Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

I paid for premium coach exit row - no one else did but moved there!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

I paid for premium coach exit row - no one else did but moved there!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2019, 3:37 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 295
I am 6f4 and ahem wideshouldered and often get asked by FA’s to move to the window exit row seats as they require to be occupied.

Also, I sometimes approach the flight attendant closest to the exit row at boarding and ask if I can move there once boarding is completed and if they remain empty, timing is crucial.

If I board last and see that they are empty, I occupy them directly after boarding, without any issues so far. My allocated seat remains empty which sometimes may be a blessing for the passengers I would have been sitting next to (more space for them).
Yemona is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 3:55 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,434
They are NOT allowed to pick any open seat.
Originally Posted by Lomapaseo
where does it say that?
Where does it say Y pax can't move themselves to premium economy, MCE, J or F?
richarddd is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 4:50 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Roswell, GA
Programs: AA EXP 2.8m,Lifetime PLT, Hilton Diamond, IHG PlLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 3,193
what I think is that, ever since all the airlines started this trend of charging for seats, almost now thru out the whole plane, what before , in terms of seat selection and moving around after the doors were closed has been lookeddown at by those who paid $$ to select their seat.

I can understand, that has a customer that had paid in advance to select their seat, having
some other passenger take a seat in that section, that passenger would feel jilted.

However, now with all the airlines, finding new way to charge passengers fees, beyond the ticket price.. things are not going to change.

airlines are making a lot of money in extra fees... good for them.. bad for the customers.
fotographer is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 5:28 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: near London
Programs: BAEC Bronze
Posts: 31
OP paid for a guaranteed exit row seat and got it. The payment is to guarantee that specific seat, not for occupancy of the seat. (You could still get the same seat without paying for it, probably if the flight was a bit more full).

The other passengers also got what they paid for - they had no guarantee that they could occupy those seats. In this instance they were lucky, but if the seats were occupied then they wouldn't be able to sit there.

This happens all the time on BA for example - without status, you can pay for specific seats, but you could equally just wait and possibly still get those exact same seats without paying for them. It's just a case of whether you want to be 100% sure of getting those seats.
Mulder00 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 8:05 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mci
Programs: aa
Posts: 669
Just saw the same thing happen on a flight this week. Guy tried to poach the exit row seat, FA comes through with the electronic manifest and asks him to move to his assigned seat as the other passengers had paid to sit in that row. The guy starts yelling back at the FA who turns and walks away. Guy thinks he has "won". Purser returns and the guy finally moves. It was nice to see it finally happen.
travelinterpreters is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 8:24 am
  #36  
HGH
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 126
I've seen it both ways. Once a guy tried to move up to an empty row on a CRJ and the FA had none of that business.

On another flight, the middle seat in my row was empty, and a large gentleman was headed towards it. The FA said, let's do better than that and put him in the empty exit row. He got a much better seat than he paid for and I had an empty seat next to me.

I don't see how this is any different that anything with dynamic pricing. When you buy early to guarantee you get what you want, there is always the chance someone else will get the same thing at a lower price if it is still available: airplane tickets, concert tickets, cars, clothes, etc.
HGH is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 9:02 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,659
Originally Posted by pfreet
The OP has a point the responders seem to be missing. The passengers did not get upgraded to the exit row, they just took those seats. If you paid for a first class seat and someone from coach who wasn't upgraded just walked up and sat in an empty first class seat, would you be as cavalier? I think not.
I agree that the poachers should not be allowed to take the seats they didn't pay for. However, I think it's the airline's loss and their choice to enforce or not. As a fellow passenger I try not to get involved with others unless it really affects me.
FAA1996 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 9:24 am
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,203
enforcement is varialble

I have friends who are CC on non US airlines and they do enfoce the exit row / extra leg room seats and if someone does move into them they are pretty quick at telling them to move or to take their credit card as payment.

But if the CC moves passengers into those seats then you have no complaint and it's quite possible this happened to the OP which is why the crew apparently "didn't care"
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 10:40 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,226
I will say it’s kind of a double whammy for non elite passengers. Most of the seats in the front thought the middle are MCE or Preferred seats which must be paid for, but they don’t just have that fee, they’re also required to pay the additional fare difference over basic economy.
donotblink is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 10:53 am
  #40  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by donotblink
I will say it’s kind of a double whammy for non elite passengers. Most of the seats in the front thought the middle are MCE or Preferred seats which must be paid for, but they don’t just have that fee, they’re also required to pay the additional fare difference over basic economy.
Sorry, but no sympathy. They choose to buy basic economy tickets. These are the associated rules.
GrumpyYoungMan likes this.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 12:25 pm
  #41  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
Allowing paxs to self upgrade into MCE defeats the purpose of selling MCE seats. No different if someone self upgrades from Y to J.
ikwia and BLG like this.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 2:04 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by Cornelius Jonson
I booked a flight LAX-JFK and could only afford coach seating. AA offers exit row seats for $65-$99. I selected the bulkhead exit row seat with tons of leg room and paid the fee. Boarding the plane, the entire row across the aisle from me was empty and just before take off, other passengers from coach helped themselves to those seats. The flight crew saw and didn't care. So they got for free what I had to pay for. Granted I was guaranteed a seat they were not. Still not really fair. Also wouldn't it be in the airline's financial interest to charge onboard for those seats? You want an exit row give us your credit card for $99 and you can have it vs. letting people move and sit there for free.
First 6 rows of couch on a321T are MCE seats. If someone who is already sitting there moved to an exit row they don’t need to pay for it since they are already in MCE or have elite status. I doubt passengers from the last row could see that exit row is unoccupied and move there.
gateH15 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 2:22 pm
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wanting First. Buying First.
Programs: Lifetime Executive Diamond Platinum VIP with Braniff, Eastern, Midway, National & Pan Am
Posts: 17,492
Originally Posted by Cornelius Jonson
Also wouldn't it be in the airline's financial interest to charge onboard for those seats? You want an exit row give us your credit card for $99 and you can have it vs. letting people move and sit there for free.
The handheld devices used by UA FAs to sell drinks and snacks also accommodate onboard paid upgrades to E+.

Originally Posted by enviroian
I"m more intrigued by the OP's account of there being an empty exit row.
Why?
At least twice this year I have had entire MCE/E+ rows to myself.
Empty seat next to me in F as well.
Herb687 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 2:28 pm
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 30,036
Originally Posted by Herb687
Why?
At least twice this year I have had entire MCE/E+ rows to myself.
Empty seat next to me in F as well.
I can’t remember any flight in the past year where there was any empty bulkhead seat or F seat.
enviroian is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2019, 8:40 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SNA
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K (until it expires then never again), *wood Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,239
End of the day the OP got what they paid for, a confirmed seat with more legroom. There's a reasonable argument that its in AAs financial benefit to not allow people to move themselves to these seats without payment unless its due to operational needs, ie standby/BE/unassigned seats who get lucky and end up there, not only so they can monetize these seats but also to avoid people such as the OP feeling they paid for something they could have got for free. On the other hand those pax rolled the dice and got lucky, not just in the seat being open (which probably isn't frequent) but also in the lack of enforcement. It very well might be that the majority of people who know they need/want the extra legroom will still pay to get those seats rather gamble that not only will an MCE/Exit seat be open but also that the FAs wont move them back. From the crews perspective I'm guessing this was more conflict avoidance and the comparison to a self-upgrade to F (or J on this flight) is very much different than moving to a seat with a few extra inches of legroom, doesn't make it right that pax took those seats if they weren't eligible for them but the comparison to J/F upgrades is apples:bowling balls.
ryan182 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.