I'm fed up with FIRST/BA - we're being ripped off
#47
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, Amex Cent, SPG Gold, IC Plat Amb, Hilton Diam(given it though I'd never stayed in a Hilton)
Posts: 333
I thank Land-of-Miles and Bealine for their very informative comments and I think the prinicple problem is one of service - and it's lack.
To my mind, First simply does not feel 'special' and I have honestly had some dreadful crew members dealing with me and no, I am not rude: I always say Hello, I always smile, I always remember my p's and q's, and I NEVER use a call bell.
Yet, it the service just is not what it used to be - it simply isn't, I'm afraid and I am getting fed up paying the price of an F ticket for crap service - I have to say I have flown Business First with Continental and I though their level of service was vastly superior to First but they didn't have beds.
Can I just say, has anyone else noticed the tutts and stares you get if you don't want to eat the moment the plane takes off - this seems relatively recent (i.e. over the past couple of years) that the crew are overtly obvious in trying to get all F pax to eat at the same time.
I understand why but it is just another example of how the advertised product is not a reality.
Sorry, I guess I feel passionate about BA and especially First (and my mates will tell you I am mad about them - sad!) but even I am getting really p.....d about it.
To my mind, First simply does not feel 'special' and I have honestly had some dreadful crew members dealing with me and no, I am not rude: I always say Hello, I always smile, I always remember my p's and q's, and I NEVER use a call bell.
Yet, it the service just is not what it used to be - it simply isn't, I'm afraid and I am getting fed up paying the price of an F ticket for crap service - I have to say I have flown Business First with Continental and I though their level of service was vastly superior to First but they didn't have beds.
Can I just say, has anyone else noticed the tutts and stares you get if you don't want to eat the moment the plane takes off - this seems relatively recent (i.e. over the past couple of years) that the crew are overtly obvious in trying to get all F pax to eat at the same time.
I understand why but it is just another example of how the advertised product is not a reality.
Sorry, I guess I feel passionate about BA and especially First (and my mates will tell you I am mad about them - sad!) but even I am getting really p.....d about it.
#48
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,916
Originally Posted by starlight
Can I just say, has anyone else noticed the tutts and stares you get if you don't want to eat the moment the plane takes off - this seems relatively recent (i.e. over the past couple of years) that the crew are overtly obvious in trying to get all F pax to eat at the same time.
I understand why but it is just another example of how the advertised product is not a reality.
#49
Join Date: Jun 2003
Programs: BA, IHG, 5C
Posts: 4,413
Originally Posted by aristoph
Not true! Please see the recent thread which quoted from the BA Annual Report the income from miles sold to partners at £350m (if my memory serves me right) versus an estimated cost to BA of £15m if all of those miles were redeemed for free flights. That is a profit margin of 2,300%! I think they should roll out the red carpet for Tesco mileage redeemers.
I'm no accountant, but I think there is a little more information available here. Now-redundant UK GAAP required partner miles to be accounted for in the same manner, i.e. estimated cost, and on this basis from BA's reconciliation the deferred liability was £270m lower. So the estimated profit from the £359m mileage sale is £270m (75% margin - nice!), leaving the estimated cost as £89m.
Last point - the group's £270m profit breaks up into £112m for the "company" being BA Miles, and £158m for subsidiaries = AirMiles. So they have more deferred profit from partner AirMiles than BA Miles, presumably down to more partner AirMiles outstanding or higher margin/wastage if I have this right.
#50
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Grandee (Upgraded), BA Silver, AZ MilleMiglia
Posts: 3,107
Originally Posted by starlight
Can I just say, has anyone else noticed the tutts and stares you get if you don't want to eat the moment the plane takes off - this seems relatively recent (i.e. over the past couple of years) that the crew are overtly obvious in trying to get all F pax to eat at the same time.
I understand why but it is just another example of how the advertised product is not a reality.
I understand why but it is just another example of how the advertised product is not a reality.
And although the food and wine last week was much better than J is, I still have fond memories of being spoilt with Krug, beef tournedos with foie gras, etc. Maybe I'm being unfair because LHR-JFK is so short, but it was disappointing.
#51
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,806
I have posted before on the inconsistency of the F product. I had thought things were improving, but my last flight to JFK was (on a scale from 1 to 10) a 4.
Walk to Gate 23 in Victor Pier, then bussed to the aircraft. F cabin had 17 seats, 16 pax and 3 crew. IFE was broken. Given the crew to pax ratio, the meal took an age. CSD generally uninterested. Other to give me my menu, did not see him again until I went to find him to tell him that I really didn't think that a plane should be allowed to leave LHR with defective equipment.
Crew were pleasant, but overworked. Altogether is was a pretty ordinary experience. I was travelling with someone who had never travelled F before. After boarding, a crew member took his coat. He asked for some water, and the crew member said: "We have a system", referring to what I know is the routine of get pax settled then offer nuts and drink. But the way she said it was not particularly welcoming.
Contrast with a recent trip on LH through the First Class Terminal in FRA. It's a different world.
Although one of those people who has always flown BA, because of the uncertainty about hold luggage restrictions, I now have trips booked with LH, SQ and CX in F. We'll see how they compare.
Walk to Gate 23 in Victor Pier, then bussed to the aircraft. F cabin had 17 seats, 16 pax and 3 crew. IFE was broken. Given the crew to pax ratio, the meal took an age. CSD generally uninterested. Other to give me my menu, did not see him again until I went to find him to tell him that I really didn't think that a plane should be allowed to leave LHR with defective equipment.
Crew were pleasant, but overworked. Altogether is was a pretty ordinary experience. I was travelling with someone who had never travelled F before. After boarding, a crew member took his coat. He asked for some water, and the crew member said: "We have a system", referring to what I know is the routine of get pax settled then offer nuts and drink. But the way she said it was not particularly welcoming.
Contrast with a recent trip on LH through the First Class Terminal in FRA. It's a different world.
Although one of those people who has always flown BA, because of the uncertainty about hold luggage restrictions, I now have trips booked with LH, SQ and CX in F. We'll see how they compare.
#52
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Programs: Mucci. And BA Gold – previous awards - Gold 11, Silver 7, Bronze 4.
Posts: 4,236
Originally Posted by Land-of-Miles
Bealine
I personally will pay a small premium for F over J, but not that much, because I do not genuinely feel that the BA F experience is that special and not that far away from upper deck J.
I personally will pay a small premium for F over J, but not that much, because I do not genuinely feel that the BA F experience is that special and not that far away from upper deck J.
My only consolation in this sorry tale is that as Wee Willie wields his axe my shares are going up... but I'd prefer the service levels to rise faster than the share price for a while. Cos we all know what happens to share prices eventually when your customers go elsewhere...
#54
Join Date: Jan 2006
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, HHonours Diamond, BA AMEX PremPlus
Posts: 5,140
Originally Posted by jchand
No .... What is that ??
#55
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Originally Posted by Raffles
...This is, to some extent, the problem with F - a lack of imagination.
I was genuinely astounded by the food that LH served in F when I flew down to HK in May. If you're willing to spend the money on the product then anything is possible.
I was genuinely astounded by the food that LH served in F when I flew down to HK in May. If you're willing to spend the money on the product then anything is possible.
But for some flights F is not about service (at least for me); for other flights it is all about service. I prefer to fly AA F on some routes instead of BA F (despite having worse FAs, wine, food -- just about every aspect of the soft product) ... because AA has a better hard product (better seat, desk, bed, and for this route better lounge, airport facilities, ontime record, irregular ops). So there is more than one way to get F business; however it does vary by route. AA manages to keep the food/wine/service good enough to be not annoying, and wins with the other factors. So if AA can do it, BA should have an easy time of creating a new F that will wow us again.
#56
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AMS (SEA, JNB)
Programs: Mucci Reperateur des Coeurs Brises
Posts: 4,107
Originally Posted by number_6
So if AA can do it, BA should have an easy time of creating a new F that will wow us again.
Upon landing, cars will be waiting at the gate to whisk the F pax off to their final destination. I would decrease the number of seats onboard and raise prices accordingly. It would save the cost to BA of building a ridiculous seperate terminal, and the lounge would not have to be nearly as fancy or large. The extra money could go to creating a truly amazing hard and soft product in the air, and BA could say to VS, "Yes, we do devote more to the experience in the air because we don't force our best customers to skulk around an airport all day." The cars do not even have to be Porsche or Mercedes (well, at least not at far flung destinations).
Singapore would finally be the one running away with their tails between their legs.
One can dream...
#57
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,483
veering slightly off topic on such a good thread - sorry - but like to defend one of my favourite things on UA
The only thing better was being able to listen to air traffic control on channel 9. It was so engrosing, especially around ORD and LHR, I listened to it all the way back. Wish BA had that.
Channel 9 is the best IFE in the industry imho (for the FT'er of course). Even my partner listens in sometimes...
It does stresss me a bit coming into ORD sometimes though when you are trying to work out how many of the planes ahead of you on approach are widebodies from Asia (the UA flight numbering helps out here - if you hear a couple of UA8xx in front, bank on a couple of hours at immigration!)
You know you're coming home when all the call signs change to 'Speedbird', 'Midland' and 'Easy' from 'Cactus', 'Frontier' and 'Air Force One'...
Can we have this on BA please!!!!
Originally Posted by goap
The only thing better was being able to listen to air traffic control on channel 9. It was so engrosing, especially around ORD and LHR, I listened to it all the way back. Wish BA had that.
It does stresss me a bit coming into ORD sometimes though when you are trying to work out how many of the planes ahead of you on approach are widebodies from Asia (the UA flight numbering helps out here - if you hear a couple of UA8xx in front, bank on a couple of hours at immigration!)
You know you're coming home when all the call signs change to 'Speedbird', 'Midland' and 'Easy' from 'Cactus', 'Frontier' and 'Air Force One'...
Can we have this on BA please!!!!
#58
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Originally Posted by matthewuk
....Can we have this on BA please!!!!
As for the car to plane idea, LH is already doing this in FRA (most F fares include limo to the airport, HON status gets free parking at the airport in a valet lot and they even do oil changes and car washes for you; actually even IB provides this benefit in MAD for their Emeralds). LH assigns a PA to you in the F terminal, who does everything to do with your trip (and in practice almost everything that you want, even if not LH related, I've had them order flowers and make restaurant reservations as well as arranging Fedex pickup -- and they do it joyfully; of course staff outnumbers pax in the LH F terminal most of the time).
In LHR, CX provides a limo (within 100 mile radius of LHR) for all F fares (including discounted ones). VS does it for their "J" fare (though it is priced more like F than J).
#59
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Programs: BAEC (Gold), Hilton (Gold)
Posts: 4,168
Originally Posted by number_6
In LHR, CX provides a limo (within 100 mile radius of LHR) for all F fares (including discounted ones). VS does it for their "J" fare (though it is priced more like F than J).
BAH
#60
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AMS (SEA, JNB)
Programs: Mucci Reperateur des Coeurs Brises
Posts: 4,107
Originally Posted by number_6
As for the car to plane idea, LH is already doing this in FRA (most F fares include limo to the airport, HON status gets free parking at the airport in a valet lot and they even do oil changes and car washes for you; actually even IB provides this benefit in MAD for their Emeralds). LH assigns a PA to you in the F terminal, who does everything to do with your trip (and in practice almost everything that you want, even if not LH related, I've had them order flowers and make restaurant reservations as well as arranging Fedex pickup -- and they do it joyfully; of course staff outnumbers pax in the LH F terminal most of the time).
In LHR, CX provides a limo (within 100 mile radius of LHR) for all F fares (including discounted ones). VS does it for their "J" fare (though it is priced more like F than J).
In LHR, CX provides a limo (within 100 mile radius of LHR) for all F fares (including discounted ones). VS does it for their "J" fare (though it is priced more like F than J).
But I really mean cut out the airport entirely. Have a car bring the best customers directly from door to aicraft door: no terminals, no lounges, no check-in desks, no spas, no shops, no noodle bars, no waiting in queues ever. No ratrace. Just showing up at the aircraft (not the airport) 10-20 minutes before the doors close. This would be the essence of a seamless travel experience, because there would be no seams to speak of.
The only thing possibly better would be a private jet (and those don't have (pseudo)beds, excepting the BBJ of course).
Again, probably just a dream, because the logistics of getting such a scheme right would most likely be impossible for an organisation such as BA that has become addicted to cutting corners at every possible moment. (We need to have an intervention...)