How do you see travel being able to resume - new measures?
#76
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I don’t expect things to go back to normally any time this year even if flight availability improves tremendously by October.
With a 5-10% hit to GDP in a substantial set of countries, there is no quick and easy way to get back to normal .... especially when the gunpowder of monetary and fiscal stimulus will have been expended heavily already this spring.
I am betting it will be balkanized recoveries, but uncertainty is going to be strong probably even into late 2020/early 2021. And the lack of global coordination on so many levels is going to make for a messier recovery than if things had been done differently in and from January.
With a 5-10% hit to GDP in a substantial set of countries, there is no quick and easy way to get back to normal .... especially when the gunpowder of monetary and fiscal stimulus will have been expended heavily already this spring.
I am betting it will be balkanized recoveries, but uncertainty is going to be strong probably even into late 2020/early 2021. And the lack of global coordination on so many levels is going to make for a messier recovery than if things had been done differently in and from January.
#77
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: TPA for now. Hopefully LIS for retirement
Posts: 13,703
#78
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 722
I have a feeling America will be the last to lift restrictions.
#79
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 722
My own experience tells me its much more widespread. I felt terrible March 5-7. I mean really, really sick. I've had Pulmonary Embolisms, so I know what shortness of breath is. Headache, fever, terrible aches, exhausted, dry cough. There was no real testing here at all then. Even if I wanted to get tested, the 2 questions I would have had to answer YES to, were, 1. Did you travel out of the country, and 2. Have you been in contact with anyone testing positive... Seriously, how could # 2 have happened if no testing going on. DH, a couple mild symptoms. THEN, on March 8, the first 2 in my county tested positive. ( I think after having returned from New Orleans). It's been floating around here for quite awhile. And son in DTW, was sick Feb 28-March 2. Fever, exhaustion, sore throat. Went all around his place. Daughter and Son-in-law have both had symptoms, loss of smell/taste, shortness of breath, headache, fever. Son-in-law thinks it goes back to Atlanta Hawks game.They are in a different city in Tennessee. So, of my 5 immediate family members, I suspect ALL of us infected. We've all contacted the county health departments. Even if we wanted testing, what would it show? We would probably test negative.
So, my point is I think most would test positive for the antibody. And it would be actually harder to find someone with Active/Positive to invite to the party, if we've been more infected than we realize.
So, my point is I think most would test positive for the antibody. And it would be actually harder to find someone with Active/Positive to invite to the party, if we've been more infected than we realize.
#80
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 722
15 minute testing is already becoming available, and in my opinion will likely be the catalyst for some limited international travel to be possible. Tourists will be the last ones to likely get approved for international travel, but I foresee in late April or May testing begins for business and family/immigration travel to have restrictions lifted, but with the expectation departure and arrival testing plus self-quarantine restrictions. The best way to slowly get the travel industry back moving is to start some slow trials with essential travelers first, before you open the flood gates to tourism.
Anyone who thinks this will last until Fall, I don't think you quite understand the magnitude of travel being completely halted for months, and lockdowns continuing. It just can't happen without entire industries and even countries failing, and with current measures in place across the world, things will start to look better in a couple weeks time once the US and most Europeans countries peak and numbers start to fall. Sure, some poor 3rd world countries will struggle with it ,and their bans may continue until a vaccine is approved, but most governments will be going stir crazy wanting to open up travel to essential travelers, people wanting to be with loved ones, business and work travelers. It will cause a lot of social unrest if things continue the way they are now for too long. Governments have to balance safety not only from a deadly disase, but also safety of people having financial security.
Anyone who thinks this will last until Fall, I don't think you quite understand the magnitude of travel being completely halted for months, and lockdowns continuing. It just can't happen without entire industries and even countries failing, and with current measures in place across the world, things will start to look better in a couple weeks time once the US and most Europeans countries peak and numbers start to fall. Sure, some poor 3rd world countries will struggle with it ,and their bans may continue until a vaccine is approved, but most governments will be going stir crazy wanting to open up travel to essential travelers, people wanting to be with loved ones, business and work travelers. It will cause a lot of social unrest if things continue the way they are now for too long. Governments have to balance safety not only from a deadly disase, but also safety of people having financial security.
#81
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Travel restrictions from state to state is a very new thing for the US, and one that seems to be expanding. My own home state of North Carolina has not restricted travel yet, but two of our counties have. Dare County which includes most of the Outer Banks set up roadblocks a couple of weeks ago and only allow residents into the county. Next door Hyde County followed a few days later but only as to Ocracoke Island, also on the Outer Banks. Unlike Dare, Hyde is not restricting entry to the mainland portion of the county. Dare and Hyde have no cases of the C-virus as yet. I read where Rhode Island is stopping cares with NY license plates and going house to house looking for New Yorkers. I also read where NY is talking about suing states that block entry of their citizens.
I could see a federal judge putting a stop to these travel restrictions within the US, but if not, at some point past the peak of the virus the restrictions will have to be removed. There will be economic pressure to do that. The Outer Banks economy is based on tourism and summer is their high season. The group that will be most economically vulnerable will be the owners of the many "mini-hotels", the 10 and 12 bedrooms homes that line the ocean front, which are virtually all rentals. Most of them do not cash flow now, or barely do so. People buy them on the "bigger fool" theory that a bigger fool will come along and pay an even higher price for them. The 2008 travel disruption just from the economic downturn led to many foreclosures of these houses, so the total ban for a couple of months in the spring rental market may send more of them over the edge financially. Anyone looking to buy such a property may have some good buying opportunities coming up.
I could see a federal judge putting a stop to these travel restrictions within the US, but if not, at some point past the peak of the virus the restrictions will have to be removed. There will be economic pressure to do that. The Outer Banks economy is based on tourism and summer is their high season. The group that will be most economically vulnerable will be the owners of the many "mini-hotels", the 10 and 12 bedrooms homes that line the ocean front, which are virtually all rentals. Most of them do not cash flow now, or barely do so. People buy them on the "bigger fool" theory that a bigger fool will come along and pay an even higher price for them. The 2008 travel disruption just from the economic downturn led to many foreclosures of these houses, so the total ban for a couple of months in the spring rental market may send more of them over the edge financially. Anyone looking to buy such a property may have some good buying opportunities coming up.
In MN some of the rural areas have been trying to discourage urban dwellers from coming to their second homes/cabins and also saying that if you're coming, please bring your own groceries and other necessities so as to avoid stressing the supply chain in local stores. It seems like a mixed message to beg "vacationers" not to spend money in the local economy.
#82
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Thats the issue at hand, that there are asymptomatic spreaders, and hence social distancing for the entire country because we can't test every single individual in the US. The question that follows with what you have asked is why do we test in the first place? For a test that confirms an active infection, the purpose would be to diagnose and guide treatment. For a test that shows a previous anti-body response, it just gathers data of past response to an infection which can be used for epidemiology purposes. I agree, the more clinically useful one is the one that confirms an active infection.
The perfect world would be to test the entire population, and isolate the active individuals who are both symptomatic and asymptomatic. Due to an imperfect world, social distancing/self quarantine is the best that we have for the entire population due to resource constraints. Tests can help guide physicians to make the proper diagnosis and treatment plan for the front line staff.
The perfect world would be to test the entire population, and isolate the active individuals who are both symptomatic and asymptomatic. Due to an imperfect world, social distancing/self quarantine is the best that we have for the entire population due to resource constraints. Tests can help guide physicians to make the proper diagnosis and treatment plan for the front line staff.
Testing everyone, whether for asymptomatic infection or acquired immunity, is the equivalent of asking everyone to be a human subject with no Institutional Review Board approval procedures, no informed consent, and no possible compensation.
Similarly, those here who are suggesting that all airline passengers (and crew, I would hope) be tested should ask themselves whether they would want TSA or most countries' low-level airport employees to perform somewhat invasive and unpleasant medical procedures, including drawing blood from a huge number of healthy-appearing individuals. For instance, think how difficult it is to get a TSA employee to put on clean gloves before doing a pat-down search or touching and digging through carry on items that will later be handled or worn by the passenger.
#83
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,038
I think we should be realistic about how fast a vaccine can be developed and tested. Read this:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...months-show-me
Some excerpts:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...months-show-me
Some excerpts:
#84
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 237
I disagree in part because by September, there will still be people dying. Restrictions are like gas station prices. With gas prices, they shoot up when the price of oil goes up but are slower to drop when the price of oil drops.
#85
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 42.1% in PDX , 49.9% in PVG & 8% in the air somewhere
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite, UA 1K, AS MVP GLD 75K, DL Pt
Posts: 1,086
I suspect the Southern Hemisphere will be moving into fall/winter and we should assume Brazil and Africa will become the exploding case. Hard to believe we won't implement very restrictive motions and travel by country we managed each individually.
#87
formerly wchinchen
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Honolulu
Programs: AA CK, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,290
I have a problem with requiring testing unless the test results can and will be used to guide treatment or otherwise benefit the patient. IMO it's OK to test when someone is being admitted to the hospital so that one knows whether PPE is required and whether the person should be put into a ward with other COVID-19 cases, but for mild symptoms, the best medical advice is simply to self quarantine and perhaps take some OTC medicines to relieve symptoms.
Testing everyone, whether for asymptomatic infection or acquired immunity, is the equivalent of asking everyone to be a human subject with no Institutional Review Board approval procedures, no informed consent, and no possible compensation.
Similarly, those here who are suggesting that all airline passengers (and crew, I would hope) be tested should ask themselves whether they would want TSA or most countries' low-level airport employees to perform somewhat invasive and unpleasant medical procedures, including drawing blood from a huge number of healthy-appearing individuals. For instance, think how difficult it is to get a TSA employee to put on clean gloves before doing a pat-down search or touching and digging through carry on items that will later be handled or worn by the passenger.
Testing everyone, whether for asymptomatic infection or acquired immunity, is the equivalent of asking everyone to be a human subject with no Institutional Review Board approval procedures, no informed consent, and no possible compensation.
Similarly, those here who are suggesting that all airline passengers (and crew, I would hope) be tested should ask themselves whether they would want TSA or most countries' low-level airport employees to perform somewhat invasive and unpleasant medical procedures, including drawing blood from a huge number of healthy-appearing individuals. For instance, think how difficult it is to get a TSA employee to put on clean gloves before doing a pat-down search or touching and digging through carry on items that will later be handled or worn by the passenger.
On a philosophical and for debating purpose: As for testing the entire population, that will depend on the policy makers of the US if we ever come to that point for any communicable disease. Think, what if the Coronavirus was rather a hemorrhagic fever pathogen with a 3 week incubation period and a mortality rate between Coronavirus and less than Ebola? The entire world would be crippled for a very long time. We are quite lucky in that sense. The social distancing policy mandated by governors to close non-essential business in my opinion, is more intrusive to an individual than what the Coronavirus swab test will ever cause. The individual's benefit or harm is no longer considered when the greater good of society outweighs the individual's in situation like the current pandemic. Otherwise, mass mandates will never work. If people are willing to give up their paychecks for the greater good of the community during shut downs, then I doubt people would care much about personal health care privacy issues at hand for a coronavirus test that requires swabbing only, without a venous puncture.
As for going back on topic, I can see travelers having to show proof of negative Coronavirus testing before traveling or crossing borders. If domestically in the US, we are requiring a 14 day quarantine due to inter-state flying, how can we assume foreign countries wouldn't require even a more drastic disease free burden of proof before entering their countries? It will be interesting to see how opening borders will happen between all of the countries again. The US has the highest number of cases, and US travelers will probably have the highest restrictions before entering another country.
Travel will not be the same anymore until the profits come back for the airline industry. There won't be the same level of luxury soft products for a long time when airline companies are trying to financially survive. When people are losing jobs and wages, what matters in life will not be: the latest and greatest first class soft product, frequent flier miles, points, achieving the highest level of loyalty program, or the latest Instagram location. Unless you are on FlyerTalk. Drastic cuts to what we have been accustomed to will be the norm (ie. lounges, fast customer service....etc).
#88
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: LHR, LGW
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,436
So could you explain how this is different to what you describe? Apart from the incubation period you suggest. Are we not in a crisis when the world is entirely crippled right now? Again as you suggested. I ask as I’m very intrigued by people’s perspectives on this. It’s unprecedented and frankly chatting is good for everyone right now. Providing we are still isolating.
#89
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 722
The thing with dying will be the rate of new cases and new deaths. US and most of the Western world has implemented social distancing and other items. Assuming this we can turn the curve as many hope in 4 weeks and peak # of deaths ( can't believe we say it like that ).
I suspect the Southern Hemisphere will be moving into fall/winter and we should assume Brazil and Africa will become the exploding case. Hard to believe we won't implement very restrictive motions and travel by country we managed each individually.
I suspect the Southern Hemisphere will be moving into fall/winter and we should assume Brazil and Africa will become the exploding case. Hard to believe we won't implement very restrictive motions and travel by country we managed each individually.
#90
formerly wchinchen
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Honolulu
Programs: AA CK, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,290
We have been told 7-14 days to isolate and a few country’s are isolating for longer periods.
So could you explain how this is different to what you describe? Apart from the incubation period you suggest. Are we not in a crisis when the world is entirely crippled right now? Again as you suggested. I ask as I’m very intrigued by people’s perspectives on this. It’s unprecedented and frankly chatting is good for everyone right now. Providing we are still isolating.
So could you explain how this is different to what you describe? Apart from the incubation period you suggest. Are we not in a crisis when the world is entirely crippled right now? Again as you suggested. I ask as I’m very intrigued by people’s perspectives on this. It’s unprecedented and frankly chatting is good for everyone right now. Providing we are still isolating.
For any pathogen, there are two things to consider 1) how easy it is to pass to another person 2) How easily does it kill the host (how many days and the mortality rate).
Ebola passes through bodily fluids and can has a high and fast mortality rate, so even though its deadlier, its abit less easy to pass from one host to another due to the burn out rate ( the virus will limit itself due to how fast it kills it host). The host has less chance of spreading the virus/pathogen. Lets say there is a pathogen that can spread as easily as Coronavirus (bodily fluids and respiratory droplets), but has a 30% mortality rate that happens around 3-4 weeks after contracting the virus, this would be something the world hasn't seen yet. Lets imagine, the entire mucosal surface starts to leak blood because the virus attacks the capillary and vasculature. With a social media connected world, any images of a mass hemorrhagic fever like illness will cause mass panic. Unlike Coronavirus, the medical community who contracts hemorrhagic fever like illness won't be able to continue providing health care, which would cripple the health care system. Look at the personal protective gear required for a hemorrhagic fever versus Coronavirus. Totally different leagues of protection. The medical resources required to treat hemorrhagic fever will be a totally different ball game in itself. The fear that you have a 30% death rate will cause social instability (we still have essential services like grocery stores because the rate of death is low; can you imagine what happens if the mortality rate of Coronavirus jumped to 30%? who is going to be working at all?)
Another "what if scenario"....what if the disease is a prion with a mortality rate of near 100% within 2-5 years of contracting it? I would recommend researching about prions. When our spine surgeon colleagues operate on a positive Jakob Creutzfeldt patient, its a totally different ball game of disinfecting that operating room.