Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CX Issues Trading Statement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 8:22 pm
  #31  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Programs: CX DM, SQ TPP, QF GO LIFE, OZ*G LIFE, Marriott TIT LIFE, WOH GLOBALIST LIFE, HH DM, BA GO LIFE
Posts: 598
Did anyone notice on the Bloomberg interview with Ivan Chu following the release of 1H 2016 results where Ivan mentioned about the acX lounge at T5 at LHR. Boy is this guy out of touch where they fly to at LHR.

I vote for his removal and replacement as CX needs a proper leader to manage the airline. I've also noticed how Airline Business magazine hasn't even done a profile on him unlike other CX CEO who have featured regularly.

There are signs that media and the industry do not like Ivan. I can also feel that the senior management team has the same feeling as those of us on this board. They should never allow Ivan to speak to media as a) we cannot understand his English, b) inability to articulate interviewers questions and c) giving wrong facts such as lounge at LHR T5.

Here is Bloomberg video: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ting-discounts

Go to 2:03 minutes to hear the comments on the T5 lounge. Unbelievable for a CEO to be out of touch or perhaps he has been flying BA to LHR secretly!

REPLACE IVAN ASAP! MOVE HIM TO SWIRE CHINA........

In adddition, the finance director, Martin Murray also needs to be replaced for the fuel hedging losses. Can they also bring someone that we can understand their English!

Last edited by 380Flyer; Oct 16, 2016 at 6:48 am
380Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 9:05 pm
  #32  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 328
Originally Posted by MeltingAlf
Interesting. Do you happen to have the article from CAPA? I've been reading CAPA for the past five months or so and I think I missed it out.
http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/asia-europe-slowest-growing-major-market-but-dynamic-af-klm-and-sia-shrinkas-oneworld-china-grow-305914
Aus106080 is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2016 | 8:18 am
  #33  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: SIN
Programs: QF WP, BA Silver, AF/KL FB Plat, SK EBG, A3 *S, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Gold
Posts: 1,373
Originally Posted by Aus106080
http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/asia-europe-slowest-growing-major-market-but-dynamic-af-klm-and-sia-shrinkas-oneworld-china-grow-305914
Thanks.

I don't happen to see where 'From CAPA report, the loading fo SQ is the lowest among all Asia and European airlines in the euro-Asia market.' but just that 'SIA's European load factors in 2016 are many of its lowest load factors in a decade: SIA posted a 67% European load factor in May-2016' - which clearly refers to itself and not in comparison with the other Asian/European airlines.
MeltingAlf is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 4:59 pm
  #34  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Programs: CX DM, SQ TPP, QF GO LIFE, OZ*G LIFE, Marriott TIT LIFE, WOH GLOBALIST LIFE, HH DM, BA GO LIFE
Posts: 598
Get this about Ivan Chu:

A little birdie met Ivan recently and during his discussion, Ivan was bragging about how he used to date loads of flight attendants when he was young.

Now why on earth would he talk like this when a) he is a turn off and not even good looking and b) as a CEO, you would not expect to talk in this manner. He is bringing himself to the same low level as Donald Trump.

He apparently gloated about Jetstar HK and said "we're dead if we've Qantas at the top & Jetstar at the bottom". Just goes to show how comfortable CX has been with their dominant position in HK which is now disappearing at a very fast rate.

This guy is such a fool to say that he lives in mid-levels and that he is a high flyer. To be honest, this guy does not impress me one bit. What a turn off!!!!

I am just disgusted by this man and he really needs to exit CX soonest given his lack of leadership and vision. I know from the beginning that he was not the right fit for the job and my gut feeling has confirmed that he is not the right person for the job.

Time to bring change!

Last edited by 380Flyer; Oct 17, 2016 at 7:05 pm
380Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 5:41 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: CX
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by 380Flyer
Get this about Ivan Chu:

A little birdie met Ivan recently and during his discussion,
Ivan Chu might not be the greatest fit for this role.
But unless there's some credible source to this, I'm not sure what you're trying accomplish here spreading such rumours?
nolounge is offline  
Old Oct 17, 2016 | 6:37 pm
  #36  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Programs: CX DM, SQ TPP, QF GO LIFE, OZ*G LIFE, Marriott TIT LIFE, WOH GLOBALIST LIFE, HH DM, BA GO LIFE
Posts: 598
Originally Posted by nolounge
Ivan Chu might not be the greatest fit for this role.
But unless there's some credible source to this, I'm not sure what you're trying accomplish here spreading such rumours?
These are not rumours. These are real facts from the man himself. Put simply, Ivan is not fit to be the CEO of CX. He needs to be replaced asap.
380Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2016 | 10:55 pm
  #37  
sxc
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,797
http://downloads.cathaypacific.com/c...pdf/CXW246.pdf

Page 3:

How severe are the business challenges at the moment?
The environment is very tough indeed. We have seen more
and more capacity added into the market. Our revenues are
declining and yield is under great pressure. The weakness
of the global economy has led to a reduction in premium
demand, with major companies tightening their belts on
corporate travel. There are other factors too the decline in
Hong Kongs inbound tourism, for example, and the impact
of security scares in Europe.

Is this just another short-term problem?
We believe that what we are facing now is the new normal.
This is not a short-term crisis but one that will impact us over
the long term and it will require us to do things differently.
In recent years we have been working hard to increase our
productivity and keep our underlying cost base that is,
costs without fuel competitive. Weve had some success,
but we need to do more.
Other airlines are facing the same external environment as us,
with fuel surcharges gone and revenues weakening, but they are
doing better than we are because they have a leaner cost base.
Thats why we need to get more productive and fast.

What can we do to turn things around?
We have already begun a critical review of our business
which will look at how we can improve revenues and costs.
We will review every option for improving efficiency and
productivity to help us maintain a strong financial position
and deliver acceptable returns to our investors.
We understand the need to continue to invest in our
businesses and to continuously improve our products and
services. But this is going to require us to do things differently,
so we will review the way in which we are organised, the work
which we do and our cost base. At the same time we are also in
the process of developing our future strategy for the long term

What will the strategy review entail?
This body of work is already underway, led by [Chief Operating
Officer] Rupert Hogg and the directors. The focus will be on
how we can win over the next five to 10 years and the things
we need to do to survive and thrive for another 70 years in an
environment that is experiencing significant change.
As part of this we will need to refocus our organisation on
the things our customers really value, making better use of
data to inform our decision-making, accelerating our digital
capabilities, and looking at new ways to use our brand
reputation to drive revenue premiums. You will be hearing
a lot more about our new strategic focus in the months
ahead.

As part of the business review, will we be reassessing our
fuel hedging position?

Hedging is, and always will be, a core element of our riskmanagement
strategy. Fuel is by far our single biggest cost,
and we hedge to manage volatility and protect ourselves
against severe and sustained fuel-price rises that could
put our entire business in jeopardy. We expect oil prices to
continue to be volatile and so we have taken another look at
our hedging policy and the specifics of how we hedge.
The key point to make is that the trading statement
was not about hedging. The real problem is the continued
deterioration in our revenues, and thats what we want to
address through this business review.

Will the drive to cut costs affect our customer offering?
It is vital that we continue investing in things that will improve
the travel experience for our customers on the ground and
in the air, spending money on the areas that they truly value.
The challenge is to be able to do things more productively
and efficiently as we deliver a differentiated experience to
our customers.

When do we expect things to improve?

Its not going to be overnight. It will take a sustained recovery
of the global economy for the market to absorb all the excess
capacity and for premium and corporate demand to recover.
But of course we cant afford to wait for this to happen, so
well need to focus on rebasing our costs and improving
productivity, while continuing to deliver experiences that our
customers really value.

What should our people do in the face of the current
challenges?

We need our colleagues to understand that what we are
facing is not a short-term challenge but a structural problem
that requires a careful and sustained response. As we
undertake our review we need everyone to ensure their work
continues to have a positive impact on our customers and
performance.
We have an amazing team passionate and committed
that has been through many challenging times with us
before. It will take a concerted effort to get through this latest
challenge, but we will keep you all informed of our progress
every step of the way.

How can I find out more?

We will be communicating openly and frequently as we
undertake the business review and begin our strategy work.
The leadership team will be running town hall sessions and
giving updates to their teams. We have already published a
detailed FAQ on the current situation and invited everyone to
give feedback through Slido.
What I read from the above is that CX thinks they can fix their profitability via cost cutting and process re-engineering, rather than growing the business. As someone once said "You don't cut your way to growth"
sxc is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 12:21 am
  #38  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,477
What I read about in the above statement, my feeling is as following:

1>, We management can do no wrong and we would not admit that we lost our pants in fuel hedging. As a good gambler, we will continue to hedge our fuel to make some loss back (yeah...). If the fuel is really that volatile in future, we can proudly say that we were right to hedge; should the fuel was not that volatile and we continue to have a loss, we can say that we have told you that there was some structural problem within the company and nothing to do with us management.
2>, We management can do no wrong and we would not admit that we have lost touch to our customer base. We would not admit that HK Express is causing more problem than we anticipated. We would not admit that we made a huge mistake not to form a JV with Qantas on JetStar HKG when first offered few years back before they approach China Eastern.
3>, We management can do no wrong and we would not admit that the company is in worse shape even when the fuel had dropped. So to prove that we will continue our cost cutting by remove food and beverage, checked luggage etc. from the current Y fares. And we will start to sell alcoholic drinks or any drinks in Y cabin from now on. If success we can proud us management, if fail we blame the market. Simples.
FlyerTalker688786 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 3:37 am
  #39  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
What i read from that is the management doesn't really have a plan.
1010101 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 5:45 am
  #40  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 328
Originally Posted by 1010101
What i read from that is the management doesn't really have a plan.
The critical review may be performed by third party.
Aus106080 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 5:53 am
  #41  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,588
Originally Posted by Aus106080
The critical review may be performed by third party.
those management consultants with fancy flow diagrams are as scam as ivan himself.

what management needs is strong leadership and vision, both which CX lacks. spending millions on external consultant do not resolve thei problems.

step 1 is to make employee love the firm they serve. they alreary failed it from basics. how can customer love a firm where its own employees so hate
fakecd is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 6:33 am
  #42  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 328
Originally Posted by fakecd
those management consultants with fancy flow diagrams are as scam as ivan himself.

what management needs is strong leadership and vision, both which CX lacks. spending millions on external consultant do not resolve thei problems.

step 1 is to make employee love the firm they serve. they alreary failed it from basics. how can customer love a firm where its own employees so hate
Short-sighted, emphasis on cost cutting, low morale, all are quite common for a typical Hong Kong Company.
Aus106080 is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2016 | 11:58 am
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
Originally Posted by QRC3288
Loads do look really dreadful right now.
I did ORD-HKG-SYD and return over the last 12 days or so. Outbound flights were full, but operated in the aftermath of typhoon cancellations which may have been a factor. Return flights SYD-HKG and HKG-ORD, both 77W, were about half full. The PEY cabin on 806 HKG-ORD yesterday / Wednesday was 13/34.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2016 | 11:48 pm
  #44  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: HK
Programs: CX
Posts: 77
Originally Posted by BearX220
I did ORD-HKG-SYD and return over the last 12 days or so. Outbound flights were full, but operated in the aftermath of typhoon cancellations which may have been a factor. Return flights SYD-HKG and HKG-ORD, both 77W, were about half full. The PEY cabin on 806 HKG-ORD yesterday / Wednesday was 13/34.
Was on HKG-FCO recently (when it was still daily), J had 6 empty seats at check-in but was later told on board that it's all full because a group of aunties from the Mainland has decided to pay cash at check-in for instant upgrade. They were scattered around the cabin... I walked around the cabin mid flight and saw some of them clogging around one of the D/G seat at the back J cabin....playing cards....haha

Note: Absolutely no bias/prejudice here.

PE was full that flight with Y 60% full.

Return flight FCO-HKG, J was oversold and 2 was downgraded, PE all full and Y 99% full.

But of course we aren't sure what sort of margins were those seats sold for.
dunflyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.