High-flying barrister, 41, and his family are removed from BA flight at Heathrow
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Land of Enchantment!
Programs: Southwest RR, Alaska Mileage Plan™
Posts: 341
High-flying barrister, 41, and his family are removed from BA flight at Heathrow
Funny article from DailyMail.com
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rmed-cops.html
Mr Banner paid for business class tickets, but his nanny had been downgraded because BA oversold the flight.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rmed-cops.html
- Charles Banner, QC, 41 was forced to leave the plane with his family and nanny
- Matters became heated after Mr Banner was told the children's nanny had been allocated a seat in economy and he and his wife wanted to work during the flight
- Mr Banner claims BA plane staff were 'rude' with one commenting: 'You wish.'
- Pilot refused to take off until family left. The flight was delayed by 90 minutes
Mr Banner paid for business class tickets, but his nanny had been downgraded because BA oversold the flight.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Singapore
Programs: BAEC GFL (Only took 30 years)
Posts: 500
From his chambers profile, I see he is an expert in dispute resolution.
Bit odd though, assuming it is correct, that it seems there was a spare seat for the nanny in Club the crew wouldn't let her sit in. There may yet be more to this story.
Edit to add that seems empty seat may have been blocked out middle seat so ignore my observation above.. Also not clear if 1 year old was going to sit on lap or had own seat.
Bit odd though, assuming it is correct, that it seems there was a spare seat for the nanny in Club the crew wouldn't let her sit in. There may yet be more to this story.
Edit to add that seems empty seat may have been blocked out middle seat so ignore my observation above.. Also not clear if 1 year old was going to sit on lap or had own seat.
Last edited by Midships; Feb 12, 2022 at 7:40 am
#4
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 6,576
“Mr Banner claimed that even though there was a spare seat close to him in business class, cabin crew staff insisted that nanny could still not sit in it.”
Isn’t that the middle seat in CE that’s supposed to be kept empty?
Isn’t that the middle seat in CE that’s supposed to be kept empty?
#7
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Singapore
Programs: BAEC GFL (Only took 30 years)
Posts: 500
#8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Singapore
Programs: BAEC GFL (Only took 30 years)
Posts: 500
https://www.rollonfriday.com/news-co...row-over-nanny
Interestingly Charles Banner QC is of the view that after making a complaint to BA and telling the cabin crew that he had done this, (I suppose he must have done it on his phone during the dispute) the cabin crew then asked the pilot not to fly the plane with him and his party onboard, "...most likely to provide the cabin crew with cover against the complaint."
Of course if both he and his wife wanted to work, I suppose one of them could have swapped with the nanny.
Last edited by Midships; Feb 12, 2022 at 12:22 am
#10
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 300
I know CB and he is a decent chap. The fact that it was his child's NANNY as the DM put it is irrelevant. The flight was overbooked, and BA involuntarily downgraded, This would not be apparent at check in I presume because of the variable number of rows in CE. They would have been on the same booking and therefore same group. Or seats were not properly assigned until the gate.
I can well believe the attitude of the cabin crew. It strikes me that this i reminiscent of every encounter I have had where people take the piss and then whinge to the boss about me.
There is an assumption above that we are talking about the middle seat rather than an actual spare seat.
I'm with CB on this. BA oversold, downgraded a passenger and then, it appears to me, have not been very helpful to a longstanding GCH.
I can well believe the attitude of the cabin crew. It strikes me that this i reminiscent of every encounter I have had where people take the piss and then whinge to the boss about me.
There is an assumption above that we are talking about the middle seat rather than an actual spare seat.
I'm with CB on this. BA oversold, downgraded a passenger and then, it appears to me, have not been very helpful to a longstanding GCH.
Last edited by i_concur; Feb 12, 2022 at 1:07 am
#11
Join Date: Jul 2013
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, Hilton Diamond *, IHG, Couples Romance Rewards
Posts: 2,351
I know CB and he is a decent chap. The fact that it was his child's NANNY and the DM put it is irrelevant. The flight was overbooked, and BA involuntarily downgraded, This would not be apparent at check in I presume because of the variable number of rows in CE. They would have been on the same booking and therefore same group. Or seats were not properly assigned until the desk.
I can well believe the attitude of the cabin crew. It strikes me that this i reminiscent of every encounter I have had where people take the piss and then whinge to the boss about me.
There is an assumption above that we are talking about the middle seat rather than an actual spare seat.
I'm with CB on this. BA oversold, downgraded a passenger and then, it appears to me, have not been very helpful to a longstanding GCH.
I can well believe the attitude of the cabin crew. It strikes me that this i reminiscent of every encounter I have had where people take the piss and then whinge to the boss about me.
There is an assumption above that we are talking about the middle seat rather than an actual spare seat.
I'm with CB on this. BA oversold, downgraded a passenger and then, it appears to me, have not been very helpful to a longstanding GCH.
#12
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,065
We only know one side of this story, only that of the barrister, and even that as presented by the DM ~ hardly enough information to make an informed judgement. I can tell you from a captain's perspective that to kick a passenger off a flight is not a small matter and that to turn the aircraft round and return to stand is a decision not made lightly.
#13
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Programs: BA Blue
Posts: 125
Funny article from DailyMail.com
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rmed-cops.html
Mr Banner paid for business class tickets, but his nanny had been downgraded because BA oversold the flight.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rmed-cops.html
- Charles Banner, QC, 41 was forced to leave the plane with his family and nanny
- Matters became heated after Mr Banner was told the children's nanny had been allocated a seat in economy and he and his wife wanted to work during the flight
- Mr Banner claims BA plane staff were 'rude' with one commenting: 'You wish.'
- Pilot refused to take off until family left. The flight was delayed by 90 minutes
Mr Banner paid for business class tickets, but his nanny had been downgraded because BA oversold the flight.
#15
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Singapore
Programs: BAEC GFL (Only took 30 years)
Posts: 500
From the website where I think the DM got the story:
https://www.rollonfriday.com/news-co...row-over-nanny
QUOTE
"Eventually they gave us boarding passes but did not indicate that the nanny, whom their mother and I needed to look after the children whilst we worked on the flight, had been downgraded to a separate cabin from us. We were only told this at the gate on boarding the plane".
UNQUOTE