TSA management practices and misconduct hearing on CSPAN
#31
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
It was kind of like a slow-motion 'wave' at a stadium - heads turned to look as the cutie dog and handler made their way down the lines, toddlers and little kids' hands reaching out to try to pet the dog.
Didn't see anyone trying to take his picture though.
#32
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 396
#33
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 396
What screening would you say is necessary or should be taken?
#34
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
On that particular day, the Pre lane went to a WTMD and dedicated belt (full Pre experience) and the regular line went to the NoS after the TDC.
The dog was a cutie, and obviously added another layer of security, but it didn't change anyone's wait time (for better or worse - I didn't see the dog alert or anyone get pulled from the line).
The dog was a cutie, and obviously added another layer of security, but it didn't change anyone's wait time (for better or worse - I didn't see the dog alert or anyone get pulled from the line).
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,130
I am not saying that Managed Inclusion has ended but that is what 'Fouled Anchor' Neffenger has been saying. I have benefited from MI a few times but Pre has always shown on my boarding pass not by BDO/Dog selection.
The real issue is the lack of support for Pre by TSA while going gangbusters on trying to enroll more gullible travelers.
#36
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
IIRC, I thought there was a 'rule change' a few years ago that potentially allowed under 12's and over 75's to keep shoes and light outerwear, depending on the airport/checkpoint. I'm not sure, but I think it might have been before Pre. I think the problem was that kids and the elderly disproportionately slowed things down when they removed their shoes and then put them back on, often right at the belt. The justification, oddly enough, was that these two age groups generally represented a slightly lower risk. That's a huge departure from hearing that terrorists were known to use children and handicapped people in wheelchairs.
#38
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
The rule allowing those under 12/over 75 to keep shoes and jackets on is 3 years old. PreCheck was started in late 2011.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,130
I think the Whole body Imagers, shoes, belts, and LGA restrictions are examples of security steps that are just not necessary.
One could also look at the rate of occurrence of any particular style off attack. None for belts that I am aware of. One shoe bomber some billion or so passengers ago. And I guess we have to look back at Bojinka to find an attack that used a liquid as an attack.
I would suggest that the risk of attacks that these steps supposedly reduce is not worth the manpower or cost.
#41
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
I think you're spot-on with the kids' rule change.
#42
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
?? TSA says they've got sniffer dogs and they're going to be getting more. I'm taking their word for it. They don't have a lot of dogs right now, so it doesn't surprise me that I've rarely seen them.
Somehow I don't think I'm getting my point across to you - and I acknowledge that's apparently my fault.
TSA says they have dogs and will be getting more.
TSA says managed inclusion is dead. TSA says the dogs will speed up security.
How will the dogs speed up security if they are sniffing pax in a terminal with no Pre line? How will the dogs speed up security if they sniff both Pre and regular lines (what I witnessed) and go away?
If the dogs aren't being used to speed up security (no Pre lanes or they sniff everybody but no one appears to pass the sniff test - no one gets 'expedited'), then what are they being used for in those circumstances?
I can only think of two things.
1) it's MUCH faster than swabbing/testing everyone, so it's an added 'layer', but it doesn't speed anything up.
2) it's a way of preventing a Brussels-style attack by eliminating the possibility of explosives in the packed lines.
If you can think of another possible reason for using the dogs while not expediting any pax, I'm all ears! Seriously!
Somehow I don't think I'm getting my point across to you - and I acknowledge that's apparently my fault.
TSA says they have dogs and will be getting more.
TSA says managed inclusion is dead. TSA says the dogs will speed up security.
How will the dogs speed up security if they are sniffing pax in a terminal with no Pre line? How will the dogs speed up security if they sniff both Pre and regular lines (what I witnessed) and go away?
If the dogs aren't being used to speed up security (no Pre lanes or they sniff everybody but no one appears to pass the sniff test - no one gets 'expedited'), then what are they being used for in those circumstances?
I can only think of two things.
1) it's MUCH faster than swabbing/testing everyone, so it's an added 'layer', but it doesn't speed anything up.
2) it's a way of preventing a Brussels-style attack by eliminating the possibility of explosives in the packed lines.
If you can think of another possible reason for using the dogs while not expediting any pax, I'm all ears! Seriously!
It was, I must say, the easiest, quickest, least-invasive screening I've had since scope-and-grope started. I was through it in less than ten minutes, despite the volume of travelers being equal to what, in my experience, has caused 30-45 minute waits at that same queue in the past.
Heck, I think it was the best screening experience I've seen since 9/11, although I believe the addition of an ETD canine and the ETD machines were both reasonable, non-invasive improvements over the standard pre-9/11 screening.
To be clear, this was the main queue, not a PreCheck queue. It literally handled half of MCO's traffic (for those who have never been, MCO had two queues, one at each end of the main terminal, each handling half of the airport's 129 gates). There didn't appear to be any separate PreCheck queue that day, since all travelers were essentially being including in PreCheck-style screening.
I had some hope afterward that this would become the new norm, but later I read about MI II, and that it had ended, and on my last trek through MCO the queue was back to normal, with AIT for most, no penalty box, no canine, no ETD swabs, and a 40-minute wait with about the same volume of travelers. Ponderous, man. Ponderous.
My apologies if we're not communicating well. Here's what I'm trying to say:
I do not believe that TSA is making ANY effort to prevent a land-side attack, like the Brussels attack. It's not their job. Their job is to try to prevent damage to airside and aircraft. It's not about the passengers and other airport patrons (which were the target of the Brussels attackers), it's about the "essential infrastructure."
The dogs are not there to stop Brussels-style attackers. They are there to add a sense of legitimacy to random inclusion (aka Managed Inclusion).
I do not believe that TSA is making ANY effort to prevent a land-side attack, like the Brussels attack. It's not their job. Their job is to try to prevent damage to airside and aircraft. It's not about the passengers and other airport patrons (which were the target of the Brussels attackers), it's about the "essential infrastructure."
The dogs are not there to stop Brussels-style attackers. They are there to add a sense of legitimacy to random inclusion (aka Managed Inclusion).
#43
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
The queue post-TDC was altered to create a penalty box in the middle, where the canine and handler were stationed. The rest of the queue was routed around the penalty box, giving the dog plenty of opportunity to sniff passing travelers. Once they passed the dog, travelers then entered a larger queue area where about a dozen ETD machines were set up in a row, each with a TSO manning it. Every traveler had their hands swabbed and tested, and moved on.
#45
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ONT/FRA
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 878
"TSA" and "duplication of effort" go hand-in-hand. Just one example: automated sterile area exit doors with alarms and mechanisms that prevent pax from entering through the exit, yet they are all manned by a TSO.