A pat down that ended my wife up in the ER
#61
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IAD
Posts: 2,060
Been thinking about this some more. It's very frustrating, there there seems to be no solution. Maybe there are no EASY solutions, but we can still do a hard one. What if the OP put together a list of expenses he incurred as a result of his wife's hospitalization and submitted it to the TSA as an invoice? He'd have to have a good attorney behind him, of course. I know, the TSA would laugh at it. What if several people did that? And copied the media? What about a class action?
It's just so wrong and so evil that innocent people have to submit to victimization by their government in order to "protect the nation". Since WE are the nation, it makes no sense - we're victimizing ourselves to protect ourselves? WTH? It MUST change. Somehow.
It's just so wrong and so evil that innocent people have to submit to victimization by their government in order to "protect the nation". Since WE are the nation, it makes no sense - we're victimizing ourselves to protect ourselves? WTH? It MUST change. Somehow.
#62
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
It is also possible that the reason the poster's relatives are not seeing the complaints is because these two screeners are not sticking their fingers into women's vaginas, chopping men's testicles or busting people's medical devices. Perhaps they have somehow managed to avoid administering such aggressive gropes.
#63
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Gold
Posts: 1,672
I think the point was that it sounded like you meant the presence of TSA staff at a checkpoint was deterring a terrorist attack on the queue. The presence of armed LEOs nearby may be a deterrent. TSA staff can only attack back with harsh language, or flee, so there's no help to be found in that quarter.
#64
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SEA
Programs: Delta TDK(or care)WIA, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,869
I think the point was that it sounded like you meant the presence of TSA staff at a checkpoint was deterring a terrorist attack on the queue. The presence of armed LEOs nearby may be a deterrent. TSA staff can only attack back with harsh language, or flee, so there's no help to be found in that quarter.
#65
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: Delta Diamond Medallion 1MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Car Executive Elite
Posts: 550
I agree with you - I don't know what airport Rico's brother and wife work for, but in my last three trips through LAX and HNL I have seen a young woman crying, another woman visibly shaken, husbands getting angry at the TSA and an elderly woman complaining about the invasiveness of the search, plus an unpleasant experience of my own. I don't fly that often (anymore) but considering I'm not even at the checkpoint for that long, I find it hard to believe that someone working there all day has not heard any complaints!
My wife does not travel by air with me any more for family visits, etc. I would not be able to stand there and watch one of those TSA "people" doing that assault on her; I'd be arrested.
My frequently used airline is losing thousands of dollars because my family does not fly any more. But the company's response to this is "oh well".
#66
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,681
Been thinking about this some more. It's very frustrating, there there seems to be no solution. Maybe there are no EASY solutions, but we can still do a hard one. What if the OP put together a list of expenses he incurred as a result of his wife's hospitalization and submitted it to the TSA as an invoice? He'd have to have a good attorney behind him, of course. I know, the TSA would laugh at it. What if several people did that? And copied the media? What about a class action?
It's just so wrong and so evil that innocent people have to submit to victimization by their government in order to "protect the nation". Since WE are the nation, it makes no sense - we're victimizing ourselves to protect ourselves? WTH? It MUST change. Somehow.
It's just so wrong and so evil that innocent people have to submit to victimization by their government in order to "protect the nation". Since WE are the nation, it makes no sense - we're victimizing ourselves to protect ourselves? WTH? It MUST change. Somehow.
#67
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Except that there's a significant risk of being caught unless the first TSO is bribable and that's hard. I think people on this forum tend to greatly underestimate the difficulty of implementing plots that rely on "insiders". Those are indeed viable if the opponent is a national intelligence service whose operators are trained in how to approach and select people. They learn how to do so in a way that won't cause suspicion and they also learn how to fit into a society. But it can take years to be successful in that sort of task because of the very real risk of being reported by people who aren't willing to cooperate, especially in this day and age. So they have to move very slowly, deliberately, and carefully.
I don't think that terrorist groups ever had that capability, but it's nearly impossible that they have it now given the focus on operations to degrade and track communications and money slow, both of which are essential to the success of any such long-term operation.
I don't think that terrorist groups ever had that capability, but it's nearly impossible that they have it now given the focus on operations to degrade and track communications and money slow, both of which are essential to the success of any such long-term operation.
You're making this sound a lot harder than it really is. And taking comfort where there is none.
#68
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 436
Can't sue the feds this way, unfortunately (which is one reason why privatization is a good idea). She'd need to file an FTCA claim with the TSA and allow them 6 months to pay. If they don't (and they don't), the woman may sue in federal court.
--Jon
--Jon
#69
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 129
All pro/anti TSA arguments aside, since when did vomiting and stress mean rushing to the ER?
Did this really qualify as an EMERGENCY?
I've met people that get stressed or can't cope with day to day life, and while I sympathize, how can the TSA know whether she's faking it or telling the truth? If the "terrorists" find out they'll make an exception for victims of sexual assault they'll groom victims of sexual assault to carry out attacks.
While it's unfortunate what happened to your wife, we have yet to have another plane crash or even come close to crashing thanks to terrorists on US soil.
That said I think the TSA could use some more training and be cut back significantly, but at the end of the day there are people out there that can't cope with even minor inconveniences to them when they're traveling and frankly they should avoid traveling especially by air where it is a giant cattle car in the sky.
Air travel is cheaper than it's ever been and as such expect the same quality of "service" that you'll get at any discount business, which means getting a cold shoulder when you feel disrespected.
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wanting First. Buying First.
Programs: Lifetime Executive Diamond Platinum VIP with Braniff, Eastern, Midway, National & Pan Am
Posts: 15,946
Complain to TSA here: http://www.tsa.gov/contact/index.shtm
Also complain to your congressman, both your senators, the White House and the airport administration every time TSA tries to force you through a naked body scanner or punishes you for refusing by subjecting you to the groping.
This is our only option for fighting back against an agency that is way out of control.
Also complain to your congressman, both your senators, the White House and the airport administration every time TSA tries to force you through a naked body scanner or punishes you for refusing by subjecting you to the groping.
This is our only option for fighting back against an agency that is way out of control.
Voters who refuse to stand up and buck the corrupt special-interest infested two party system (more scanners for Chertoff to sell to a Romney administration; more unionized government-employed thugs to be employed by an Obama administration) as it stands today are a big part of the problem.
The poster upthread that claimed that NO politician will take on TSA is wrong. While most won't, there are a few that will. If enough of us supported these politicians (even when they are in the opposite, or a third, party from our natural preference), change would be possible.
#71
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 436
Thanks, Doctor. Except that doesn't explain why the hospital wanted to admit her for multiple nights.
--Jon
--Jon
#72
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 196
No one should have to check their dignity at the security gate.
Although my story is not as awful as the OP'S, I , too, was treated for PTSD. To get a pat down here in the US is something I am skittish about but has not been nearly as horrifying for me as it is in Europe. In the last year, I have been patted down in both Amsterdam and in Rome. These people might as well be doing a breast exam and a pelvic. I can't bear the thought of ever going through that again.
To the OP: My best advice? Make sure your wife has a therapist that she can talk to before she needs to fly and that this individual is available to her via phone in the event that this happens to her again. My prayers go out to both of you!
Although my story is not as awful as the OP'S, I , too, was treated for PTSD. To get a pat down here in the US is something I am skittish about but has not been nearly as horrifying for me as it is in Europe. In the last year, I have been patted down in both Amsterdam and in Rome. These people might as well be doing a breast exam and a pelvic. I can't bear the thought of ever going through that again.
To the OP: My best advice? Make sure your wife has a therapist that she can talk to before she needs to fly and that this individual is available to her via phone in the event that this happens to her again. My prayers go out to both of you!
#73
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
If there's going to be a White Knight, it won't be from Congress; nor the Judiciary until the current Justices umm... move on. Which leaves the Executive branch, and only a second-term one at that for the re-election consideration noted above. But not this second-term one I fear.
#74
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 45
That said I think the TSA could use some more training and be cut back significantly, but at the end of the day there are people out there that can't cope with even minor inconveniences to them when they're traveling and frankly they should avoid traveling especially by air where it is a giant cattle car in the sky.
Air travel is cheaper than it's ever been and as such expect the same quality of "service" that you'll get at any discount business, which means getting a cold shoulder when you feel disrespected.
Air travel is cheaper than it's ever been and as such expect the same quality of "service" that you'll get at any discount business, which means getting a cold shoulder when you feel disrespected.