Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Service Animal Fiasco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2011, 12:40 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
There are no laws that enforced solely through voluntary compliance.
Sigh. Voluntary compliance plus random enforcement.

There's no cop sitting outside my door waiting for me to file my 1040 tax returns every April 15th. On the other hand, if I don't file my return, there's always the possibility that I might get audited, with much more severe penalties if it turns out that I owed the government money.

Originally Posted by Always Flyin
There is abuse of the system. Everyone knows it and it affects other passengers. It is just so terrible, isn't it, to require compliance with standards before you bring a loose animal into the passenger compartment of a plane?
I agree that there's abuse of the system, and I agree that people ought to follow the rules. I'm just not sure that your prescription isn't worse than the original problem.

Originally Posted by Always Flyin
I note you didn't respond to my query about my pet python...
'Cause I got no problem with it. If you're comfortable with a python hanging around your neck, so am I ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2011, 12:54 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,745
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
Sigh. Voluntary compliance plus random enforcement.

There's no cop sitting outside my door waiting for me to file my 1040 tax returns every April 15th. On the other hand, if I don't file my return, there's always the possibility that I might get audited, with much more severe penalties if it turns out that I owed the government money.
I guess I just got confused when you said above: "Some laws are enforced through involuntary compliance; others are enforced through voluntary compliance." I guess you didn't mean what you said.


I agree that there's abuse of the system, and I agree that people ought to follow the rules. I'm just not sure that your prescription isn't worse than the original problem.
Nor am I. See? We agree on something!
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2011, 1:07 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
I guess I just got confused when you said above: "Some laws are enforced through involuntary compliance; others are enforced through voluntary compliance." I guess you didn't mean what you said.
What I said was true, but incomplete. If that's sufficient cause to criticize my integrity, so be it.

I noticed nobody jumped all over ND Sol's back when he misstated the acronym of the relevant agency as ACCA. But, hey, that's life in the NBA ...

Originally Posted by Always Flyin
Nor am I. See? We agree on something!
Never in doubt from my perspective ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2011, 1:39 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,745
Ok.

ND Sol! You bad person. You misstated the acronym of the relevant agency as ACCA.

Always Flyin is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2011, 1:52 pm
  #50  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
Standardized training and certification. You know, like I said earlier.
That brings me back to my original suggestion:

Originally Posted by Ari
If you feel that way, then lobby Congress to change the law or the FAA to modify the correspondig CFR (I don't recall the exact interplay of the ACAA and the FAA's CFR with respect to ESAs).
Ari is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2011, 3:42 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
What I said was true, but incomplete. If that's sufficient cause to criticize my integrity, so be it.

I noticed nobody jumped all over ND Sol's back when he misstated the acronym of the relevant agency as ACCA. But, hey, that's life in the NBA ...



Never in doubt from my perspective ...
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
Ok.

ND Sol! You bad person. You misstated the acronym of the relevant agency as ACCA.

Off to goalie's penalty box for me since I typed a "C" instead of an "A".

(BTW, ACAA is not an "agency", but is a law, but don't worry, I won't jump all over anyone's back.)
ND Sol is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2011, 9:50 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
Yes, I would, so that those who have a legitimate need can avail themselves of the privilege and those who are not eligible cannot.

Handicapped people have to get permit to park in a handicapped parking space.

Why should people in need of a service animal not have to do something similar?

People should not unnecessarily be subjected to the untrained pets of others in the confined space of an airplane.
Your suggestion of an official training and credential system is ridiculou$, exce$$ive and complete overkill for the scale of the "problem" as you describe it, and in no way comparable to the parking permit system.

I have a handicapped parking permit. To get it, I took the form to one of the specialists I see, she completed it and I mailed to the DMV, who in turn mailed me my parking permit. Cost: 1 first class stamp. Every state has something similar: a form to be completed by a licensed physician and a permit given out by the existing government agency which deals with motor vehicles and no additional bureaucracy was created for the permit process.

You want legislation to set up an agency of the government, which would first hire staff, then solicit expert testimony and eventually set standards for training, then hire and train evaluators, and set up offices in all 50 states because that's the way federal programs work. These offices would then issue credentials to tested and approved trainers of service animals and eventually to the animals themselves after testing.

Next anyone who needed a service animal would be required to have the animal trained by an authorized, licensed trainer to standards set by the federal government, which may or may not match the needs of the individual, and then tested by government evaluators to a government set standard in order to get a credential to take their service animal out in public or on a plane.

The cost of federal program would of course be borne by the taxpayers, and come from the current "surplus" in the federal budget while the individual needing the service animal would pay out of pocket for all the extra training and testing, and you know, don't you, that medical insurance does not pay for service animals, even guide dogs for the blind?

All this so you won't be disturbed by a barking dog on a plane?

FT's ToS prohibit me from stating exactly what I think of such an attitude.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2011, 6:34 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: DFW, SEA and AA in between
Programs: AA-3MM-ExPLT
Posts: 1,146
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
I have a handicapped parking permit. To get it, I took the form to one of the specialists I see, she completed it and I mailed to the DMV, who in turn mailed me my parking permit. Cost: 1 first class stamp. Every state has something similar: a form to be completed by a licensed physician and a permit given out by the existing government agency which deals with motor vehicles and no additional bureaucracy was created for the permit process.
So we already have a useless bureaucracy dealing with air travel. It's pretty simple: you get a form, take it to your mental health provider, s/he fills it out and you mail it to TSA with a picture of the service animal. They send you a placard which you hang from the service animal.

Other than training a few service animals to open the mail and run a lamination machine, we already have what we need.
BStrauss3 is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2011, 7:00 pm
  #54  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by BStrauss3
So we already have a useless bureaucracy dealing with air travel. It's pretty simple: you get a form, take it to your mental health provider, s/he fills it out and you mail it to TSA with a picture of the service animal. They send you a placard which you hang from the service animal.
Just to clarify, an "emotional support animal" is not the same as a "service animal" in the eyes of the law (and also in many practical ways).
Ari is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2011, 8:25 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Originally Posted by BStrauss3
So we already have a useless bureaucracy dealing with air travel. It's pretty simple: you get a form, take it to your mental health provider, s/he fills it out and you mail it to TSA with a picture of the service animal. They send you a placard which you hang from the service animal.

Other than training a few service animals to open the mail and run a lamination machine, we already have what we need.
Maybe you should read the whole thread before responding.

The poster I was responding to wants every service animal to have standardized training and certification of the training to be carried with the owner. Mental health providers have zip to do with service animals, they might suggest emotional support animals to their clients.

... and not many animals of any species would put up with a placard hanging from their neck.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2011, 8:31 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Back to the OP. WN charges $75 for a carry on pet (cat or dog) and nothing if it is a "service animal." Not really hard to figure out.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2011, 6:27 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 360
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
Give me a break. This crap has to be stopped.

"Emotional support"? If you are that emotionally fragile, stay home.
Yeah especially the disabled vets with PTSD who got it just to inconvenience TSOs and to get to fly with pets with them, right? I was told by a TSO at SDF that if I was unable to walk into the scanner and "assume the position" that I and my wheelchair should "just stay home."
4nsicdoc is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2011, 11:14 am
  #58  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TX
Programs: WN A List Preferred and CP, AA, IHG Spire, Hertz #1 Gold 5*, Hilton Diamond, Enterprise Platinum
Posts: 1,269
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
Back to the OP. WN charges $75 for a carry on pet (cat or dog) and nothing if it is a "service animal." Not really hard to figure out.
That's the bottom line. And what kind of papers does WN require upon check-in or boarding? any idea?

I think we hit a nerve here with this topic.
doctall41 is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2011, 12:19 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Originally Posted by doctall41
That's the bottom line. And what kind of papers does WN require upon check-in or boarding? any idea?

I think we hit a nerve here with this topic.
Here's the law:
(d) As evidence that an animal is a service animal, you must accept identification cards, other written documentation, presence of harnesses, tags, or the credible verbal assurances of a qualified individual with a disability using the animal
from this article, which also explains the laws relating to "credentials" required for emotional support animals.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2011, 11:24 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 79
Give it a rest. I've never seen a service animal cause a problem on a plane. If there were any allergies, they can be resolved quietly and privately.

Half the flights I take are disrupted by loud, bratty, seat-kicking, irritating children that can't even maintain the composure of a dog or a cat. We should worry about those and moving them to the back behind a soundproof barrier.

By the time the kids are raising hell at 30,000 I'm already worked up after the TSA abuse at the checkpoint. When the stewardess comes by with the booze to soothe the nightmare of air travel, that too has been jacked up in price to larcenous levels.

An occasional bark would be a huge improvement from the almost guaranteed screaming, whining, and seat kicking which have become an accepted part of air travel.

Please, if you're on my next flight, and you have an emotional comfort animal, share him with me. Meeting a well behaved animal companion will be a nice break from the stress.

Besides, air travel is already a three ring circus, so there have to be animals somewhere. The service tigers could not make it past the TSO tasked with stealing our pen knives and nail files.

Last edited by scoow; Sep 3, 2011 at 1:20 pm Reason: unnecessary
darwin76 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.