Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

BA worker 'suspended for taking backhanders from celebs'

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BA worker 'suspended for taking backhanders from celebs'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:03 am
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,097
This story is old news, he is no longer working for BA.
Can I help you is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:10 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,459
......

Last edited by Disco Volante; Feb 17, 2017 at 4:11 am
Disco Volante is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:13 am
  #33  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,212
Originally Posted by Disco Volante
I'm not sure that's right NickB. There will be a lot of people with a house of that value and a similar income, certainly enough to make it of little significance in the context of this story. The combination of easily-available self-certification mortgages and a steeply rising property market prior to the crash meant that if you are in your mid-40s and in your third property, it would be difficult not to have a house worth £800K. Starting with a small deposit and putting the gains from that sale into the next purchase, with the maximum gearing each time, would get you to £800K pretty quickly.
^
Prospero is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:38 am
  #34  
J_B
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver, Club Carlson Gold, Best Western Platinum, Bodean's Q-Card
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by NickB
No, it does not. Please read the last para of post #21 before making such comments.
Read it and respectfully disagreed
J_B is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:41 am
  #35  
Moderator: Qatar Airways
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LHR/NCE/MIA
Programs: BAEC GfL & GGL, SQ Gold, Amex Centurion, Mucci des Chevaliers des Bons Mots et Qui Savent Moucher
Posts: 8,949
I presume the journalist who wrote the article, checked the Land Registry to ensure the accused actually owns the property, opposed to perhaps the accused renting?
msm2000uk is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:42 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London N8
Programs: BA (LTG), Miles&More (whatever the lowest level is), Oyster card (zones 1-2)
Posts: 891
What is that people think is wrong - that this sort of service is available at all, or that someone (allegedly) took money for it?

I personally am amazed that it was even possible to have relationship with an individual who could re-attach the bridge to a plane, move someone to a better seat etc for free, but then I am not GGL.
ScruttonStreet is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 4:54 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, M&M FF
Posts: 125
I'm shocked on behalf of all celebrities that they have to resort to backhanders to obtain the treatment they so richly deserve...

What is the world coming to, I wonder!
patentlyobvious is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 5:00 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Herts, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, HH Diamond.
Posts: 3,178
BA should issue a pricelist for these services
stewaran is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 5:08 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Programs: BA GGLfL
Posts: 1,342
Originally Posted by ScruttonStreet
What is that people think is wrong - that this sort of service is available at all, or that someone (allegedly) took money for it?

I personally am amazed that it was even possible to have relationship with an individual who could re-attach the bridge to a plane, move someone to a better seat etc for free, but then I am not GGL.
The Special Services team at T5 is relatively small such that one tends to get to know the members of the team by name. The nature of the role is that there is typically 5 mins chit chat when being escorted to/from planes so one can imagine how this type of "relationship" might develop.
Lolbert is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 5:25 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: SQ-PPS+8, BA-Mucci Diamente, Mucci Siegneur des Bains Chauds
Posts: 2,286
Surely BA should add a compulsory gratuity to the cost of tickets so we do not have to tip in lounges? £20* a sector seems reasonable, with perhaps £30 for Gold Card holders due to there more demanding nature.

* Non refundable and per sector; gratuity may or may not be passed onto staff depending on on-time performance and customer satisfaction targets.
VC10 Boy is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 5:38 am
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,584
The gulf between his income and those he was paid to assist is very broad indeed. With some individuals that kind of position can really go to one's head.
hugolover is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 6:05 am
  #42  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,364
Originally Posted by Disco Volante
I'm not sure that's right NickB. There will be a lot of people with a house of that value and a similar income, certainly enough to make it of little significance in the context of this story. The combination of easily-available self-certification mortgages and a steeply rising property market prior to the crash meant that if you are in your mid-40s and in your third property, it would be difficult not to have a house worth £800K. Starting with a small deposit and putting the gains from that sale into the next purchase, with the maximum gearing each time, would get you to £800K pretty quickly.
This is patently not true. With median house prices around 315K in London, it just is not the case that there are "a lot of people with a house of that value."
The combination of easily-available self-certification mortgages and a steeply rising property market prior to the crash meant that if you are in your mid-40s and in your third property, it would be difficult not to have a house worth £800K. Starting with a small deposit and putting the gains from that sale into the next purchase, with the maximum gearing each time, would get you to £800K pretty quickly.
Well, it may be that in planet DV or planet prospero, or generally planet Flyertalk-GB, there are lots of people who "self-certificated" and purchased house several times "with the maximum gearing each time" and ended up with houses worth over 800K. The idea that this is a typical experience in the population at large is, imo, fanciful and quite simply not borne out by the numbers on median house prices.

It seems to me that some people on this board tend to extrapolate from their own lives and those of their families and friends and assume that they are reasonably representative of a substantial part of the population whereas, in reality, they represent a small proportion towards the higher end of the income distribution.

if you are in your mid-40s and in your third property, it would be difficult not to have a house worth £800K.
Really? I am above mid-40s; my income is higher than £35K; I live in London; I have changed properties over 3 times and my current house is not remotely near £800K. And most of the people around me also have houses which have much lower values than this (when they own a house, that is).
The very fact that you consider it "difficult" for somebody of that age/income not to have a house near £800K just shows how much your worldview is shaped by your own personal experience and social circle.

little significance in the context of this story.
I stated in my first post on this that one should not attempt to extrapolate to the situation of the individual discussed in the article. I stand by this.
NickB is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 6:11 am
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,364
Originally Posted by J_B
Read it and respectfully disagreed
So, you disagreed with the statement that followed my discussion of house prices that "Not that this means anything in relation to the particular individual under discussion here, though. People should avoid jumping to conclusions when they are not in possession of sufficient facts to do so."

And yet, you state a little later "Talking about the value of this guy's house in the context of this story just vindicates the journo's decision to include it."

Has it occurred to you that there might be a contradiction between the two?
NickB is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 6:18 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 4,029
Originally Posted by NickB
This is patently not true. With median house prices around 315K in London, it just is not the case that there are "a lot of people with a house of that value."
Well, it may be that in planet DV or planet prospero, or generally planet Flyertalk-GB, there are lots of people who "self-certificated" and purchased house several times "with the maximum gearing each time" and ended up with houses worth over 800K. The idea that this is a typical experience in the population at large is, imo, fanciful and quite simply not borne out by the numbers on median house prices.

It seems to me that some people on this board tend to extrapolate from their own lives and those of their families and friends and assume that they are reasonably representative of a substantial part of the population whereas, in reality, they represent a small proportion towards the higher end of the income distribution.

Really? I am above mid-40s; my income is higher than £35K; I live in London; I have changed properties over 3 times and my current house is not remotely near £800K. And most of the people around me also have houses which have much lower values than this (when they own a house, that is).
The very fact that you consider it "difficult" for somebody of that age/income not to have a house near £800K just shows how much your worldview is shaped by your own personal experience and social circle.

I stated in my first post on this that one should not attempt to extrapolate to the situation of the individual discussed in the article. I stand by this.
My bolding - Nick, aren't you doing in the second para what you're accusing people of doing in the first?
darthlemsip is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2015, 6:37 am
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,364
Originally Posted by darthlemsip
My bolding - Nick, aren't you doing in the second para what you're accusing people of doing in the first?
No I am not: I am explaining that his assumption is wrong by showing counter-examples. I am not claiming that my experience is typical of anything, merely that there will be examples like me (just in the same way as I am sure that there also are examples of people who are mid-40s, etc.. and own a 800K house) so that the statement that it is difficult for somebody in their mid-40s with that kind of income not to have a 800K house is wrong.
NickB is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.