2010 OnePass Program Changes
#226
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,890
#227
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
I am referring to real travel agents when I say yes in answer to your question, not to the desk drones that you road warriors think are travel agents, thus leading to the corporate community bashing "travel agents" needlessly. Commissions on air tickets were pulled in 2000, IIRC, and are slowly making a very limited, very quiet and date-restricted comeback, and generally only on high-bucket front cabin fares booked with non-USA-based carriers. Again, this answer does not account for provisions of any corporate contract out there.
#228
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,890
I am referring to real travel agents when I say yes in answer to your question, not to the desk drones that you road warriors think are travel agents, thus leading to the corporate community bashing "travel agents" needlessly. Commissions on air tickets were pulled in 2000, IIRC, and are slowly making a very limited, very quiet and date-restricted comeback, and generally only on high-bucket front cabin fares booked with non-USA-based carriers. Again, this answer does not account for provisions of any corporate contract out there.
#229
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
#230
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Which is really piddle$hit compared to getting additional bookings.
It's interesting how this sort of minutae that Larry focused on is being unraveled here all around the time of his "departure." I completely understand the desire to save $5 a booking, and any beancounter can pull up an Excel and multiple $5 by the number of tickets sold. But if it was pushing away lucrative corporate customers, especially when their New York-area hub has other contenders, they were essentially biting off their nose to spite their face.
So the real question is, did it really cause them to lose enough business? After all, the policy was on the books for some 5-6 years, and without this UA linkup, they likely would not have revisited it.
#231




Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Portland, Maine
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, HYATT Globalist, HH Diamond, AA Plat Pro, MR Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,195
Read the following to get better informed about what *Gs -- excepting US/UA *Gs -- are currently entitled to in terms of departure lounge access even on domestic only Star Alliance flights:
http://www.staralliance.com/en/trave...ss-policy.html
I am counting on that last item above being changed to something like the following:
"*Continental, United and US Airways Star Alliance Gold customers may only access the CO PC, UA Red Carpet Club and US Airways Clubs within the U.S. when travelling in conjunction with a Star Alliance international flight."
The policy will remain that most Star Alliance carriers' *Gs (excepting CO/UA/US *Gs) will get access to the * Alliance carrier's lounges even when traveling only domestically on * airlines.
http://www.staralliance.com/en/trave...ss-policy.html
I am counting on that last item above being changed to something like the following:
"*Continental, United and US Airways Star Alliance Gold customers may only access the CO PC, UA Red Carpet Club and US Airways Clubs within the U.S. when travelling in conjunction with a Star Alliance international flight."
The policy will remain that most Star Alliance carriers' *Gs (excepting CO/UA/US *Gs) will get access to the * Alliance carrier's lounges even when traveling only domestically on * airlines.
OK I believe I have a NAZI Lounge agent stalking me.
I get this agent - usually a female, but now and again a male - who is at every lounge I try to enter when traveling on a *A first class reward ticket.
I get pushback ALL the time - do not know why.
Please clarify for me (If you know these answers - i realize we are waiting for more info about the Oct CO entrance to *A and need more details).
I book a economy class ticket on CO for travel only in the USA.
I have a PC membership.
Can I enter a *A lounge in the USA?
Can I enter a RCC lounge in USA?
Can I enter a US Air lounge in the USA?
Related question....
My wife was returning from a FRA to Washington D.C. to PWM on Luft and then onto United.
She was first class (not Bus class) from FRA to Washington, D.C. then economy washington to PWM.
NOTE: the Washington - PWM had NO seats so it was I guess called a vol. downgrade if I am correct.
She could use the fabulous LH lounge in FRA but once in the USA they would NOT let her enter either the LH lounge OR the UA lounge because she was done with the first class leg and now in "Economy" (not by choice) on this last leg in the regional jet.
Were they correct in denying access?
I thought as long as she had first class international tix, basically she could get into most any LH/UA/*A lounge during the same day of travel.
Please help.
#232
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Presently in ORD only. It's expected that all UA RCCs will be accessible in the future.
This has not been mentioned, and I personally don't expect it to happen.
My wife was returning from a FRA to Washington D.C. to PWM on Luft and then onto United.
She was first class (not Bus class) from FRA to Washington, D.C. then economy washington to PWM.
NOTE: the Washington - PWM had NO seats so it was I guess called a vol. downgrade if I am correct.
She could use the fabulous LH lounge in FRA but once in the USA they would NOT let her enter either the LH lounge OR the UA lounge because she was done with the first class leg and now in "Economy" (not by choice) on this last leg in the regional jet.
Were they correct in denying access?
I thought as long as she had first class international tix, basically she could get into most any LH/UA/*A lounge during the same day of travel.
She was first class (not Bus class) from FRA to Washington, D.C. then economy washington to PWM.
NOTE: the Washington - PWM had NO seats so it was I guess called a vol. downgrade if I am correct.
She could use the fabulous LH lounge in FRA but once in the USA they would NOT let her enter either the LH lounge OR the UA lounge because she was done with the first class leg and now in "Economy" (not by choice) on this last leg in the regional jet.
Were they correct in denying access?
I thought as long as she had first class international tix, basically she could get into most any LH/UA/*A lounge during the same day of travel.
Since she was not flying onwards in int'l Biz or First, she would not have access. Only if she were *G and used those credentials would she be able to use the "same day" rule. If she would have whipped out a *G card, she would've been admitted.
Also, a rule of thumb, if LH denied her access, they were probably correct. LH may be rigid, but they are always fair, are well trained, and play by the rules. If they denied her, it was most likely correct based on the credentials provided. If UA, US, or CO denied her, I would be more likely to question it. I have never run into a LH lounge attendant who was not well versed in every nuance of the *A lounge admittance policy.
#233
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,648
Which is really piddle$hit compared to getting additional bookings.
It's interesting how this sort of minutae that Larry focused on is being unraveled here all around the time of his "departure." I completely understand the desire to save $5 a booking, and any beancounter can pull up an Excel and multiple $5 by the number of tickets sold. But if it was pushing away lucrative corporate customers, especially when their New York-area hub has other contenders, they were essentially biting off their nose to spite their face.
So the real question is, did it really cause them to lose enough business? After all, the policy was on the books for some 5-6 years, and without this UA linkup, they likely would not have revisited it.
It's interesting how this sort of minutae that Larry focused on is being unraveled here all around the time of his "departure." I completely understand the desire to save $5 a booking, and any beancounter can pull up an Excel and multiple $5 by the number of tickets sold. But if it was pushing away lucrative corporate customers, especially when their New York-area hub has other contenders, they were essentially biting off their nose to spite their face.
So the real question is, did it really cause them to lose enough business? After all, the policy was on the books for some 5-6 years, and without this UA linkup, they likely would not have revisited it.
#234
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Programs: UA 1P, CO Plat, MR Plat, SPG Plat, US Dirt
Posts: 1,506
I think everyone is different. My corporate TA with AAA has said multiple times that they get no cut for selling continental or any other airline. They do charge a $40 fee per ticket booked as the agency fee but that includes a lot more services for us than just booking....
#235
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
I think everyone is different. My corporate TA with AAA has said multiple times that they get no cut for selling continental or any other airline. They do charge a $40 fee per ticket booked as the agency fee but that includes a lot more services for us than just booking....
#236
FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Some place in this wonderful world (usually at 39,000 ft in seat 1C)
Programs: CO Gold Elite / NW Gold Elite
Posts: 13,747
Besides as already noted (TA's to receive a small "booking fee") the GDS's are a very EXPENSIVE method of distribution, co.com is co's lowest cost method of distribution and I completely understand their desire to push traffic to it (very similar to Hilton's policy for earning points is designed to push traffic to their inhouse distribution channels)
#237
FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Some place in this wonderful world (usually at 39,000 ft in seat 1C)
Programs: CO Gold Elite / NW Gold Elite
Posts: 13,747
nope..airlines have been tough on TA's...hotels have been much more gentle to them
#238
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry9630/4.7.1.40 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)
CO PC members also have access to RCCs in SNA and PHX. That access actually pre-dates the ORD access by a bit.
Originally Posted by channa
Presently in ORD only. It's expected that all UA RCCs will be accessible in the future.
Last edited by sbm12; Sep 13, 2009 at 7:00 am
#239
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry9630/4.7.1.40 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)
The "fee" that TAs receive these days is from the customer, not the airline. So while the GDS distribution costs the airline a bit the TA commission no longer does.
I also think that the 50% thing is vastly overstated on FT in terms of impact on the traveling public. Most folks barely care at all about the miles and the status. CO changed it because of UA and that's fine and some folks here will benefit, but I firmly believe that they were not losing business in a significant enough capacity with the policy in place for it to have been bad for them.
Originally Posted by socrates
Besides as already noted (TA's to receive a small "booking fee")
I also think that the 50% thing is vastly overstated on FT in terms of impact on the traveling public. Most folks barely care at all about the miles and the status. CO changed it because of UA and that's fine and some folks here will benefit, but I firmly believe that they were not losing business in a significant enough capacity with the policy in place for it to have been bad for them.
Last edited by sbm12; Sep 13, 2009 at 7:06 am
#240
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry9630/4.7.1.40 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)
The "fee" that TAs receive these days is from the customer, not the airline. So while the GDS distribution costs the airline a bit the TA commission no longer does.
I also think that the 50% thing is vastly overstated on FT in terms of impact on the traveling public. Most folks barely care at all about the miles and the status. CO changed it because of UA and that's fine and some folks here will benefit, but I firmly believe that they were not losing business in a significant enough capacity with the policy in place for it to have been bad for them.
The "fee" that TAs receive these days is from the customer, not the airline. So while the GDS distribution costs the airline a bit the TA commission no longer does.
I also think that the 50% thing is vastly overstated on FT in terms of impact on the traveling public. Most folks barely care at all about the miles and the status. CO changed it because of UA and that's fine and some folks here will benefit, but I firmly believe that they were not losing business in a significant enough capacity with the policy in place for it to have been bad for them.
Based on what CO has announced this week, it's apparent that CO thinks that even marginally turning off customers -- or leaving customers turned off -- as before the status miles liberalization has cost or would cost CO business that CO can ill afford to lose this year or next year.

