Asia Miles award availability
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,786
Asia Miles award availability
If Asia Miles site let you select a an award flight with date/time/flight number, bu then said you don't have enough miles, does it mean that flight is available if you have enough miles? I can transfer miles in but I don't want to transfer if there isn't a flight available.
Another question is that if the flight is available as standard award, why do they list the flight as Priority 1 and Priority 2 award for more points? If someone paid for Priority 1 using more points do they get to take away someone's booked Standard award seat? Also when I select a date to check, it pops up a message saying you are likely to be waitlisted, but then the next screen will show there is a flight available. Do they just show that message everytime regardless whether there are seats or not?
Another question is that if the flight is available as standard award, why do they list the flight as Priority 1 and Priority 2 award for more points? If someone paid for Priority 1 using more points do they get to take away someone's booked Standard award seat? Also when I select a date to check, it pops up a message saying you are likely to be waitlisted, but then the next screen will show there is a flight available. Do they just show that message everytime regardless whether there are seats or not?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
No.
#3
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
I don't think they'd let holds for inadequate miles <70%.
They take the position you can always redeem something else http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/catha...l#post28436114
They take the position you can always redeem something else http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/catha...l#post28436114
#4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 1A
Programs: Elite Diamond Purple Dot Gold Silver Titanium for life
Posts: 1,822
I don't think they'd let holds for inadequate miles <70%.
They take the position you can always redeem something else http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/catha...l#post28436114
They take the position you can always redeem something else http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/catha...l#post28436114
Award holding... waitlisting... segmented inventory...drip releasing seats... it's all part of a broader loyalty warfare strategy to know what you would be willing to pay, how much you have, and when you're most likely to buy what type of ticket or redemption.
#5
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
P.S. my 70% assertion is current as of this evening. I called Manila as my brother (who currently has <100 AM in his account right now), picked a SYD-HKG-SYD return that's cleared, and got recited the 70% rule
Last edited by percysmith; Jul 1, 2017 at 10:33 am
#6
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 1A
Programs: Elite Diamond Purple Dot Gold Silver Titanium for life
Posts: 1,822
You better send the source of the 30% figure to Steve Rackstraw, cos that's certainly not how AM operates these days http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/catha...l#post27945926
Most FFPs around the world operate as one unit with shared long term interests. I can only assume Asia Miles was, and is positioned in a way to be sold off.
Surprised. Given all the difficulty of getting seat availability recently https://forum.hongkongcard.com/forumSE/show/22044 #5 , enhanced security questions, misinterpretation of rules, plus generally pricing higher than outport airlines, I've been driven to buying outport tickets after CX redemptions were not available.
#8
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
He's on the CX side. Cathay has really messed up their business by allowing Asia Miles to be totally seprated from Marco Polo. Asia miles is incentivized to always play the short term game of miles sales and actively avoid redemptions, while Marco Polo is a longer-term play designed to drive more revenue to the airline. Their interests are not aligned and this creates a position where someone like Steve might struggle to get Asia Miles onboard with the logic as the companies are very separated in long term strategies.
CX revenue control decides how many seats to put up for miles and how many for cash
They can then filter a bit using own miles-only availability/Priority One/Priority Two, but currently they're restrained in how much they apply restrictions (perhaps they desire a certain amount of overseas FFP revenue)
AM is merely geared to pushing as many miles out the door as they can convince people to redeem iPads for them
AAdvantage and Alaskan (Alaskan Mileage Plan really puts Alaska on the Canto travel blogging map) seem to be nothing but a cheap conduit to acquire CX seats until recently (yes I know that is parochial and not objective but that's what it looks like from here)
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,786
Just an update, first batch of transfer points got in today and got the outbound ticket. Now hope that the 2nd batch gets in before the return ticket is gone! Weird that it is less points to book them separately. 70000 + 105000 instead of roundtrip 180000.