implementation. At the moment the UK government (and all the European ones) are thinking how they can lockdown without killing the economy in general (not just travel). Restricting population movements, including maybe the Christmas transhumance, is very high on the list of actions which will be taken.
Oh, I'm setting the bar very low in terms of what they will propose. After all it's a "Task force" on travel without any experts from the travel industry.
13901 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 11:44 am
  #4521  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: AA platinum, BA gold, Star Alliance silver, Lotusmiles silver, Carlson gold
Posts: 24
transit via LHR and 1 day stay in the UK

I am a US citizen and am planning to finally rebook my return flights to NYC (using BA biz tix that were cancelled by BA and are good for rebooking). The route is TLV/LHR/NYC. I cannot find any UK govt website which officially states transiting through LHR is OK. Ideally, I would like to have a quick meeting at the airport with a London client, but if I do so, I will need to quarantine in the UK for 14 days. I read somewhere that if my final flight is brought forward, then the quarantine is shortened and I fly out. Can anyone help with these two options?
raquelle is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 12:02 pm
  #4522  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 17,915
Originally Posted by raquelle
I am a US citizen and am planning to finally rebook my return flights to NYC (using BA biz tix that were cancelled by BA and are good for rebooking). The route is TLV/LHR/NYC. I cannot find any UK govt website which officially states transiting through LHR is OK. Ideally, I would like to have a quick meeting at the airport with a London client, but if I do so, I will need to quarantine in the UK for 14 days. I read somewhere that if my final flight is brought forward, then the quarantine is shortened and I fly out. Can anyone help with these two options?
Hi,

Transit through LHR is good . You only need to quarantine in the UK until your flight to NYC leaves. ( I assume the meeting would be landside at LHR or in a nearby hotel) -not sure about having a meeting whilst in quarantine/self isolation though.

Regards

TBS
KARFA likes this.
The _Banking_Scot is online now  
Old Oct 28, 2020, 12:15 pm
  #4523  
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,514
Originally Posted by raquelle
I am a US citizen and am planning to finally rebook my return flights to NYC (using BA biz tix that were cancelled by BA and are good for rebooking). The route is TLV/LHR/NYC. I cannot find any UK govt website which officially states transiting through LHR is OK. Ideally, I would like to have a quick meeting at the airport with a London client, but if I do so, I will need to quarantine in the UK for 14 days. I read somewhere that if my final flight is brought forward, then the quarantine is shortened and I fly out. Can anyone help with these two options?
Originally Posted by The _Banking_Scot
Hi,

Transit through LHR is good . You only need to quarantine in the UK until your flight to NYC leaves. ( I assume the meeting would be landside at LHR or in a nearby hotel) -not sure about having a meeting whilst in quarantine/self isolation though.

Regards

TBS
You will find plenty of references in this thread where your post has been moved to confirming that a US citizen may transit in LHR on the way to the US and leave the UK without self-isolating for 14 days. However, if you are staying overnight you are expected to go straight to your hotel and back to the airport for your flight. I don't believe meeting your client during your stay is permitted (unless you can meet him/her airside during your transit) according to the rules.
littlefish and KARFA like this.
NewbieRunner is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 4:37 am
  #4524  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,821


Another grim set of figures for Thursday, which will inform the update on travel corridors due this evening. In that respect Jamaica is now 29.2 and Bonaire (etc) is effectively zero.
adrianlondon, YYCCL3 and wilsnunn like this.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 5:15 am
  #4525  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland
Programs: AY+ Platinum, SK Gold, BAEC Silver, airbaltic VIP, Radisson VIP
Posts: 6,531
Switzerland update:

New cases: 9386 (last 24 hoursj

Test positivity: 26.6% (22.7% on average for the last 14 days)

Incidence: 836.6/100k
adrianlondon likes this.
florens is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 5:45 am
  #4526  
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,514
14-day COVID-19 case notification rate per 100 000, weeks 42-43 (ECDC - map produced on 28 October 2020






Geographic distribution of 14-day cumulative number of reported COVID-19 cases per 100 000 population, worldwide, as of 29 October, 2020


NewbieRunner is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 6:52 am
  #4527  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,477
With the latest set of figures, copyright c-w-s, there is now no-where left in Europe (at least with some sort of viable entry policy for UK arrivals) under 100 - Greece being the closest having just tipped over that milestone today.

Given that the last Greek island was only very recently released from the self-isolation requirement, it appears inconceivable that it'll be removed from the travel corridor list for a while yet, meaning that 20 per 100k on the 7 day basis long since disappeared into the distance, and 100 per 100k on the 14 day measure is now heading the same way.

Denmark, again very recently added back, is at 165. Germany and Sweden are in that same ballpark. Extending the reasoning on Denmark should mean that none of those are under threat, although I'm aware it's probably more nuanced than that.

So where's the line now where questions begin to be asked? 200? That puts only Cyprus at risk this week, although it dipped down below that threshold again this morning.

There also don't seem to be any newspaper reports from Spad leaks of removals - something of a novelty recently, however inaccurate those leaks have turned out to be.

This is looking more like a status quo or even expansion of the corridor list week. Such small mercies ...
DaveS likes this.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 7:00 am
  #4528  
Hilton 10+ BadgeAccor 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Rhineland-Palatinate
Programs: *A Gold (A3), HHonor Gold
Posts: 5,699
And then some destination countries are not feasible except for some specific necessary travel. Germany bans all tourism stays for one month starting Monday for example.
DaveS likes this.
fransknorge is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 7:13 am
  #4529  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,016
Originally Posted by NWIFlyer
So where's the line now where questions begin to be asked? 200? That puts only Cyprus at risk this week, although it dipped down below that threshold again this morning.
The line seems to have gone up as cases went up in the UK, so maybe closer to the UK rate of 431.6?

You could make a comparison to Latvia. First they set the limit to 16, but there are no longer any European countries with a rate of less than 16, so the line was increased to allow entry from any countries with a rate lower than that of Latvia (82.7 in the most recent weekly assessment).

Currently the best performing countries seem to be Estonia, Finland and Norway. All other EEA countries are currently above 100. Estonia and Norway require pretty much everyone to quarantine and Finland doesn't let people in unless arriving on a leisure boat from a Schengen country.
Im a new user is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2020, 7:23 am
  #4530  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: M&S Elite+
Posts: 3,657
The Swiss approach quoted in another thread makes more sense and may be in practice what they are moving towards by chance or design. If they could do something like that it opens up many countries and crucially for some the USA.

Originally Posted by brunos
Very interesting approach indeed:

Criteria for the list

The new infections per 100 000 inhabitants over the past 14 days are examined to determine whether a country or an area has an increased risk of infection, If the incidence in a country is at least 60 higher than the incidence in Switzerland, the country will be added to the list.

Since the epidemiological situation is constantly changing, this list is regularly updated to take account of the current incidences. Data from the ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) is used to this end.

Areas bordering on Switzerland can be exempted from inclusion on the list despite a corresponding incidence of the new coronavirus. The reason for the greater differentiation applied in these cases is the close economic, social and cultural ties that exist with neighbouring countries. The incidence is then examined in individual areas rather than in the country as a whole.
lhrpete likes this.

Last edited by DaveS; Oct 29, 2020 at 7:39 am
DaveS is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.