those explosive detectors
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 568
those explosive detectors
Didn't realize that the body scanners pick up handkerchiefs .
I was therefore singled out and they swiped me and my hands with that strip to put in the (I assume ) explosive detections machine.
Don't these people realize that any self respecting terrorist would have someone else handle any explosives and place them in his suitcases or carry-on for him?
I was therefore singled out and they swiped me and my hands with that strip to put in the (I assume ) explosive detections machine.
Don't these people realize that any self respecting terrorist would have someone else handle any explosives and place them in his suitcases or carry-on for him?
#2
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Didn't realize that the body scanners pick up handkerchiefs .
I was therefore singled out and they swiped me and my hands with that strip to put in the (I assume ) explosive detections machine.
Don't these people realize that any self respecting terrorist would have someone else handle any explosives and place them in his suitcases or carry-on for him?
I was therefore singled out and they swiped me and my hands with that strip to put in the (I assume ) explosive detections machine.
Don't these people realize that any self respecting terrorist would have someone else handle any explosives and place them in his suitcases or carry-on for him?
#3




Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
As for terrorists, given that in the U.S. they are primarily white nationalists, I suspect that they might not wear a handkerchief just for cultural reasons. Of course, TSA has confessed that there have been no threats to U.S. domestic-departing aviation at all since 9/11. So talking about what they would or wouldn't do is a theological question, akin to debating the number of hairs on the armpit of an angel. Not an empirical one.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,966
Any self respecting "explosives" detector would not false alarm on, of all things, a handkerchief.
As for terrorists, given that in the U.S. they are primarily white nationalists, I suspect that they might not wear a handkerchief just for cultural reasons. Of course, TSA has confessed that there have been no threats to U.S. domestic-departing aviation at all since 9/11. So talking about what they would or wouldn't do is a theological question, akin to debating the number of hairs on the armpit of an angel. Not an empirical one.
As for terrorists, given that in the U.S. they are primarily white nationalists, I suspect that they might not wear a handkerchief just for cultural reasons. Of course, TSA has confessed that there have been no threats to U.S. domestic-departing aviation at all since 9/11. So talking about what they would or wouldn't do is a theological question, akin to debating the number of hairs on the armpit of an angel. Not an empirical one.
#5




Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,966
The MMW Body Scanner with ATR often alarms on my bare neck. No implants, jewelry, markings, or other unusual items. Really unsettling getting bare skin pat downs. Guess TSA thinks my neck is a realistic replica.
#7
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 568
wonder if well endowed men get identified as terrorists too. I have heard of people sticking a cucumber down there to see what happens
#10
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Any self respecting "explosives" detector would not false alarm on, of all things, a handkerchief.
As for terrorists, given that in the U.S. they are primarily white nationalists, I suspect that they might not wear a handkerchief just for cultural reasons. Of course, TSA has confessed that there have been no threats to U.S. domestic-departing aviation at all since 9/11. So talking about what they would or wouldn't do is a theological question, akin to debating the number of hairs on the armpit of an angel. Not an empirical one.
As for terrorists, given that in the U.S. they are primarily white nationalists, I suspect that they might not wear a handkerchief just for cultural reasons. Of course, TSA has confessed that there have been no threats to U.S. domestic-departing aviation at all since 9/11. So talking about what they would or wouldn't do is a theological question, akin to debating the number of hairs on the armpit of an angel. Not an empirical one.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,966
Have plates and screws in my back and haven't alarmed WTMD or WBI.
#12




Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: United Airlines 1 MM, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,777
From the experiences of my friends, it takes something along the lines of an artificial knee or hip to trigger a metal detector. A large metal plate might also, although I have a friend with a fairly large plate in his tibia that never alarms on metal detectors. Friends with staples and screws have not reported anything.
Last edited by catocony; May 22, 2018 at 9:13 am
#13


Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,818
Of course, TSA has confessed that there have been no threats to U.S. domestic-departing aviation at all since 9/11. So talking about what they would or wouldn't do is a theological question, akin to debating the number of hairs on the armpit of an angel. Not an empirical one.
more accurate to say "there have been no attacks on U.S. domestic-departing aviation..."
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,966
The 95% was for Red Team test items missed by TSA, not actual threats. I think the statement goes back to no known active threats in play. That doesn't mean there are no unknown threats being planned.


