![]() |
Take a vacation, get static managed https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/06/china...hnk/index.html . These folks can’t catch a break.
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 34492925)
IMO flight circuit breakers are much less problematic than community circuit breakers. Some compounds have over 10,000 residents, and a single positive case means bad news for all. On a slightly related note, I was initially worried about the "10 q-tips per test tube" practice (because all 10 get orange codes if 1 is positive...and it's conceivable that they live in ten different communities), but I haven't been burned yet. Single q-tip test tubes still exist. However, I don't know of any testing kiosks that always use them (e.g. my favorites usually give me my own test tube, but when they are running low, they switch to the 10/tube thing).
|
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 34494574)
When there's a compound lockdown, do other residents know who had the positive test, either officially (notice posted on door like IIRC Singapore did) or through the grapevine (lack of confidentiality)?
1. Their specific buildings get sealed 2. They are mentioned in our WeChat groups. I wouldn't call these "official", but the community leader (who works for the government) is a member Social pressure in the Confucian sense (e.g. focus on the community) is a major part of the equation. This is why public shaming comes into play. We haven't had any positives since the end of the big lockdown in my compound. Other places have, but the new lockdowns have been quite short in cases that I'm aware of. That having been said, the current Sanya situation doesn't seem pleasant, based on what I've read thus far. Most of the 80,000 people locked down there don't live in Sanya, so they are stuck in hotel rooms. Apparently, their room rates were slashed by 50% per government order. |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 34495130)
That having been said, the current Sanya situation doesn't seem pleasant, based on what I've read thus far. Most of the 80,000 people locked down there don't live in Sanya, so they are stuck in hotel rooms. Apparently, their room rates were slashed by 50% per government order.
|
Yeah but do they get EQNs though? :D
|
Originally Posted by EmpressRouge
(Post 34495167)
I heard that hotels are complying -- by giving guests 50% of the high season, winter rates. It's currently low season so the "discounted" lockdown rates are actually higher than the regular low season rates tourists originally booked.
|
Now that Hong Kong quarantine is only 3 days, does anyone think it's easier to go to Hong Kong, go through the 3 day quarantine, get a visa for the mainland in Hong Kong, and then fly from Hong Kong to the mainland?
As far as I know, any one can apply for a mainland visa in Hong Kong at the Chinese Foreign Ministry Commissioner's Office -- you don't need Hong Kong residence -- and they recently updated their guidelines to allow Q and S visas to be processed. 3. The scope of applicants eligible for applying for a visa out of humanitarian needs will be expanded as appropriate. In addition to visiting an immediate family member in China who is in critical medical condition and in need of care, or arrange funeral matters of an immediate family member in China, foreign family members (including spouses, parents, spouse's parents, children and their spouses, brothers and sisters, grandparents, and grandchildren) of Chinese citizens or foreign nationals with permanent residence status in the Mainland of China can apply for visas for reunion or family visit. The above applicants should submit routine documents, and the full-process vaccination certificates of the vaccine licensed or approved for emergency use by China or WHO shall be provided. |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 34495130)
In the case of my compound, we always know who the positives are.
1. Their specific buildings get sealed 2. They are mentioned in our WeChat groups. I wouldn't call these "official", but the community leader (who works for the government) is a member Social pressure in the Confucian sense (e.g. focus on the community) is a major part of the equation. This is why public shaming comes into play. We haven't had any positives since the end of the big lockdown in my compound. Other places have, but the new lockdowns have been quite short in cases that I'm aware of. That having been said, the current Sanya situation doesn't seem pleasant, based on what I've read thus far. Most of the 80,000 people locked down there don't live in Sanya, so they are stuck in hotel rooms. Apparently, their room rates were slashed by 50% per government order. |
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34495506)
Sounds like it could be very expensive if they're stuck at a high-end property even if it's 50% off. However, if it's cheap, it could be a nice way to earn some EQNs.
|
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 34495498)
Now that Hong Kong quarantine is only 3 days, does anyone think it's easier to go to Hong Kong, go through the 3 day quarantine, get a visa for the mainland in Hong Kong, and then fly from Hong Kong to the mainland?
As far as I know, any one can apply for a mainland visa in Hong Kong at the Chinese Foreign Ministry Commissioner's Office -- you don't need Hong Kong residence -- and they recently updated their guidelines to allow Q and S visas to be processed. Notice on the Adjustment of Requirements for Chinese Visa Application During COVID-19 Pandemic |
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 34495498)
Now that Hong Kong quarantine is only 3 days, does anyone think it's easier to go to Hong Kong, go through the 3 day quarantine, get a visa for the mainland in Hong Kong, and then fly from Hong Kong to the mainland?
As far as I know, any one can apply for a mainland visa in Hong Kong at the Chinese Foreign Ministry Commissioner's Office -- you don't need Hong Kong residence -- and they recently updated their guidelines to allow Q and S visas to be processed. Notice on the Adjustment of Requirements for Chinese Visa Application During COVID-19 Pandemic Getting from HK to the mainland is pretty much impossible now, it’s really like winning the lotto to get a border crossing slot or getting a flight into the mainland. Basically China doesn’t want anyone to come but if you insist they will make it as painful on you and your wallet as possible. Once you’re inside you also are under constant surveillance and under threat of lockdown of undetermined time. I’d advise anyone to avoid this place now unless it’s for family or a life changing amount of money. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 34495540)
It's a Government-mandated rate. "No".
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 34495705)
It’s still 7 days you need to stay in HK and all at a hotel if you’re a visitor without a place in HK. So there really isn’t much change other than being able to get fresh air for the final 4 days.
Getting from HK to the mainland is pretty much impossible now, it’s really like winning the lotto to get a border crossing slot or getting a flight into the mainland. Basically China doesn’t want anyone to come but if you insist they will make it as painful on you and your wallet as possible. Once you’re inside you also are under constant surveillance and under threat of lockdown of undetermined time. I’d advise anyone to avoid this place now unless it’s for family or a life changing amount of money. |
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34495731)
Have you been to HK at all since the start of the pandemic? |
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34495731)
Have you been to HK at all since the start of the pandemic?
|
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34495731)
Have you been to HK at all since the start of the pandemic?
|
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 34495705)
It’s still 7 days you need to stay in HK and all at a hotel if you’re a visitor without a place in HK. So there really isn’t much change other than being able to get fresh air for the final 4 days.
The extra 4 (or to be precise, 7) days are labelled as self-monitoring so technically it's not quarantine. Under the previous regime of 7+7 (also seven days self-monitoring), you certainly were allowed to leave HK during the self-monitoring period. So unless there is explicit wording banning this under the new scheme, then I would assume that you are free to leave HK during the +4/+7 period. |
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 34495705)
I’d advise anyone to avoid this place now unless it’s for family or a life changing amount of money. 😀 |
Originally Posted by tauphi
(Post 34498413)
Are you sure about this? You are allowed to go anywhere in HK other than high-risk venues. Unless they explicitly state that you are not allowed to leave HK then you are.
The extra 4 (or to be precise, 7) days are labelled as self-monitoring so technically it's not quarantine. I think travelinmanS is right. If one is a tourist or does not have a residence or a friend/relative to stay with in HK, the last four-day is still a hotel stay. The only difference is the ability leave the hotel room visiting venues and places that are allowed. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 34495540)
It's a Government-mandated rate. "No".
|
Originally Posted by UA_Flyer
(Post 34498759)
I beleive travelinmanS only made comparsion between 7 verus 3+4 from the perspective of a visitor. He did not say anyting about leaving HK.
I think travelinmanS is right. If one is a tourist or does not have a residence or a friend/relative to stay with in HK, the last four-day is still a hotel stay. The only difference is the ability leave the hotel room visiting venues and places that are allowed. |
Originally Posted by UA_Flyer
(Post 34498767)
I have had three quarantine stays at designated HK quarantine hotels and were able to earn hotel nights and points.
|
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 34498841)
But if you are a tourist, wouldn't you need a place to stay anyways? And you can leave HK as soon as your Chinese visa is issued. Schedule the visa appointment for day 4, pay the expedite fee, pick it up day 5, take a late flight on day 5 or early flight on day 6. You don't need to wait 7 days before leaving.
|
Originally Posted by ftrichard
(Post 34498926)
Sounds slick. What's the reality?
|
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34498933)
I would like to know too.
It sounds great in theory, and completely skips having to deal with the Chinese consulates (no health code needed flying from HK to the mainland). Just wondering if anyone has spotted a flaw in this proposal, and/or is brave enough to try it. |
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 34498841)
But if you are a tourist, wouldn't you need a place to stay anyways? And you can leave HK as soon as your Chinese visa is issued. Schedule the visa appointment for day 4, pay the expedite fee, pick it up day 5, take a late flight on day 5 or early flight on day 6. You don't need to wait 7 days before leaving.
I cannot comment on getting PRC visa from HK. All I know is that it is not business as usual as before Covid when getting PRC visa in HK was pretthy easy. All I know is most of my local HK colleguages are having difficutlies entering China. Foreign passport holders (non-HK residents) even more challenging, but I have no data point to share other than hearing stories told by my local HK colleagues. I would suggest you call CITS HK directly and understand the current entry policy for China before deciding whether to make the trip to HK. I hope all work out for you. |
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 34498944)
Same here.
It sounds great in theory, and completely skips having to deal with the Chinese consulates (no health code needed flying from HK to the mainland). Just wondering if anyone has spotted a flaw in this proposal, and/or is brave enough to try it. |
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 34498975)
Yeah, the flaw is this ain’t gonna happen. Good luck trying though.
1. Getting rejected for the visa application is a real possibility, no matter whether or not he meets the requirements because rules change all the time and there is a subjective element to the process that us mere mortals can't control 2. If he does manage to score a flight from HK to Xiamen or wherever, that flight might not actually happen, and Xiamen Airlines doesn't care enough to put him on its next flight (it could be three weeks later anyway) |
Originally Posted by UA_Flyer
(Post 34498948)
As I said, I am not commenting on "leaving HK". or "going to Mainland". My post was about comparing the difference between 7-day quarantine versus 3+4 newly relaxed requirements.
I cannot comment on getting PRC visa from HK. All I know is that it is not business as usual as before Covid when getting PRC visa in HK was pretthy easy. All I know is most of my local HK colleguages are having difficutlies entering China. Foreign passport holders (non-HK residents) even more challenging, but I have no data point to share other than hearing stories told by my local HK colleagues. I would suggest you call CITS HK directly and understand the current entry policy for China before deciding whether to make the trip to HK. I hope all work out for you. |
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34499176)
If I test positive at any point during the 3+4 quarantine, I'm assuming I'll be sent to a facility for a minimum of 21 days?
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34499176)
Is it possible to book a one-week trip? During those last four days, it seems like I can do most things except for visiting seniors' homes or bars, which hm ok with.
|
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 34499508)
Until you test negative, no min period.
And restaurants. They're thinking of hospitals (where you're not the patient (e.g. a visitor) as well. No restaurants too? Is this confirmed? |
You stay til Day 10
Restaurants are definitely no go for yellow code - any premise where the operator has to check you in is out of bounds. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 34499563)
You stay til Day 10
Restaurants are definitely no go for yellow code - any premise where the operator has to check you in is out of bounds. |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 34499066)
I wouldn't give him zero percent odds, but there is no way I could recommend this approach in good conscience to someone without a PRC visa (or people with visas who aren't prepared to spend an extra month in HK)
1. Getting rejected for the visa application is a real possibility, no matter whether or not he meets the requirements because rules change all the time and there is a subjective element to the process that us mere mortals can't control 2. If he does manage to score a flight from HK to Xiamen or wherever, that flight might not actually happen, and Xiamen Airlines doesn't care enough to put him on its next flight (it could be three weeks later anyway) |
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 34500451)
I may do this if I really need to travel to China in the next few months, if I can get a visa before arriving in HK. Not having to go through the health code process is still a plus, and I do have a few friends in HK I've been wanting to visit. Also, HK-mainland flights are exempt from the circuit breaker system, and still quite a bit cheaper.
2. Your reliance on HK-China flights operating is laughable 3. If you want to try to game the lottery system, do so before your trip (I'm guessing $1000 for a consolidated bribe; this includes their mark-up on hotel costs in Zhuhai) |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 34499563)
You stay til Day 10
Restaurants are definitely no go for yellow code - any premise where the operator has to check you in is out of bounds. |
Originally Posted by lsquare
(Post 34499672)
What if I have a flight on day 9, but still test positive?
|
Originally Posted by UA_Flyer
(Post 34498759)
I beleive travelinmanS only made comparsion between 7 verus 3+4 from the perspective of a visitor. He did not say anyting about leaving HK.
I think travelinmanS is right. If one is a tourist or does not have a residence or a friend/relative to stay with in HK, the last four-day is still a hotel stay. The only difference is the ability leave the hotel room visiting venues and places that are allowed. In any case, while three days in Q probably will deter most visitors, the freedom for the subsequent 4/7 days is significant. You can do pretty much everything apart from eating in or clubbing (takeaways are still allowed, they'll even let you into the restaurant to do the order and pickup, no QR scanning required). For example, you could visit Disneyland. Essentially you will get exactly the same treatment as someone in HK who is currently unvaccinated (< 3 doses). |
I wonder if anyone knows. I want to take a flight from LHR-PVG-HKG. It is only a transit in PVG, so I will stay airside. Is that allowed currently in PVG?
|
Originally Posted by justinlau88
(Post 34502716)
I wonder if anyone knows. I want to take a flight from LHR-PVG-HKG. It is only a transit in PVG, so I will stay airside. Is that allowed currently in PVG?
2. When they restart (maybe pretty soon), they will cost a lot more than LHR-HKG 3. I don't think airside transit is allowed, but I'd be most concerned about PVG-HKG not happening (I think there are only around two flights per month) |
percysmith (and others): Can you comment on what HKG-Mainland flights are:
1. Easiest to book 2. Least likely to be axed 3. Least expensive 4. Would you trust KA more than Mainland carriers? ? #3 is certainly less important than points 1 and 2. Furthermore, I'm guessing there isn't a huge price difference between the lowest and the highest, but if Quanzhou costs $100 less than Changsha, I'd grab Quanzhou because my entire time in either place would be spent in a hotel room (unless I knew I could score a really nice hotel in Changsha). #2 is key for anyone who wants to try this. I'm thinking of relatively high frequency (e.g. 2+ flights/week) and important. It's somewhat perplexing that Shanghai doesn't meet the mark, but let's just play the ball as it lies. Regarding #4 -I follow the CX forum here, and therefore get the fact that CX/KA have serious operational issues, especially on Mainland flights (well, LHR as well) -The thing is, I also know that CA, CZ, MU, MF have no problem leaving customers high and dry (i.e. they are pretty good at refunds, but you'll be on your own to sort things out) As we've discussed in the London thread, both Korea and Taiwan are better options than Hong Kong from reliability and cost standpoints. For non-residents, getting a PRC visa in either of these places is almost impossible (so, don't try them unless you have a visa or RP). Furthermore, Taiwan is only viable if you have permission to enter Taiwan. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:59 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.