Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

What impact will the new ECML franchise have on BA to NCL and EDI

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What impact will the new ECML franchise have on BA to NCL and EDI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:17 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 162
Originally Posted by Calchas
As usual there seems to be a downward push in quality. "An updated version of the luxury offered by Pullman trains"? F having tables with slightly bigger seats is not an impressive statement. What little else could the F cabin have to distinguish it from Standard? Frankly the picture of the F cabin on the front of the article is an embarrassment.
.
Its certainly lacks any kind of wow-factor. At least 1st class will still have increased pitch and a table.
RedcardPingle is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:22 am
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mostly UK
Programs: Mucci Extraordinaire, Hilton Diamond, BA Gold (ex BD)
Posts: 11,209
Originally Posted by callum9999
Are you sure the British Rail days were really as rosy as you remember? A lot of people are so influenced by wanting the train system to be public that they have false memories of how great it used to be!

While I'm not overly familiar with the East Coast route, as a whole, punctuality increased, frequency increased, passenger numbers boomed, better and cleaner trains were run and, though it seems the opposite, passenger satisfaction has been consistently higher than it was with British Rail. There were also large fare increases, something people seem to think only happened after privatisation.
My best memories of the east coast mainline certainly weren't during BR (but that was one of their better lines), it was with their initial private operator GNER.

Unfortunately, the current franchising system means we'd never have another GNER, all the government is looking for is the highest bidder and no consideration on facilities that make life more pleasant for the traveller.

GNER then overbid for their 2005 franchise and had to cut costs and raise fares and still couldn't meet their commitments.

Then National Express bid even more in 2007 and had to cut more costs and raise fares and we know what happened there.

East Coast was operated by the government and was returning a profit. So the government then repeat the same mistake of giving the franchise to the highest bidder. This time they bid ever more than National Express.

So a private operator can do a good job if they're not squeezed for every penny by the government. If the franchise had been based on past performance and a reasonable fee had been arranged for GNER to pay the government then it would work better in passengers interests.

Unlike the airline industry, where it's possible to start another airline and compete given enough capital and slots at the appropriate airport the chance to launch competitive routes on the railways is very small and as those who have tried to get an open access permit can tell you is a time consuming process.

Now Virgin/Stagecoach have a monopoly of intercity services heading north out of London.
layz is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:32 am
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mostly UK
Programs: Mucci Extraordinaire, Hilton Diamond, BA Gold (ex BD)
Posts: 11,209
Originally Posted by Calchas
A return of meals is a plus ^ But I'll believe it when I see it.

On the BA side, London to Edinburgh in four hours is starting to be competitive with air, I think, at least on the LHR-EDI route.
Return of meals? There's always been meals, just no longer restaurant quality.

You can buy sandwiches and certain hot food at the buffet and first class gets a complimentary meal appropriate to the time of day.

National Express promised hot food at seat in standard class. What it boiled down to was sticking some pre-heated paninis on the trolley. The experiment was a failure as expected because the food usually got cold before anyone bought it so it just got thrown out.

At best this will be a more modern version of what I thought National Express would have done. I thought they'd have used their WiFi enabled EPOS systems so the person on the trolley could take hot food orders that were fulfilled in the kitchen and delivered later. So Virgin may make it possible to order the existing menu using an app. However, I believe it when I see it.

It's possible to do four hours EDB-KGX now, but only one train a day and that's only possible by not stopping anywhere else except Newcastle. Unfortunately the network can't cope with too many fast trains like that. It's rare to not have a train stop at York.
layz is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:42 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,379
Originally Posted by BlueThroughCrimp
BR received a fraction of what the current industry does, the electrification of the East Coast mainline on the cheap shows, but BR wasn't allowed to invest in it properly.
InterCity made a profit.

Frequency has increased as stock is being worked harder, and assets sweated. That's all very well until something goes wrong, and as such, things like Virgin Cross Country's Operation Princess was a disaster.
I made no claim about funding, merely on the actual service provided (and judging from hundreds of comments I've seen from regular commuters in the BR days, the service was poor in numerous scenarios that had absolutely nothing to do with lack of funding but just general mismanagement and apathy).

I wasn't talking about shifting capacity around by running shorter but more frequent trains. The increase in frequency has been of the "normal" train services, and it's working incredibly well.
callum9999 is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:47 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dundee
Programs: BA Plastic. HH Diamond. Speedwell Bar Lifetime Platinum.
Posts: 1,426
Originally Posted by callum9999
I made no claim about funding, merely on the actual service provided (and judging from hundreds of comments I've seen from regular commuters in the BR days, the service was poor in numerous scenarios that had absolutely nothing to do with lack of funding but just general mismanagement and apathy).

I wasn't talking about shifting capacity around by running shorter but more frequent trains. The increase in frequency has been of the "normal" train services, and it's working incredibly well.
I would have though funding and service would be related...
BlueThroughCrimp is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:52 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,713
Originally Posted by layz
My best memories of the east coast mainline certainly weren't during BR (but that was one of their better lines), it was with their initial private operator GNER.

........ snip snip snip ......

Now Virgin/Stagecoach have a monopoly of intercity services heading north out of London.
Originally Posted by layz
Return of meals? There's always been meals, just no longer restaurant quality.

........ snip snip snip.......

It's possible to do four hours EDB-KGX now, but only one train a day and that's only possible by not stopping anywhere else except Newcastle. Unfortunately the network can't cope with too many fast trains like that. It's rare to not have a train stop at York.
^ +1 on pretty much all of that
BerksFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 8:59 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London
Posts: 23,449
Will BA launch an open access operator - perhaps called Little East Coast - citing consumer choice on rail routes served by evil uncustomer friendly monopolistic Virgin?
Swanhunter is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 9:00 am
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,046
As I said, I don't think that any more revenue can be pressed out of the ECML. I expect it to pass back into DOR's hands in due course.

Epic fail by the government and civil service.
Sixth Freedom is online now  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 9:03 am
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by layz
Return of meals? There's always been meals, just no longer restaurant quality.

You can buy sandwiches and certain hot food at the buffet and first class gets a complimentary meal appropriate to the time of day.

National Express promised hot food at seat in standard class. What it boiled down to was sticking some pre-heated paninis on the trolley. The experiment was a failure as expected because the food usually got cold before anyone bought it so it just got thrown out.

At best this will be a more modern version of what I thought National Express would have done. I thought they'd have used their WiFi enabled EPOS systems so the person on the trolley could take hot food orders that were fulfilled in the kitchen and delivered later. So Virgin may make it possible to order the existing menu using an app. However, I believe it when I see it.
Alas you're probably right. I don't really consider the current food served on the train in First to be a "meal" with the exception of the north bound dinner services.
Calchas is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 9:36 am
  #40  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mostly UK
Programs: Mucci Extraordinaire, Hilton Diamond, BA Gold (ex BD)
Posts: 11,209
Originally Posted by Calchas
Alas you're probably right. I don't really consider the current food served on the train in First to be a "meal" with the exception of the north bound dinner services.
Northbound dinner services and the hot breakfast services are the highlights of the East Coast route, both ideal meals for journeys to Yorkshire and the North East. Although I liked using the restaurant on trains to Leeds, York and Newcastle the current alternative is fine when on the designated meal trains. I particularly miss the three course meal aspect of the restaurant on the 4+ hour trips to Edinburgh.

According to one person I was talking to in the old Newcastle based East Coast customer service centre they said that the first class complimentary catering offering had significant influence from the BA Club Europe product on the longer short haul flights. They even have afternoon tea on some trains, although that service has been reduced to a small number of trains due to feedback.

Originally Posted by Sixth Freedom
As I said, I don't think that any more revenue can be pressed out of the ECML. I expect it to pass back into DOR's hands in due course.

Epic fail by the government and civil service.
I hope you're right and they don't just allow them to renegotiate their franchise, a second chance neither GNER or NXEC were given. Richard Branson seems to be able to cry and get his way more than most.

I just can't see any way that the figures add up.

I hope FirstGroup is checking this franchising process for irregularities.
layz is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 10:04 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MAN/BHX
Programs: ABBA
Posts: 6,027
Originally Posted by layz
I'm not sure how on train WiFi works these days but according to the original GNER promotional materials it was a combination of satellite and 3G meaning that it should still work in mobile dead spots. They also claimed it'd work in tunnels but not sure how that works (except for short tunnels where one end of the train is still outside).
Leaky feeder? You can get phone service in the chunnel.

Of course keeping the services public would have been low risk (government gets all the profits and no risk of having to bail anyone out) and the services were already highly rated. The arms length management of East Coast meant it ran like a private company but the shareholder being the government.
So why did they re advertise it?

Actually walk up fares can be cheaper on the plane. Advance purchase fares on the trains aren't available on the day of travel (so you're left with the full price options). When flying I can often book a discounted ticket for travel on the day if the flight isn't too busy and a number of times I've even redeemed Avios for a same day flight.

Another option on BA is booking those 'semi-flex' fares (the ones that are entirely free to change on day of travel) a few days before you're travelling if you know the date but not 100% sure of the time. You can't do that with cheap train fares.
The most I pay for a MAN-LHR is £161 in the morning (peak time single), and £35 for a flexible return half leaving after 7PM. This is rarely on the day though, I usually book about 8PM the night before (and I may well be doing it tomorrow in a couple of hours)

But If I'm going to London it has to be the first flight down, and it has to be the last flight back. Not worthwhile otherwise.

Current prices are:
Train: £180 rtn
Plane VS: £230 (far more than normal, Q down, R back, must be due to being Friday)
Plane BA: £403 (I down, R back)
Plane BA Avios: £35 + 9000 avios. Seriously, availability (ok I'm gold), but that gives a "value" of 3.2p per avios (11500 avios for £368). Of course I'd never book BA so in reality it is worth at most £195 for 9000 avios, or 2.1p per avios)

I'd love to see the fare rules for MAN-LHR, I assume there's tons of availability, but caught out by the booking window. I really should resume my expertflyer subscription, I wonder if I can claim it back against tax...
paulwuk is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 10:39 am
  #42  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by paulwuk
I'd love to see the fare rules for MAN-LHR, I assume there's tons of availability, but caught out by the booking window. I really should resume my expertflyer subscription, I wonder if I can claim it back against tax...
Ask and you shall receive. Which fare class?

(You can also find out for yourself on ITA Matrix!)
Calchas is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 10:57 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Increasingly rarely on a plane
Programs: Losing status by the day
Posts: 611
Originally Posted by layz
My best memories of the east coast mainline certainly weren't during BR (but that was one of their better lines), it was with their initial private operator GNER.

Unfortunately, the current franchising system means we'd never have another GNER, all the government is looking for is the highest bidder and no consideration on facilities that make life more pleasant for the traveller.

GNER then overbid for their 2005 franchise and had to cut costs and raise fares and still couldn't meet their commitments.
Hear hear - GNER absolutely rocked. Many happy memories of Friday evenings spent in the restaurant car back from NCL.

Although they did overbid slightly for the refranchise in 2005, the thing that absolutely floored them was the financial status of their owner, Sea Containers.

We had recently been threatened with quality being a much higher factor in franchise scoring. This award shows that's tosh...
henners is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 12:11 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: North East
Programs: Hilton HHonors, BAEC Silver
Posts: 1,204
Originally Posted by callum9999
Are you sure the British Rail days were really as rosy as you remember? A lot of people are so influenced by wanting the train system to be public that they have false memories of how great it used to be!

While I'm not overly familiar with the East Coast route, as a whole, punctuality increased, frequency increased, passenger numbers boomed, better and cleaner trains were run and, though it seems the opposite, passenger satisfaction has been consistently higher than it was with British Rail. There were also large fare increases, something people seem to think only happened after privatisation.
The East Coast route used to be one of BR's best from what I remember as a late teenager at the time. Ticket fares were more affordable proportionately, and you didn't get confused with the over complex ticketing systems that are in existence now. Don't disagree with what you say at all though, as GNER made some significant improvements with investment from the mid 90's onward. However, National Express in my opinion operated a terrible service, compounded by walking out of contract in 2009. Hopefully Virgin/Stagecoach will do a better job.
TyneTraveller is offline  
Old Nov 27, 2014, 12:38 pm
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mostly UK
Programs: Mucci Extraordinaire, Hilton Diamond, BA Gold (ex BD)
Posts: 11,209
Originally Posted by TyneTraveller
The East Coast route used to be one of BR's best from what I remember as a late teenager at the time. Ticket fares were more affordable proportionately, and you didn't get confused with the over complex ticketing systems that are in existence now. Don't disagree with what you say at all though, as GNER made some significant improvements with investment from the mid 90's onward. However, National Express in my opinion operated a terrible service, compounded by walking out of contract in 2009. Hopefully Virgin/Stagecoach will do a better job.
What you say is true. It's all well and good having these nice booking engines that pull out all these cheap fares, but wasn't it so much nicer when you didn't have to plan ahead, you knew the turn up and go fare was reasonable enough?

Even 10 years ago I thought turn up and go rail was affordable (although it was getting to the stage many disagreed). I could get a NCL-KGX GNER Executive ticket for £270 return which was first class open return + 3 course meal (or breakfast) each way in the restaurant + 7 days parking + Z12 tube travel. The regular first open return was £260 without the meals and parking.

Now a standard class anytime is £301, and a first class anytime return is £418, meals are now included for all in first class but are nothing like the 3 course restaurant meals.

So now instead of paying £270 and enjoying the flexibility I buy the cheapest first class advance tickets I can lay my hands on. I'd rather have the flexibility but I can't justify the cost when I can often get first class returns for less than £200.
layz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.