Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Continental to Moscow

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2004, 7:59 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ATL/MOO (Many Others Often)
Programs: DL GM (2MM), Lifetime Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,456
Continental to Moscow

According to The Moscow Times, it looks like EWR to DME could happen next year. This would be a great way to get into Russia's best airport (DME). See http://www.themoscowtimes.com/storie...11/02/042.html for details

Last edited by woody125; Nov 1, 2004 at 8:00 pm Reason: Speling Eror
woody125 is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004, 9:26 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 140
Continental has yet to submit an application to Russian civil aviation authorities, but Gennady Chernov, deputy head of the Federal Air Transportation Agency, said the airline should not encounter any difficulty.

"They just have to submit their flight schedule. Under a bilateral agreement they have the right to operate to Russia," Chernov said. A 1994 agreement lets the United States designate up to six airlines and Russia up to nine to operate between the two countries.

how come they get 9 and we get only 6?? do they even have 9 national airlines? we should have shown more muscle ..
smoothtakeoff bumpylanding is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004, 10:44 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA 1K, AA 2MM, Bonvoy LT Plt, Mets fan
Posts: 5,073
Originally Posted by smoothtakeoffbumpylanding
how come they get 9 and we get only 6?? do they even have 9 national airlines? we should have shown more muscle ..
What US airlines would even be interested in the route? DL flies to SVO; now CO's going in. UA? AA? Maybe - but only both, not just one! NW? Why? US, WN, B6, F9?

The only way this hurts the US is if the cargo carriers count towards the 6. Then, with Fedex, UPS & DHL, it starts to tighten up.

Can you even name 9 Russian airlines?



EDITED 11/2 to remove the reference to DL abandoning SVO, since even after it was pointed out and acknowledged 2 other posters bulked up the thread by repeating it...

Last edited by CO FF; Nov 2, 2004 at 1:47 pm
CO FF is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004, 11:50 pm
  #4  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: EWR (Wayne Township, NJ) and PHX
Programs: CO OnePass Plat and SPG - Plat, Marriott Plat (don't use -it's a comp), AmericaWest CP
Posts: 4,810
Talking please...

Moscow is an up and coming city of Eastern Europe... FYI. Delta still flies the route once daily I believe, it was inherited from Pan American World Airways... (Although they do fly to SVO) I actually think for a short time they had a codeshare with Aeroflot in the early 90's. Currently they operate the flight with a 767-300. Continental has plans dating back to 1999 to operate to SVO or now SME with a 777, but I think they found more use for it somewhere else and the economic climate changed. Although They are planning on a 767 this time...


-Vincent
vincom is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 3:37 am
  #5  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, ex-BD Gold, SPG Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 2,040
I really look forward to this. DME is far superior to SVO, and for EWR is preferable to JFK. Though I haven't flown CO internationally, I can't imagine it offering a worse combination of service and comfort than DL (DL 30/31 JFK-SVO rank among my least comfortable [coach] transatlantic experiences, to be avoided if there is any convenient alternative).
chalf is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 8:23 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA 1K, AA 2MM, Bonvoy LT Plt, Mets fan
Posts: 5,073
Originally Posted by CO FF
What US airlines would even be interested in the route? DL tried and abandoned it
OOPS -- my bad. I searched SME, instead of SVO, and found that DL didn't fly JFK-SME...

Vincom - thanks for catching it.
CO FF is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 10:08 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,723
Originally Posted by CO FF
What US airlines would even be interested in the route? DL tried and abandoned it..
DL didn't abandon SVO -- since Pan Am's demise in '91 they've always served the ex-PA run from JFK.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 10:19 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: SFO
Programs: United 1K
Posts: 2,264
Excellent opportunity for CO. Moscow is a wonderful city.
jaguar is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 12:46 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ATL/MOO (Many Others Often)
Programs: DL GM (2MM), Lifetime Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,456
9 Russian Airlines? I'll try...

Originally Posted by CO FF
Can you even name 9 Russian airlines?
1.Aeroflot
2.Pulkovo (based out of St. Pete and hopes to fly to the U.S. next summer)
3.Siberian Air (#1 domestic airline in Russia and #2 internationally, acquiring Airbus A310s as we speak)
4.Transaero (flies only Boeing aircraft and used to service NY, LA and one or two other US cities)
5.KrasAir (leasing non-Russian aircraft by the boat load right now, flies to numerous cities in Germany and charters all over)
6.DalAvia (not worth mentioning other than they do fly from the Far East of Russia into Japan)
7.Domodedevo Airlines (based out of DME with a nice network inside Russia)
8.Rossiya (President Putin's company of choice...flies only charters right now but will start some commercial flights in 05)
9.Vladivostok Air Company (flies only Russian Tupulovs but is trying to get permission to fly from Vladivostok to the west coast of the U.S, probably Los Angeles, which is only possible via Korean Air with a stop at ICN right now)
woody125 is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 12:51 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ATL/MOO (Many Others Often)
Programs: DL GM (2MM), Lifetime Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,456
Originally Posted by CO FF
What airlines would even be interested in the route? DL tried and abandoned it
Delta has flown continuously from JFK to SVO since the Pan Am buy out in the early 90s. At one time they had daily flights from FRA to SVO as well as the non-stop from the US. They also flew some from Warsaw and FRA to LED. While they only fly from JFK to SVO right now, they only fly full aircraft. The article I mentioned above has the Delta station manager in Russia saying Delta is looking at expanding their service into Moscow.

In coach, it is the bottom of Delta's deep barrel. Shoot for J at all costs!
woody125 is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 5:08 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Central Florida
Programs: Bonvoy-Gold, HH-Gold, UA-Gold, *A-Gold
Posts: 2,043
Originally Posted by CO FF
The only way this hurts the US is if the cargo carriers count towards the 6. Then, with Fedex, UPS & DHL, it starts to tighten up.
DHL is German. It is owned by Deutsch Post. It is not US owned. Airborne Express was US owned but DHL bought them, so they are now German.

Also Aeroflot plans to join SkyTeam, so CO may be looking to link up with the capital so that they can partner to Aeroflot's network.

- HF

Last edited by HobokenFlyer; Nov 2, 2004 at 5:10 pm
HobokenFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004, 5:32 pm
  #12  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, ex-BD Gold, SPG Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 2,040
Originally Posted by HobokenFlyer
DHL is German. It is owned by Deutsch Post. It is not US owned. Airborne Express was US owned but DHL bought them, so they are now German.

Also Aeroflot plans to join SkyTeam, so CO may be looking to link up with the capital so that they can partner to Aeroflot's network.

- HF
I thought that US airlines could not be majority foreign owned. ISn't the DHL ownership structure such that it is still formally US owned, at least within the US?
chalf is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2004, 2:01 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MOW
Programs: KLM Flying Dutchman forever, bmi Diamond Club (is there a theme here?), LH, BA, EK, DL nobody
Posts: 1,877
Apparently, CO said today they would not start flying to DME until 2006. http://news.morningstar.com/news/DJ/...INE000480.html

Last edited by apoivre; Dec 8, 2004 at 2:40 am
apoivre is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2004, 3:58 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: Alaska Airlines, CO Emeritus, United kettle, Ural Airlines Wings, Hilton, National
Posts: 979
Originally Posted by chalf
I thought that US airlines could not be majority foreign owned. ISn't the DHL ownership structure such that it is still formally US owned, at least within the US?
Seattle-based Airborne Inc. said its shareholders have approved the proposed sale of its Airborne Express ground shipping business to DHL Worldwide Express Inc., the American subsidiary of Germany's Deutsche Post.


Airborne said at least 30.9 million shares, or 63.4 percent of those outstanding, were voted in favor of the transaction.

The company in March announced the deal with DHL, which would pay Airborne shareholders $21.25 per share in cash, valuing the




DHL is completely controlled by Deutsche Post. You are right that they use the subsidiary to allow them to fly here, (through a sort of loophole.) Even that loophole required a horrific lobbying blitz in Washington in order for it to be allowed.

I think their populist/competition ads are cute, but do not let them fool you, the German people were abused for decades when Deutsche Post had a monopoly on the German market. (2$ for a local letter etc. etc... ) In reality
DHL is German "payback" for American incursion of UPS and FedEx in the '70s 80's and 90's.
Derrico is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2004, 6:14 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: south of WAS DC
Posts: 10,131
CO has a business class fare 50day/7 day IAD-MOW for under $2500. Lots of partners take the second half from western europe.
slawecki is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.