Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Embarrassed by CO

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 12:39 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by reinballe
They were denied boarding in Quebec... but I do not know which city in Quebec. I assumed they meant Quebec City, but it might have been Montreal.
I see. I'm a little surprised, frankly, because I fly this route a lot, and there are, obviously, frequent delays. Most of the passengers connect at EWR and I have always heard the local YQB staff tell passengers about to miss their connections that they will need to make the change at EWR. Similarly, I would be astonished if anyone working for the airport authority of YQB would even have access to Marriott hotel vouchers at EWR.

But let's assume the IDB/VDB did take place at YQB, and I'll assume it was YQB, because CO is the only one who flies YQB-EWR. Anyone who would fly from YUL would almost certainly say Montreal.

In this case, while I am not defending what may have happened (and let's take the women at their word for the moment and assume they were not confused, despite their age) is that the contractors at YQB simply didn't have access to all the CO guidelines, nor sufficient training.

Remember, the people who work the counters at YQB process passengers for 11 carriers, and I am quite sure they don't receive nearly the kind of in-depth training from each one that this kind of IrrOps would require.

I'm not saying that's a good thing, but it's an inevitable consequence of this kind of system.

If the reroutes were really done at YQB I believe the women in question could probably receive compensation from WE CARE, since basic CO procedures weren't followed..of course, these women have long since vanished, unless one of them is a long-term lurker here in FT
TWA Fan 1 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 12:55 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 392
Two Sides to Every Story

It amazes me, but doesn't surprise me, that many of you forget the elementary school game of Telephone.

I hope they decide to either "tar & feather" or "draw & quarter" the alleged perpetrator of this fraudulent act.
Don'tGoThere is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:08 pm
  #18  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tucson, Southern Arizona, North America, Western Hemisphere, The Earth, a small planet in the solar system. Previously OnePass Infinite Platinum Elite, now over entitled 1K
Posts: 2,293
If they were bumped from a Jungle Jet compensation might not be required.

http://airconsumer.dot.gov/publicati...tm#overbooking

If the airline must substitute a smaller plane for the one it originally planned to use, the carrier isn't required to pay people who are bumped as a result. In addition, on flights using aircraft with 30 through 60 passenger seats, compensation is not required if you were bumped due to safety-related aircraft weight or balance constraints.
Old Gold is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:12 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by Old Gold
If they were bumped from a Jungle Jet compensation might not be required.

http://airconsumer.dot.gov/publicati...tm#overbooking
The compensation others were discussing is a matter of CO policy, not DOT regulations...
TWA Fan 1 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:13 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by Don'tGoThere
It amazes me, but doesn't surprise me, that many of you forget the elementary school game of Telephone.

I hope they decide to either "tar & feather" or "draw & quarter" the alleged perpetrator of this fraudulent act.

While this is true, the perception that was left with the customer(s) still remains. The fact that they felt mistreated and were willing to say such to a complete stranger is a consequence of how CO handled the situation, whatever it may have been.
channa is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:18 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by Old Gold
If they were bumped from a Jungle Jet compensation might not be required.

http://airconsumer.dot.gov/publicati...tm#overbooking

There are rules and there is what companies do.

Most carriers use the usual DB compensation rules for their non-DB required flights just because they don't want additional regulation on the matter.

Also, it's some carriers provide VDB-level compensation to IDBs who are not entitled to compensation (due to arrival within 1 hour to final destination) as a customer service gesture.
channa is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:27 pm
  #22  
Moderator: Avis and Rental Cars
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,070
Sounds a lot like my coworker's situation where he was offered $200 for a IDB. After pushing, he was offered $117 cash or a $300 voucher. I haven't seen him in a few weeks to get an update on the situation.
IAHtraveler is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:41 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,689
Originally Posted by elll
I don't doubt that they answered no. I believe they thought they were treated unfairly. I question whether they really were.

I work for an elderly person (79 years old), and regularly interact with other elderly people. They don't always realize what they have, or what they were told. They may have been given a travel voucher, but didn't understand what they were given.

My boss, who is infinite platinum and 1 million miler, doesn't always understand what GAs or PClub staff tell him. He comes back to the office telling me something that I know not to be true and have to go into co.com to find proof that he's wrong.

That's why I think these women didn't understand what they were given. If I'm wrong, CO needs to find the person who shorted them.
The problem is that they were IDB'd and therefore should have been given cash. Most people remember getting cash no matter how old they are. Perhaps they were given vouchers and they don't remember that, but, if so, CO violated the law.
rjque is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:43 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,541
If the YQB staff did not know how to issue ETCs and Vouchers, they would HAVE to call the Help Desk for this, since the ladies already received meal + hotel vouchers, there is no excuse for no IDB compensation to be issued...

I am waiting for the OP to PM me so we can get the ball rolling on an investigation or CoInsider can be contacted via telephone to deal with this one.
usa18dca is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 1:51 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by IAHtraveler
Sounds a lot like my coworker's situation where he was offered $200 for a IDB. After pushing, he was offered $117 cash or a $300 voucher. I haven't seen him in a few weeks to get an update on the situation.

The combined carrier will have to be very careful. If they're the largest carrier, they'll probably be under more scrutiny than before, so if they play shady games, the fines and oversight could be a lot more impacting.
channa is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 2:54 pm
  #26  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SFO/JFK
Programs: UA 1P MM, AA-PP, AS, DL
Posts: 2,060
I have seen CO do this twice in the year I have been flying them since they joined *A. Once at IAH on a flight to MGA and the other on a flight from MGA to IAH. The IAH time was an elderly lady whom only spoke Spanish. GA was denying her boarding telling her, in english, that she would have to wait until the evening flight (this was the morning departure for MGA, with only 2 a dat). The agent gave her a boarding pass and sent her on her way. Standing next to the podium and heard everything that transpired. Followed the lady and asked her what had happened and what she was given, Nada! Went back to the agent and asked why the lady had not been compensated due to an IBD. There was alot of back and forth-who are you? none of your business-what do you know about IBD?-none of your business-where are you seated?-none of your business. In the end I asked for a supervisor to rectify the situation. Got sweet old lady $400.00, meal vouchers and parked her in the PC in E terminal. We are still friends to this day, she even invited me for dinner in her modest house in Mayasa. 2nd time something very alike, only part of a missionary group in MGA.

All of this left a very poor taste in my mouth and dim view of CO which I still have to this day. Everyone on this board talks poorly of UA's compensation but I have never heard of these low, underhanded preying on unsuspecting people on UA. I have found UA plays by the rules in these situations.
zoegksf is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 3:55 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: retired from SFO Terminal 3
Posts: 7,437
Originally Posted by channa
CO can do some shady things sometimes.

I've seen CO IDB people because they want to remain chintzy on the VDB comp.

I've also seen CO try to weasel out of comp when in an DB situation when they had a couple who wanted to fly together and needed only 1 VDB.


We are allowed to IDB if no one takes the VDB.

We also will not pay out for more seats than we need. If we only need one seat and you are a party of two, one will receive the VDB. If you don't like this then do not volunteer.
sfogate is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 3:59 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: retired from SFO Terminal 3
Posts: 7,437
I have no idea if the OP knows the whole correct story but there is no excuse if these ladies did not receive what they are entitled to receive.

The rules on VDB and/or IDB are very straight forward for both the airlines and the consumer.
sfogate is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 4:01 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by sfogate
I have no idea if the OP knows the whole correct story
Correct. Before we all go berserk blaming people, there needs to be quite a bit more tangible information.
TWA Fan 1 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 5:22 pm
  #30  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: East Coast
Programs: UA 1k & MillM
Posts: 563
Originally Posted by sfogate
I have no idea if the OP knows the whole correct story...
Well. Obviously I do not know if they told me the truth, or if they had gotten certificates they were completely unaware of. But I believed them.

On the other hand, I am not sure why an representative would not grant them what they are entitled to.
  • I can imagine a rep being poorly informed (and non CO employee). Or taking a "short-cut" because the required vouchers/certificates where not on hand. That might explain why they were asked to sign they had volunteered, when they had not?
  • Would a rep have any incentives to pay out less than the entitled amount? Does it look bad on the rep's record if he/she pays out lots of compensation, or has a high number of IDBs (instead of VDBs)?

By the way they were very sweet.
- They said about Smisek that that he was a very young and handsome man . That was even after I told them he was from CO.
- They were initially very upset about airlines overbooking flights at all, but less so after I explained why airlines do it, and how it indirectly can lower the airfares we have to pay.
- The woman next to me also complained that her monthly expenses for health care (I think medicare premium) had gone up from (initially) $37 to $100+ this year. But accepted that price hikes of this magnitude are not unusual when one compares prices that are separated in time by 17 years!!!
reinballe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.