Yet to be announced Exec Club changes: your fears, conjecture and general grousing
#962
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Programs: Mucci, BAEC (Silver), FlyBe
Posts: 1,649
Easier to earn and retain status
FWIW, the sign-off on the e-mail I've got today from James Hillier states:
From this one might infer any of the following:
Right, clearly I'm being flippant. My point is to show that, depending on your mood, you might decide from the above quote that any of those options could be valid.
Still, the distinction between "earning" and "retaining" might be interesting...
I will be in touch again in a few weeks to tell you about more exciting changes, including how were planning to make it easier for our members to earn and retain status within the Club.
- TP thresholds are to be reduced
- Silver cards for anyone flying 4 flights on BA metal
- Bronze level to be introduced
- A monthly raffle for a Gold card
- Premier card if you get a photo of you and Willy Walsh on Facebook (and 'Like' it)
Right, clearly I'm being flippant. My point is to show that, depending on your mood, you might decide from the above quote that any of those options could be valid.
Still, the distinction between "earning" and "retaining" might be interesting...
#963
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 16,011
The language used certainly implies that BA is, at the very minimum, not raising tier point qualification levels for elite status - how else could you interpret making it "easier" to "earn" or "retain" status?
#965
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BOS
Programs: BA Silver, Mucci
Posts: 5,289
500 tps = bronze
1000 tps = silver
2000 tps = gold
It is easier to earn status (bronze) and retain status (at some level). It may not be as easy to earn and retain your current status.
#966
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Biot, France
Programs: BA Executive Club Gold, TK Smiles and Miles, Hilton Honors
Posts: 222
I hope this is true!
Cheers,
Steve
#967
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
Well, as someone who genuinely resides and works in France (a Eurobenefitter if you like) I hope that you are right and that the qualification levels will not be increased for residents in Europe (especially as I also received this e-mail from James Hillier so would assume it applies to me as well).
#968
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
#969
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,422
#970
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,190
Given the statement "were planning to make it easier for our members to earn and retain status within the Club", I fail to see how that can be interpreted as requiring 1,500 TPs for Silver.
#971
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
#972
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Edinburgh
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 9,034
You just need to learn to speak BA's language, also called Enhancish.
#974
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Edinburgh
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 9,034
The dissection of BA's emails is entirely valid as they have previous on making ambiguous (intentionally or not) statements that insinuate an improvement but that actually turn out to be something completely opposite.
#975
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 10,709
Not sure if this refers to recent posts or older ones, but I don't see any winding-up. Well, no more than normal for this board
The dissection of BA's emails is entirely valid as they have previous on making ambiguous (intentionally or not) statements that insinuate an improvement but that actually turn out to be something completely opposite.
The dissection of BA's emails is entirely valid as they have previous on making ambiguous (intentionally or not) statements that insinuate an improvement but that actually turn out to be something completely opposite.
But I do agree what they say and often mean are two different things.