A return to Maui [threads merged]
#31
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,121
#32
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,121
Not right now for new route EWR-KEF. Maybe someday in the future.
#33
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,121
#34




Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CLE,OH
Programs: UA 1K 3MM, AA Plat, F9 Elite, the later two thanks to Jeff $, HHdia, Mgold, WynDia, Choicepl, IHGDia
Posts: 1,405
CLE-LAX-HNL One stop 737-9ER
#35
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
The flight crew will be CLE-based so that is an option. I suppose they could also bring the crew in on a different 737 and switch them onto a plane that is operating on EWR-LAX or IAH-LAX, too. Actually, I think they'll have to do that unless they are going to have two different CLE-LAX 73E flights; they need one for LAX-OGG, too. I'd bet on a direct single flight number EWR-(LAX)-OGG if they tried to do something like that.
#36
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,121
#37
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS Titanium, Marriott Lifetime Plat, UA Gold
Posts: 11,594
hmmm, pulling the 752s for possible transcon duty or more European routes?
How full are the LAX-HNL flights right now? Maybe they figure they are not losing too much revenue by not having the BF seats.
How full are the LAX-HNL flights right now? Maybe they figure they are not losing too much revenue by not having the BF seats.
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL Diamond, B6 Mosaic, AS MPV Gold, UA Gold MM, Marriott Plat, SPG Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite
Posts: 16,679
#39



Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FUK/Fukuoka
Programs: AS, HA, JL, UA
Posts: 753
CO should try SEA/PDX/SFO/SAN-HNL with 739 to feed Guam service.
#41
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: CLE
Posts: 9,816
You guys are all worried about EUAs and the first thing I'm wondering about is the performance of a 739 on the short runway in OGG!
Does anyone else fly a 737 into/outta OGG? Alaska yet? Aloha must have, but IRRC they had -700s. Will be interesting to see the performance of a -900 on the short runway going back to LAX.
Don't see any of this loaded in the res system yet, but if indeed it is August start, it would have to be coming in soon.....
A OGG layover would be a nice addition to the mix!
DRW
Does anyone else fly a 737 into/outta OGG? Alaska yet? Aloha must have, but IRRC they had -700s. Will be interesting to see the performance of a -900 on the short runway going back to LAX.
Don't see any of this loaded in the res system yet, but if indeed it is August start, it would have to be coming in soon.....
A OGG layover would be a nice addition to the mix!
DRW
#42
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SAT
Programs: UA Premier Silver
Posts: 3,682
I hope the fares are reasonable, I wouldn't mind making a MR out of the new service.
#43
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,227
#44




Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CLE
Programs: UA GS+LT UC, AA EXP+LT PLT, Fairmont LT PLT, Marriott PLT, Hilton DIA, Hyatt Glob, Avis CHM
Posts: 4,889
#45


Join Date: May 2006
Location: STL
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Platinum Pro, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,494
The flight crew will be CLE-based so that is an option. I suppose they could also bring the crew in on a different 737 and switch them onto a plane that is operating on EWR-LAX or IAH-LAX, too. Actually, I think they'll have to do that unless they are going to have two different CLE-LAX 73E flights; they need one for LAX-OGG, too. I'd bet on a direct single flight number EWR-(LAX)-OGG if they tried to do something like that.
If LAXOGG couldnt work on a 752, I don't see how it would be worth spending an entire 73E when that could be allocated to something else. While the fare environment has changed significantly since TZ/AQ have left the market, connectivity seems to be the key since it would have to rely solely on local traffic unless it moves later as LAXHNL has to connect from the hubs.


