Originally Posted by rwoman
(Post 18683233)
And in the news/blogs again...
Airports against lifting the liquid ban Wow... We spend all of this money on technologies that are still "not good enough." |
It's all about money...
The TSA throw your water bottle away so you'd have to BUY water bottles from the vending machines located so strategically a few feet beyond the TSA check point. I witnessed happy workers filling up the vending machines for water bottles joking about how the passengers get ripped off. That's how corrupt gov officials get rich.
|
Originally Posted by Pesky Monkey
(Post 18687475)
Is this surprising? Are they more interested in pretend security or $3 bottles of water?
Well said! The whole thing is a scam and a lot of people have not waken up to the reality that the TSA is not in it to protect you but only to get rich out of the manufactured fear. |
Originally Posted by Yosemite
(Post 18729536)
The TSA throw your water bottle away so you'd have to BUY water bottles from the vending machines located so strategically a few feet beyond the TSA check point. I witnessed happy workers filling up the vending machines for water bottles joking about how the passengers get ripped off. That's how corrupt gov officials get rich.
That said, this IS why I typically carry my own refillable bottle! :) |
I may have missed it, but has anyone emptied their bottle of water into the liquids zip-lock bag to go through security, and refilled the now empty bottle once past the checkpoint?
|
Originally Posted by quick_dry
(Post 18731987)
I may have missed it, but has anyone emptied their bottle of water into the liquids zip-lock bag to go through security, and refilled the now empty bottle once past the checkpoint?
You are allowed a baggie-full of 3.4 ounce or less containers of liquid and it is not uncommon for TSOs to challenge (and deny) a container based on 1) the amount the container holds is not printed on the container (even if the container is clearly so small that it can't be over-volume) and 2) the container (toothpaste, for ex.) clearly has less than 3.4 ounces in it, but the container's label indicates a larger potential capacity. I don't recall ever seeing this labelling requirement spelled out on the website or at the checkpoint videos and signs, but I've see it enforced at the checkpoing on more than one occasion. (Once the TSO got worked up because he said my deodorant (not a gel) was bigger than the container stated (a lot of them do look pretty large, but it's just the container/cap that are big). The best part - it wasn't even an LGA, it was just easier to corral all my toiletries, including my toothbrush, in the Kippie baggie. If you just pour the water into the baggie, even if it's only two ounces, there's no way for you to 'prove' that the amount is less than 3.4 ounces, so you'll have to toss it. If you put it in a smaller baggie inside the regular baggie, you will still have the missing container label problem. |
Originally Posted by rwoman
(Post 18729646)
I'm not sure it's government making the $$ - TSA does not own the machines...
That said, this IS why I typically carry my own refillable bottle! :) |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 18732038)
Once the TSO got worked up because he said my deodorant (not a gel) was bigger than the container stated (a lot of them do look pretty good. |
I agreed with this....
|
Flew out of PHX Sky Harbor today, the anouncements at the Scanner/xray were
"Remove ALL liquids, gels, aersols from your carry-on regardless of size. If you do not have a clear 1quart size bag to place your liquids in, you can either check your carry-on or abandon the items". The TSA people also stated this was a nationwide TSA rule and that it is now being strictly enforced. I visited the TSA website and there is a search feature, so just for kicks I search for "nail polish" and "mascara" (I searched for these two items because they are common for travelers to carry and are very small). Suprisingly, both these items came up under the 3-1-1 rule. |
Originally Posted by FatherAbraham
(Post 19094282)
Flew out of PHX Sky Harbor today, the anouncements at the Scanner/xray were
"Remove ALL liquids, gels, aersols from your carry-on regardless of size. If you do not have a clear 1quart size bag to place your liquids in, you can either check your carry-on or abandon the items". The TSA people also stated this was a nationwide TSA rule and that it is now being strictly enforced. I visited the TSA website and there is a search feature, so just for kicks I search for "nail polish" and "mascara" (I searched for these two items because they are common for travelers to carry and are very small). Suprisingly, both these items came up under the 3-1-1 rule. From what I've been told, the policy of removing the Freedom Baggie has always been in place however it was sporadically enforced but is now being strictly enforced and......<wait for it> If one forgets to remove their baggie (i.e. 05:30 flight and not quite awake ;)) or deliberately doesn't remove their baggie, they will win a bag check and will be then sent back to the end of the line to start over. Yes, be sent back to the end of the line and also from what I've been told, there is a big uproar with TSO's and their supes having to enforce this as it is going to majorly slow down the screening process |
You Have Got to Be Kidding!!!!
Scans and gropes won't galvanize the American Flying Public, but this just might! And not even a poorly designed and reported Gallup poll will make them popular:rolleyes:
I've not taken my Kippie bag out at a US airport for 2 years and have not been asked to. Last week, I checked baggage, but I saw none of this in either RDU or PHL.
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19096476)
Bolding mine: Sort of....
From what I've been told, the policy of removing the Freedom Baggie has always been in place however it was sporadically enforced but is now being strictly enforced and......<wait for it> If one forgets to remove their baggie (i.e. 05:30 flight and not quite awake ;)) or deliberately doesn't remove their baggie, they will win a bag check and will be then sent back to the end of the line to start over. Yes, be sent back to the end of the line and also from what I've been told, there is a big uproar with TSO's and their supes having to enforce this as it is going to majorly slow down the screening process |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19096476)
If one forgets to remove their baggie (i.e. 05:30 flight and not quite awake ;)) or deliberately doesn't remove their baggie, they will win a bag check and will be then sent back to the end of the line to start over. Mike |
Originally Posted by ediemac1
(Post 19096737)
Scans and gropes won't galvanize the American Flying Public, but this just might! And not even a poorly designed and reported Gallup poll will make them popular:rolleyes:
I've not taken my Kippie bag out at a US airport for 2 years and have not been asked to. Last week, I checked baggage, but I saw none of this in either RDU or PHL.
Originally Posted by mikeef
(Post 19096882)
No doubt they get sent to bed without dinner, also. :rolleyes:
Mike |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19096476)
If one forgets to remove their baggie (i.e. 05:30 flight and not quite awake ;)) or deliberately doesn't remove their baggie, they will win a bag check and will be then sent back to the end of the line to start over. Yes, be sent back to the end of the line and also from what I've been told, there is a big uproar with TSO's and their supes having to enforce this as it is going to majorly slow down the screening process
It's gonna suck if they're really going to back to enforcing the 3-1-1 rule after years of not caring. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:27 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.