Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Americas > Argentina
Reload this Page >

Best Airline from US to EZE??

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Best Airline from US to EZE??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 9:52 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Programs: UA 1K, SPG, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 23
Best Airline from US to EZE??

Hi guys,
I'm planning my flight to EZE, and I'm wondering which carrier is the most decent of the options available:

United
Continental
American
Mexicana
Aeromexico


Last year, I took American direct to EZE from Chicago, but they don't offer that route anymore (and besides, we had an AWFUL crew/experience with AA). I don't get to fly biz class, so I would love to have the most comfortable economy experience as possible.
chiflygirl is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 9:58 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FLL & EZE
Programs: UAL Gold DL Silver Hilton GoldMarriott Gold
Posts: 917
Originally Posted by chiflygirl
Hi guys,
I'm planning my flight to EZE, and I'm wondering which carrier is the most decent of the options available:

United
Continental
American
Mexicana
Aeromexico


Last year, I took American direct to EZE from Chicago, but they don't offer that route anymore (and besides, we had an AWFUL crew/experience with AA). I don't get to fly biz class, so I would love to have the most comfortable economy experience as possible.
I gather you are not 1k or such with United so that leaves Economy Plus out as a freebie. Not that coach on United is anything great. Of your choices I would suggest Continental. I have never flown them in coach to EZE, only in J, but seems like a decent product in back and decent reviews.

Sam
samftla is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:15 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,599
Don't hesitate to fly LAN, which is a One World carrier, and probably has good connections with AA. Almost all of their aircraft now have an excellent IFE system at all seats. They have a nonstop to EZE from MIA. You also won't pay for your drinks.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:36 pm
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,881
Interesting question and one I am keen to know the answer on as well. ^
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 2:42 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
Don't hesitate to fly LAN, which is a One World carrier, and probably has good connections with AA. Almost all of their aircraft now have an excellent IFE system at all seats. They have a nonstop to EZE from MIA. You also won't pay for your drinks.
Right answer. JJ (TAM) is great in J and F if you don't mind a GRU connection, but I don't know their Y product.
BenjaminNYC is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 2:54 pm
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,599
Originally Posted by BenjaminNYC
Right answer. JJ (TAM) is great in J and F if you don't mind a GRU connection, but I don't know their Y product.
No one ever suggested you were familiar with their Y product . For me, GRU is too far out of the way, and an unpleasant airport for connections. SCL, however, is a pleasant and easy connection, should you end up there. Also, LIM now has a decent airport and isn't a bad connection point.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 2:58 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
No one ever suggested you were familiar with their Y product . For me, GRU is too far out of the way, and an unpleasant airport for connections. SCL, however, is a pleasant and easy connection, should you end up there. Also, LIM now has a decent airport and isn't a bad connection point.
You're right about GRU, and with the MIA-EZE on LA, LA is the best choice.
BenjaminNYC is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 5:31 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FLL & EZE
Programs: UAL Gold DL Silver Hilton GoldMarriott Gold
Posts: 917
One minor problem neither JJ or LAN where listed as options by chiflygirl. And considering her statement about the previous experience with AA it seems that flying AA to Miami to connect to LAN might not be a choice she would want to consider.

Sam
samftla is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 6:49 pm
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,599
Originally Posted by samftla
One minor problem neither JJ or LAN where listed as options by chiflygirl. And considering her statement about the previous experience with AA it seems that flying AA to Miami to connect to LAN might not be a choice she would want to consider.

Sam
I know it might not be a choice she would want to consider, but I thought it might be a choice she had not even considered. Since she mentioned AA as an option, I thought she might be very interested in an excellent OW Partner option.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 9:44 am
  #10  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SFO, EZE
Programs: UA 1K 2.43 MM
Posts: 2,425
If you're confined to the back, I'd say the shortest flight(s), with the minimum number of stopovers, and reasonable connection times, on any of the majors would be my suggestion.

Since the flights to/from NA are at night, if you can sleep in an economy seat so much the better. Nothing beats sleeping for most of the flight!

John
SoFlyOn is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 9:51 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,881
Originally Posted by SoFlyOn
If you're confined to the back, I'd say the shortest flight(s), with the minimum number of stopovers,
I'd go along with that kind of thinking as well. The differences in economy travel with most airlines aren't all that great to make one want to have to go out of your way for. So yes, the shorter flight time is the better option.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 11:09 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Programs: UA 1K, SPG, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 23
Smile

I'm Premiere Executive with United, but they are so expensive to get to BA. The LAN option appeals to me, especially the free booze part. I was curious about Continental's coach international because it seems the most direct route from Chicago.
chiflygirl is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 4:55 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FLL & EZE
Programs: UAL Gold DL Silver Hilton GoldMarriott Gold
Posts: 917
Originally Posted by chiflygirl
I'm Premiere Executive with United, but they are so expensive to get to BA. The LAN option appeals to me, especially the free booze part. I was curious about Continental's coach international because it seems the most direct route from Chicago.
Don't get too excited about the free booze part of LAN. In coach it is not exactly free flowing. Prior to the meal service you might be able to get a whiskey, wine or beer but most likely would have to wait for the meal service and get it then. The wine is poured from the bottle and one glass. If you are able to flag a flight attendant down you might be able to snag a refill but I have found that hit or miss. Otherwise, yes LAN offers excellent service in Y, but dealing with a transfer from AA to LAN at MIA might not be so wonderful.

Sam

Last edited by samftla; Jan 23, 2009 at 6:20 pm
samftla is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 6:15 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CLT
Programs: AA EP, AA AC
Posts: 4,268
Well I've done UA in E+ to EZE and found it quite acceptable from IAD. Since its a red eye both ways, it was not too bad. Note, that the 767 is 2-3-2 seating in coach which makes it pretty nice as well.

Safe Travels.
GTITAN is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 11:13 pm
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 57,064
Originally Posted by GTITAN
Well I've done UA in E+ to EZE and found it quite acceptable from IAD. Since its a red eye both ways, it was not too bad. Note, that the 767 is 2-3-2 seating in coach which makes it pretty nice as well.
E+ and being a lowly UA MP 2P are the two reasons I chose UA over the other usual suspects for my June trip from Canada through ORD & IAD to EZE so good hear this feedback.

Good luck with your decision, OP.
tcook052 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.