Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Interrogated and Detained at IAH for Photographing

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Interrogated and Detained at IAH for Photographing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 5:13 am
  #496  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,725
Originally Posted by bocastephen
What's worse - there are still forces in this country who want to ban (or find the purchase or reading of, suspicious) the sale of magazines like Flying, or Airliners.
Shotgun News was declared a "subversive publication" in court documents.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:17 am
  #497  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,681
Check out the one for travel agents!:

http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/po...elAgencies.asp

What Should I Consider Suspicious?
  • Purchase of a one-way ticket for use within a couple of days.
  • Payment of cash for ticket purchase.
  • Proof of identity on the strength of documents which are questionable in authenticity.
  • A sudden spike in the number of persons purchasing tickets to a particular locatioin (e.g., to a country overseas) during a specific time period.
(sic.)
Ari is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 2:19 am
  #498  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,348
Originally Posted by Ari
Check out the one for travel agents!:

What Should I Consider Suspicious?
...
* A sudden spike in the number of persons purchasing tickets to a particular locatioin (e.g., to a country overseas) during a specific time period.
Yeah, nothing xenophobic about suspecting people who travel overseas. And obviously Richard Reid and the jockey jihadist traveled with large entourages, so being afraid of lots of people going somewhere makes sense.

Wait a minute. Isn't Oprah coming to Australia ("a country overseas") with a "large number of persons" during "a specific time period"? Oprah is a terrorist!
RadioGirl is online now  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 3:09 am
  #499  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 9,998
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
Oprah is a terrorist!
Old news.

Originally Posted by vasantn
Words fail me.
Me too, especially since the morons that wrote the "Camera Sales and Photo Processing Businesses" of "Operation Sentry" don't seem to know anything about digital cameras. Apparently they think all terrorists still use drop-off photo-finishing services to process their "film."

Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts
Ken hAAmer is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 3:34 am
  #500  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
Why do people photograph airports? To prove they were there? I have yet to be in any airport that seemed memorable enough to drag out a camera. Guess I just lack the esthetic sensitivity.
LuvAirFrance is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 4:39 am
  #501  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
I don't even own a camera, so there!

(Actually, my new BlackBerry has a camera buried within it, but I don't know how to use it yet.)

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 10:28 am
  #502  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
Why do people photograph airports? To prove they were there? I have yet to be in any airport that seemed memorable enough to drag out a camera. Guess I just lack the esthetic sensitivity.
Dulles, the Pan Am terminal at JFK, and many others are quite interesting, beautiful buildings - I have photographed them often.
polonius is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:33 pm
  #503  
mkt
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,333
Originally Posted by Ari
Eh. I'd rather have hundreds of murders 5 miles from my house than a bunch of bored cops running DUI roadblocks and salivating over any possible moving violation.
You just described were I live.

With one change.

We have hundreds of murders a year. And bored cops running DUI roadblocks, salivating over any possible moving violation.

Last edited by mkt; Sep 16, 2010 at 3:04 pm
mkt is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 12:41 pm
  #504  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
Why do people photograph airports? To prove they were there? I have yet to be in any airport that seemed memorable enough to drag out a camera. Guess I just lack the esthetic sensitivity.
So is your point that Constitutionally-circumscribed powers of government should be expanded or constrained based on what you think is good art?
PTravel is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 4:15 pm
  #505  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by polonius
Dulles, the Pan Am terminal at JFK, and many others are quite interesting, beautiful buildings - I have photographed them often.
The old Pan Am terminal that Delta is now using (T3) will be destroyed with improvements being made at JFK.

T4 will be expanded for DL, T3 will be raized, and T2 will be kept with an airside corridor connecting T4 to T2.

T3 JFK isn't very functional with the sheer # of people they are trying to squeeze through it, but it is a piece of history, just as the TWA terminal at JFK is.
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 5:47 pm
  #506  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 9,998
Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
Why do people photograph airports? To prove they were there? I have yet to be in any airport that seemed memorable enough to drag out a camera. Guess I just lack the esthetic sensitivity.
Or maybe you just need to get out more:









http://moblog.net/view/268871/nice-salt-water-aquarium

YVR is an airport made for photography. I'm sure it can't be the only one.

Last edited by Ken hAAmer; Sep 17, 2010 at 2:29 pm
Ken hAAmer is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 8:09 pm
  #507  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: SW Rapid Rewards, Hilton Honors, Marriott, Avis First
Posts: 4,831
Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
Why do people photograph airports?
Because they want to.
PhoenixRev is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 12:42 am
  #508  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
The old Pan Am terminal that Delta is now using (T3) will be destroyed with improvements being made at JFK.

T4 will be expanded for DL, T3 will be raized, and T2 will be kept with an airside corridor connecting T4 to T2.

T3 JFK isn't very functional with the sheer # of people they are trying to squeeze through it, but it is a piece of history, just as the TWA terminal at JFK is.
One of us is confused - the terminal I am referring to was built for Pan Am, then became TWA, and then became something else when TWA went under. (can't remember who bought them now - was it AA?) I doubt they will be tearing that one down - it's a historically and architecturally important building.

I never fly through JFK anymore - too depressing to bring back the memories of what flying used to be - checking in at the mid-town office with the map of the world showing Pan Am' global network in twinkling white lights behind the check-in desk before boarding the bus to aterminal that was straight out of the Jetsons. AND NO ****ING TSA!
polonius is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 4:09 am
  #509  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by polonius
One of us is confused - the terminal I am referring to was built for Pan Am, then became TWA, and then became something else when TWA went under. (can't remember who bought them now - was it AA?) I doubt they will be tearing that one down - it's a historically and architecturally important building.

I never fly through JFK anymore - too depressing to bring back the memories of what flying used to be - checking in at the mid-town office with the map of the world showing Pan Am' global network in twinkling white lights behind the check-in desk before boarding the bus to aterminal that was straight out of the Jetsons. AND NO ****ING TSA!
Sadly, I believe this is the terminal you are thinking of -- once upon a time ago, it was the Pan Am WorldPort.

Pan Am built the terminal in 1960 as a showcase for international jet travel and is known for it's "Flying Saucer" roof.

More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldport_%28Pan_Am%29

It is a piece of history, but sadly Terminal 3, which was once the Pan Am WorldPort will be destroyed. T3 is still in use by Delta Air Lines, is in need of upgrades, and just can't handle the passenger traffic.

It was operated by Pan Am until 1991 when they declared bankruptcy, at which point Delta Air Lines purchased the building.

Using the T3 US Customs & Immigrations facilities is like taking a step back in time.

Here's a pic of the terminal that I took:



Now, there is the old TWA terminal as well. This is being preserved and is also a piece of history.

This terminal has been designated an NYC Landmark and is being renovated so that it can be opened to the public again.

It was built around 1963 and was known as the Trans World Flight Center. From what I understand, it was always a TWA facility until TWA shutdown.

Here's a pic of the TWA Flight Center that I took from the JFK AirTrain

For those wanting to photograph history, from public airport property, I should note security guards and JFK AirTrain employees will harass you for taking pictures from the JFK AirTrain. Apparently taking a photo of this magnificent building IS a suspicious activity.



SDF_Traveler

Last edited by SDF_Traveler; Sep 17, 2010 at 5:56 am Reason: added pics
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 2:09 pm
  #510  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 9,998
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler

Here's a pic of the TWA Flight Center that I took from the JFK AirTrain

For those wanting to photograph history, from public airport property, I should note security guards and JFK AirTrain employees will harass you for taking pictures from the JFK AirTrain. Apparently taking a photo of this magnificent building IS a suspicious activity.



SDF_Traveler
How long until looking at it becomes a felony?
Ken hAAmer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.