Citi cards closed, TYP confiscated, reasons not disclosed.
#901
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,944
In the first post in the thread, thehawk's cards were closed, but he still had access to the TY account and was able to redeem most. Soon after, they seemed to adopt the strategy of freezing the TY account first ("for review", but with only one outcome). Most recently, people have reported more like the initial behavior, their card is declined, the website tells them that the cards are closed, and they may have a short time to try to redeem.
But yes, you are in shutdown mode. Your petition is very timely....
#902
Join Date: Apr 2013
Programs: UA MPE, BA Blue, AA, IHG Plat Amb, Marriot Silver, HHonors Silver, National Exec, Avis First
Posts: 553
#904
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Programs: AA PLT 2MM
Posts: 2,026
#905
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,944
You mean cancel the TY cards? No-one knows. Someone did that last week, but their account wasn't under review, so it will be hard to tell if that did anything. My guess (and just a guess) is that if your Citi relationship is being looked at, all the cards will be closed (because you are a security risk remember). But only Citi knows....
#906
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Programs: AA PLT 2MM
Posts: 2,026
Too early to know if that strategy worked, but, it is a thought.
Probably won't help much with your petition however if you've closed your accounts yourself.
#908
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,944
But as I said, no-one here knows, and it might be worth a try to close your TY cards. Since you are at least very likely to lose those, you have little to lose.
#910
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,422
#911
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 77
Citi Mole
Well, the petition is still going public.
It's hard to say what triggered the review. My account was initiated for review yesterday. But last week, I also redeemed a check.
In any event, I accepted the risk there might be some retaliation for my petition.
#912
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 29,762
Yes thanks for posting a link that confirms my point. Maybe you didn't read it? Or if you did, maybe you can point out to the rest of us where this shows you have to go through US Postal Inspectors to make an accusation of mail fraud?
Again just to be clear I am driving a lawsuit where we are spending, ooh, maybe around $1.5m a year in legal fees with a central focus on mail fraud. We did not discuss this case with the US Postal Inspectors. We filed suit in a federal court. So this is a bit closer to home than running around google trying to find pointless links.
It was this exact connection that made me think of the applicability of mail fraud to what Citi is doing here. The difficulty in this case would be demonstrating that Citi devised the scheme to defraud customers, but frankly I could see a reasonable case being made that they made an offer to solicit business using a bogus 5% offer and then purposefully retracted that and confiscated the bait they used. Frankly one could easily weave in wire fraud allegations if some of the solicitation was made by television commercials too.
Again just to be clear I am driving a lawsuit where we are spending, ooh, maybe around $1.5m a year in legal fees with a central focus on mail fraud. We did not discuss this case with the US Postal Inspectors. We filed suit in a federal court. So this is a bit closer to home than running around google trying to find pointless links.
It was this exact connection that made me think of the applicability of mail fraud to what Citi is doing here. The difficulty in this case would be demonstrating that Citi devised the scheme to defraud customers, but frankly I could see a reasonable case being made that they made an offer to solicit business using a bogus 5% offer and then purposefully retracted that and confiscated the bait they used. Frankly one could easily weave in wire fraud allegations if some of the solicitation was made by television commercials too.
Several of us got such retention offers and suffer the same fates as those who took the new cards.
#913
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PHX
Posts: 4,787
I know of one guy who, when is TY Account went under review and was locked, went and pre-emptively shut down every single Citi credit card he had -- in hopes that this would avoid the blacklist that was sure to follow, and thus be able to sign up for new accounts in the near future.
Too early to know if that strategy worked, but, it is a thought.
Probably won't help much with your petition however if you've closed your accounts yourself.
Too early to know if that strategy worked, but, it is a thought.
Probably won't help much with your petition however if you've closed your accounts yourself.
But a "closed at customer's request" and a hope of staying on citi's good side seems like it might be worth letting those points go -- since they are likely as good as gone anyway.
#914
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 29,762
Bait and Switch - Important Update
Around 2:45 EST, got a call from TY Dept in SD, informing me the closure of TY account and TY cards (and other Citi cards closed) cannot be reversed because the purchase of GCs at CVS are considered is an "abuse" to the program, even though I only bought 2 GCs at less than 10% of the card's credit line. That the security dept said I have committed "Fraud" therefore the cards were closed regardless GC has NEVER been listed as a forbidden item to buy in any T&Cs one can find, nor "Fraud" is ever defined in writing in any of the T&Cs.
She claimed that because "fraud" and "abuse" were committed, Citi has the right to close accounts and confiscate all points earned pass and present.
I pointed out that Citi made a retention offer, but never told customer that GC purchase was forbidden. When customer bought GCs, (and in this case, so
little of them), Citi took away the bait, and used the excuse to confiscate customer's prior years' earning, thus get away with its liability to pay out the rewards. A bait and switch in its worst form.
I told her that since I did not have phone recording facility, I was in a distinct disadvantage position, when it comes to the need to retrieve the phone records so we could verify exactly what she said as representing Citi's position on this, I wanted her to send me a letter in writing with the definitions she told me how the "fraud" and "abuse" are defined by Citi so I can have it in writing to take it to arbitration or other channels. She said a customer cannot dictate how Citi words its letter but she would send a letter on the account closure which is final.
She did not know my AA and HHonor cards were also closed. Then she said it was because i committed "fraud" to purchase GCs at merchant's where it earned category bonus. I asked her to clarify whether GC purchase itself is considered "fraud" and "abuse" on any card, or it is ONLY when purchased with cards with category bonuses? She said she did not know that she had to check with Citi's legal dept.
Again she reiterated the decision to closed my accounts and confiscated all my points earned from prior years was final. She would send me a letter.
I would let the community know what exact wordings are on the letter.
So Citi did tell me, verbally, what the reasons were, "fraud" and "abuse" on 2 GCs purchases on each of the Preferred cards that had retention bonus offers, and this allows them to take away 188K TYPs earned 4 years ago.
@ma91pmh, I would appreciate your assessment here on this latest admission by Citi.
She claimed that because "fraud" and "abuse" were committed, Citi has the right to close accounts and confiscate all points earned pass and present.
I pointed out that Citi made a retention offer, but never told customer that GC purchase was forbidden. When customer bought GCs, (and in this case, so
little of them), Citi took away the bait, and used the excuse to confiscate customer's prior years' earning, thus get away with its liability to pay out the rewards. A bait and switch in its worst form.
I told her that since I did not have phone recording facility, I was in a distinct disadvantage position, when it comes to the need to retrieve the phone records so we could verify exactly what she said as representing Citi's position on this, I wanted her to send me a letter in writing with the definitions she told me how the "fraud" and "abuse" are defined by Citi so I can have it in writing to take it to arbitration or other channels. She said a customer cannot dictate how Citi words its letter but she would send a letter on the account closure which is final.
She did not know my AA and HHonor cards were also closed. Then she said it was because i committed "fraud" to purchase GCs at merchant's where it earned category bonus. I asked her to clarify whether GC purchase itself is considered "fraud" and "abuse" on any card, or it is ONLY when purchased with cards with category bonuses? She said she did not know that she had to check with Citi's legal dept.
Again she reiterated the decision to closed my accounts and confiscated all my points earned from prior years was final. She would send me a letter.
I would let the community know what exact wordings are on the letter.
So Citi did tell me, verbally, what the reasons were, "fraud" and "abuse" on 2 GCs purchases on each of the Preferred cards that had retention bonus offers, and this allows them to take away 188K TYPs earned 4 years ago.
@ma91pmh, I would appreciate your assessment here on this latest admission by Citi.
Last edited by Happy; Jun 7, 2013 at 10:14 am
#915
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 29,762
I got a verbal definition from SD office that the security dept considers buying GCs are committed Fraud and Abuse of the program, regardless the amount involved.
Dont know how in depth the hunt is penetrating, however people who never redeemed any checks got shut down last weekend as well.
Essentially anyone ever bought any GC on a card with the GGD category bonus is at risk.