Whoa...that would condemn him to a lifetime of 'anomaly resolution gropes' every time he went through the NoS:

"Something suspicious going on with your resistance, dude, we have to size up the situation and decide how to handle it. Step this way please" (snapping of blue gloves).

So....touch a young boy at a checkpoint, and it's national security.

Touch a young boy somewhere else and it's illegal. Hmmmm....

(Yes, I realize the rape charge means something other than touching happened, but my point still stands)

How is something like this even possible for someone with the highest ethical standards who was conducting himself with integrity???

An update from the MailOnline website:
The Daily Mail:
TSA agent arrested over 'rape of young boy' he was mentoring through Big Brothers Big Sisters program
PUBLISHED: 18:14 EST, 1 November 2012
UPDATED: 18:24 EST, 1 November 2012

A short quote:

Paul Magnuson, who recently worked as a transportation security inspector for the TSA and was returning to America after working on a job in Frankfurt, Germany, was arrested in the international airport in Newark, New Jersey.

and

MailOnline spoke with TSA spokesman David Castleveter who said that Magnuson was fired as a result of the arrest.

�TSA is aware of the allegations against the former Cleveland-based employee and continues to cooperate with investigative authorities,� Castleveter said.

�TSA holds its employees to the highest ethical standards and expects all employees to conduct themselves with integrity and professionalism and takes appropriate action when allegations are substantiated.�

Wow, goalie, it's like you're psychic or something.

OK, now I'm confused.

One of our (reliable) resident TSOs has mentioned in recent posts the extreme difficulties in firing TSA employees for misconduct.

So isn't it a bit disingenuous for a TSA spokesman to say that Magnuson was 'fired' when IIRC, Magnuson has 7 days to appeal the firing and longer if the union comes to back him up (TSA's new excuse for not being able to fire anyone - the union won't allow it). So he can't possibly have been really fired - maybe the process has been initiated, maybe he will be given an opportunity to 'resign'.

It also brings up another question: does TSA fire someone (Magnuson) based solely on suspicion of wrong-doing? Magnuson has been arrested, but he has not yet had his day in court. We have no way of knowing at this time whether or not he will be found guilty. If he is found innocent, will TSA then reinstate him with back pay? Will he be able to sue TSA for firing him and collect $$$ of taxpayers' money in settlement?

Note that the quote was an indirect quote from the article: the writer said that the TSA spokesman said that Magnuson was 'fired'. I suspect (but have no evidence to prove) that the spokesman made the usual indirect allusion ('Magnuson is no longer working for TSA' or 'Magnuson has been relieved of duty') and the writer jumped to the obvious --- if technically incorrect --- conclusion.

Yup, you got that right, Spiff! I agree as well. He's too crazy! He did not have background check. He never did. He was supposed to do the fingerprinted.

So why doesn't it work on lottery numbers

Wow, you hit that nail on the head.

10. Australia stopped being a penile colony a while back.
9. Don't have to register as sex offenders there.
8. Need to install backscatter machines in the holes in the Berlin Wall, out of an abundance of caution.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.

Okay, I need some help here.

Give him a chance at a trial, but if he's guilty I say lock him up and throw away the key.

...in General Population.

Not that it makes any difference, but this scumbag was not a TSO. He was an inspector like this dolt http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?d...2-944325cea23d There are several things that you can be fired outright for. The appeal, if there is one, is on the checklist with turning in your uniforms. Also, these employees are not covered by the union.

Was he TSA?