Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Another story of abuse of a disabled passenger

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Another story of abuse of a disabled passenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2016, 7:57 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Another story of abuse of a disabled passenger

http://nationalpainreport.com/a-crps...4.html#respond

I was taken to a private room and told that if I refused to be touched then I would be escorted out of the airport and that I could “come back.” I don’t live in Indianapolis and I’m not wealthy and I couldn’t afford to just leave and come back whenever. So I told them to get it over with.

The moment the officer touched my leg I started screaming and crying. I tried to jump out of the chair. Ms. Benson and the officer were both startled and alarmed by my reaction and offered to just send me out of the airport
TSA's response: sign up for PreCheck and/or call TSA Cares before you travel.

Addendum:

From AskTSA:
We ensure our people are mission-ready, expertly trained, & deliberately developed.
https://twitter.com/AskTSA/status/774985348518739968

Last edited by petaluma1; Sep 11, 2016 at 9:08 am
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 12:57 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: BAEC, IB+, TAM multi+
Posts: 453
That's an absolutely terrible story.

However, had she even contacted the TSA beforehand stating that due to medical reasons, she was not able to undergo a pat-down on her leg? Did she have a doctors prescription stating that a pat-down would be impossible due to medical reasons?

I am unsure how such a situation would be handled in europe, let alone in the us where TSA is a lot stricter.
Bakpapier is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 7:29 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Interesting comments to the from someone who claims to be a former TSA screener:

Next if the anomaly is in the groin, the only way they can resolve that anomaly is a pat down that extends from your waist to your hips. This is policy. Yes agents take into consideration you may not want to do it, and let’s be honest, I never wanted to touch anyone’s groin area, passengers are filthy and disgusting, but they have a job. That job mean they have to be sure that you aren’t stuffing anothing in your pants or in between your legs and using the uncomfortable situation to bypass a pat down, and yes people do this all the time. I’ve found guns drugs money … cheeseburgers in the crotchessential of passengers. We don’t make this up.

As far as what occurred in the private screening again, they have a job and they can only accommodatever passenger so much without jeopardizing there job, which is to be certain that you have nothing in the groin area that is a threat. Sometimes that means multiple pat downs by a few agents so they can compare what they felt to the other agents and determine if it’s ok or not. Sometimes, yes, you will be asked to take your pants down if the object in question can not be identified by a pat down. In those i say wait until you pass security to stuff your pants with whatever.

Also this idea that TSA stripe search people is bs. Tsa doesn’t have the mandate to do so. The police can ask us to perform one while they are watching but the decision to just do so isn’t TSA.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 7:35 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
I hate to finding myself siding with the TSA, but not sure what really could have been done here. TSA can't be in a situation where someone just says "no, you can't pat me down, because it will cause pain in that area" will result in them saying "oh, ok, then, never mind, go on ahead."
cestmoi123 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 8:38 am
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
I wonder what law or regulation permits the police to direct TSA to perform a strip search without a warrant or an arrest.
chollie is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 8:52 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by cestmoi123
I hate to finding myself siding with the TSA, but not sure what really could have been done here. TSA can't be in a situation where someone just says "no, you can't pat me down, because it will cause pain in that area" will result in them saying "oh, ok, then, never mind, go on ahead."
They could have used an HHMD and done an explosives test. Or they could work really hard and come up with some kind of PreCheck system for the disabled, a system that is not subject to randomness. TSACares certainly doesn't help in this situation.

OR.....they could used Pre-style screening for ALL passengers.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 10:44 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Interesting comments to the from someone who claims to be a former TSA screener:

Next if the anomaly is in the groin, the only way they can resolve that anomaly is a pat down that extends from your waist to your hips. This is policy. Yes agents take into consideration you may not want to do it, and let’s be honest, I never wanted to touch anyone’s groin area, passengers are filthy and disgusting, but they have a job. That job mean they have to be sure that you aren’t stuffing anothing in your pants or in between your legs and using the uncomfortable situation to bypass a pat down, and yes people do this all the time. I’ve found guns drugs money … cheeseburgers in the crotchessential of passengers. We don’t make this up.

As far as what occurred in the private screening again, they have a job and they can only accommodatever passenger so much without jeopardizing there job, which is to be certain that you have nothing in the groin area that is a threat. Sometimes that means multiple pat downs by a few agents so they can compare what they felt to the other agents and determine if it’s ok or not. Sometimes, yes, you will be asked to take your pants down if the object in question can not be identified by a pat down. In those i say wait until you pass security to stuff your pants with whatever.

Also this idea that TSA stripe search people is bs. Tsa doesn’t have the mandate to do so. The police can ask us to perform one while they are watching but the decision to just do so isn’t TSA.

No dont get me wrong if you are being abused or whatnot that is a different story and i dont condone it, but serious put yourself in their position. I dealt with liars, arrogant, rude, annoying passengers all the time for 8 hrs straight no breaks while on the floor. We expect to people to try and take advantage of our sympathy but most aren’t gonna cave because this is their job. No matter how sh***y and pointless people feel it is.
First of all, the writer's command of the English language is remarkably similar to a former TS&S poster...

This individual has a very interesting opinion about the citizens who pay his salary and benefits.

...and, he's a brave soldier in the War on Drugs and the War on Cash.

...and, he admits to requiring passengers to remove their pants right before he claims that "stripe search people is bs."
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 10:55 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Programs: AAdvantage Executive Platinum, Delta Silver Medallion, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador
Posts: 14,117
As a passenger with a disability, I have often wondered about this. Before being subjected to the pat down, I am always asked whether I have any areas that are particularly sensitive. In my case, the answer is no. I have to wonder what happens when the answer is yes. Are TSOs trained to perform a more gentle pat down on such areas? What is the procedure? I have no idea.
ysolde is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:02 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
First of all, the writer's command of the English language is remarkably similar to a former TS&S poster...

This individual has a very interesting opinion about the citizens who pay his salary and benefits.

...and, he's a brave soldier in the War on Drugs and the War on Cash.

...and, he admits to requiring passengers to remove their pants right before he claims that "stripe search people is bs."
Which is why I chose to quote those paragraphs.

BTW, what is a "crotchessential"?
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:06 am
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
I hadn't heard of the requirement to submit yourself to multiple groin gropes by multiple TSOs. No wonder they don't want outside witnesses or cameras during their dirty little backroom sessions.

I wonder if SOP requires a full grope after the pax lowers his/her trousers, especially if the pax is going commando that day. I'm betting that the same SOP that says a TSO must stroke a pax's bare arm or head or face if the NoS indicates an anomaly there dictates that even a completely exposed pax groin still has to be rubbed three times each way.

I'm wondering if he and his co-workers eat the cheeseburgers they regularly find stuffed down pax trousers.
chollie is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:08 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
Originally Posted by petaluma1
BTW, what is a "crotchessential"?
Aka 'screener delight'.

Especially if several of them get to grope a pax's groin and then spend time comparing notes and discussing their 'feelings' while the pax stands there, trousers down, waiting.
chollie is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:08 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by ysolde
As a passenger with a disability, I have often wondered about this. Before being subjected to the pat down, I am always asked whether I have any areas that are particularly sensitive. In my case, the answer is no. I have to wonder what happens when the answer is yes. Are TSOs trained to perform a more gentle pat down on such areas? What is the procedure? I have no idea.
Have never experienced it, but have heard that some screeners are harder on areas that the passenger claims are sensitive. From comments to the article:

Omg. I was almost ready to miss my flight. I did tell her why I was in the wheelchair. What CRPS/RSD is where it affects me etc etc. She then tried showing me how she would barely touch me on my left arm by rubbing the back of her had on my arm. I told her even the slightest touch will hurt, but I understood it had to be done. Well, she didn’t do that type of touch to my bad areas. She literally grabbed them with a firm grip. Not once, twice…but three times. I guess my screaming in pain was something she enjoyed. The tears coming down my face seemed to feed her power trip more.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:11 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by ysolde
Are TSOs trained to perform a more gentle pat down on such areas? What is the procedure? I have no idea.
There are multiple reports that the clerks make sure they rub that area harder.

Originally Posted by chollie
I hadn't heard of the requirement to submit yourself to multiple groin gropes by multiple TSOs. No wonder they don't want outside witnesses or cameras during their dirty little backroom sessions.

I wonder if SOP requires a full grope after the pax lowers his/her trousers, especially if the pax is going commando that day. I'm betting that the same SOP that says a TSO must stroke a pax's bare arm or head or face if the NoS indicates an anomaly there dictates that even a completely exposed pax groin still has to be rubbed three times each way.

I'm wondering if he and his co-workers eat the cheeseburgers they regularly find stuffed down pax trousers.
I'll admit to temporarily going commando through checkpoints wearing just sweat pants when doing 100% opt outs hoping for a hard pull on the pants legs. Never happened, although I did take off a hoodie one day when ordered without a shirt underneath. The clerks went ballistic.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:17 am
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
Originally Posted by ysolde
As a passenger with a disability, I have often wondered about this. Before being subjected to the pat down, I am always asked whether I have any areas that are particularly sensitive. In my case, the answer is no. I have to wonder what happens when the answer is yes. Are TSOs trained to perform a more gentle pat down on such areas? What is the procedure? I have no idea.
ysolde, TSOs have posted in this forum in the past pointing out that declaring a sensitive area on your body is a 'red flag' because it's exactly what a bad guy would do to try to divert attention from concealed contraband. Therefore, sensitive areas are supposed to get extra attention.

Many TSOs choose to act as though that ALL pax who declare sensitive areas are, at the very least, liars concealing something. They then compound this stupidity by believing that the only satisfactory way to clear a declared sensitive area is by rubbing or pressing very hard.

One TSO posted that if he does a groin grope and the pax doesn't flinch, he's immediately suspicious and doubles down until he does get a reaction. Of course, he never posted about finding a single piece of groin contraband after all his 'doubling down' efforts.
chollie is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2016, 11:40 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,130
Originally Posted by chollie
I wonder what law or regulation permits the police to direct TSA to perform a strip search without a warrant or an arrest.
There is no such law. TSA is not authorized to perform strip searches. I would think a person would need to be in custody for such an invasive search.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.