![]() |
Pre-Check only for some passengers?
Really now, what's the point of giving my wife pre-check and not me? If we were trying to slip something through we could have had her carry it.
Besides, we are going to go through the same line anyway for luggage security. (Of course that doesn't do any good against the TSA guy who exchanged a bag of nuts for a love note.) |
Pre-Check only for some passengers?
The point is that your wife is still going thru the same security check as you. She is still screened for liquids and her laptop is still being x-rayed.
PreCheck is more for travelers who know what can/can't go thru security. The enrollment fee is more of a "barrier to entry" to weed out those who know the rules and those who don't. If you only travel a few times a year chances you will not enroll due to cost and chances are that you are also not as familiar on what is allowed. |
There is frequently a difference in the screening: subject to strip search machine or not.
Given the "managed inclusion" into PreCheck may not involve a fee, the fee (if even applicable) acting as "barrier to entry" for the "non/less/differently-knowledgeable" may be considered a non-barrier of sorts. The TSA didn't create PreCheck to weed out those who know the TSA's rules from those who don't know the TSA's rules. It was created for other reasons. |
Originally Posted by seawolf
(Post 21627896)
The point is that your wife is still going thru the same security check as you. She is still screened for liquids and her laptop is still being x-rayed.
PreCheck is more for travelers who know what can/can't go thru security. The enrollment fee is more of a "barrier to entry" to weed out those who know the rules and those who don't. If you only travel a few times a year chances you will not enroll due to cost and chances are that you are also not as familiar on what is allowed. Where do you get this from? If I pony up $85 for pre-check, are they going to grill me about my travel habits and then educate me on what is and isn't allowed? Active duty in uniform who may have never flown commercial before are eligible for Pre. Anyone who ponies up $85 is eligible for Pre, even if they aren't a frequent flyer. Anyone who has GE (which might be someone who only flies internationally once or twice a year but who wants to streamline the re-entry process) is eligible for Pre. Random people pulled out of line by TSOs who may have never flown before are immediately eligible for Pre. |
And the NEXUS/SENTRI/GE users who got it for road travel in the main also are set up for PreCheck participation -- but that PreCheck participation for an infrequent flyer mostly would happen if someone remembers to enter the appropriate numbers in the Known Traveler field of the airline records.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 21628586)
And the NEXUS/SENTRI/GE users who got it for road travel in the main also are set up for PreCheck participation -- but that PreCheck participation for an infrequent flyer mostly would happen if someone remembers to enter the appropriate numbers in the Known Traveler field of the airline records.
|
Originally Posted by Ari
(Post 21629257)
I doubt many people signed up with GE for road travel.
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 21628549)
Anyone who ponies up $85 is eligible for Pre, even if they aren't a frequent flyer.
The simple truth is that everyone should be screened by Pre standards (shoes on and metal detectors), as is done in most countries. |
Originally Posted by BubbaLoop
(Post 21632742)
Not true. I am not eligible for Pre because I am not a US citizen or resident.
The simple truth is that everyone should be screened by Pre standards (shoes on and metal detectors), as is done in most countries. I hate it but it's a necessary evil right now (current procedures) BTW you don't have to be a US citz to get GE |
Originally Posted by bizorbetter
(Post 21635800)
Until someone gets something horrible through.....then how would you feel
I hate it but it's a necessary evil right now (current procedures) BTW you don't have to be a US citz to get GE So you really believe no plot could ever involve an unwitting 'mule' over-75 or under-12 or active duty in uniform (hint: think Nadal Hassan). All of those folks already get a form of expedited screening. The young and old get to keep their shoes on (like folks most everywhere else in the world) and those in uniform get automatic access to Pre. Of course, the minute they separate from service (even after 30 years, with a retired military ID) or they travel in civilian clothes (but with an active duty ID), they are untrustworthy. |
Originally Posted by bizorbetter
(Post 21635800)
Until someone gets something horrible through.....then how would you feel
I hate it but it's a necessary evil right now (current procedures) BTW you don't have to be a US citz to get GE |
Originally Posted by bizorbetter
(Post 21635800)
Until someone gets something horrible through.....then how would you feel
I hate it but it's a necessary evil right now (current procedures) When I fly into (and therefore over) the US, I am screened by Pre standards, as used abroad: my shoes and cardigan stay on, and there is no full body scanner. None of the many airplanes flying into the US full of people screened this way have ever fallen out of they sky. The truth is, taking off shoes and using full body scanners does not add to security (and may even decrease it since full body scanners make it a lot easier to take a gun on a plane, but that is another story).
Originally Posted by bizorbetter
(Post 21635800)
BTW you don't have to be a US citz to get GE
In addition to that, it remains an open question if presenting GE plus a foreign passport as ID will actually get you into a Pre line at the TSA entry point. I know from experience that presenting a passport (of a perfectly ordinary democratic country with no ties to terrorism) to a TSA officer induces a state of immediate distrust against the passport holder. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 21636041)
:rolleyes:
So you really believe no plot could ever involve an unwitting 'mule' over-75 or under-12 or active duty in uniform (hint: think Nadal Hassan). All of those folks already get a form of expedited screening. The young and old get to keep their shoes on (like folks most everywhere else in the world) and those in uniform get automatic access to Pre. Of course, the minute they separate from service (even after 30 years, with a retired military ID) or they travel in civilian clothes (but with an active duty ID), they are untrustworthy. The argument is basically at what point the risk equals the inconvenience and everyone will differ on that. |
Originally Posted by BubbaLoop
(Post 21636915)
From the GE site: "Global Entry is open to U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, Dutch citizens, South Korean citizens and Mexican nationals." I, as most of the world´s people, am not a US citizen or resident, Dutch, South Korean or Mexican national. . |
Originally Posted by BubbaLoop
(Post 21636915)
In addition to that, it remains an open question if presenting GE plus a foreign passport as ID will actually get you into a Pre line at the TSA entry point. I know from experience that presenting a passport (of a perfectly ordinary democratic country with no ties to terrorism) to a TSA officer induces a state of immediate distrust against the passport holder. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:54 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.