Pre-Check only for some passengers?
Oct 22, 2013 | 10:35 am
#32
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,061
And yet you keep complaining you can't get PRE or GE or whatever whilst you are bragging about beating the system!.....??? Seems maybe the system in some ways is working better than you think.
This absolutely proves my point(s) in many ways .......however it is clear that there is a bias on this thread......and while i accept everyone's opinion i feel i might be wasting everyone's time here.
This absolutely proves my point(s) in many ways .......however it is clear that there is a bias on this thread......and while i accept everyone's opinion i feel i might be wasting everyone's time here.
Oct 22, 2013 | 12:23 pm
#33
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,444
Please explain to me how I showed you that "the easier the screening the larger the threat, that is a fact." (quoting you)
I am not beating the system. I am taking water (not anything remotely dangerous) onto an airplane. This water is purchased airside and does not go through the security checkpoint (where, in fact, it is not allowed). All I am doing is getting it past a secondary and unannounced look into peoples bag which is not performed by airport security professionals. I have never been asked if I had water (in which case I would not lie).
If you think that taking any water purchased airside on a long overnight flight should be prohibited and punishable by not allowing this person to have the priviledge of not having to remove their shoes to fly within the US, Im very sorry to say I believe there is something very wrong about your morals.
And yet you keep complaining you can't get PRE or GE or whatever whilst you are bragging about beating the system!.....??? Seems maybe the system in some ways is working better than you think.
This absolutely proves my point(s) in many ways .......however it is clear that there is a bias on this thread......and while i accept everyone's opinion i feel i might be wasting everyone's time here.
This absolutely proves my point(s) in many ways .......however it is clear that there is a bias on this thread......and while i accept everyone's opinion i feel i might be wasting everyone's time here.
If you think that taking any water purchased airside on a long overnight flight should be prohibited and punishable by not allowing this person to have the priviledge of not having to remove their shoes to fly within the US, Im very sorry to say I believe there is something very wrong about your morals.
Oct 22, 2013 | 1:28 pm
#34
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 648
Please explain to me how I showed you that "the easier the screening the larger the threat, that is a fact." (quoting you)
I am not beating the system. I am taking water (not anything remotely dangerous) onto an airplane. This water is purchased airside and does not go through the security checkpoint (where, in fact, it is not allowed). All I am doing is getting it past a secondary and unannounced look into peoples bag which is not performed by airport security professionals. I have never been asked if I had water (in which case I would not lie).
If you think that taking any water purchased airside on a long overnight flight should be prohibited and punishable by not allowing this person to have the priviledge of not having to remove their shoes to fly within the US, Im very sorry to say I believe there is something very wrong about your morals.
I am not beating the system. I am taking water (not anything remotely dangerous) onto an airplane. This water is purchased airside and does not go through the security checkpoint (where, in fact, it is not allowed). All I am doing is getting it past a secondary and unannounced look into peoples bag which is not performed by airport security professionals. I have never been asked if I had water (in which case I would not lie).
If you think that taking any water purchased airside on a long overnight flight should be prohibited and punishable by not allowing this person to have the priviledge of not having to remove their shoes to fly within the US, Im very sorry to say I believe there is something very wrong about your morals.
Now maybe i understood that as before the first screening and not the secondary, if so my bad (I don't think it was clear), however the statement clearly includes an intention of deceit (your word not mine). And i guess your point is that secondary screening isn't so good....uhh, ok so what.
As far as the rest of the drivel in your last post.......not even sure how to approach that.
Oct 22, 2013 | 1:43 pm
#35
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
You wrote..." I have been hiding my bottle of water deep down in my carry-on and putting my follow-the-rules liquid baggie on top as a deterrent for years"
Now maybe i understood that as before the first screening and not the secondary, if so my bad (I don't think it was clear), however the statement clearly includes an intention of deceit (your word not mine). And i guess your point is that secondary screening isn't so good....uhh, ok so what.
As far as the rest of the drivel in your last post.......not even sure how to approach that.
Now maybe i understood that as before the first screening and not the secondary, if so my bad (I don't think it was clear), however the statement clearly includes an intention of deceit (your word not mine). And i guess your point is that secondary screening isn't so good....uhh, ok so what.
As far as the rest of the drivel in your last post.......not even sure how to approach that.