Community
Wiki Posts
Search

G*D Save "The Queen", except on CO Flights

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 11:02 am
  #16  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,251
I can't imagine the CO inflight services group has enough time on their hands to go through each movie and check-off a list of words to dub out. I think they rely on their outside vendor to supply inflight entertainment that meets set standards and criteria.

I think our wrath should be targeted at this vendor - there is absolutely no possible reason I can think of for censoring the word "God" in this context. If our society has become so prissy that we cannot use the word "God" within a privately funded and distributed form of entertainment, then we are really all nuts.

There are really so many more things that people could and should get bent out of shape about (global warming, war and conflict, poverty, disease, etc.); to put all this effort into where the word God appears or how to wish someone a happy holiday or what kind of decorations are appropriate and non-threatening is really silly.

I had the name of the inflight entertainment vendor before, when I went looking for a copy of the Hawaii boarding video, but I can't seem to find it now. Perhaps someone knows who they are and we can inquire what their thinking was to censor this word?
bocastephen is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 12:07 pm
  #17  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Siesta Key, Florida
Programs: UA GS4Life, AF/KL Lifetime Plat, BA Gold, AA 1MM, IC Diamond RA, Hyatt Humorist, Bonv Plat, et alia
Posts: 2,741
Removed; misposted
vsevolod4 is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 2:01 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: DL MM/FC/FO; UA PS; AA GLD
Posts: 2,063
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I think our wrath should be targeted at this vendor - there is absolutely no I had the name of the inflight entertainment vendor before, when I went looking for a copy of the Hawaii boarding video, but I can't seem to find it now. Perhaps someone knows who they are and we can inquire what their thinking was to censor this word?
This is from the thread in the AA forum. I don't know if its helpful for the CO discussion, or not:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showt...=646349&page=4

post #46

My company manages the IFE content for American Airlines, along with many of the top tier airlines today. Each airline makes its own decisions concerning censorship of audio and video content. We implement those decisions when we encrypt the content for release.

The actual censored passages are removed by humans and not merely by software filters. There is a great amount of post-production that goes into formatting a video for airline use. Each airline has their own standards (QF is rather lenient, AA is rather conservative).

I hope this bit of information is helpful.
sushibear is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 7:25 pm
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,251
Originally Posted by sushibear
This is from the thread in the AA forum. I don't know if its helpful for the CO discussion, or not:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showt...=646349&page=4

post #46

My company manages the IFE content for American Airlines, along with many of the top tier airlines today. Each airline makes its own decisions concerning censorship of audio and video content. We implement those decisions when we encrypt the content for release.

The actual censored passages are removed by humans and not merely by software filters. There is a great amount of post-production that goes into formatting a video for airline use. Each airline has their own standards (QF is rather lenient, AA is rather conservative).

I hope this bit of information is helpful.
Great information....so it seems our question really should be directed at CO after all. So, did CO specifically request the word "God" be removed from "The Queen", or is the word "God" on their permanent IFE blacklist?

Interesting to find out from that referenced post that CO is not the only airline that seems to find the word "God" offensive and worthy of censuring
bocastephen is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 2:45 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: DL MM/FC/FO; UA PS; AA GLD
Posts: 2,063
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Great information....so it seems our question really should be directed at CO after all. So, did CO specifically request the word "God" be removed from "The Queen", or is the word "God" on their permanent IFE blacklist?

Interesting to find out from that referenced post that CO is not the only airline that seems to find the word "God" offensive and worthy of censuring
I don't have a clue whether the AA post has any relevance to CO, but one of the most important issues on the AA thread was that the word "homosexual" was bleeped, and AA prides itself on being "the gay-friendly airline." Their record hasn't been so good lately.
sushibear is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2007 | 2:18 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, UA Million Miler
Posts: 2,596
I just saw this on CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Movi....ap/index.html
BigPoppaCO is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2007 | 2:53 pm
  #22  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,251
Originally Posted by BigPoppaCO
That's almost funny Well, at least the dufus didn't lose his job over this, but he certainly deserves a slap upside the head.

Given CO's habit of resurrecting long dead movies from the grave, I wonder what this censor would have done if CO requested a copy of "Oh God!" with George Burns. No audio and little black boxes over the actors' mouths?

So two mysteries solved - it appears CO gets their movies from a different company than the one which produces their custom inflight programming and Hawaii boarding videos.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 8:06 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United LT-GS, AA LT-Plat, Hyatt LT-Globalist, Hilton LT-Diamond, Marriott LT-Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 15,840
I saw the movie yesterday flying from EWR to LAX. Interestingly, when Her Majesty used this word, it survived; however, the Almighty didn't. [She used the term when the vehicle she was driving broke down]. Given the various ways in which the word could have been used, I imagine that it should have been censored too.
ContinentalFan is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 11:35 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Programs: LH Frequent Traveller, BA Silver
Posts: 74
How about us former colonial subjects who are offended by the "Queen"?!

Off with her head, I say...
Delhi Flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.