Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ID Check at Gate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 12:52 pm
  #46  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by ralfp
(What belongs to the ID?)

If checking domestic air passengers' IDs reduces the threat to air travel, would checking car passenger IDs reduce the threat to road travel? Even if it did, would checking those IDs be justified, legal, or "the right thing to do"?
I could be wrong here, but I THINK that in most states, it is illegal to drive without a valid drivers license (A drivers license is a valid form of Govt ID). And yes, requesting a drivers license of a driver is legal and not regarded as a search by a LEO.
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 12:54 pm
  #47  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
Originally Posted by Paolo01
I could be wrong here, but I THINK that in most states, it is illegal to drive without a valid drivers license (A drivers license is a valid form of Govt ID). And yes, requesting a drivers license of a driver is legal and not regarded as a search by a LEO.
Car passengers are not driving. That's why I said "passengers" and not "drivers".
ralfp is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 12:54 pm
  #48  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by Spiff
The federal government should be kicked out of every US airport.
That I like the idea of. I am all about returning airports to state, city and commercial control. ^^^
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 12:58 pm
  #49  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by ralfp
Car passengers are not driving.
And a LEO can and will ask them for ID though it is not required to be on their person by law.

Anyway, I missed the passenger part of your initial statement. Sorry.

I believe that there is a difference between being a passenger on a highway and being a passenger at 30,000 ft.
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:07 pm
  #50  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
Originally Posted by Paolo01
And a LEO can and will ask them for ID though it is not required to be on their person by law.
That's the point. Now think about trucks. Hazmat big rigs. Do passengers need ID (I don't know)?

Originally Posted by Paolo01
I believe that there is a difference between being a passenger on a highway and being a passenger at 30,000 ft.
Besides 30,000ft and a few 100mph, what? As it stands, police could catch a lot of criminals by searching car passengers and checking their IDs.

Sure, aircraft are different from cars. Sure, checking IDs can help reduce crime (if you compare IDs against a list of fugitives), but I don't see any evidence that it really improves the safety of domestic travel in ways that are specific to the unique nature of air travel (which is used as the justification). Or are there statistics to show that verifying IDs has done anything?
ralfp is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:10 pm
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,985
Originally Posted by Paolo01
And a LEO can and will ask them for ID though it is not required to be on their person by law.

Anyway, I missed the passenger part of your initial statement. Sorry.

I believe that there is a difference between being a passenger on a highway and being a passenger at 30,000 ft.
Regardless, please explain how checking anyones ID (with the exception of the aircraft operators credentials) contributes to the safe conduct of a commercial aircraft flight.

I guess if an ID was thrown really hard the narrow edge might make a paper cut but then they would be considered a weapon and confiscated with my water.

I thought the purpose of screening was to ensure no weapons, explosives or incendaries made it onto the aircraft.

Isn't all the rest of the play nothing more than poor theater?

I say it is!!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:16 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OKC/DFW
Programs: AA EXP/2 MM
Posts: 9,999
Originally Posted by Paolo01
IF we assume that the Gov't issued ID is not fake, then yes, comparing it to a home printed boarding pass helps in the process of limiting risk to an aircraft.
How does valid ID magically prevent anyone from harming an aircraft?
oklAAhoma is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:21 pm
  #53  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by ralfp
That's the point. Now think about trucks. Hazmat big rigs. Do passengers need ID (I don't know)?



Besides 30,000ft and a few 100mph, what? As it stands, police could catch a lot of criminals by searching car passengers and checking their IDs.
The ID check is a check, not a search.

DOE vehicles require that all drivers and PAX have ID (Drivers are not allowed to pick up hitch hikers ). I am not sure about the TEXACO truck.

And you are correct. If you are willing to discount the altitude number of passengers and speed, there is not a lot of difference between a 747 and Chevy Impala. (Please bring back the older Impala SS's, circa 1995, if anybody on this board is in the decision making loop )
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:42 pm
  #54  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
Originally Posted by Paolo01
The ID check is a check, not a search.
Which is why I wrote "searching car passengers and checking their IDs."

Originally Posted by Paolo01
DOE vehicles require that all drivers and PAX have ID (Drivers are not allowed to pick up hitch hikers ). I am not sure about the TEXACO truck.
Department of Energy? Don't you mean DOT?

Originally Posted by Paolo01
And you are correct. If you are willing to discount the altitude number of passengers and speed, there is not a lot of difference between a 747 and Chevy Impala. (Please bring back the older Impala SS's, circa 1995, if anybody on this board is in the decision making loop )
Ah, the elite Schutzstaffel edition.

So, why check ID? Especially if the purpose (stopping terrorists) is total BS, as terrorists are excluded from the lists against which names are checked.
ralfp is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:51 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LAX
Programs: CO Platinum HHonors Diamond Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,312
"Papers!!"

Few of the 9/11 hijackers made any attempt to disguise their names on flight and credit card records. A bunch had official Virginia IDs from the local DMV.

Gee, if only some TSA guys had been checking that their IDs matched their boarding passes, huh?

What is the ID check supposed to establish or prevent? Seriously?

peace,
~Ben~
seoulmanjr is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 1:53 pm
  #56  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by ralfp
Department of Energy? Don't you mean DOT?



Ah, the elite Schutzstaffel edition.
No I mean DOE. I don't know anything about DOT passenger requirements for their vehicles.
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 2:39 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LAX
Programs: CO Platinum HHonors Diamond Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,312
Originally Posted by TSA Website
-- Why..do I have to show my ID?

-- It's critical to make sure those boarding the plane with you are really who they say they are. Our officers are specially trained and equipped with blacklights and magnifying loupes to ensure your ID and boarding pass are valid.
So, I repeat -- Few of the 9/11 hijackers made any attempt to disguise their names on flight and credit card records. A bunch had official Virginia IDs from the local DMV. All were flying on valid IDs that matched their valid boarding passes. So what is the ID check supposed to establish or prevent?

peace,
~Ben~
seoulmanjr is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 2:43 pm
  #58  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by seoulmanjr
So, I repeat -- Few of the 9/11 hijackers made any attempt to disguise their names on flight and credit card records. A bunch had official Virginia IDs from the local DMV. All were flying on valid IDs that matched their valid boarding passes. So what is the ID check supposed to establish or prevent?

peace,
~Ben~
Is 9/11 the only paradigm we are allowed to draw air safety lessons from? It is a large one, but not the only.
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 2:45 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LAX
Programs: CO Platinum HHonors Diamond Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,312
Originally Posted by Paolo01
Is 9/11 the only paradigm we are allowed to draw air safety lessons from? It is a large one, but not the only.
Fair enough. What are the other paradigms where verifying IDs matched BPs prevented or could have prevented a terrorist attempt by a passenger against an airliner?

peace,
~Ben~
seoulmanjr is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 2:51 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
Originally Posted by seoulmanjr
Fair enough. What are the other paradigms where verifying IDs matched BPs prevented or could have prevented a terrorist attempt by a passenger against an airliner?

peace,
~Ben~
Especially when those checks are not performed against any real, enforceable under color of law criteria (such as wants/warrants checks with local/national databases), which would not be legal under the current regulations anyway?
DevilDog438 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.