AA can't fly as many pax back to the mainland as they fly from the mainland to Hawaii
#31
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,226
Last year around this time I was on an HNL -> PHX in J when they were looking for volunteers. I took a $1,000 voucher and took the HNL -> DFW in J on the 777! Much better J product so I came out ahead.
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: TPA for now. Hopefully LIS for retirement
Posts: 13,708
I wonder how often they have to deny boarding to or offload actual revenue passengers instead of just nonrevs.
#33
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,520
I wouldn't call the decision to use this plane on this route short sighted, they didn't have a lot of options with the 757 gone. The problem is they are not planning loads very well, and it's going to get worse as they add more of these planes to PHX routes.
#34
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,226
It's worth noting that it's expected that overall capacity will increase to Hawaii with the addition of WN to the market, while demand should remain relatively consent. It should reduce some demand for AA tickets.
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
If demand is exceeding capacity because there's a gulf between the 321 and the 777/333 (too few 757, 767, 332 needed for TATL routes) then AA should price accordingly. But as stated above some of the paxs may be non revers and AA still might come ahead if it has to pay for VDBs.
#36
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,520
On the other hand Southwest is not adding any premium seats to the market. Years ago it was pretty much a guaranteed EXP upgrade LAX-LIH. Since the A321's have come online I often struggle to even find an F seat for sale.
#37
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AA 1MM
Posts: 185
That's disappointing to know. This sub fleet of planes have long stage lengths, why do they configure them the same as the rest of the fleet? A few extra inches in F and a foot rest would have been nice. And add an extra row of first for 20 seats. Sheesh.
#38
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Perhaps they de used not to do that because the A321neos will displace the current A321S? (Inherent cheapness.)
#39
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
The problem is that it's very inefficient and costly to operate very small numbers of an aircraft type. Training, including pilot certification and scheduling, cabin crew training (with most USA airlines requiring FAs to be qualified on all aircraft in the fleet, maintenance (including training), parts (including inventory costs at various hubs), etc. really become expensive, although the minumum number of matching aircraft needed to obtain most of the efficiently gains is actually very reasonable. In fact, in an earlier era, the number was documented to be about six in a study by the CAB that helped to support the move to deregulate airlines.
#40
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,520
That said I won’t be shocked to see the Hawaii neos configured the exact same way as the mainland (non-ETOPS) neos. At least they should have satellite Internet (which still won’t work to overwater Hawaii if they go with ViaSat as they have been - another brilliant plan).
And that also probably means the same seat layout in a premium light configuration (compared to the 757’s they replace).
#41
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: DL Diamond, AAdvantage EXP, Hyatt Explorist, HHonors Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 7,344
Definitely possible. An indicator of this is that they installed Gogo ATG on these planes. Why do that when it’s only good for the short time it can be in contact with the antennas on the west coast and these airframes only fly to Hawaii?
That said I won’t be shocked to see the Hawaii neos configured the exact same way as the mainland (non-ETOPS) neos. At least they should have satellite Internet (which still won’t work to overwater Hawaii if they go with ViaSat as they have been - another brilliant plan).
And that also probably means the same seat layout in a premium light configuration (compared to the 757’s they replace).
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW/DAL
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, AS MVPG, HH Diamond, NCL Platinum Plus, MSC Diamond
Posts: 21,422
#43
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: DL Diamond, AAdvantage EXP, Hyatt Explorist, HHonors Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 7,344
#44
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bay Area
Programs: WN A-List, AA good-riddance, Safeway Club Card Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,851
#45
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: DL Diamond, AAdvantage EXP, Hyatt Explorist, HHonors Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 7,344
For the “worlds largest airline” that is the most pathetic WiFi coverage.
maybe the entertainment content is at least streamed via an onboard server which doesn’t need WiFi, but geez that’s sad.
maybe the entertainment content is at least streamed via an onboard server which doesn’t need WiFi, but geez that’s sad.