FA permitting a "self upgrade" to MCE/exit row after boarding door closes
#61
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,503
I have been on AS flights with empty exit rows where kettles from the back of the bus self-upgrade during flight, FA comes by to provide an exit row safety briefing.
UA is at the opposite end of the spectrum - FAs closely protect Y+ seats.
UA is at the opposite end of the spectrum - FAs closely protect Y+ seats.
#62
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
But...these people today didn't ask the FA. They just *did it*, right at the start of the safety demo when it would have been awkward for the FA to get involved. Plus, I have to wonder if the FA wasn't influenced by recent events such as the one on United where an FA evicted two self-upgraders and it made the news (a couple days after UA3411). So the desire to avoid conflict probably took priority...especially since it was pretty evident that I, the person in the window seat, was mildly annoyed as opposed to completely outraged.
Anyway, I'm curious as to whether AA actually has this "open seating after the door closes" policy, knowing that UA, DL, and most others do not.
#63
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Strikes me highly possible.
#65
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
If so, I most definitely stand corrected, I was told that any seat that would require payment from the passenger in question could not, technically, be moved into, I thought.
#66
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: United/American/Vietnam
Posts: 22
Realize that the FAs need to follow company policy and could be fired for upgrading someone because the seat was empty. As you indicated you had paid for the upgrade. Have you contacted the airline and notified them and asked for a refund of the additional amount you paid for the up-graded seat?
#67
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Realize that the FAs need to follow company policy and could be fired for upgrading someone because the seat was empty. As you indicated you had paid for the upgrade. Have you contacted the airline and notified them and asked for a refund of the additional amount you paid for the up-graded seat?
#70
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
I don't see it any different to any other seat purchase within a cabin. If it was a passenger relocating from say, an economy cabin to a premium economy cabin, that would be very different
I am not aware of AA prohibiting passengers from changing seats within a cabin ; it it does, then that is different and all passengers should stay in assigned seats regardless
#71
Join Date: Apr 2014
Programs: United/American/Vietnam
Posts: 22
I think a blocked seat does show up. I am at the top level on United and (on very few flights) have even had the seat next to me in business class international blocked. On boarding an FA always mentions that if the seat is needed for a legitimate customer it may be used. I have no problem if someone is seated there but it is nice to have the empty seat there.
#72
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
Realize that the FAs need to follow company policy and could be fired for upgrading someone because the seat was empty. As you indicated you had paid for the upgrade. Have you contacted the airline and notified them and asked for a refund of the additional amount you paid for the up-graded seat?
It isn't an upgrade, it is still the economy cabin
I don't see it any different to any other seat purchase within a cabin. If it was a passenger relocating from say, an economy cabin to a premium economy cabin, that would be very different
I am not aware of AA prohibiting passengers from changing seats within a cabin ; it it does, then that is different and all passengers should stay in assigned seats regardless
I don't see it any different to any other seat purchase within a cabin. If it was a passenger relocating from say, an economy cabin to a premium economy cabin, that would be very different
I am not aware of AA prohibiting passengers from changing seats within a cabin ; it it does, then that is different and all passengers should stay in assigned seats regardless
But it is interesting to learn that AA seems to have a very different take on MCE than UA does on E+.
#73
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Programs: AA PLT, 1.8mm
Posts: 6,988
has the official policy changed recently ? The last dozen or so times I've seen someone from the crowded back of the bus move forward to an MCE seat, the FA promptly has them move back to their original seat. Even if the person offers to pay for the "upgrade", the FA states that they have no mechanism to accept payment, so they need to go back to their ticketed seat.
#74
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
has the official policy changed recently ? The last dozen or so times I've seen someone from the crowded back of the bus move forward to an MCE seat, the FA promptly has them move back to their original seat. Even if the person offers to pay for the "upgrade", the FA states that they have no mechanism to accept payment, so they need to go back to their ticketed seat.
Can't find anything on it, and, as you say, I guess it's changed, seemingly.
#75
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 5,270
Could also just be one of the many FAs who doesn't give a damn, just like we've seen for years.