Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Improving upgrade odds for couples

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2025 | 8:28 am
  #16  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CLT
Programs: AA EXP; Avis PC; Hertz PC; Marriott LT Gold; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,269
Originally Posted by ryanbriar
That is exactly what is happening. You can call in and split the PNR into two then link the two PNRs for the upgrade (there may be a way to note the split). I think that should work for the solo processing, but I haven’t done it in a while so I don’t recall if this approach will work.

Alternatively, split the PNR, don’t link off the bat and re-link after your upgrade presumably clears at the window.
If I understand this correctly, if one pax is EXP and the other is no status, if I split the PNR and link, we both have EXP status for upgrades in the 100 hour window?
HofstraJet is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2025 | 9:03 am
  #17  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MHK
Programs: AA Exec Plat - some level of status in IHG, Marriot & HIlton
Posts: 1,806
Originally Posted by Mr. BoH
That has not been my experience. Last 4 times they called me to the desk to ask if we wanted to split. I got the sense that if we didn’t reply they were going to skip us.
Agreed. Heck, a couple months ago I even got a call from the gate agent on my cell phone when I was already boarded to ask.
ksucats is online now  
Old Jul 27, 2025 | 9:16 am
  #18  
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: AA EXP, National EE
Posts: 182
Originally Posted by ksucats
Agreed. Heck, a couple months ago I even got a call from the gate agent on my cell phone when I was already boarded to ask.
Yeah, same. I even had the GA come find me in my seat on the plane to see if one of us wanted the FC seat that became available (assuming due to a no-show).
Perdita is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2025 | 9:35 am
  #19  
40 Countries Visited
5M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: JFK/LGA
Programs: AA LT EXP/5 MM, BA Blue Bayou, HH LT Diamond
Posts: 6,445
There is no question a booking with 2 UG requests pending will be skipped if only one seat opens up. When both clear it just means that 2 seats opened up.
pauleeepaul is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2025 | 10:16 am
  #20  
20 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: EWN-RDU
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, BA Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 93
The Mrs. and I never have an issue with upgrades because we are both Exp and I schedule flights that have high odds that first class will be wide open. Ymmv
EncFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 4:02 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Feb 2025
Programs: AA ExP HH Diamond
Posts: 8
I just had this happen. Wife and I flying LAX-JFK-ATH on one ticket and daughter flying JFK-ATH on a different ticket. Wife and I on SWU, Daughter on mileages upgrade. I have EXPL, no one else has status. My daughter got upgraded and there was one SWU seat still showing available. AA said that the seats were released one at a time so my wife and I didn’t get the seats even though there were 2 seats available. I probably could have split us and given her one seat but I didn’t do that. Seems crappy that the person with no status gets the upgrade over someone with ExPl.
JeffS661 is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 4:10 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum/Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite-Lifetime, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,881
Originally Posted by JeffS661
AA said that the seats were released one at a time so my wife and I didn’t get the seats even though there were 2 seats available. I probably could have split us and given her one seat but I didn’t do that. Seems crappy that the person with no status gets the upgrade over someone with ExPl.
That's not quite how it works. You could have gotten the seat before the no status passenger but chose not to. When I travel with my SO, we always book on separate PNRs. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. Passengers in one PNR can't be in different cabins.
USFlyerUS is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 4:13 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Feb 2025
Programs: AA ExP HH Diamond
Posts: 8
Originally Posted by USFlyerUS
That's not quite how it works. You could have gotten the seat before the no status passenger but chose not to. When I travel with my SO, we always book on separate PNRs. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. Passengers in one PNR can't be in different cabins.
I don’t understand. How did I choose not to? If two seats were available, why did one go to my daughter and the other sat unclaimed instead of my wife and I both getting upgraded?
JeffS661 is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 4:22 pm
  #24  
20 Nights
20 Countries Visited
3M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Madison WI
Programs: AA EXP, LT Plt, 2.9MM, Lifetime AC, HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Hertz Precs Crcl
Posts: 2,829
Originally Posted by JeffS661
...AA said that the seats were released one at a time so my wife and I didn’t get the seats even though there were 2 seats available. I probably could have split us and given her one seat but I didn’t do that. Seems crappy that the person with no status gets the upgrade over someone with ExPl.
Originally Posted by JeffS661
I don’t understand. How did I choose not to? If two seats were available, why did one go to my daughter and the other sat unclaimed instead of my wife and I both getting upgraded?
You "chose" to not split the PNR and seats where released one at a time. If you HAD split and linked, chances are high both of your would have been upgraded.
Madison Guy is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 4:28 pm
  #25  
30 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,257
Originally Posted by JeffS661
I don’t understand. How did I choose not to? If two seats were available, why did one go to my daughter and the other sat unclaimed instead of my wife and I both getting upgraded?
The two seats were released one at a time, you and your wife could therefore not be upgraded when the first seat was made available, they went to the next passenger, your daughter, then they released the next seat once again you weren’t eligible because there was only one seat, I think the choose not to relates to not having split the pnr which was your best chance

I get that you don’t like the outcome but it is the way it works, I never ever travel on the same pnr as my wife for this very reason,
tennessetom is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 5:45 pm
  #26  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum/Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite-Lifetime, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,881
Originally Posted by JeffS661
I don’t understand. How did I choose not to? If two seats were available, why did one go to my daughter and the other sat unclaimed instead of my wife and I both getting upgraded?
If you had split the PNR, you'd both likely have been upgraded, albeit not at the same time.
ryanbriar likes this.
USFlyerUS is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 6:41 pm
  #27  
30 Countries Visited
1M
100 Nights
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: AA 1MM CK, DL Plat, Hilton Diamond, Bonvoy Ambassador (RIP SPG), Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,664
This is how I view companion upgrades:
  • Single PNR — two spaces in the upgrade inventory need to be open at ones to process. Even if there are many seats open in J, the “computer” may only release one at a time at the window (same with SWUs). This means that you will get skipped over.
  • Separate PNRs, but linked together for upgrades — I believe that this avoids the inventory release issue and allows the companion to inherit status if they don’t have their status in the system, but folks can correct me if I am wrong.
  • Separate PNRs unlinked — Complementary upgrade based on each person’s status. One “workaround” should approach #2 not avoid the inventory release issue is to link the PNRs after the higher-tier person clears to then ideally clear an upgrade for a companion.

Please feel free to correct me if any of this is off base. I’ve learned the hard way with getting skipped over so now my wife and I split PNRs off the bat if we are going the upgrade route and cross-reference for IROPS etc.
Evita_FT likes this.
ryanbriar is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 8:36 pm
  #28  
30 Countries Visited
1M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Programs: Lost count
Posts: 248
Originally Posted by ryanbriar
This is how I view companion upgrades:
  • Single PNR — two spaces in the upgrade inventory need to be open at ones to process. Even if there are many seats open in J, the “computer” may only release one at a time at the window (same with SWUs). This means that you will get skipped over.
  • Separate PNRs, but linked together for upgrades — I believe that this avoids the inventory release issue and allows the companion to inherit status if they don’t have their status in the system, but folks can correct me if I am wrong.
  • Separate PNRs unlinked — Complementary upgrade based on each person’s status. One “workaround” should approach #2 not avoid the inventory release issue is to link the PNRs after the higher-tier person clears to then ideally clear an upgrade for a companion.

Please feel free to correct me if any of this is off base. I’ve learned the hard way with getting skipped over so now my wife and I split PNRs off the bat if we are going the upgrade route and cross-reference for IROPS etc.
How about single PNR - one pax with status on AA and other pax with no status or is a member of other oneworld alliance?
Evita_FT is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 9:36 pm
  #29  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Programs: AS, AA, UA, Hilton, Marriott, Caesars DE
Posts: 2,542
Originally Posted by ryanbriar
This is how I view companion upgrades:
  • Single PNR — two spaces in the upgrade inventory need to be open at ones to process. Even if there are many seats open in J, the “computer” may only release one at a time at the window (same with SWUs). This means that you will get skipped over.
  • Separate PNRs, but linked together for upgrades — I believe that this avoids the inventory release issue and allows the companion to inherit status if they don’t have their status in the system, but folks can correct me if I am wrong.
  • Separate PNRs unlinked — Complementary upgrade based on each person’s status. One “workaround” should approach #2 not avoid the inventory release issue is to link the PNRs after the higher-tier person clears to then ideally clear an upgrade for a companion.

Please feel free to correct me if any of this is off base. I’ve learned the hard way with getting skipped over so now my wife and I split PNRs off the bat if we are going the upgrade route and cross-reference for IROPS etc.
Only caveat I will add is for the linked-PNR, the agents who have helped me in the past have asked if I want to allow split upgrades or keep joined. Where you have the option like you stated to upgrade one at a time, or all-or nothing. Granted I’ve only had this potentially happen to me once, where my non-status companion was upgraded ahead of me, and I went to #1 on the UG list. So in theory you can still have the issue of needing R2, and not a sequential upgrade when space is released one at a time
safari ari is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2025 | 9:48 am
  #30  
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 43
SWU Advice

Traveling to HND from LAX on 9/10 (the 115am flight) using SWUs and confirmed on the initial legs, but waitlisted on the LAX to HND leg. My question is that there are two people on the PNR, with me being Exec Plat and my wife no status, is there any reason to split the PNR for better odds of the SWU's clearing? Thanks
lincoln2018 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.