![]() |
After i filled in the survey, I consolidated my UR points up. I'm not going to leave it up to chance there's a grace period to do it once they announce the new "enhanced" benefits.
|
Chase must suddenly see a surge in points transfers from F/FU to CSP/CSR...lol.
|
Originally Posted by BOSTravels
(Post 28571458)
Chase must suddenly see a surge in points transfers from F/FU to CSP/CSR...lol.
|
Originally Posted by jalabi99
(Post 28569002)
Chase is shooting itself in the foot with this idea of theirs.
|
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 28572060)
Implement or not, Chase is shooting itself either ways.
You know what would be great? If companies actually gave a [redacted] like they used to, and didn't pretend they were broke and on the verge of bankruptcy. |
Originally Posted by mikesyr18
(Post 28568527)
Give me a break. The actual company is JP Morgan, and their stock is up $30 a share this year.
If you want "Chase" to get rid of high end cards, they would have to get rid of both the JP Morgan Reserve and the Sapphire Reserve, which won't happen. I would say Chase is doing pretty well, even when they've lost money from these cards. JP Morgan Reserve card's customer base is MUCH smaller than the Sapphire Reserve. Chase wants a much bigger piece of the high end market than the JP Morgan Palladium currently has. That is the reason to introduce the Sapphire Reserve because it cannot grow the Palladium meaningfully. The name change on the Palladium should be a story-telling to you that why Chase wants to introduce the "Reserve" line of cards. Talk about high end market - just take a look of the AMEX Plat card line-up - you have the generic Plat card, the MB Plat and the card for Ameriprise customers though seems everyone can get it for example But the Schwab's Plat and the Morgan Stanley Plat definitely are only for the folks that actually have a high investment assets in the respective institutions, no less than the JP Morgan Palladium, sorry, the now "Reserve" card. So the AMEX High End market is a much stronger line up than Chase's JP Morgan Palladium then the new Sapphire Reserve which is not even a year old and already Chase has to think about cut backs. |
Originally Posted by Steve in Olympia
(Post 28568872)
It is a fallacy to declare that the Freedom cards "are designed as cashback cards" and, since the "cashback structure has not been impacted," the cards have not been devalued. Your argument reaches the desired conclusion only because you assumed the conclusion before you reached it.
This is a classic example of begging the question. As Ambrose Bierce once wrote, "An ostrich doesn't need wings because it can't fly anyway." [redacted] many consumers choose the Freedom cards for the UR benefit.......consumers (like me) who never redeem for cash. We know that those consumers exist because every travel blogger advises their readers that redemptions for cash are the worst possible use of the Freedom cards. [redacted].
Originally Posted by slm9555
(Post 28568964)
Even though the Freedom and FU are "Cash back cars" even Chase markets the benefits as "points" that you can redeem for cash back. For example, when you read the fine terms on a FU sign up bonus it basically says that you get 15,000 points that can be redeemed for $150 cash back. It's really all about points and those points are used for cash back if you want them to be.
Several years ago we received preapproval Ink Cash offers with "$250" bonus like every 2 months. I always threw it away thinking that we did not want a cash rebate card... That was until one day I finally sat down to read the T&Cs, then found out it actually was 25,000 points that can be redeemed for $250 cash back... That tells us that Chase does not intend this card as a cash rebate card from the outset - the cash rebate is just one of the redemption options. Freedom has gone from straight cash rebate to UR point earning at least 5 or more years ago fwiw. |
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 28568540)
Legally speaking - Chase reserves the right to change the T&Cs at any times. With this, Chase can do pretty much as it sees fit.
|
Moderator Note: Please follow the FT rules and respond to concepts and ideas without name calling.
|
My fear is that the devaluation of UR transfers from no-fee to fee cards is only the first phase of Chase's changes. The second phase will likely be to adjust the fee and/or benefits of the CSR, but they won't even hint about such changes until the first wave of CSR cardholders has made its renewal decisions. I'm thinking they will either increase the CSR's annual fee or reduce the travel credit to put greater distance between the cost of holding a CSP ($95) and a CSR ($450-300=150). I predict the rumors will start in November.
|
Originally Posted by mikesyr18
(Post 28573239)
In addition to shooting themselves in the foot with being the best issuer of major bank cards in America, they'll shoot themselves in foot again if they devalue the point value on the Freedom and INK cards.
Chase is not as great as you think.
Originally Posted by mikesyr18
(Post 28573239)
You know what would be great? If companies actually gave a [redacted] like they used to, and didn't pretend they were broke and on the verge of bankruptcy.
As you are forced to play the game, the only thing you can do is to get leverage with the banks.
Originally Posted by Happy
(Post 28573585)
The credit card business only contributes a small portion of the bank's profit if you even read the 10Q and 10K now you are talking about stock price.
Originally Posted by UpperNWGuy
(Post 28575332)
My fear is that the devaluation of UR transfers from no-fee to fee cards is only the first phase of Chase's changes. The second phase will likely be to adjust the fee and/or benefits of the CSR, but they won't even hint about such changes until the first wave of CSR cardholders has made its renewal decisions. I'm thinking they will either increase the CSR's annual fee or reduce the travel credit to put greater distance between the cost of holding a CSP ($95) and a CSR ($450-300=150). I predict the rumors will start in November.
|
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 28576964)
Actually, the best go to Discover and AMEX according to J.D. Power.
Chase is not as great as you think. Not really sure how credible JD Power is anymore, though, since they list Capital One as #3 behind AMEX and Disco... I really don't see that as being true. http://www.jdpower.com/press-release...sfaction-study And not to get off topic, but UR points in combination with "cash back" is a pretty good system, whereas AMEX and Discover do not have that. You cannot take your rewards dollars and turn them into Membership Rewards for example to get 6 MR per dollar at grocery stores, and then transfer them 1:1 at many of the transfer partners they offer (but not all since many aren't 1:1). |
If Chase were to do this, when would it likely happen? It wouldn't seem right if you paid your annual fee and it's too late to get refund. I'm just wondering this because the one year anniversary is coming up. It seems like it would only be fair to give you the chance to agree to the terms before you pay another annual fee.
|
Originally Posted by Critterlynn
(Post 28577354)
... wouldn't seem right if you paid your annual fee ...
|
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 28576964)
I read the latest 10K per your advice. It turns to be the credit card business was significant to JPM, which contribute almost 10% of its noninterest revenue in 2016 (more than 10% in 2014 and 2015). On the other hand, JPM made less money from mortgage.
In house Trading of Equities and Fixed Income contribute a significant amount of earnings. The latest quarter just reported, Net Income was $7 Billions. In comparison, the consumer and community banking unit, JPMorgan's largest business division that operates Chase Bank, reported $11.4 billion in revenue, flat from a year ago. The unit's net income was $2.2 billion So, Chase bank's Net Income which is from all activities including business loans, mortgages, credit cards, etc etc, is 28% of the Total Net Income. I dont bother to dig up the number from CC out of the $2.2 billion. Needless to say, it contributes far less than the investment banking and trading activities. That is where the top tier banks make the bulk of their profit. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.