Does BA ever penalise throwaway ticketing?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
#3
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 222
What if, for example, you have an exDUB ticket but actually want to return to Manchester. You throw away the last leg back to Dublin but have a separate LHR-MAN (or wherever else) ticket for the same time, making it plainly obvious you never intended to board the LHR-DUB sector?
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
What if, for example, you have an exDUB ticket but actually want to return to Manchester. You throw away the last leg back to Dublin but have a separate LHR-MAN (or wherever else) ticket for the same time, making it plainly obvious you never intended to board the LHR-DUB sector?
Even if BA noticed, which you'll agree is quite unlikely if you have ever used one of their IT products, BA has no remedy against you in this situation.
You have two separate, unrelated contracts of carriage. Your apparent intention to breach one does not give BA the right to breach the other.
#5
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 663
I am currently pondering something very similar for an ex-HEL trip I'm planning - a single to HEL is looking pretty expensive on our dates, while a return is better value. However, this means that we would have a flight to HEL one evening with a return booked for a future date (which we may unfortunately miss), followed by a HEL-LHR-LCY-JFK-LAX etc (or similar) ticket the next day, which will eventually include a final leg back to the European mainland that we may also unfortunately miss.
I'm usually blas about the final leg of an ex-EU itinerary, but I'm a bit more concerned about missing it in connection with missing the return leg of the LHR-HEL-LHR flight too... Seems like that's tempting some flags to be flagged - or am I just over-thinking it?
I'm usually blas about the final leg of an ex-EU itinerary, but I'm a bit more concerned about missing it in connection with missing the return leg of the LHR-HEL-LHR flight too... Seems like that's tempting some flags to be flagged - or am I just over-thinking it?
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
It is telling that the BA COC, unlike those of many other carriers, does not contain a provision which permits the carrier to invalidate any ticket purchased without an intent to fly as ticketed.
In the fact pattern described in this thread, a carrier could infer that a passenger holding multiple tickets which are "impossible" to fly, has violated such a provision. BA does not have such a provision in its COC. AA, to give a OW example, does use fairly sophisticated software to locate separate tickets which are "impossible".
In the fact pattern described in this thread, a carrier could infer that a passenger holding multiple tickets which are "impossible" to fly, has violated such a provision. BA does not have such a provision in its COC. AA, to give a OW example, does use fairly sophisticated software to locate separate tickets which are "impossible".
#7
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LHR
Programs: BA Gold, TG Gold, HHonors Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 8,665
They can suspend your BAEC account (which freezes your entire Avios balance) and subject you to an audit.
Its never been clear to me what happens as a result of that audit.
Its never been clear to me what happens as a result of that audit.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA
Posts: 50
I know other OW airlines have policies in place for these types of tickets (throwaway/hiddencitY) - AA, UA.
And I have heard of people having thier BA account suspended pending an "audit" (what ever that means) but like KenJohn said theres not much info on outcome of these audits. I'm not quite sure how they could penalise you if theres been no breach of their carriage terms?
#9
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Programs: I go wherever the content takes me.
Posts: 5,698
And I have heard of people having thier BA account suspended pending an "audit" (what ever that means) but like KenJohn said theres not much info on outcome of these audits. I'm not quite sure how they could penalise you if theres been no breach of their carriage terms?
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Reports of anything being done specifically as a result of this are few and far between, hence the general confidence that if you only do it occasionally, nothing will come of it. After all, people's plans do sometimes change, and BA has got bigger fish to fry than to hassle everyone who may have a genuine reason arising out of changed plans for not using all of the ticket that they originally booked. No doubt BA would normally prefer to spend its resources chasing outright and expensive fraud than to get into messy legal arguments about whether you're entitled to drop the last sector without any recourse from the airline.
But, as in so many of these things, there is an old aviation saying that is useful: Try not to fly close to the edges of the air. Bad things have been known to happen there.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
You agree to fly the entire journey using all the flight coupons in the correct order.
However, the contract does not specify a remedy for breach, beyond repricing if you wish to continue your journey.
BAEC may, if they have time on their hands, decide to close your account, as they are entitled without reason in the BAEC terms. However, I suspect they have bigger fish to fry than someone missing a DUB sector.
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA
Posts: 50
It is a breach of the carriage terms. [http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/...ns-of-carriage part 3C]
You agree to fly the entire journey using all the flight coupons in the correct order.
However, the contract does not specify a remedy for breach, beyond repricing if you wish to continue your journey.
BAEC may, if they have time on their hands, decide to close your account, as they are entitled without reason in the BAEC terms. However, I suspect they have bigger fish to fry than someone missing a DUB sector.
You agree to fly the entire journey using all the flight coupons in the correct order.
However, the contract does not specify a remedy for breach, beyond repricing if you wish to continue your journey.
BAEC may, if they have time on their hands, decide to close your account, as they are entitled without reason in the BAEC terms. However, I suspect they have bigger fish to fry than someone missing a DUB sector.
This is interesting:
3c9) If you cancel a booking before the check-in deadline for your flight, we will not cancel your return or onward reservations.
So for example if you book BUD-LHR-NRT and call to cancel the BUD flight you can still use the LHR-NRT???