FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Cathay Pacific | Cathay (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay-487/)
-   -   Cathay reviewing herringbone J? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay/949023-cathay-reviewing-herringbone-j.html)

kchika Jun 16, 2009 10:41 am

In Club World, those in "A" seats or the "EF" pairs would have to climb over someone else's feet, wouldn't they? The SQ seats have a footrest area that is tucked into the previous seat, restricting the amount of space in which you could rest your feet on. You'll see what I mean at 1:01 in this video.

tedhl Jun 16, 2009 10:58 am

I have flown in both...for BA, I think it's good enough to qualify, at least in my own view, as "direct aisle access". it's very much different from the traditional J seats where you need to climb over a whole person when they're sleeping with the seat reclined. now even if the person is sleeping, climbing over the feet is very doable and easy...

for SQ, from my experience I don't see how it's more restricted in terms of feet room vs. the CX's narrow ottoman...it's not that on CX's there's huge feet room anyway. it might be something negative when considered on its own, but, when compared to CX's new J, I personally don't see this as something more negative...

bizclassboy Jun 16, 2009 12:01 pm

I think BA and CX biz class in leagues apart, BA is way better in terms of space, comfort and price between HKG and LHR to be specific

bizclassboy Jun 16, 2009 12:07 pm


Originally Posted by tedhl (Post 11916677)
I thought BA's J config also allows "direct aisle access" for all ? well, ok, not as "direct" as CX's where you're really right next to the aisle, but for me I think it's "direct" and easy enough.

for SQ, how's their "sleeping at an angle" different from the CX ones where the seats are at an angle already ? in a sense I think SQ's is a clever design in that you'll need to sleep in the same angle as the CX herringbone seat, but when you're not sleeping you actually get the much roomier feel.

To get BA direct acces int aisle in C class you need to be fast off the mark and have a travel agent like the one I have, she books the flights between HKG and LHR for me in upper deck on BA with direct access from window seat, 62A or K everytime for me

sealalula Jun 16, 2009 12:47 pm


Originally Posted by Sam7 (Post 11914650)
OMG.I hope you did not get caught :o

I saw an FA walking out of the curtains in front of the J section and i immediately stood up and walked away hehe ;)

XFed2001 Jun 16, 2009 2:51 pm


Originally Posted by Crocodile (Post 11908794)
I was beginning to think that I was just easily pleased, but I too like the new J. I have done a several regional flights (HKG-MNL or TPE) along with a few long haul (HKG-JNB and HKG-SYD) in the herringbone seats and found it great for privacy, space and comfort. I especially love the upstairs on the 747.

Apart from not being able to see out the window, I am happy with everything else, but maybe that is because I just enjoy getting on a plane and putting on some headphones and relaxing alone. Unfortunately I have not flown in business on any other airline, so can't really compare.

(I also like the new Y)

Crocodile: If I may, you mentioned that the regional J seats were also in the herringbone configuration . Pardon my ignorance but are the new J seats in the regional 747 the same as in the 773? In particular, I was interested in what J seats were like on the HKG-SIN route which I understand is not 3-class . Thanks to you and anyone else who might know.

kchika Jun 16, 2009 3:05 pm

XFed2001, there is only one 747-400 configuration: 74A. CX sometimes deploy these aircraft to regional destinations to maximize aircraft utilization. There is no "regional 747".

Both the 74A and 777-300ER (77A) have the herringbone configuration in J. Due to the number of 77As CX currently have, the 77A operates less regional flights than the 74A. HKG-SIN is served by a mix of regional aircraft and occasionally a 74A. If you're seeing 773 for your flight, then it is going to be operated by the 777-300 (773).

Crocodile Jun 16, 2009 7:14 pm


Originally Posted by XFed2001 (Post 11918256)
Crocodile: If I may, you mentioned that the regional J seats were also in the herringbone configuration . Pardon my ignorance but are the new J seats in the regional 747 the same as in the 773? In particular, I was interested in what J seats were like on the HKG-SIN route which I understand is not 3-class . Thanks to you and anyone else who might know.

As kchika has already mentioned, I have used the new J to regional destinations, but they are the long-haul J. This is because there are quite a few "EQV" aircraft in the schedule for flights to TPE and MNL, so sometimes get lucky with aircraft such as the 74A. I assume some of these are planes that do the overnight to/from Europe.

Flyingfox Jun 17, 2009 5:55 pm

Scary seat.:eek:

We just did F on a 777 and I took the chance to pop into an empty business class seat.
Those seats are incredibly claustrophobic - and where is your right arm supposed to go? The partitions are scary.
My shoulders did not fit well into that space at all - I felt like a tinned sardine!

The older slant seat was much better for sitting, at least!

sealalula Jun 17, 2009 8:35 pm


Originally Posted by Flyingfox (Post 11925524)
Scary seat.:eek:

We just did F on a 777 and I took the chance to pop into an empty business class seat.
Those seats are incredibly claustrophobic - and where is your right arm supposed to go? The partitions are scary.
My shoulders did not fit well into that space at all - I felt like a tinned sardine!

The older slant seat was much better for sitting, at least!

Exactly !!!!
I got a shocked how many seats there were.
I tried sitting down and my shoulders couldnt fit in as im in a hurry :td:

NYCbustravelguy Jun 18, 2009 1:17 am


Originally Posted by Flyingfox (Post 11925524)
Scary seat.:eek:

We just did F on a 777 and I took the chance to pop into an empty business class seat.
Those seats are incredibly claustrophobic - and where is your right arm supposed to go? The partitions are scary.
My shoulders did not fit well into that space at all - I felt like a tinned sardine!

The older slant seat was much better for sitting, at least!

I flew both JFK-HKG and HKG-BKK on the 777 in F, both times, the FAs commented to me that before the economic meltdown, they J business has already started to decline b/c of the new J seats. They told me people picked SQ or TG and even UA over the new J seats. Most stated they are simply too tight. On the HKG-BKK flight, the crew told me they had lost so much business that the airline was looking at serious trouble, the F FA estimated that J loads were off more than 70% and F more than 80%. He was really concerned for his job and the airline's future. He thought the new J seats were really killing them in terms of getting repeat business. I know for one, I opt to fly SQ over CX to avoid the seats when flying J.

Captain Schmidt Jun 18, 2009 1:31 am


Originally Posted by kchika (Post 11916436)
I too am pleased with the herringbone layout. At the end of the day, you can't really please everyone. Take BA for example - yes they do have a great configuration, but not everyone gets direct aisle access. In the new SQ seats, one would have to sleep at an angle. I'm also curious to find out if the seats on 9W/AC/NZ/VS are the "flip-over" type? i.e. one would have to stand up and make their own bed manually...

9W does not have "flip-over" seats. The set-up is very similar to CX, though they give you what looks like a duvet but is supposed to go on top of the bed once reclined as a kind of mattress pad (though I did use it as a duvet once). They also serve Dom in J ^

hau cheng Jun 18, 2009 1:52 am


Originally Posted by NYCbustravelguy (Post 11927244)
I flew both JFK-HKG and HKG-BKK on the 777 in F, both times, the FAs commented to me that before the economic meltdown, they J business has already started to decline b/c of the new J seats. They told me people picked SQ or TG and even UA over the new J seats. Most stated they are simply too tight. On the HKG-BKK flight, the crew told me they had lost so much business that the airline was looking at serious trouble, the F FA estimated that J loads were off more than 70% and F more than 80%. He was really concerned for his job and the airline's future. He thought the new J seats were really killing them in terms of getting repeat business. I know for one, I opt to fly SQ over CX to avoid the seats when flying J.


I think the financial crisis is having a greater effect. However, as J seems wide open on many routes, I wonder if the seat issue is a contributing factor?

deeseeel Jun 19, 2009 3:47 am

Good to hear they're reviewing J. Herringbone is nice for aisle access. But the current CX configuration is too narrow for a business class seat. Every time I moved my arm, I bumped the partition with my elbow. The lack of space really gives the cabin a feedlot feel.

pacificboot Jun 19, 2009 4:12 am

Before everyone gets too excited about CX reviewing the J seats, note that it is just a change to a "reverse" herringbone configuration, meaning there will still be a partition seperating customers. Take a look at the US Airways forum and the new Envoy seats, and I think CX might be heading in that direction. The seats do look not that much better than the current ones, it still looks prety cramped. Also, as always, more room in J probably means less seat count which reduces award availability.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.