Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

High-flying barrister, 41, and his family are removed from BA flight at Heathrow

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

High-flying barrister, 41, and his family are removed from BA flight at Heathrow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2022, 9:22 am
  #271  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 346
Originally Posted by HarbourGent
The logic of mob rule.
The video showed him arguing with the police officers and initially refusing to disembark so don't think it's just the mobs. There are certain behaviours which are not acceptable in public, on aircrafts etc
hydro001 is online now  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 9:29 am
  #272  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Diamond, IHG Platinum, Senior Railcard & Bus Pass
Posts: 987
Originally Posted by Agent69
Having read the comments on the DM website it appears that their readers are all closet BA haters, who unanimously support the QC (how could an airline be so incompetent as to overbook the cabin).

I dread to think what their response would be if they were sat in row 12 of CE and were told their first choice of main course was unavailable!
Originally Posted by T8191
I read them and mataphorically wept ... for the ignorance and bias displayed by those who posted, and the herd of ignoramuses that agreed!
I spent some time yesterday reading the DM comments (I was bored). These are two of my favourites:

- “Highly unlikely that a business class passenger will be out of pocket. Generally their tickets will be fully flexible.”
- “The idea of paying for business-class flights on BA within London, from London to a European destination -- more money than good sense. But that's lawyers for you.”
wrp96, hydro001 and truncated like this.
WickedStepMother is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 9:45 am
  #273  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Programs: BA GGL & GfL, AA LTP, Marriott (sigh) Ambassador, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,238
he wasnt downgraded ON THE PLANE. he clearly thought he could talk his way into his preferred seating once onboard and then had some words which clearly worked against him by his own admission in the video.

and it obviously went on long enough to annoy other pax enough to think to film, which, thank goodness. no sympathy, especially given he used his connections to plant this story to publicly shame BA for what is a standard industry practice re oversales.
VSLover is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 9:47 am
  #274  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by WickedStepMother
I spent some time yesterday reading the DM comments (I was bored). These are two of my favourites:

- “Highly unlikely that a business class passenger will be out of pocket. Generally their tickets will be fully flexible.”
- “The idea of paying for business-class flights on BA within London, from London to a European destination -- more money than good sense. But that's lawyers for you.”
How about 'I hope he wins compensation against the airline and the police . And the nanny should independently seek legal advice on this matter ' (and that got over 1,000 likes)
Agent69 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 9:54 am
  #275  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,593
It turned out he wasn't very high-flying at all.
adrianlondon is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 9:58 am
  #276  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,146
Angry Nannies ... NO!

An irrelevant bit of Nanny impact from an old TR of mine ... 2015, and our first [and only] BA First.
And then it was time to review our fellow pax. Which was not a cheering prospect. A family group consisting of: 1K, younger male, 1F older male, 4K, female with lap infant, 4F, toddler. We are surrounded, although at least 2F is empty. And then it isn’t, as Nanny is brought forward from CW to occupy the vacant seat and look after Infant whilst Mummy has lunch. Cool. Nanny gets her meal brought forward from CW. Mummy joins Nanny on the footstool in 2F to feed infant. Daddy comes and talks to Wife and Infant. Wife goes and talks to Toddler. Daddy returns to seat, Toddler comes and talks to Infant. Mummy rejoins Nanny …. and this cycle of activity goes on constantly for the entire 9 hour journey. It was particularly annoying for iWife in 2K, as she is continually being presented with people’s bums by her left ear. AAAARRRGGGGHHHH.
TR: Our first BA First, and our first visit to St Lucia
T8191 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 10:32 am
  #277  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Programs: BA GGL & GfL, AA LTP, Marriott (sigh) Ambassador, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,238
please tell me ITV is currently filming "Heathrow: Britain's Busiest Airport" because thats all I could think of when I saw the police
Silver Fox, DelTroon and AJA_ like this.
VSLover is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 11:05 am
  #278  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bergen - Norway
Programs: EBD , FBG
Posts: 563
“One of the finest legal brains within these fields” , which one is planning… He didn’t plan the outcome of this very well.

I can understand he is pissed that they didn’t inform him until boarding area, but it’s only a two hour flight. Had it been a longhaul flight, obviously the difference between club and economy had been something to trip over, but this was just too much
Kleffen is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 1:06 pm
  #279  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 879
For anyone not wanting to avoid visiting DM site - the video is directly hosted at here

I am guessing our esteemed friend probably thought swearing was acceptable in this situation, regardless of if you agree or disagree, as Helen Lovejoy would say think about the children! Setting a poor example and I always say reflects you as a person.
Crismyth likes this.
suley is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 1:46 pm
  #280  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dundee
Programs: BA Plastic. HH Diamond. Speedwell Bar Lifetime Platinum.
Posts: 1,426
The rolls eyes from 2C when he said all he did was swear was, well, interesting.
BlueThroughCrimp is online now  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 1:50 pm
  #281  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
Originally Posted by suley
I am guessing our esteemed friend probably thought swearing was acceptable in this situation, regardless of if you agree or disagree, as Helen Lovejoy would say think about the children! Setting a poor example and I always say reflects you as a person.
And as a barrister, perhaps think about how this might play in the hands of the other party. In this case, if for the sake of argument, one takes the passenger's claim that he believes they were fully within their rights at face value, I would argue that swearing is simply offering the other party a cheap and unexpected trump card on a silver platter.

Indeed, if the airline had - as he suggests - no leg to stand on in the first instance, then all of a sudden, they can just hide behind the swearing to justify what he considers a disproportionate reaction. It will be very hard to answer that, because once it is accepted that there was an argument and you were swearing and the plane was already moving, what risk the tension created becomes a matter of interpretation and the crew's argument will be "safety first, he was swearing, and we did not know if the situation would continue to deteriorate or where this would stop, and rather than risk an incident 35,000 feet up, the reasonable mitigation was to offload the passengers so that they could calm down and the rest of the passengers could be carried safely and without further delay". And quite frankly, this is an argument you will never manage to convincingly answer regardless of whether you were right or wrong in the first place as the point of focus will cease to be the initial situation to become the swearing/escalation instead.

Last edited by orbitmic; Feb 15, 2022 at 2:53 pm
orbitmic is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 2:24 pm
  #282  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Glasgow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Sixt Platinum, HHons Diamond
Posts: 927
Originally Posted by orbitmic
And as a barrister, perhaps think about this might play in the hands of the other party. In this case, if for the sake of argument, one takes the passenger's claim that he believe they were fully within their rights at face value, I would argue that swearing is simply offering the other party a cheap and unexpected trump card on a silver platter.

Indeed, if the airline had - as he suggests - no leg to stand on, then all of a sudden, they can just hide behind the swearing to justify what he considers a disproportionate reaction. It will be very hard to answer that, because once it is accepted that there was an argument and you were swearing and the plane was already moving, what risk the tension created becomes a matter of interpretation and the crew's argument will be "safety first, by the time he was swearing, we did not know where this would stop and rather thank risking an incident 35,000 feet up, the reasonable mitigation was to offload the passengers so that they could calm down and the rest of the passengers could be carried safely and without further delay.
You've hit the nail on the head - and I speak from personal experience (albeit not swearing at cabin crew). I will have to be slightly vague in my account below!

Many years ago a colleague was so unreasonable towards me that I broke my cardinal rule and used a phrase similar to "I don't give a f**k what you do with product X", after about 20 minutes of me being goaded and insulted. Said colleague constantly used the "f" word in company presentations and general interactions and so I didn't think my use of it would shock them, indeed the company culture encouraged foul language. However, my use of the word led to a complaint as they were (rather miraculously) offended and terribly upset. To cut a long story short it led to me leaving and starting my own company.

The rest is history and I owe the complainant a debt of gratitude as everything turned out fine for me and I got the shove to move on.

The reason I tell this story is that it did teach me to never swear in challenging situations as you will likely come out the worst for it, even if you were initially the victim. You immediately lose "the moral high ground" and lay yourself open to being accused of intimidating behaviour etc.
Grog, orbitmic, Silver Fox and 8 others like this.
Vinotraveller is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 3:13 pm
  #283  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 80
The following appeared in the comments section of one of the DM's incarnations of the story.
Whether or not it's true,(after all, we live in the age of the internet where nothing can be guaranteed), it's not a case of jumping on the 'I was there' bandwagon as it certainly predates similar accounts.
It does however seem to me to be a more believable account of why an aircraft be wheeled back and police called to encourage a passenger to leave the
aircraft than the damage limitation exercise which has appeared in several publications.

<<
I was on this flight. The man in question was acting in a completely unacceptable manner; swearing at the cabin crew and repeating "do you know who I am?" whilst flashing his Executive Club gold card around..... BA did the right thing to remove him from the flight. We were delayed by more than two hours and missed our dinner reservations, finding only a motorway services open for dinner on the first day of our holiday. Mr. Banner should be the one providing compensation to the 80+ passengers who had their evening ruined by his appalling behaviour.....Further, someone of his standing should know that the cabin crew do not have the ability to cater for his demands once boarded and that he should have sought compensation after the flight or declined to board the flight rather than act in such a reprehensible manner once on board.
>>
Carnforth is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 4:05 pm
  #284  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bergen - Norway
Programs: EBD , FBG
Posts: 563
Originally Posted by Carnforth
The following appeared in the comments section of one of the DM's incarnations of the story.
Whether or not it's true,(after all, we live in the age of the internet where nothing can be guaranteed), it's not a case of jumping on the 'I was there' bandwagon as it certainly predates similar accounts.
It does however seem to me to be a more believable account of why an aircraft be wheeled back and police called to encourage a passenger to leave the
aircraft than the damage limitation exercise which has appeared in several publications.

<<
I was on this flight. The man in question was acting in a completely unacceptable manner; swearing at the cabin crew and repeating "do you know who I am?" whilst flashing his Executive Club gold card around..... BA did the right thing to remove him from the flight. We were delayed by more than two hours and missed our dinner reservations, finding only a motorway services open for dinner on the first day of our holiday. Mr. Banner should be the one providing compensation to the 80+ passengers who had their evening ruined by his appalling behaviour.....Further, someone of his standing should know that the cabin crew do not have the ability to cater for his demands once boarded and that he should have sought compensation after the flight or declined to board the flight rather than act in such a reprehensible manner once on board.
>>
A few days back when this thread got initiated, I was thinking about joking about him using the infamous “do you know who I am?”. And there it was. The most tacky way of behaving arrogant no matter who you are… Not even the Pope, Nelson Mandela or whoever should use that silly phrase…
Silver Fox, LETTERBOY and wrp96 like this.
Kleffen is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 4:52 pm
  #285  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
To be fair to him I'm willing to cut him some slack but only if nanny was indeed downgraded at the gate and was on the same booking as the family. If that was the case BA cocked it up.
HIDDY is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.