High-flying barrister, 41, and his family are removed from BA flight at Heathrow
#271
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 346
#272
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Diamond, IHG Platinum, Senior Railcard & Bus Pass
Posts: 987
Having read the comments on the DM website it appears that their readers are all closet BA haters, who unanimously support the QC (how could an airline be so incompetent as to overbook the cabin).
I dread to think what their response would be if they were sat in row 12 of CE and were told their first choice of main course was unavailable!
I dread to think what their response would be if they were sat in row 12 of CE and were told their first choice of main course was unavailable!
- “Highly unlikely that a business class passenger will be out of pocket. Generally their tickets will be fully flexible.”
- “The idea of paying for business-class flights on BA within London, from London to a European destination -- more money than good sense. But that's lawyers for you.”
#273
Join Date: Oct 2005
Programs: BA GGL & GfL, AA LTP, Marriott (sigh) Ambassador, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,238
he wasnt downgraded ON THE PLANE. he clearly thought he could talk his way into his preferred seating once onboard and then had some words which clearly worked against him by his own admission in the video.
and it obviously went on long enough to annoy other pax enough to think to film, which, thank goodness. no sympathy, especially given he used his connections to plant this story to publicly shame BA for what is a standard industry practice re oversales.
and it obviously went on long enough to annoy other pax enough to think to film, which, thank goodness. no sympathy, especially given he used his connections to plant this story to publicly shame BA for what is a standard industry practice re oversales.
#274
Join Date: Jan 2015
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,630
I spent some time yesterday reading the DM comments (I was bored). These are two of my favourites:
- “Highly unlikely that a business class passenger will be out of pocket. Generally their tickets will be fully flexible.”
- “The idea of paying for business-class flights on BA within London, from London to a European destination -- more money than good sense. But that's lawyers for you.”
- “Highly unlikely that a business class passenger will be out of pocket. Generally their tickets will be fully flexible.”
- “The idea of paying for business-class flights on BA within London, from London to a European destination -- more money than good sense. But that's lawyers for you.”
#276
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,146
Nannies ... NO!
An irrelevant bit of Nanny impact from an old TR of mine ... 2015, and our first [and only] BA First.
TR: Our first BA First, and our first visit to St Lucia
And then it was time to review our fellow pax. Which was not a cheering prospect. A family group consisting of: 1K, younger male, 1F older male, 4K, female with lap infant, 4F, toddler. We are surrounded, although at least 2F is empty. And then it isn’t, as Nanny is brought forward from CW to occupy the vacant seat and look after Infant whilst Mummy has lunch. Cool. Nanny gets her meal brought forward from CW. Mummy joins Nanny on the footstool in 2F to feed infant. Daddy comes and talks to Wife and Infant. Wife goes and talks to Toddler. Daddy returns to seat, Toddler comes and talks to Infant. Mummy rejoins Nanny …. and this cycle of activity goes on constantly for the entire 9 hour journey. It was particularly annoying for iWife in 2K, as she is continually being presented with people’s bums by her left ear. AAAARRRGGGGHHHH.
#278
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bergen - Norway
Programs: EBD , FBG
Posts: 563
“One of the finest legal brains within these fields” , which one is planning… He didn’t plan the outcome of this very well.
I can understand he is pissed that they didn’t inform him until boarding area, but it’s only a two hour flight. Had it been a longhaul flight, obviously the difference between club and economy had been something to trip over, but this was just too much
I can understand he is pissed that they didn’t inform him until boarding area, but it’s only a two hour flight. Had it been a longhaul flight, obviously the difference between club and economy had been something to trip over, but this was just too much
#279
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 879
For anyone not wanting to avoid visiting DM site - the video is directly hosted at here
I am guessing our esteemed friend probably thought swearing was acceptable in this situation, regardless of if you agree or disagree, as Helen Lovejoy would say think about the children! Setting a poor example and I always say reflects you as a person.
I am guessing our esteemed friend probably thought swearing was acceptable in this situation, regardless of if you agree or disagree, as Helen Lovejoy would say think about the children! Setting a poor example and I always say reflects you as a person.
#281
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
Indeed, if the airline had - as he suggests - no leg to stand on in the first instance, then all of a sudden, they can just hide behind the swearing to justify what he considers a disproportionate reaction. It will be very hard to answer that, because once it is accepted that there was an argument and you were swearing and the plane was already moving, what risk the tension created becomes a matter of interpretation and the crew's argument will be "safety first, he was swearing, and we did not know if the situation would continue to deteriorate or where this would stop, and rather than risk an incident 35,000 feet up, the reasonable mitigation was to offload the passengers so that they could calm down and the rest of the passengers could be carried safely and without further delay". And quite frankly, this is an argument you will never manage to convincingly answer regardless of whether you were right or wrong in the first place as the point of focus will cease to be the initial situation to become the swearing/escalation instead.
Last edited by orbitmic; Feb 15, 2022 at 2:53 pm
#282
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Glasgow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Sixt Platinum, HHons Diamond
Posts: 927
And as a barrister, perhaps think about this might play in the hands of the other party. In this case, if for the sake of argument, one takes the passenger's claim that he believe they were fully within their rights at face value, I would argue that swearing is simply offering the other party a cheap and unexpected trump card on a silver platter.
Indeed, if the airline had - as he suggests - no leg to stand on, then all of a sudden, they can just hide behind the swearing to justify what he considers a disproportionate reaction. It will be very hard to answer that, because once it is accepted that there was an argument and you were swearing and the plane was already moving, what risk the tension created becomes a matter of interpretation and the crew's argument will be "safety first, by the time he was swearing, we did not know where this would stop and rather thank risking an incident 35,000 feet up, the reasonable mitigation was to offload the passengers so that they could calm down and the rest of the passengers could be carried safely and without further delay.
Indeed, if the airline had - as he suggests - no leg to stand on, then all of a sudden, they can just hide behind the swearing to justify what he considers a disproportionate reaction. It will be very hard to answer that, because once it is accepted that there was an argument and you were swearing and the plane was already moving, what risk the tension created becomes a matter of interpretation and the crew's argument will be "safety first, by the time he was swearing, we did not know where this would stop and rather thank risking an incident 35,000 feet up, the reasonable mitigation was to offload the passengers so that they could calm down and the rest of the passengers could be carried safely and without further delay.
Many years ago a colleague was so unreasonable towards me that I broke my cardinal rule and used a phrase similar to "I don't give a f**k what you do with product X", after about 20 minutes of me being goaded and insulted. Said colleague constantly used the "f" word in company presentations and general interactions and so I didn't think my use of it would shock them, indeed the company culture encouraged foul language. However, my use of the word led to a complaint as they were (rather miraculously) offended and terribly upset. To cut a long story short it led to me leaving and starting my own company.
The rest is history and I owe the complainant a debt of gratitude as everything turned out fine for me and I got the shove to move on.
The reason I tell this story is that it did teach me to never swear in challenging situations as you will likely come out the worst for it, even if you were initially the victim. You immediately lose "the moral high ground" and lay yourself open to being accused of intimidating behaviour etc.
#283
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 80
The following appeared in the comments section of one of the DM's incarnations of the story.
Whether or not it's true,(after all, we live in the age of the internet where nothing can be guaranteed), it's not a case of jumping on the 'I was there' bandwagon as it certainly predates similar accounts.
It does however seem to me to be a more believable account of why an aircraft be wheeled back and police called to encourage a passenger to leave the
aircraft than the damage limitation exercise which has appeared in several publications.
<<
I was on this flight. The man in question was acting in a completely unacceptable manner; swearing at the cabin crew and repeating "do you know who I am?" whilst flashing his Executive Club gold card around..... BA did the right thing to remove him from the flight. We were delayed by more than two hours and missed our dinner reservations, finding only a motorway services open for dinner on the first day of our holiday. Mr. Banner should be the one providing compensation to the 80+ passengers who had their evening ruined by his appalling behaviour.....Further, someone of his standing should know that the cabin crew do not have the ability to cater for his demands once boarded and that he should have sought compensation after the flight or declined to board the flight rather than act in such a reprehensible manner once on board.
>>
Whether or not it's true,(after all, we live in the age of the internet where nothing can be guaranteed), it's not a case of jumping on the 'I was there' bandwagon as it certainly predates similar accounts.
It does however seem to me to be a more believable account of why an aircraft be wheeled back and police called to encourage a passenger to leave the
aircraft than the damage limitation exercise which has appeared in several publications.
<<
I was on this flight. The man in question was acting in a completely unacceptable manner; swearing at the cabin crew and repeating "do you know who I am?" whilst flashing his Executive Club gold card around..... BA did the right thing to remove him from the flight. We were delayed by more than two hours and missed our dinner reservations, finding only a motorway services open for dinner on the first day of our holiday. Mr. Banner should be the one providing compensation to the 80+ passengers who had their evening ruined by his appalling behaviour.....Further, someone of his standing should know that the cabin crew do not have the ability to cater for his demands once boarded and that he should have sought compensation after the flight or declined to board the flight rather than act in such a reprehensible manner once on board.
>>
#284
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bergen - Norway
Programs: EBD , FBG
Posts: 563
The following appeared in the comments section of one of the DM's incarnations of the story.
Whether or not it's true,(after all, we live in the age of the internet where nothing can be guaranteed), it's not a case of jumping on the 'I was there' bandwagon as it certainly predates similar accounts.
It does however seem to me to be a more believable account of why an aircraft be wheeled back and police called to encourage a passenger to leave the
aircraft than the damage limitation exercise which has appeared in several publications.
<<
I was on this flight. The man in question was acting in a completely unacceptable manner; swearing at the cabin crew and repeating "do you know who I am?" whilst flashing his Executive Club gold card around..... BA did the right thing to remove him from the flight. We were delayed by more than two hours and missed our dinner reservations, finding only a motorway services open for dinner on the first day of our holiday. Mr. Banner should be the one providing compensation to the 80+ passengers who had their evening ruined by his appalling behaviour.....Further, someone of his standing should know that the cabin crew do not have the ability to cater for his demands once boarded and that he should have sought compensation after the flight or declined to board the flight rather than act in such a reprehensible manner once on board.
>>
Whether or not it's true,(after all, we live in the age of the internet where nothing can be guaranteed), it's not a case of jumping on the 'I was there' bandwagon as it certainly predates similar accounts.
It does however seem to me to be a more believable account of why an aircraft be wheeled back and police called to encourage a passenger to leave the
aircraft than the damage limitation exercise which has appeared in several publications.
<<
I was on this flight. The man in question was acting in a completely unacceptable manner; swearing at the cabin crew and repeating "do you know who I am?" whilst flashing his Executive Club gold card around..... BA did the right thing to remove him from the flight. We were delayed by more than two hours and missed our dinner reservations, finding only a motorway services open for dinner on the first day of our holiday. Mr. Banner should be the one providing compensation to the 80+ passengers who had their evening ruined by his appalling behaviour.....Further, someone of his standing should know that the cabin crew do not have the ability to cater for his demands once boarded and that he should have sought compensation after the flight or declined to board the flight rather than act in such a reprehensible manner once on board.
>>