Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

tsa screening inbound international flights?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

tsa screening inbound international flights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2013, 12:44 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA MP, Anti tsa
Posts: 29
tsa screening inbound international flights?

Flew ba 217 lhr iad yesterday. Upon reaching corridor that takes you to mobile lounge to cbp, there were 2 tsa clerks standing around in corridor doing nothing. Any idea what they were there for?
cleareddirectfluky is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 1:25 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Programs: HH-S WS-G
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by cleareddirectfluky
standing around in corridor doing nothing.
I think you just answered your own question
Polar Man is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 3:12 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 574
TSA guys standing around doing nothing?
Sorry, I just can't picture it.
yandosan is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 3:21 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
Only to the untrained eye did it appear that they were doing nothing.
eyecue is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 4:13 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
To the trained eye, it's obvious they're doing nothing.
Caradoc is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 5:21 pm
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Officers often are deployed throughout the sterile area. Nothing to be particularly concerned about.
Often1 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 5:32 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,957
Originally Posted by Often1
Officers often are deployed throughout the sterile area. Nothing to be particularly concerned about.
TSA employees doing nothing are a waste of taxpayer and passenger funds. It's definitely something to be concerned about. They should be cleaning the restrooms, resurfacing an active runway, or laid off. Permanently.
Spiff is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 5:52 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,232
Originally Posted by Often1
Officers often are deployed throughout the sterile area. Nothing to be particularly concerned about.
TSA clearly has excess personnel. Time for a RIF. 25% reduction seems about right.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 6:05 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by Often1
Officers often are deployed throughout the sterile area. Nothing to be particularly concerned about.
They're not officers. They are neither sworn nor do they hold any sort of warrant. They're clerks. They have one lawful function and milling about wasting taxpayer money outside of a checkpoint exceeds it.
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 6:06 pm
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by eyecue
Only to the untrained eye did it appear that they were doing nothing.
And to the trained eye they are simply often standing about doing nothing.
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 6:57 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,166
Originally Posted by eyecue
Only to the untrained eye did it appear that they were doing nothing.
Well, let's just say that this is a "trained eye" talking who deals with you people on a frequent basis in interagency working groups. I know that's a foreign concept out there in Denver.

You won't comprehend it; but, rest assured that your agency and your bosses really are clueless and really are the laughing stock of the U.S. national security sector.

So, yes... These clerks really were just standing around.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 7:02 pm
  #12  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,957
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA clearly has excess personnel. Time for a RIF. 25% reduction seems about right.
100% RIF (Reduction in Farce) is about right. Airport and airline security should be the sole purview of airports and airlines. The federal government should have zero say in the matter.
Spiff is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 7:05 pm
  #13  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by Often1
Officers often are deployed throughout the sterile area. Nothing to be particularly concerned about.
What airports have you seen them at? I've never noticed a TSA agent in the secure area for arriving international fights handled by CBP and would be surprised if they trust them enough to be in that secure area.
tom911 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 7:16 pm
  #14  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by cleareddirectfluky
Flew ba 217 lhr iad yesterday. Upon reaching corridor that takes you to mobile lounge to cbp, there were 2 tsa clerks standing around in corridor doing nothing. Any idea what they were there for?
One risk here is that someone coming into the U.S. with large amounts of cash, precious metals, jewelry or even drugs could just pass them off to the TSA agent before they every get to a CBP station where they would be subject to search and having to declare the items. Seems like a good workaround if TSA employees are allowed to position themselves somewhere along the secure route to where you present your passport and declaration form. They could conspire with a passenger to bypass CBP. Easier than stealing a MacBook at a checkpoint.
tom911 is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2013, 7:21 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,232
Originally Posted by Spiff
100% RIF (Reduction in Farce) is about right. Airport and airline security should be the sole purview of airports and airlines. The federal government should have zero say in the matter.
I agree that screeners should be employees/contractors of the airline/airport companies. I believe oversight should be a government agency, FAA.

I see the above as long term, for now TSA needs to slim down since TSA is clearly a bloated agency. Don't think cutting Pistole would hurt since he doesn't do anything but take a paycheck home.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.