new lounge rules for gold? [End of Open Doors for Golds]
#721
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#722
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Hague, NL
Programs: GMLFL, Life 2.0 - Mucci Premiere Classe & des Chevaliers Toulousiens
Posts: 22,911
#723
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold(twice), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 679
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I don't mind the communication as much as I mind the loss of the benefit I have used often enough to value it.
Originally Posted by henkybaby
I believe you are the exception (based on the past 700 posts and the fact that this a very biased sample)
Last edited by Prospero; May 28, 2011 at 2:51 am Reason: Correct quote syntax
#724
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Edinburgh
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 9,034
(PUTI) I am still with HIDDY as far as the rationale for this move is concerned and I still don't think it affects us much. I still think that our irritation is caused by the way it is communicated.
Without getting into details I know where the communication originated and I also know that this topic on FT gave them a lot to think about. Maybe they will not 'correct' this communication fallacy but I am pretty sure that future communications will take into account the commotion this has caused.
I still believe that WW-HIDDY and some other posters are the voice of reason but you can't disarm an emotional reaction with rational arguments. I hope BAEC takes into account that the incorrect communication of a relatively minor change caused a disproportionate reaction.
Without getting into details I know where the communication originated and I also know that this topic on FT gave them a lot to think about. Maybe they will not 'correct' this communication fallacy but I am pretty sure that future communications will take into account the commotion this has caused.
I still believe that WW-HIDDY and some other posters are the voice of reason but you can't disarm an emotional reaction with rational arguments. I hope BAEC takes into account that the incorrect communication of a relatively minor change caused a disproportionate reaction.
You should drink more (often)
#725
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 15,353
Henky, you are sort of proving your point and ours. You are right, in 700 posts no one has said that they use OD on a regular basis, every week or whatever, most say either,
1) They never use it (so change or no change, they are uneffected),
2) They use it once in a blue moon, and in many cases has been very convenient/lifesaver and are peeved at the changes.
3) They value it and use it fairly regulary a few times a year (and are very peeved) of this third category half believe this a decision maker as to whether they will fly BA enough in the future or not, while the other half will probably go on as they are (Those who are not GC do not count in my reckoning).
So Henky, obviously the flyer that never uses it (which incidentally is often a UK based O/D flyer is not too bothered by it and will only only be peeved if they see it either as a 1) General diminishing of benefits, or
2) Such as yourself, is bothered by the incredibly bad way they communicated these changes
However categories 2 and 3 are more likely to be non UK based fliers, you know, the ones that BA has to go out of its way to appease, the ones who have a lot of choice.
This is where BA is shooting itself in the foot.
In the real World I have spoken with perhaps 10 people about this who regularly fly BA (ar GC holders), 5 could not care less, 4 are somewhat bothered by this, 1 is not going to bother flying BA anymore (not me) enough to matter. Can BA afford this, over something so trivial? Even if it is 1 in 100?
If they got rid of LGW for the OD scheme it would end most of their problems and that is the way they should go.
1) They never use it (so change or no change, they are uneffected),
2) They use it once in a blue moon, and in many cases has been very convenient/lifesaver and are peeved at the changes.
3) They value it and use it fairly regulary a few times a year (and are very peeved) of this third category half believe this a decision maker as to whether they will fly BA enough in the future or not, while the other half will probably go on as they are (Those who are not GC do not count in my reckoning).
So Henky, obviously the flyer that never uses it (which incidentally is often a UK based O/D flyer is not too bothered by it and will only only be peeved if they see it either as a 1) General diminishing of benefits, or
2) Such as yourself, is bothered by the incredibly bad way they communicated these changes
However categories 2 and 3 are more likely to be non UK based fliers, you know, the ones that BA has to go out of its way to appease, the ones who have a lot of choice.
This is where BA is shooting itself in the foot.
In the real World I have spoken with perhaps 10 people about this who regularly fly BA (ar GC holders), 5 could not care less, 4 are somewhat bothered by this, 1 is not going to bother flying BA anymore (not me) enough to matter. Can BA afford this, over something so trivial? Even if it is 1 in 100?
If they got rid of LGW for the OD scheme it would end most of their problems and that is the way they should go.
#726
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Edinburgh
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 9,034
On the evidence of this thread, the latter is the likely outcome. Out of the thousands (or tens of thousands) of GCHs, I bet those that have complained about this change can be measured in a 10s or small number of hundreds.
More assumptions. There is no evidence that this is an LGW-only problem. Indeed, there was an indicator up-thread that the issue may be with NA and Asia lounges, which are those more likely to be managed in an outsourced manner and have per-passenger costs.
#727
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 15,353
I would be willing to bet that over 90% of GCH's have no idea yet that any such change is forthcoming. What would be the only sign of this? Reading an e-mail sent a week ago from the airline?? Personally I almost never read them right away if at all, and only read it because I saw this thread! For that matter most GCH's that value this perk and are to use it over the next 3 weeks will be able to, and as has been attested countless times, the avergare person who values this perk does NOT use it that frquently, so it will be months before most would even be aware of it.
Regarding what you say about Asia and NA lounges, that quite frankly is just noise, much of it posted by those who are guessing for reasons. For that matter please tell me, which BA operated lounge in Asia are you referring to? Mumbai or HKG (which is a joint lounge), Possibly SIN, which is/was supposed to be joint? Because that is it. You do realize that only half the NA lounges are BA operated right? and that the layout of half those US airports means that OD is impractical for anyone else but BA or 1w passengers, don't you? You also realize that outside of the UK, BA only has about a dozen operated lounges in Europe, don't you? In fact BA only has about 32 lounges that it operates itself in the entire World outside the UK,
Regarding what you say about Asia and NA lounges, that quite frankly is just noise, much of it posted by those who are guessing for reasons. For that matter please tell me, which BA operated lounge in Asia are you referring to? Mumbai or HKG (which is a joint lounge), Possibly SIN, which is/was supposed to be joint? Because that is it. You do realize that only half the NA lounges are BA operated right? and that the layout of half those US airports means that OD is impractical for anyone else but BA or 1w passengers, don't you? You also realize that outside of the UK, BA only has about a dozen operated lounges in Europe, don't you? In fact BA only has about 32 lounges that it operates itself in the entire World outside the UK,
#728
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Edinburgh
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 9,034
I would be willing to bet that over 90% of GCH's have no idea yet that any such change is forthcoming. What would be the only sign of this? Reading an e-mail sent a week ago from the airline?? Personally I almost never read them right away if at all, and only read it because I saw this thread! For that matter most GCH's that value this perk and are to use it over the next 3 weeks will be able to, and as has been attested countless times, the avergare person who values this perk does NOT use it that frquently, so it will be months before most would even be aware of it.
If GCHs don't read their email then I've no sympathy with them if they try to use OD and get rejected. BA can't be expected to phone everyone. I'm sure early in the thread someone said there was a message in MMB too?
I've said from the start I'd be perturbed if a benefit was removed from me. I'm human, I like to feel valued and taking something away from me hurts my feelings. But, is it really such a hardship to sit in a public area every so often. I do it when I don't fly BA and I've not caught anything contagious yet.
But then, BS has been called on that BA agent, so perhaps its all part of the big act to fool those apparent few people who used the service. And they would have got away with it if it wasn't for those pesky FT posters.
For that matter please tell me, which BA operated lounge in Asia are you referring to? Mumbai or HKG (which is a joint lounge), Possibly SIN, which is/was supposed to be joint? Because that is it. You do realize that only half the NA lounges are BA operated right? and that the layout of half those US airports means that OD is impractical for anyone else but BA or 1w passengers, don't you? You also realize that outside of the UK, BA only has about a dozen operated lounges in Europe, don't you? In fact BA only has about 32 lounges that it operates itself in the entire World outside the UK,
#729
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,367
I would tend to agree with you on this. It won't be an issue for the majority of GCHs beyond being taken as another sign of penny-pinching by BA. But we always come round to the same thing again: if very few people do mind, how much fewer actually use it (and from this thread we can also infer that the number of those who mind exceeds the number of those who actually use it) and, if so, how credible is the claim that this has significant cost saving implications for BA? One cannot have one's cake and eat it on this.
#730
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: BA Gold,SQ Gold
Posts: 15
This is what I have been saying all along,since BA is trying to do it's best to get non-UK residents on board (lower tier points,OD!!!) you'd think they'd try to RISE above competitors by offering MORE,not LOWER themselves and emulate other FFP and become similar.Every business needs an added value over competitors and for non-UK residents OD is imprtant even though it's not that widely used but it is indeed a carrot!
#731
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: BA Gold,SQ Gold
Posts: 15
We have no clue as of how many GCHs have called,mailed or complained to BA.
The general cencus here on this board is that the whole problem lies in LGW and GVA,2 lounges out of "60 dedicated British Airways lounges" (source BA.com).
Since most people here post that they rarely use or never use it,I don't see how 2 lounges being crowded influences BA to cancel the perk.
Henk,most people here are dissatisfied about the loss of OD,some people are indifferent and some others act like BA apologists.
#732
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: usually somewhere between 30000 and 40000 feet...but actually the English countryside
Programs: BA GGL/Lifetime Gold, EK Gold, Lowly M&M, Marriott tit, Hhonors Diamond, numerous others
Posts: 1,156
What I do object to is the tone of the email and the fact that they even biggerd it up as to what the benefit was, and then have rubbed salt in the wound for all by removing it.
The miles and perks are nice, I appreciate the comments about narrowing the gap twixt Gold and Silver, however I fly to get from A to B in the most efficient manner possible - anything else the airlines through at me to get my business is a bonus.
#733
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 15,353
Uggh yes Paralytic you are right probably no more than 10% feel strongly about this. So using that mentality I never collect Tesco points or do the mechanations of what many here do, and neithetr do 90% of BA GCH's so they too should be eliminated???
Regarding the phone call, as in all of Asia BA has only ONE lounge operated solely by BA, I strongly doubt that Mumbai is such a problem, don't you? IS it the two JV lounges with Qantas?
Regarding the phone call, as in all of Asia BA has only ONE lounge operated solely by BA, I strongly doubt that Mumbai is such a problem, don't you? IS it the two JV lounges with Qantas?
#734
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SJC
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,628
This is what I have been saying all along,since BA is trying to do it's best to get non-UK residents on board (lower tier points,OD!!!) you'd think they'd try to RISE above competitors by offering MORE,not LOWER themselves and emulate other FFP and become similar.Every business needs an added value over competitors and for non-UK residents OD is imprtant even though it's not that widely used but it is indeed a carrot!
But you can thank us for exporting another feature of American culture to you, which is full-service airlines racing each other to the bottom, rather than one-upping each other with improvements.
#735
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: BA Gold,SQ Gold
Posts: 15
They won't upgrade services and offers,just cut everywhere they can.