United and Continental Announce New Leadership Team
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,867
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,072
I'm not as concerned with boarding protocol. I'll get to board first, or close to first, in either scenario.
I'm more concerned with the overall culture towards Elites. Things like UA paying for hotels for 1Ks during unexpected overnights, or better call center accommodation during IRROPS. That's sort of stuff.
That's mostly invisible to the general public and takes some of the pain/edge off of travel. UA gets this, and I hope it continues.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
True, yes, but in infrequent (to me) instances. I've witnessed flights boarding that way but never been on one.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,867
How about non-elites getting the ICC all the time? You have NO IDEA waht a gigantic pain in the rear that is. I refuse to call UA support, which means that I only book UA if I have to. They would be really smart to let we *Gs in to :-: your :-: special call center.
ETA: If CO non-elites start getting India, they will raise hell.
ETA: If CO non-elites start getting India, they will raise hell.
#50
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central NJ
Programs: UA 1MM+ - Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 187
I'm not so sure of this. The joint solution - moving to the Star Alliance Common IT Platform hosted by Amadeus - would have conferred significant commercial benefits on both an intrinsic basis (to UA and CO) and extrinsic basis (in working with other Star partners). Given the deepening of the TATL joint venture, the growing importance of ancillary revenues, and soon-to-be expanded importance of United to the commercial offerings and value proposition of Star Alliance, I think an argument can be made that the merger may underscore, rather than forestall, the imperative to transition to the Common IT Platform.
I view the CIO decision to be based on this as CO will simply adopt the 'new' UA system. I am guessing that with the addition of CO requirements the project may extend longer than anticipated. I think this also goes along with the announcement to delay the move of the Ops center to Sears (can't get me to call it that) tower.
What concerns me is the E+ and ExPlus fallout from these decisions. I really want ExPlus on some of the EWR routes. specifically would love to see an ExPlus regional on EWR-MSP. They (CO) are competing against a a far superior product on DL (ie compass).
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SPI
Programs: AA Gold, UA LT Plat, Mar LTT
Posts: 18,147
Dave
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SPI
Programs: AA Gold, UA LT Plat, Mar LTT
Posts: 18,147
I hope they get rid of ICC and MCC, to be fair.
Dave
#53
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central NJ
Programs: UA 1MM+ - Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 187
I was on a flight from MSP to ORD and the GA said that 100% of plane was elite (I didn't buy that, but I bet it was a large majority) and they were going to board by row. and yes, this was since they implemented the boarding groups.
I can tell you that everyone in the boarding area was pissed. It took 3x to board because everybody had 2 bags. So many checked luggage that day.
#54
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
I think that this explains a lot of why there is disagreement on the forum here. I'm always looking out for myself but I'm also interested in what the carrier does on a much broader level to take care of everyone. CO seems to have a narrower range of "service" offered but the bottom end is higher than the bottom end at UA. Strange as it may sound, I'd rather the company top out at 90 rather than 100 if it bottoms out at 40 instead of 10. I actually think that represents a better operation for both me and others in the long term.
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
Given that I will be going back to general nobody in March, I'm concerned with the opposite. There are frequent reports of UA frontline staff being pretty much unconcerned with anyone below 1K. I have not experienced this, but I have experienced the minimum of hospitality provided by CO for many years now. Make me feel like you're thankful that I'm there. That's not asking for a lot.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,072
I'm sure it'll all get worked out over time, but in the interim, but until everything is fully merged, it's generally going to be better to stay on your home carrier as much as possible.
ETA: If CO non-elites start getting India, they will raise hell.
Seriously, though, while we don't know what contracts UA has in place with the ICC, it would be nice if the combined carrier was committed to having USA agents for everyone over time. DL realized their mistake and brought it back in. UA can do the same here.
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,072
I think that this explains a lot of why there is disagreement on the forum here. I'm always looking out for myself but I'm also interested in what the carrier does on a much broader level to take care of everyone. CO seems to have a narrower range of "service" offered but the bottom end is higher than the bottom end at UA. Strange as it may sound, I'd rather the company top out at 90 rather than 100 if it bottoms out at 40 instead of 10. I actually think that represents a better operation for both me and others in the long term.
But I agree with most posters on the board, the general customer should get a reasonable baseline as well.
Using your numbers, there's no reason the airline can't strive to be 100 at the top, while still maintaining a 40 at the bottom.
#58
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 2,842
I think that this explains a lot of why there is disagreement on the forum here. I'm always looking out for myself but I'm also interested in what the carrier does on a much broader level to take care of everyone. CO seems to have a narrower range of "service" offered but the bottom end is higher than the bottom end at UA. Strange as it may sound, I'd rather the company top out at 90 rather than 100 if it bottoms out at 40 instead of 10. I actually think that represents a better operation for both me and others in the long term.
^^
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SPI
Programs: AA Gold, UA LT Plat, Mar LTT
Posts: 18,147
Bottom line is that the 1x/year flyers - who DON'T come to FT - just do NOT view things thru the FT lens. They care about cost, schedule, and destination. Period.
Dave
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,725
When I was CO/NW-centric (until recently) and flew UA occasionally with no status, it was painful. Sometimes employees wouldn't even make eye contact. I'd always get a high-number boarding zone, no matter the price of the ticket, so it was always 50/50 I'd have to gate-check my stuff. Roll into ORD on a rainy day with a blown-up connection and I'd have a choice between standing in a snaky 90-minute CS line, or trying to dial / queue for an Indian call center and wait for an infuriating, incoherent exchange that will probably make things even worse. And so on.
But for the last year or so I've been showing up with my *G BP and UA staff address me by my name, boost me into E+ with a smile, bring me extra snacks onboard, etc.
I'm still the same polite, patient passenger, but it takes that status marker to avoid being treated like a caged chicken on the back of a truck heading for the Tysons plant. The observation ConciergeMike makes upthread, that UA staff often can't seem to be bothered with the 97% of their customers who are sub-1k, rings true for me too.
I sometimes think UA's loyalty strategy rests in part on making sure elites get to observe non-elites suffering.
That instinct to publicly, visibly divide customers based on class is unpleasant to me, whether I'm the beneficiary (makes me self-conscious) or the victim (makes me resentful). Reminds me of Basil Fawlty's scheme to attract a higher-class clientele to Fawlty Towers: his newspaper advert ended with: "No riff-raff." I see that in UA culture but not CO's. That's the cultural flaw I would like New United to correct without compromising the elite service experience.
Last edited by BearX220; Jul 27, 2010 at 11:30 am