Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:18 pm
  #301  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by al613
1. How TSO knows by looking at your ID, that you commited any of these?
He doesn't, nor does he know if you are a terrorist, so what is the point of checking ID?

2. How your ID helps with No fly list? I've never seen them matching it against any list, do they know all the names by heart?
And, since the No Fly list specifically excludes the most dangerous terrorists, what is the point of checking ID?

3. If you go to Russia, Ukraine, Afganistan etc and buy there passport with your picture and a different name, how TSA is going to know that it's fake? Are they trained to determine legitimacy of passports of all the countries of this world?[/quote]You can buy viable fake ID on Alverado Street in LA, so what is the point of checking ID?

May be someone can experiment and create a passport of the country that does not exist, like Rebublic of Provance, and see if TSA will let you in.
I'll bet there are plenty of countries that do exist that most TSOs have never heard of, so what is the point of checking ID?
PTravel is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:19 pm
  #302  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PDX
Programs: AS, DL, UA, AC, Nexus, TSA Pre
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by bocastephen
There's your problem. The NFL doesn't have the names of actual terrorists or know threats to aviation security. The list includes a huge number of Caucasian names (John Smith) that have nothing to do with middle-eastern terrorists, a plethora of people added during the Bush era for doing nothing more than protesting government policies, and a few names of individuals suspected of aiding or financing terrorism, but without the means or intent to actually harm aviation.

If the list was designed to do exactly what it was suppose to do, there would be only a few hundred names on it or so, and it wouldn't be maintained by the TSA, although they could run passenger names against it to find a match.

Even then - not even close to foolproof. The alternate identities are still far too easy to get and are a simple bypass to this entire apparatus.
I agree with all of that. Would you agree that checking IDs, if done correctly with secure BPs, IDs and an accurate NF list would help make flying more secure?
nrgiii is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:23 pm
  #303  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,625
Originally Posted by carterd
as a general comment, TSO's can ask for ID under their authority to maintain security
I was once stopped by a campus cop for running a stop sign on my bicycle. When she asked "Do you have a driver's license?" I wondered whether she was allowed to ask for that and whether showing it would cause points to appear on my driving record.

Thinking fast, I replied "Yes." She never asked me to produce the license. Maybe she was as surprised by my answer as I was by her question. I showed her a student ID and kept the driver's license in my wallet.
nsx is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:25 pm
  #304  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by bocastephen
There's your problem. The NFL doesn't have the names of actual terrorists or know threats to aviation security. The list includes a huge number of Caucasian names (John Smith) that have nothing to do with middle-eastern terrorists, a plethora of people added during the Bush era for doing nothing more than protesting government policies, and a few names of individuals suspected of aiding or financing terrorism, but without the means or intent to actually harm aviation.

If the list was designed to do exactly what it was suppose to do, there would be only a few hundred names on it or so, and it wouldn't be maintained by the TSA, although they could run passenger names against it to find a match.

Even then - not even close to foolproof. The alternate identities are still far too easy to get and are a simple bypass to this entire apparatus.
...and don't forget rock singers who change their names...
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:28 pm
  #305  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Originally Posted by nrgiii
I agree with all of that. Would you agree that checking IDs, if done correctly with secure BPs, IDs and an accurate NF list would help make flying more secure?
No. It's too easy to get a fake ID. Or a real one with somebody else's name.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:31 pm
  #306  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,231
Originally Posted by nrgiii
I agree with all of that. Would you agree that checking IDs, if done correctly with secure BPs, IDs and an accurate NF list would help make flying more secure?
No, because there is still no way to guarantee someone's true identity absent some sort of mandatory DNA or retina scan database which I would oppose with every vigor my cells could generate.

What I WOULD propose is the creation of a two-tiered screening system a la 'Nexus'. Those who want to pre-register, submit to a background check and biometric sample (retina scan) would be able to enter a completely different security lane with minimal screening - just a bag x-ray and WTMD without removal of shoes, laptops, liquids, etc. In essence, a true 'Trusted Traveler'.

The CLEAR system never came close to that model and was a dismal failure - which is why it's out of business.

In this way, the TSA could redirect its limited resources at people it doesn't know, while leaving the people it does know the he** alone.

Of course we're still not even close to being safe until they properly scan cargo and improve through-the-fence access management - but that's another issue.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:33 pm
  #307  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,129
Originally Posted by nrgiii
I agree with all of that. Would you agree that checking IDs, if done correctly with secure BPs, IDs and an accurate NF list would help make flying more secure?
Not Boca but I would say that checking ID does not make a flight more safe.

What makes a flight safer is keeping WEI off the airplane.

Inspecting all cargo would make a flight safer.

Screening all airport workers would make a flight safer.

Knowing who bought a ticket for a flight does not make the flight safer.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:34 pm
  #308  
KCK
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 314
Originally Posted by nsx
I was once stopped by a campus cop for running a stop sign on my bicycle. When she asked "Do you have a driver's license?" I wondered whether she was allowed to ask for that and whether showing it would cause points to appear on my driving record.

Thinking fast, I replied "Yes." She never asked me to produce the license. Maybe she was as surprised by my answer as I was by her question. I showed her a student ID and kept the driver's license in my wallet.
Maybe she was just questioning your understanding of octagonal red signs.
KCK is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:34 pm
  #309  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,725
Originally Posted by nrgiii
I agree with all of that. Would you agree that checking IDs, if done correctly with secure BPs, IDs and an accurate NF list would help make flying more secure?
If (all) done correctly, yes, more secure. So would checking every traveler against the NCIC (wanted criminal/suspects) database. So would prohibiting any passenger without at least a Secret-equivalent government security clearance.

But putting a paramilitary checkpoint on the nearest street corner to my house would make the neighborhood more secure. So would allowing arbitrary random searches of houses by the police. That doesn't mean I want either of those things.

Where do you draw the line? Can't fly if you were convicted of disorderly conduct in college? Reckless driving? Haven't paid child support? (to some extent they already do that since you can lose your DL for not paying.) Overdue library book?

The entire concept of a NF list (not allowed to fly, but no due process, no redress, no transparency, no accountability) is un-American. Anyone who passed a junior-high-level civics class would know that. That morons in the government thought that was the right thing to do is quite scary.
studentff is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:36 pm
  #310  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PDX
Programs: AS, DL, UA, AC, Nexus, TSA Pre
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by bocastephen
No, because there is still no way to guarantee someone's true identity absent some sort of mandatory DNA or retina scan database which I would oppose with every vigor my cells could generate.

What I WOULD propose is the creation of a two-tiered screening system a la 'Nexus'. Those who want to pre-register, submit to a background check and biometric sample (retina scan) would be able to enter a completely different security lane with minimal screening - just a bag x-ray and WTMD without removal of shoes, laptops, liquids, etc. In essence, a true 'Trusted Traveler'.

The CLEAR system never came close to that model and was a dismal failure - which is why it's out of business.

In this way, the TSA could redirect its limited resources at people it doesn't know, while leaving the people it does know the he** alone.

Of course we're still not even close to being safe until they properly scan cargo and improve through-the-fence access management - but that's another issue.
You are left with the same problem: how do you confirm the person going through the "True Trusted Traveller" line is who he says he is without some kind of secure ID and/or biometric check (which you oppose with every vigor of your cells)?
nrgiii is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:38 pm
  #311  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Utqiagvik (Barrow) Alaska and Ann Arbor, Michigan
Programs: Charter Member Delta Diamond Medallion, Lifetime AA Platinum, IHG Diamond, Hilton & Marriott Gold
Posts: 630
What's wrong with McDonald's at 10,000 feet?

Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
There are certain people I don't want on my flights either. Namely: POS, those who bring McDonalds onboard, drunks, and those who don't believe in showering
What do you have against food from McDonald's? Is food from the local pub ok to board?
ceieoc is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:44 pm
  #312  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PDX
Programs: AS, DL, UA, AC, Nexus, TSA Pre
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by studentff
If (all) done correctly, yes, more secure. So would checking every traveler against the NCIC (wanted criminal/suspects) database. So would prohibiting any passenger without at least a Secret-equivalent government security clearance.

But putting a paramilitary checkpoint on the nearest street corner to my house would make the neighborhood more secure. So would allowing arbitrary random searches of houses by the police. That doesn't mean I want either of those things.

Where do you draw the line? Can't fly if you were convicted of disorderly conduct in college? Reckless driving? Haven't paid child support? (to some extent they already do that since you can lose your DL for not paying.) Overdue library book?
That's the tough part, where to draw the line. Too much security is bad and too little security is bad and there's no security without some amount of inconvenience. Personally, I'll put up with more security (and the inconveniences that come with it) at the airport because my options to deal with the situation at 35,000 feet are quite limited.

Originally Posted by studentff
The entire concept of a NF list (not allowed to fly, but no due process, no redress, no transparency, no accountability) is un-American. Anyone who passed a junior-high-level civics class would know that. That morons in the government thought that was the right thing to do is quite scary.
I couldn't agree more.
nrgiii is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:48 pm
  #313  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by nrgiii
And do you really want the alternative: let anyone with a pulse fly?
Do you want what TSA's trying to implement? Asking permission every time you fly with the possibility of being denied based on information that may not even be correct? How would you feel if that happened to you? Would you be upset or would you think "gee, the government must have something on me that I don't know about, I must be a threat"?

If so, do you think secret lists and asking for government permission is what America should be based on?

If we can agree that there are some people who should not be permitted to fly, then there needs to be a means to prevent them from flying.
It's called the court system. If they're that much of a threat, there should be sufficient evidence they've commited a crime for a jury to convict them. Until that happens, they're as free as any other citizen and innocent until proven guilty. After all, you'd want the same rights and courtesies afforded to you, right?
Superguy is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:49 pm
  #314  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 252
Originally Posted by nrgiii
Back to my original argument: IF BPs where secure and IF ID's were secure and IF the NF list was accurate, then checking IDs at the checkpoint would help make flying more secure. No, checking IDs by itself would not stop every bad guy or terrorist who wants in to the sterile area. But if the above conditions were met, then I think the inconvenience and intrusiveness of showing ID could be justified as a legitimate security measure.

What I take issue with are those who claim checking ID's can never make us safer.
If that's what it takes, checking ID will never make us safer, since we can never meet those conditions.

What does an 'accurate' NF list entail? Mindreading everyone for potential homocidal tendencies a la Minority Report?

What does a secure BP mean? The 2,000,000 passengers per day will carry cell-phone images of encrypted boarding passes?

What does secure ID mean? 24-hour tracked RFID chips sewed deep into people's skulls so they can't trade them with people who look like them?

ID checking is a revenue-protection scheme to benefit the airlines.

Last edited by Mr. Gel-pack; Nov 19, 2009 at 2:56 pm
Mr. Gel-pack is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2009, 2:52 pm
  #315  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,231
Originally Posted by nrgiii
You are left with the same problem: how do you confirm the person going through the "True Trusted Traveller" line is who he says he is without some kind of secure ID and/or biometric check (which you oppose with every vigor of your cells)?
That's why I said 'a la Nexus' - you scan your Iris at a console and pass a gate which gives you access to the special screening lane. If you want to make it official, we can use the same machines that Nexus and Global Traveler use and it can spit out a slip of paper one can hand to a screener after picking up bags and leaving the lane.

It would dramatically simplify the screening process for millions of frequent travelers and enable the TSA to focus efforts more efficiently.
bocastephen is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.