US Immigration Exit Tracking
#76
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
I have attempted to limit my comments to the topic of the original post which was Immigration exit controls for visitors to the United States. I posted the relevant laws and regulations that apply to visitors to the United States.
Immigration exit controls for foreign visitors has absolutely nothing to do with US Passports, US citizens
Immigration exit controls for foreign visitors has absolutely nothing to do with US Passports, US citizens
#77
#78
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
and again you cite no examples to your references. That does not make them facts. You just can not accept that Immigration exit controls for foreign visitors has absolutely nothing to do with US Passports, US citizens or unpaid child support.
If you think it does post the Federal law, or regulation that supports it. If you have a specific example that can be researched then cite it. Otherwise, it is not a fact. It is just your assertion that you will not support with information that can be explored. Fancy way of saying that it is nothing more than your opinion which you are entitled to however, don't expect folks to take it as fact when you refuse to support it.
FB
If you think it does post the Federal law, or regulation that supports it. If you have a specific example that can be researched then cite it. Otherwise, it is not a fact. It is just your assertion that you will not support with information that can be explored. Fancy way of saying that it is nothing more than your opinion which you are entitled to however, don't expect folks to take it as fact when you refuse to support it.
FB
About spoon-feeding on demand -- consider that reserved primarily for a subset of those US citizens whose passports expire within five years of issue date (or sooner).
I indicated that an element of your post was a misrepresentation of national interest, and the facts on that are what they are and have been since 1996 and 1997. Apparently not everyone loves to be corrected as much as I would. That's ok by me -- different strokes for different folks.
We already have exit controls of some sort for visitors that are also used for US persons too. It has already been useful for US interdiction of espionage-related and terrorism-related activity. I welcome all efforts to try to disprove this paragraph too.
Last edited by GUWonder; May 27, 2013 at 4:42 am
#79
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: AUS / DXB
Programs: BA Silver | AA LT Gold | EY Silver | Marriott LT Titanium
Posts: 1,838
I'm curious whether this would apply to visitors only, or all non-US citizens (including LPRs). Were LPRs subject to US-VISIT exit fingerprinting when it was in force?
#80
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
The US lost track of the the bomber's departure from the US for Russia, with US having to rely upon Russia to correct the record and indicate how long he was in Russia and where in Russia he had gone on the same trip. Some think that if his flight departure details were known, then he may have been intercepted at some point before the bombing. Also, some think that (more) exit controls should be in place to facilitate the revocation of asylum/refugee status if a person granted such status in the US goes to the foreign country of citizenship. Hope that helps indicate why this has come up in connection with those attacks.
By the way, even as Russia had warned the US about that individual, the Russian government didn't really do much of anything to him on his entry to or exit from Russia despite previously having warned the US that the individual was an extremist of some sort.
Russia has entry/exit controls, knew his Russian passport details, has a blacklist system in place, and yet he was more or less left alone on his trip to/from Russia.
By the way, even as Russia had warned the US about that individual, the Russian government didn't really do much of anything to him on his entry to or exit from Russia despite previously having warned the US that the individual was an extremist of some sort.
Russia has entry/exit controls, knew his Russian passport details, has a blacklist system in place, and yet he was more or less left alone on his trip to/from Russia.
Also - how would exit control from the US indicate in any way where and how any individual is about to spend his time outside the US? (as you seem to imply that it was due to lack of such control that the US had to rely on Russia for such info)
And his flight details were most certainly known - all US-bound passanger's details are relayed to the US before the flight even starts.
Let's face it - the authorities had zilch on the guys, but not due to lack of exit controls.
#81
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Exit controls [Russian-style] from the US would mean the reliance on airline information for tracking and/or exit controls would decline and the name-related miss would be far less likely to occur.
The principal (since-deceased) Boston Marathon bomber had been interviewed by the FBI before 2013 based on Russia's flagging him down. His communications and travel records examined by the FBI, with contributions from the NSA. A good chunk of this info has been publicly validated by key Congressional leaders, and elements of all of it have been in the press too.
#82
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#83
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
But this is all beside the point under discussion - US exit controls.
Due to the way his name was on the Aeroflot passenger manifest, the US did not previously match his departure from the US with his filed re-entry to the US, and the US had to rely upon Russia to inform the FBI about the bomber's travel history to the country and about the duration of his most recent trip to Russia.
So I still stick to my opinion, that exit controls would have absolutely no influence on the subsequent Boston bombing. (I can hardly wait when some senator will bring 9/11 in the picture)
#84
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
But he wasn't. I'm rather sure that if the Russians would have seen any reason to detain him, they would have. They are not so easily fooled by transcription of non-Latin script names as the yanks seem to be.
But this is all beside the point under discussion - US exit controls.
Sorry, but this still doesn't answer the original issue you brought up - ie. that having a functional exit control would have somehow indicated how long and where the guy had been in Russia. A JFK stamp has not (yet) a GPS chip with satellite upload functionality embedded (now how much such a contract would be worth?)
And this interview resulted in? Exactly - zilch. To refine my wording, the authorities had zilch to stick on the guy.
So I still stick to my opinion, that exit controls would have absolutely no influence on the subsequent Boston bombing. (I can hardly wait when some senator will bring 9/11 in the picture)
But this is all beside the point under discussion - US exit controls.
Sorry, but this still doesn't answer the original issue you brought up - ie. that having a functional exit control would have somehow indicated how long and where the guy had been in Russia. A JFK stamp has not (yet) a GPS chip with satellite upload functionality embedded (now how much such a contract would be worth?)
And this interview resulted in? Exactly - zilch. To refine my wording, the authorities had zilch to stick on the guy.
So I still stick to my opinion, that exit controls would have absolutely no influence on the subsequent Boston bombing. (I can hardly wait when some senator will bring 9/11 in the picture)
If we had Russian style exit controls at JFK, he would have been tracked in a way which he wasn't by the US because: his US docs would have been used and relayed more effectively to the relevant systems that are now fed by airlines and driven by airlines' info; or if he was using only Russian docs he would have had to explain himself about his legal presence in the US. His period of time outside of the US would be more reliably tracked and his destination would have been known in a way it wasn't known by the US at the time of his departure from the US.
The FBI thought it didn't have enough to arrest him last year or before. Whether there was some other basis for the US to go after him or not, who knows but I am betting some blowhard like US Rep. Peter King or US Sen. Lindsay Graham wouldn't mind whipping something up.
The Russian government doesn't always detain people that some of their officials may wish to detain.
By the way the Russian government sometimes does mess up things based on differences between Cyrillic alphabet script and Roman alphabet script, just probably way less often than is the case with the US if it involves a manual examination.
I am not making a case for additional exit controls, as I am opposed to their expansion. I am also of the thought that the Boston marathon bombers could have acted even without departure from and re-entry to the US.
Last edited by GUWonder; May 28, 2013 at 1:35 am
#85
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,107
Exactly
#86
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The US does try to keep tabs on how long US persons are outside of the US and to where we travel. Can't say I am a fan of that either, but the status quo is what it is.
Last edited by GUWonder; May 28, 2013 at 3:06 am
#88
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,216
I was going to say it was not a case of asking permission, but of tracking who was leaving, but I am not so sure now. How long before you have to tell the government why you want to leave, like Australia does? :/
#89
#90
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SYD
Programs: Miles & More, Virgin Velocity
Posts: 46
Information sought on this form is required to administer immigration, customs,quarantine, statistical, health, wildlife and currency laws of Australia and its collection is authorised by legislation. It will be disclosed only to agencies administering these areas and those entitled to receive it under Australian law.
For permanent residents leaving Australia, it is not only a record of travel movements for permanent residents but gives statistics on why people are emigrating from Australia and whether temporarily or permanently.
Last edited by mfl; Jun 2, 2013 at 6:18 pm